Re: Network connection local to devices.
In what cases here for example? And are there ways (like a configuration option) to make so that nm-applet stop creating profiles tied to to a device by default? for me? And what about that unexisting -g options? is there a way to get that list of profiles without using it? ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Network connection local to devices.
My nmcli (version 1.6.2) says -g doesn’t exist… I simply connected for the first time through nm-applet, selecting the wifi AP, entering the pass, etc. ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Network connection local to devices.
Thank you very much for your answer! Indeed, just erasing what’s in “Device” (under “Ethernet” as you said, but only for wired connections: for wifi (what’s most likely to change and require auth info), it’s “Wifi”) works. On 2019-01-22 at 20:27, Thomas Haller wrote: >> Why does that work that way by default in GUI? or did I do something >> wrong at some point maybe? > > I think it makes sense to restrict a profile by default to one device. > Ultimately, that is decided by the client tool (like nm-applet) that > creates the profile profile in such a way. > > It doesn't sound like you did anything wrong. If the setting is not > best for your case, modify the profile as it suits you. Then, I’d like to know if there’s a way to make that “device” section unimportant for every wifi profile, or otherwise, how to erase it for all of them, or otherwise, in which file is this written so I write a script to do it. Also why is this the default for nm-applet (are there other widely used clients? isn’t this mailing-list the appropriate place for asking about it? or is there some other development team and mailing-list?)? isn’t there a way to change that? So I don’t forget all the connection I happen to find around each time I change computer… ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Network connection local to devices.
How do you do that through GUI? Why does that work that way by default in GUI? or did I do something wrong at some point maybe? ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Network connection local to devices.
I often change computer, but keep my configuration files, or even my whole system. Or, sometimes, I only change or add a new wifi card. Each time I do that, network-manager becomes unable to automatically use the old registered connection, as it is parametered for a specific device: is there a way to disable that? ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Using both VPN and non-VPN (default route non-VPN)
btw bing works with both: galex-713@portable:~$ ping -c1 -I tun0 ifconfig.me PING ifconfig.me (216.239.32.21) from 89.234.186.82 tun0: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from any-in-2015.1e100.net (216.239.32.21): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=32.8 ms --- ifconfig.me ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.877/32.877/32.877/0.000 ms galex-713@portable:~$ ping -c1 -I enp0s25 ifconfig.me PING ifconfig.me (216.239.32.21) from 192.168.1.38 enp0s25: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from any-in-2015.1e100.net (216.239.32.21): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.2 ms --- ifconfig.me ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10.220/10.220/10.220/0.000 ms ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Using both VPN and non-VPN (default route non-VPN)
I said it already: it timeouts or stay still forever without receiving any answer whenever I try to use another interface. For instance, currently I didn’t check the checkbox, so by default it uses tun0, and if I want to use the other interface (currently rj45 cable, that is enp0s25), here what I see: galex-713@portable:~$ curl --interface tun0 ifconfig.me; echo 89.234.186.82 galex-713@portable:~$ curl --interface enp0s25 ifconfig.me; echo And I keep a blank line with that command staying still forever until I do Ctrl+C or I disconnect. If I check that checkbox and enp0s25 becomes the default, the opposite happen: I can do that with enp0s25, but tun0 stop being usable. ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Using both VPN and non-VPN (default route non-VPN)
On 2018-12-10 at 18:16, Thomas Haller wrote: > you need to have the routes configured properly, which depends on your > environment. Maybe should I ask on debian mailing-lists (not that much active, not sure I can get more relevant help than here)? > Well, NM should get it right automatically. If it doesn't, > then you should look at the routes to understand what's wrong. > > What gives: > > ip route Currently I’m not at the needed local network, so doing it at home, with normally configured network, I get: galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route default dev tun0 proto static scope link metric 50 default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000 192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric 100 When enabling “VPN config > IPv4 Settings > Routes… > Use this connection only for resources on its network” checkbox, I get this: galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50 89.234.186.190 via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000 192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric 100 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static scope link metric 100 I’m under Debian GNU/Linux stable, x86 (32bits). Btw ifconfig: galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ /sbin/ifconfig enp0s25: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.38 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 2a01:e0a:54:cb90:dd93:58f3:5591:dc39 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0 inet6 fe80::6a50:6fa8:1bc9:b6d1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 00:1f:16:14:45:a9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 425383 bytes 300655547 (286.7 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 94334 bytes 15010937 (14.3 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 device interrupt 20 memory 0xf270-f272 lo: flags=73 mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10 loop txqueuelen 1 (Boucle locale) RX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 tun0: flags=4305 mtu 1500 inet 89.234.186.82 netmask 255.255.255.224 destination 89.234.186.82 inet6 fe80::918:d4aa:a0ae:2b1d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 inet6 2a00:5884:8305::1 prefixlen 112 scopeid 0x0 unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100 (UNSPEC) RX packets 12 bytes 1476 (1.4 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 12 bytes 808 (808.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 both interfaces are only present, but only tun0 works in the first case, and only enps25 works in the second. ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Using both VPN and non-VPN (default route non-VPN)
Hi, I’ve already asked some help on irc: I have a VPN that provides me a public IP, which I use to run network servers, but I want to access the local network I’m connecting too, without passing through the VPN (otherwise stuff accessible only through local network is not accessible anywore), while still being able to use the tun0 interface. It’s a OpenVPN VPN, configured and ran through network-manager. I was told to go in IPv4, routes... and check the last checkbox. But beside routing, when doing that tun0 becomes inaccessible: everything ends timeouting, and the other way around while not checking the checkbox: the wifi interface is inaccessible, only the tun0 answers… Why that? is it more an openvpn problem? But if asking openvpn people will I find a way to apply that through network-manager? Thank you for any help ^^ ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
