Re: Preparing for Nettle-3.9
Niels Möller writes: > If there are no show-stoppers, I may make the release as soon as this > Wednesday evening (May 10, and for me, evening starts around 17 UTC). Testing is going rather well. I've found and fixed one bug giving a compile error in the tests when configured with --disable-public-key. Beyond the configurations in the gitlab ci, I've successfully tested on x86_64 freebsd sparc solaris 10 (thanks to gcc farm) 64-bit windows (via cross-compile + wine) For macs, I've had mostly successful reports, except that sometimes mac arm64 builds seem to suffer from a GMP known issue in GMP-6.2.1, with improper use of x18 register in GMP assembly files (but I couldn't repro on gcc104.fsffrance.org). This probably deserves a note in the NEWS file. That means that I hope to package and announce a release, if not tonight, so within the next few days. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP key CB4962D070D77D7FCB8BA36271D8F1FF368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. ___ nettle-bugs mailing list -- nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se To unsubscribe send an email to nettle-bugs-le...@lists.lysator.liu.se
Re: Preparing for Nettle-3.9
Niels Möller writes: >> We have quite a few >> tests: we instantiate it with every compatible cipher and do a roundtrip >> test, we have the test vectors from RFC7253, we have an additional set >> of test vectors with 15 byte nonces published by dkg, > > Do you have any testvectors with a dozen or so blocks? Nettle's > testsuite/ocb-text.c includes some home-made test vectors with 16 > blocks, to verify the code paths that tries to handle multiple blocks > more efficiently. See > https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/blob/master/testsuite/ocb-test.c#L222 > and below. No, but it would not be hard for me to create some using either OpenSSL or Botan if you want. Best, Justus signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ nettle-bugs mailing list -- nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se To unsubscribe send an email to nettle-bugs-le...@lists.lysator.liu.se
Re: Preparing for Nettle-3.9
Justus Winter writes: > Most appreciated! I read the documentation and found only two minor > issues (patches sent). The interface looks good. Thanks, both patches applied. > We have quite a few > tests: we instantiate it with every compatible cipher and do a roundtrip > test, we have the test vectors from RFC7253, we have an additional set > of test vectors with 15 byte nonces published by dkg, Do you have any testvectors with a dozen or so blocks? Nettle's testsuite/ocb-text.c includes some home-made test vectors with 16 blocks, to verify the code paths that tries to handle multiple blocks more efficiently. See https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/blob/master/testsuite/ocb-test.c#L222 and below. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP key CB4962D070D77D7FCB8BA36271D8F1FF368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. ___ nettle-bugs mailing list -- nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se To unsubscribe send an email to nettle-bugs-le...@lists.lysator.liu.se
Re: Preparing for Nettle-3.9
Hi Niels :) Niels Möller writes: > * Support for OCB authenticated encryption mode. Most appreciated! I read the documentation and found only two minor issues (patches sent). The interface looks good. I have added support for OCB in our Rust bindings on 2022-02-03 in a feature branch. I don't think that the interface changed since (note we're only using the streaming general interface). We have quite a few tests: we instantiate it with every compatible cipher and do a roundtrip test, we have the test vectors from RFC7253, we have an additional set of test vectors with 15 byte nonces published by dkg, all kinds of tests higher up in our OpenPGP implementation including test vectors from the upcoming OpenPGP revision. I'm reasonable confident that bindings and underlying implementation behave as expected. Best, Justus signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ nettle-bugs mailing list -- nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se To unsubscribe send an email to nettle-bugs-le...@lists.lysator.liu.se
