Re: V2 publication, To Mind Is to Care, now available as PDF

2020-04-03 Thread Andreas Broeckmann



... the PDF has now been made available:

https://v2.nl/archive/articles/free-access-to-pdfs


Am 23.03.20 um 10:34 schrieb Andreas Broeckmann:


On the question of "care", which he importantly raises, I have greatly
benefited from reading the essays in "To Mind Is to Care", published
by the V2 in Rotterdam last year (disclaimer: former colleagues of
mine):

'To Mind Is to Care', edited by Joke Brouwer & Sjoerd van Tuinen,
proposes ethico-aesthetical models of care, in which science does
not search for deterministic outcomes, technology does not lead to
abandonment, politics does not induce indifference, and art is not
marginalized.

https://v2.nl/publishing/to-mind-is-to-care




#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:


Re: Bruno Latour: The health crisis is leading us to prepare for climate

2020-04-03 Thread Sam Dwyer

it’s really WEIRD that trump, an extreme authoritarian, hasn’t jumped on this 
opportunity to be a big statist dictator — it’s really what people are craving, 
why they love cuomo so much — instead he’s been doing rather the opposite, 
shoveling responsibility and authority away. Why?

Guaranteeing security is the core promise of the state — things like producing 
an abundance of ventilators or generic medications are an easy win — there’s 
nothing Smart required, you just have to do it. So, why not ?

This refusal to act — as a STATE — is so pronounced, so thorough... the push 
towards making it specific little-states faults is totally unique in the 
postwar era... in a time of crisis it’s specifically a radically anti 
federalist position... and it’s difficult to see it ending well.

It’s a radically collapsed vision of the states responsibility, and in this 
sense, I would argue that to the extent that people have begun to die because 
of this ideology, we can consider ourselves living in a collapsed state. RIP. 

-Sam Dwyer
#860.248.1155

> On Apr 3, 2020, at 4:41 AM, nettime's avid reader  wrote:
> 
> 
> (Almost) auto-translated from:
> 
> https://antinomie.it/index.php/2020/04/01/la-crisi-sanitaria-ci-induce-a-prepararci-al-cambiamento-climatico/
> 
> The health crisis is leading us to prepare for climate change
> by Bruno Latour



#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Bruno Latour: The health crisis is leading us to prepare for climate

2020-04-03 Thread nettime's avid reader

(Almost) auto-translated from:

https://antinomie.it/index.php/2020/04/01/la-crisi-sanitaria-ci-induce-a-prepararci-al-cambiamento-climatico/

The health crisis is leading us to prepare for climate change
by Bruno Latour

The unexpected coincidence between general isolation and the period of
Lent is at least welcome for those who, being in the rear, have been
asked, in solidarity, to do nothing. This forced fasting, this secular
and republican Ramadan can be an excellent opportunity for them to
reflect on what is important and what is negligible ...

As if the intervention of the virus could serve as a general test
for the next crisis, the one in which the reorientation of living
conditions will apply to everyone and for every aspect of daily
existence that we will have to learn to consider carefully. I advance
the hypothesis, like many others, that the health crisis prepares us,
induces us, encourages us to prepare for climate change. However, this
hypothesis remains to be verified.

The virus is nothing more than a link in a chain

To authorize the interconnection of the two crises is the sudden and
painful realization that the classic definition of society - humans
among them - makes no sense. The state of society depends, at all
times, on the associations between many actors, most of which do not
have a human form. This applies to microbes - we have known this since
Pasteur's time -, but also to the Internet, for the law, for the
organization of hospitals, for the capacities of the state as well as
for the climate.

And of course, despite the bickering around a "state of war" against
the virus, this is nothing more than a link in a chain in which
the management of mask stocks or tests, the regulation of property
rights, civic behavior , gestures of solidarity, have the same weight
in defining the degree of virulence of the infectious agent. Once
the entire network of which the virus is only a link is taken into
account, it does not act in the same way in Taiwan, Singapore, New
York or Paris. The pandemic is not even a "natural" phenomenon like
the famines of the past or the current climate crisis. For some time
now, society has no longer been confined to the narrow confines of the
social sphere.

__The extension of powers and the sirens of ambulances

That said, it is not clear to me how we can go much further than the
parallel. Because, after all, health crises are not new, and the rapid
and radical intervention of the state does not seem to be particularly
innovative so far. It is enough to see President Macron's enthusiasm
for taking on the figure of head of state that he has so far lacked
in such a flagrant way. Much more than the attacks - which basically
boil down to a police matter -, pandemics awaken, among the rulers
as well as among the governed, a sort of evidence - "we must protect
you", "you must protect us" - which strengthens the state authority
and allows him to claim what, in any other circumstances, would be
welcomed with a revolt.

But this state is not the state of the 21st century and of ecological
change, it is that of the nineteenth century and the so-called
"biopower". To express ourselves in the words of the late Alain
Desrosières, it is really the state of statistics: management of the
population on a territorial network seen from above and guided by the
power of experts. Exactly what we see rising today - with the only
difference being that it is replicated step by step, until it becomes
planetary.

It seems to me that the originality of the current situation is
that, remaining locked in the house, while outside there is nothing
left but the extension of the police powers and the sirens of the
ambulances, we collectively recite a caricatured form of the figure
of the biopower that seems to have come directly from a course of the
philosopher Michel Foucault. There is also the forgetfulness of the
many invisible workers forced to work anyway, so that the others can
continue to hide in their home - without forgetting the migrants who
cannot be accommodated. But precisely, this caricature is that of an
era that is no longer ours.

__An immense abyss

There is an immense gulf between the state capable of saying "I
protect you from life and death", that is, from the infection of a
virus whose trace is known only to scientists and whose effects are
understandable only through the collection of statistical data, and
the state that would dare to say "I protect you from life and death,
because I maintain the conditions of habitability of all living beings
on which you depend."

Just think about it: imagine that President Macron comes to announce,
in the same Churchillian tone, a package of measures to leave the
reserves of gas and oil in the soil, to stop the marketing of
pesticides, to abolish deep plowing and, supreme audacity, to prohibit
the heating of smokers on the terraces of bars ... If the petrol tax
triggered the movement of the gilets jaunes, it makes one shudder at
the tho