RE: [newbie] Tulip driver

2000-01-03 Thread mshirley



The problem with the tulip based cards isn't the driver, which was written
by
Becker and is reportedly very good.  It's the clones of the DEC chips that
the 
tulip driver was written for.  Not all the clones are good copies of DEC's
work.

I personally have this problem with an ASIX chipset AX88140 on my tulip
clone cards.
I have never been able to get the tulip driver to work with this, although I
heard
that version 0.91e or f would work with this card, I have always gotten
compiler errors
with this driver compile.  

That's why I am looking for a new card... :)

Mark



[newbie] Auto update headaches

1999-12-23 Thread mshirley



Fresh install of 6.0, setup modem, etc.
Run auto update.  Wait all night for downloads.
Multiple errors.  Some file conflicts with BeroFTP.
Some things need to be forced due to conflicts with
existing files.  

The auto update icon is a good idea, but let's face it,
Newbies are not gonna have a clue what files would be
needed / not needed or in conflict with other system files.

It's just right back to old school but with a slick script 
to save typing.

HELP!

mark

I'd attach the file of errors but it's at home.



[newbie] Duplicate emails.

1999-12-14 Thread mshirley

I have been getting a LOT of duplicate emails.  This is the 4-5th time
for this one.  Don't send multiple copies!  It's driving me nuts, and 
there's no way to filter multiple copies in my email program.



-Original Message-
From: Tony Fey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 1999 10:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Diamond SupraExpress Problem


To anyone that can help,

I just installed Mandrake Linux 6.1 and it did not setup my supraexpress 56k
V.90 modem, chipset 2120.  That is because the modem is pnp i'm guessing,
went to www.linuxnewbie.com and read their article on installing an isapnp
modem.  Did all the setserial and editing the isapnp.conf file to change it
to detect the modem at com1, both serial ports are diabled in the bios and i
have no other isa cards.  I keep getting a conflict with irq 4, when i set
it for com2, i get a conflict with irq3, any setting right now gets a
conflict.  my computer is an amdk6-2 450, asus p5a mainboard, voodoo3 3000,
sound blaster live value, intel pro100 management nic, and da modem.  if
anyone has seen this problem or knows the fix for it plz reply to the list
or e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED], i checked the list archives and didn't see
any problems like this one.

thanks a whole lot in advance, this is the only reason why windows is still
on my computer, once the modem works goodbye billie boy's software.

tony



RE: [newbie] Proxy Setting

1999-11-08 Thread mshirley

There's some ISP's out there that run off a satellite connection using 
proxy software to the main office.  It doesn't work very well, that's 
why I dumped em.  (mainly for remote/rural areas)

-Original Message-
From: Steve Philp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 12:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Proxy Setting


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Does anybody here knows how to Proxy Netscape . I've edited it in setting
 (Control) for Netscape but still it does not point to my ISP Proxy a
 windows NT using Wingate...
 
 Thanks Lapu_Lapu

You should be able to set it under the Advanced/Proxies tab in the
Preferences window of Netscape.  Simply tell it 'Manual Configuration'
then enter the hostname and port number for each relevant item.  That
should be all you need to do!

An ISP using Win NT and Wingate??  What sort of fly-by-night operation
is that?!
-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question

1999-10-28 Thread mshirley

Incedentally, where's this BP6 SMP article that started this thread?
My next computer's gonna be a BP6/300A setup.

-Original Message-
From: Seth Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question


On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
 From: Ronald A. Yacketta
 sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???
 
The ABit mobo that supports dual celerons. . .anybody else heard the rumor
that intel is going to start diasbling SMP capability in PPGA Celerons too?
I
read that somewhere. . .Hopefully AMD wont follow that path with the Athlon
Selects. . .

Now for the OT DSL Question(:  Im getting DSL with a static IP and im
running a
DSL box into a NIC.  So basically do i just need to configure eth0 for
normal
operation and then connect the DSL box to the NIC?  Thanks all!

  --

Seth Gibson
www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
Aggression Takes Its Toll.



RE: [newbie] Way to make an updated 6.0 CD?

1999-10-26 Thread mshirley



-Original Message-
From: Thomas J. Hamman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 9:40 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [newbie] Way to make an updated 6.0 CD?



Technically you could, yes.  You'd just remove the packages you're replacing
from Mandrake/RPMS, put the newer packages you want to use in Mandrake/RPMS,
and then from the base of the distribution tree run:

./misc/genhdlist .

To update the hdlist with the new packages.

