RE: [newbie] pcmcia thwarting install and run -- can disable?

2000-12-06 Thread Spoonman

While I've never tried to install Linux on a Casio, I would see if PCMCIA
can be disabled in the BIOS.

Spoonman

--Original Message--
From: "Chong-dong Jung" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 6, 2000 10:01:33 PM GMT
Subject: [newbie] pcmcia thwarting install and run -- can disable?


I have a casio fiva subnotebook and I tried installing Redhat 7.0
and Mandrake without much success.

Mandrake starts installing until it scans the PCMCIA, then it hangs.

Redhat installs completely.  Then once it starts to load, upon
checking the pcmcia it spews out a lot of garble and stops loading.
It asks me to repair it ... but... ^_^

My question.. is there a way of disabling pcmcia on linux install or
run?

Has anyone ever install linux on a Casio fiva?

thanks...
_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





[newbie] LM 7.2 Xircom PCMCIA 56k

2000-12-06 Thread Spoonman

I might have asked this before on this list, but it seems like I can't get
higher than 33.6 from my Xircom PCMCIA modem. I think I even tried changing
the init string a few times. Any other ideas?

Spoonman

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





RE: [newbie] Crystal 4235

2000-12-04 Thread Spoonman

If I'm not mistaken, CS423x is already supported. I have a Crystal 4232 and
it works fine.

--Original Message--
From: Jeff Dickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mandrake Newbie User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 4, 2000 3:29:27 AM GMT
Subject: [newbie] Crystal 4235


Does anyone know when the subject sound card will be supported?  It's built
onto my motherboard.  I'd rather not have to install a second card for
sound...

-JD-

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





RE: [newbie] Need xf86config help

2000-12-01 Thread Spoonman

Hmmm. Well, I'm doing a tad better with my Laptop.
I don't have that either/or problem with CD/floppy, fortunately, but I'm
doing better with my Monitor problem. I still gotta figure out a good set of
compatible specs for the TFT screen, and I know I should be happy
with800x600@16bpp. Everything else works. The thing that was giving me the
most trouble was that my graphics chip was misdetected. Make sure you have
all the documentation you can find from the manufacturer is the best advice
I can give.

--Original Message--
From: Dodd Carlton J MSgt 726 ACS/CSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 1, 2000 1:33:09 PM GMT
Subject: RE: [newbie] Need xf86config help


And I thought I was alone in this...!

I thought my problem was because I had to use "Peanut Linux" due to the
limitations of my old laptop:
P-75@90
700MB HD
40MB RAM
640x480 LCD
can only use either CD OR FDD not both, and CD-ROM drive is not bootable so
I can't do LM!

I go through XF86Setup, and set the display to 640x480 VGA, and the mode to
640x480, and everything goes fine until I startx.

Startx errors out saying that 640x480 is not a valid mode, removes it from
the list, then says there are no valid modes, so it quits.  I've looked for
an LCD setting, but the selections are limited.  This is probably an older
version of Linux.  Is there a way to add more options to the XF86Setup
monitor selection?

-Carlton

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Burden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Need xf86config help


Hey...
I'm having a similar problem with my Compaq Presario 12XL325 laptop. I just
upgraded from MK 6.0 to 7.2 and the monitor will not configure correctly. It

will work fine for the install but not with any of the GUI's. If you can get

any information, could you send it to me? If I get any info, I will send it
your way.

Thanx!

From: Spoonman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Need xf86config help
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:22:16 -0500 (EST)

Hi all,
I just upgraded from MK 6.1 to MK 7.2.
I wasn't paying attention during the install/upgrade portion
and did a fresh install, which wasn't so bad except...
I'm running on a laptop.
TOshiba Tecra 730XCDT which I had previously wrestled into 1024x768x16bpp.
Now I can't seem to get the monitor to a higher resolution than
640x480x8bpp.
Anyone out there have any advice, or maybe a xf86config I can take a look
at?

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com




_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





Re: [newbie] RE: Windows can't be written in VB

2000-12-01 Thread Spoonman

Dave DeGear wrote:
That settles it, I am never getting winme. EVER!

