Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages, more help needed

2003-08-19 Thread owenb
I ignored the lack of a signature file and continued to install using 
rpmdrake.  The installation appeared to go well but when I tried to find 
Fax2Send I could not find the program.   I did a file search and found 
that there were many files installed but I can't find any that would 
initiate a program.

Dennis Myers wrote:

On Sunday 17 August 2003 05:39 pm, owenb wrote:
 

I downloaded Fax2Send Complete -2.1-13 RPM for i386 following the
Mandrake Clubs note that a free package was available.  I checked and
found that the required additional files were already installed.
But when I attempted to install the package I got the following message.
Signature Verification Error
The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is not
correct.
No GPG signature in package
Thanks,
 Owen
   

It probably means that you do not have the GPG signature from that site loaded 
on your machine or your machine was expecting a sig and didn't get one. I 
installed and had no problem. HTH
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-19 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:05:54 +

I have to confess that I have never really worried about it when downloading from a 
reputable site. This is probably laziness rather than a good policy.

Nigel


Dick Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Personally I find the programme has one shortcoming: if there is no GPG
 signature, it does not tell whether or not the MD5 checksum is okay or not.
 For that reason - when rpmdrake shows there is no GPG signature - I do an
 rpm -K *.rpm from the console, to at least verify that the checksum is okay.
 
 HTH
 Regards,
 =Dick Gevers=
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3rc2 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Encryption is an envelope - the contents are private.
 
 iD8DBQE/QXfowC/zk+cxEdMRAkQ2AJ9Cc7oeAThfmGPHFLRcp4+rVU8tnQCgx/Am
 0Q9EN9kKu/EjNzV3S5xH8U4=
 =QZq9
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-18 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:39:15 -0700

I believe this means there is no signiture in the rpm package. I normally get a 
warning message with the option to stop or continue anyway. If there is no pgp 
signature in the package you can't check it so either continue anyway or don't get it. 
I have always just continued anyway with no problem so far.

Cheers
Nigel


Any opinions expressed in this email are not necessary those of my wife.




owenb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I downloaded Fax2Send Complete -2.1-13 RPM for i386 following the 
 Mandrake Clubs note that a free package was available.  I checked and 
 found that the required additional files were already installed.
 But when I attempted to install the package I got the following message.
 Signature Verification Error
 The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is not 
 correct.
 No GPG signature in package
 
  I stopped at this point.   What went wrong?
 I noted that the required files listed  /bin/sh  three times. Why the 
 redundancy?
 Thanks,
   Owen
 
 
 
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-18 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:11:28 +0100, Nigel Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages:

I believe this means there is no signiture in the rpm package. I normally
get a warning message with the option to stop or continue anyway. If there
is no pgp signature in the package you can't check it so either continue
anyway or don't get it. I have always just continued anyway with no problem
so far.

Personally I find the programme has one shortcoming: if there is no GPG
signature, it does not tell whether or not the MD5 checksum is okay or not.
For that reason - when rpmdrake shows there is no GPG signature - I do an
rpm -K *.rpm from the console, to at least verify that the checksum is okay.

HTH
Regards,
=Dick Gevers=

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3rc2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encryption is an envelope - the contents are private.

iD8DBQE/QXfowC/zk+cxEdMRAkQ2AJ9Cc7oeAThfmGPHFLRcp4+rVU8tnQCgx/Am
0Q9EN9kKu/EjNzV3S5xH8U4=
=QZq9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-17 Thread Dennis Myers
On Sunday 17 August 2003 05:39 pm, owenb wrote:
 I downloaded Fax2Send Complete -2.1-13 RPM for i386 following the
 Mandrake Clubs note that a free package was available.  I checked and
 found that the required additional files were already installed.
 But when I attempted to install the package I got the following message.
 Signature Verification Error
 The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is not
 correct.
 No GPG signature in package

  I stopped at this point.   What went wrong?
 I noted that the required files listed  /bin/sh  three times. Why the
 redundancy?
 Thanks,
   Owen
It probably means that you do not have the GPG signature from that site loaded 
on your machine or your machine was expecting a sig and didn't get one. I 
installed and had no problem. HTH
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-17 Thread owenb
OK.
What is a GPG signature and how do I get one.?
Dennis Myers wrote:
On Sunday 17 August 2003 05:39 pm, owenb wrote:
 

I downloaded Fax2Send Complete -2.1-13 RPM for i386 following the
Mandrake Clubs note that a free package was available.  I checked and
found that the required additional files were already installed.
But when I attempted to install the package I got the following message.
Signature Verification Error
The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is not
correct.
No GPG signature in package
I stopped at this point.   What went wrong?
I noted that the required files listed  /bin/sh  three times. Why the
redundancy?
Thanks,
 Owen
   

It probably means that you do not have the GPG signature from that site loaded 
on your machine or your machine was expecting a sig and didn't get one. I 
installed and had no problem. HTH
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-17 Thread Eric Huff
  Signature Verification Error
  The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is
  not correct.
  No GPG signature in package
 

 It probably means that you do not have the GPG signature from that
 site loaded on your machine or your machine was expecting a sig and
 didn't get one. I installed and had no problem. HTH

I think no sig in package means the package doesn't have one, not that
you haven't downloaded it.  So if that package should have one, there is
a problem!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Installing downloaded rpm packages

2003-08-17 Thread Dennis Myers
On Sunday 17 August 2003 06:40 pm, owenb wrote:
 OK.
 What is a GPG signature and how do I get one.?

 Dennis Myers wrote:
 On Sunday 17 August 2003 05:39 pm, owenb wrote:
 I downloaded Fax2Send Complete -2.1-13 RPM for i386 following the
 Mandrake Clubs note that a free package was available.  I checked and
 found that the required additional files were already installed.
 But when I attempted to install the package I got the following message.
 Signature Verification Error
 The signature of the package Fax2SendComplete -2.1-13.i386.rpm is not
 correct.
 No GPG signature in package
 
  I stopped at this point.   What went wrong?
 I noted that the required files listed  /bin/sh  three times. Why the
 redundancy?
 Thanks,
   Owen
 
 It probably means that you do not have the GPG signature from that site
  loaded on your machine or your machine was expecting a sig and didn't get
  one. I installed and had no problem. HTH
 
 
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Normally if there is one it will have a link to download the gpg sig for that 
provider. For instance texstar has his gpg key available here:
http://www.pclinuxonline.com/gpgkey.html 
So any of the rpm packages he makes available have that signature attached. 
That is the way I understand it any how. HTH
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com