That's what I did when I made an updated M6.0 CD (with the updates
specifically
for 6.0).  I can foresee you possibly having dependency problems when trying
to
mix 6.1 packages in, though; it's quite likely that there are slightly newer
versions for some libraries (like gtk, qt, etc.) in 6.1 that some packages
in
6.1 depend on, so you would need to add them too (and might as well toss in
the
newer development packages while you're at it).  But THEN you MIGHT (or
might
not, your guess is as good as mine) break some of the 6.0 packages that are
linked with slightly older libraries from 6.0.

If you haven't actually tried 6.1 yet, I'd suggest giving it a try.  It
works
great for me, and my impression of it is that it's less buggy than 6.0.
There
were some updates for 6.0 that ya just HAD to get, but I didn't even bother
getting the 6.1 updates until I was burning a CD for a friend and figured I
might as well put the existing updates on it.

 Secondly, once I get this ready, can it be burnt in *GAK* 
 Windows, or do I actually need to figure out XCDroast?

As far as I know, burning in Windows should be fine.  Though I don't know if
Windows burning programs allow you to use Rock Ridge extensions?  I'd think
you
would want a Linux CD burned with Rock Ridge extensions (it's like the Linux
version of Windows' Joliet).

-Tom


Okay, so I copy the contents of the CD to a partition, run
/misc/src/.genhdlist
so that it updates a file somewhere, then burn the whole mess back onto a
CD?

Truly uninformed,
Mark



RE: [newbie] Way to make an updated 6.0 CD?

1999-10-26 Thread mshirley



-Original Message-
From: Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Way to make an updated 6.0 CD?


On Tue, 26 Oct 1999,Thomas J. Hamman wrote:
  | On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, mshirley wrote:
  | 
  |  With all the problems with 6.1, is there a way to 
  |  make an updated 6.0 CD so that all the updates are 
  |  installed automagically?  IE, I put the CD in, and
  |  run install, etc, and get the new kernal, initscripts,
  |  and heck even the new 2.2.13 kernal and XFree86 even.
  |  Is there a file used for installation that says what files 
  |  are on the CD?
  | 
  | Technically you could, yes.  You'd just remove the packages you're
replacing
  | from Mandrake/RPMS, put the newer packages you want to use in
Mandrake/RPMS,
  | and then from the base of the distribution tree run:
  | 
  | ./misc/genhdlist .
  | 
  | To update the hdlist with the new packages.
  | 
  | That's what I did when I made an updated M6.0 CD (with the updates
specifically
  | for 6.0).  I can foresee you possibly having dependency problems when
trying to
  | mix 6.1 packages in, though; it's quite likely that there are slightly
newer
  | versions for some libraries (like gtk, qt, etc.) in 6.1 that some
packages in
  | 6.1 depend on, so you would need to add them too (and might as well toss
in the
  | newer development packages while you're at it).  But THEN you MIGHT (or
might
  | not, your guess is as good as mine) break some of the 6.0 packages that
are
  | linked with slightly older libraries from 6.0.
  | 
  | If you haven't actually tried 6.1 yet, I'd suggest giving it a try.  It
works
  | great for me, and my impression of it is that it's less buggy than 6.0.
There
  | were some updates for 6.0 that ya just HAD to get, but I didn't even
bother
  | getting the 6.1 updates until I was burning a CD for a friend and
figured I
  | might as well put the existing updates on it.
  | 
  |  Secondly, once I get this ready, can it be burnt in *GAK* 
  |  Windows, or do I actually need to figure out XCDroast?
  | 
  | As far as I know, burning in Windows should be fine.  Though I don't
know if
  | Windows burning programs allow you to use Rock Ridge extensions?  I'd
think you
  | would want a Linux CD burned with Rock Ridge extensions (it's like the
Linux
  | version of Windows' Joliet).
  | 
  | -Tom

Mandrake 6.1 works great here. The only problem I have found is that there
apears to be a conflict between the kcmclock package and the kdelibs
package.
If you have this problem, remove the kcmclock package, and install the
kdelibs
package in kpackage. Problem solved!

Ernie


I have been following the banter from Steve Philps and Axalon about how
broken 6.1 is,
and don't even want to touch it until the SECOND bug fix is out.  6.0 works
well for me,
but have been unable to get the fix packages to install correctly, and
thought that since 
I am still learning, and hence, screwing up my installs bad enough that I
need to reinstall
every now and then, that I would make an updated 6.0 CD, that way I have one
less step every
time I reinstall.

On that note, when updating the kernal and initscripts for instance, how do
I get the package 
to install?  De-install the kernal and then reinstall the new one, then
update lilo? or the other
way around?  Secondly, how do you update lilo that is on a floppy?  I don't
have lilo on the MBR.