One small question: Does the msdos.sys file still let you add the logo=0
and bootgui=0 options?

--
It sure does. You can modify the bootgui until the cows come home. Try it
out. It's completely useless and the gui boots no matter what this is set
to. WinMe has no dos shell. Pity that, since I planned to dual boot a WinMe
machine with Linux, but Windows was a baby about it and now lives in a CD
wallet.

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





[newbie] Linux and TFT screens

2000-11-30 Thread Spoonman

Since I didn't really get a reply to my rather broad question last time, let
me word it this way:
Should a laptop TFT be considered a LCD display or VGA/SVGA?

Thanks,
Mark







Re: [newbie] RE: Windows can't be written in VB

2000-11-30 Thread Spoonman

WinME doesn't have the reboot to dos option. I was going to dual boot a
machine that already had ME on it until I tried to use Partition Magic
(included with LM 6.1) and it required a rebbot in dos mode. I drop kicked
ME and Linux and I lived happily ever after.

--Original Message--
From: Dave DeGear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 30, 2000 10:12:50 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [newbie] RE: Windows can't be written in VB


Quoting Dave Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Technically, WinME is Win98 without any trace of DOS under the covers.
 You won't find autoexec.bat. config.sys, or any of those files on a
 system with WinME preinstalled. An upgraded system may still have

Are you saying that WinMe doesn't have the option to "Reboot to DOS prompt"
in the Shutdown menu?  I had thought that WinMe was just Win98 with a bunch
of
upgrades included.  I haven't actually seen a copy of it so I was just
wondering.  I do know that Win2000 doesn't even include fdisk or the sys
commands.

...Dave

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com





Re: [newbie] Performance...

2000-11-29 Thread Spoonman

Was your monitor listed as a standard monitor in X or did you have to make
it up yourself? I'm having a similar problem with a Toshiba Laptop.


--Original Message--
From: "Dave Sherman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2000 9:00:12 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [newbie] Performance...


There is another possible issue: incorrect (or sub-optimal) choice of X
display driver. I have an IBM ThinkPad i1400 series, 366MHz Celeron, 64MB
RAM, 14.1" TFT monitor, with a 72MB swap partition. When I first installed
mdk7.2, it seemed slower than molasses -- especially after having run
Caldera OpenLinux eDesktop 2.4 for almost a year with much greater speed.
At first, I attributed it to the new KDE2 being a worse resource hog than
KDE 1.2, but even when I switched to AfterStep (fairly lightweight, though
not the lightest) it was still slow. The biggest problem I saw was actually
being able to see the screen refresh itself as I scrolled thru a web page
in Netscape, or thru any document in any app -- even in an xterm!

What I eventually figured out is that during the install, my video card was
correctly detected and configured (NeoMagic 256AV), but the display I chose
(generic 1024 x 768 @ 70Hz, or something like that, because I couldn't find
my actual model #) was wrong. I was able to reconfigure X to use an IBM
display, and now the system is MUCH faster. In actuality, the software
probably does not run any faster, but because the display is so much more
responsive, it seems like the whole PC is faster.

Dave

At 12:50 PM 11/29/2000 -0500, you wrote:
Hello,
 I am running v7.2 on a 433 Mhz Celeron with 192 MB of RAM which I
 recently
upgraded from 64 MB.  There is an increase in performance, but not major. 
It
is recognizing the RAM.  Is there any configuring that I can do to increase
performance?

 Thank You,
 Vincent A. Primavera

Dave Sherman
SoftServ Business Systems, Inc.

"Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur."







[newbie] Need xf86config help

2000-11-27 Thread Spoonman

Hi all,
I just upgraded from MK 6.1 to MK 7.2.
I wasn't paying attention during the install/upgrade portion
and did a fresh install, which wasn't so bad except...
I'm running on a laptop.
TOshiba Tecra 730XCDT which I had previously wrestled into 1024x768x16bpp.
Now I can't seem to get the monitor to a higher resolution than
640x480x8bpp.
Anyone out there have any advice, or maybe a xf86config I can take a look
at?

Wishdiak
+Ferris Saves+
www.wishdiak.com