Know-nothing,
Mark



RE: [newbie] SCSI card not recognized at boot

1999-09-24 Thread mshirley



-Original Message-
From: Richard Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 3:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SCSI card not recognized at boot



If you simply use a conf option example from someone else make sure
that IRQ is not in use, if it is then that is possably the reason why
conf.modules crashed your machine.

Setserial will do exachtly the same, i suggest you read the SCSI
HOWTO found in /usr/doc/* and find out which IRQ's are used and which
are resurved for PCI devices, before you do anything else.


--
Regards Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The IRQ was the one set on the jumpers on the card.  Unless some of the
IRQ's are being rearranged, I don't think anything else is using 10, since
that's what Win98 is using for it.  This card is NOT PNP by the way.

The SCSI howto was not helpful.

Mark



[newbie] SCSI card not recognized at boot

1999-09-23 Thread mshirley

I have a PEL-1600 Scsi card for my CDR.  It is supposed to use the
AHA152x module.  I did some research on the net, and found that somebody
was able to get it working using the following command

aha152x=0x340,10,7,1

unfortunately, I don't know where to put this command.  I want this card
recognized at bootup everytime, and would like to not have to type this
command in every time.

I tried this in conf.modules, but it crashed the box.

Help please.

Thanks,
Mark



RE: [newbie] Internet Explorer

1999-09-21 Thread mshirley

Speaking as a big-three employee, leave the analogies to Ford/GM/Chrysler
out next time.  They aren't really accurate, and don't take into account
market factors in effect at the time.  And calling Chrysler smart...
whew, we won't even get into that one.

-Original Message-
From: Sean Pritchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Internet Explorer


Wait a minute Fellow Newbies!

I thought that one reason we started converting to Linux was to break
away from MS systems and Apps?

If we start putting in requests for MS Apps, MS will bungle up the
beauty of this OS and it's community.  I am not a purist, but in look at
it this way.  If I own a Dodge Ram, I don't want Ford redesigning and
building accessories for my truck, nor do I want them to do any
maintenance on it.

But,  third party mechanics can take a look, and do service on it if
they are qualified and respect my property.  They'll have warrantee
liscensing to be qualified, to ensure the customer satisfaction and
protection.

MS was to OS's and computers as Henry Ford was to cars.  Big Bad Bill
setup the mass production and implementation but Ford does not have the
most dependable vehicles, nor were they the inventors - BENZ has a
product that is fast and decades durable and dependable and the
engineering is out reach for Ford to impliment in there vehicles.

There were hybrid vehicle corporations out there that died -
AMC=Ford+GMC,  they couldn't even take the best of both to do it.  So
CHRYSLER had a mind to buy it up and revamp it.  They had the brains for
marketing and technology to do it.

DOes Linux have the edge to do something like this to MS?, we'll only
see in the decade ahead.

Sorry for the deep philosophy...
Regards,
Sean


David van Balen wrote:
 
 On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Donny wrote:
 
  Hey, does anyone know of a version of IE for linux? Or if any of the
  Unix versions of IE will run under linux?
 
 I believe the only versions of Unix supported by IE are HP-UX and Solaris.
 I very much doubt that MS has any plans to port their product to Linux for
 obvious reasons... then again, I may be wrong :)
 Neither of the above versions should work with Linux as far as I know.
 
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 
 David van Balen
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [newbie] MS releases new Windows and NT Keyboard (humor)

1999-01-03 Thread mshirley

What are you, a M$ plant?  This is the wrong place to be espousing the
value of M$ OS's! Besides, not everybody runs NT anyway.  95/98 DOES 
crash a lot.  2000 probably will too.  

-Original Message-
From: Sam Gentile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 12:00 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Sam Gentile
Subject: RE: [newbie] MS releases new Windows and NT Keyboard (humor)


I know this a joke but know what you are talking about before you speak -
Windows 2000 is extremely stable and does not require reboots. I have been
running it for almost 6 months now as my primary system including using huge
server applications like SQL Server 7.0, and other things like Visual Studio
6.0, Borland's JBuilder and IT HAS NOT CRASHED ONCE. NO REBOOTS. The NT Team
did an analysis of all situations in which re-boots are required in NT 4.0
and came up with 78 situations. All but three have been eliminated. Change
TCP parameters? No reboots. So I would caution you to have experience with
what you speak of or you just spreading around crap and FUD and that is
un-professional.

Sam Gentile
Principal Software EngineerĀ   Viridien Team Leader
toysmart.com
170 High Street
Waltham, MA 02454



-Original Message-
From: Jeanette Russo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] MS releases new Windows and NT Keyboard (humor)