Re: [newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-22 Thread Robert

I tend to disagreeevery MS users needs to know this. 
rob


 
 Hi all,
 
 Read this:
 
 In a preliminary license for its wireless Internet tools, the software
 giant appears to be floating a trial balloon by explicitly banning the use
 of open source code. Microsoft's language, which could become part of its
 commercial licensing terms, specifically bans use of the Linux (news - web
 sites) open source operating system (OS), which Microsoft seems to find
 especially objectionable.
 
 Full article at
 http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010702/tc/ms_attacks_open_source_1.html
 
 I'm sorry, maybe this is not the place to put this kind of stuff and it may
 be even old news, but I think it's important that EVERY linuxer knows what's
 M$ is up to...
 
 mv -f window$  /dev/null
 if [ -f $BOSS_COMPLAINTS ] ; then mv $BOSS 2 /dev/null ; fi
  --Jeferson L. Zacco aka Wooky
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Linux registered user #221896
  -
  Computers are used to solve problems that wouldn't exist if computers
 weren't invented in the first place.
 
 
 




Re: [newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-22 Thread Frans Ketelaars

civileme wrote:

[...]

 The mos frightening is their sharred source  Initiative.  If unwary open

[...]

Ummm, Netscape Communicater/Composer 4.77 suggests replacing 'sharred'
with 'shared'.

It has some other (more appropriate? ) suggestions :)

-Frans




Re: [newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-22 Thread Frans Ketelaars

etharp wrote:
 
 I KNEW he made a typo it was bound to happen, i bet his typo record is
 better than NASA's
 
 On Sunday 22 July 2001 12:51, Frans Ketelaars wrote:
  civileme wrote:
 
  [...]
 
   The mos frightening is their sharred source  Initiative.  If unwary
   open
 
  [...]
 
  Ummm, Netscape Communicater/Composer 4.77 suggests replacing 'sharred'
  with 'shared'.
 
  It has some other (more appropriate? ) suggestions :)
 
  -Frans

I understood that too, but the spelling checker also suggested,
among others:

- shammed
- charred
- charade
- sharked

I thought those were funny/better terms when used to refer to
Microsoft's xx source Initiative :)

Sorry for the misunderstanding I caused :(

I completely agree with civileme!

-Frans




Re: [newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-22 Thread John Rigby


Hey Civileme  folks,
Civileme, did you mean attic or arctic ??  :-)  
There is nowhere on earth that is safe. 

But for what it's worth people, all of this is simple, grade One, 
everyday business tactics.

Despite how you feel about Big Bill, he did one great thing for this 
planet:
He proved that you can get filthy rich - I mean FILTHY rich - without 
cornering the Wheat Market and starving families to death, or 
starting a good war to goose up the profits. 

Whatever is said about him he doesn't force anyone to do anything. 

Think about Genetically Modified Foods.  
Think about  forced fluoridation of water supplies.
Think about forced hah! - immunisation campaigns.

No, Big Bill is very annoying for his selling success, but he doesn't 
kill people without warning, or choice. 

Remember - we get exactly the government ( Multinational, NWO) we 
paid for.  We buy their products with our cash, inaction and silence. 



On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 03:16, you manipulated electrons to produce:
 On Saturday 21 July 2001 21:24, Robert wrote:
  I tend to disagreeevery MS users needs to know this.
  rob

 Interesting and frightening.

 The mos frightening is their sharred source  Initiative.  If
 unwary open source coders sign up for a peek at the microsoft
 software, thereafter the companies they work for don't dare use
 them on open-source projects, because they'll be hauled into court
 for stealing microsoft ideas.  It doesn't matter if the claim is
 utter crap--Microsoft can afford to keep them in court longer than
 they can affiord to stay.  This reminds me of IBM tactics about
 1977 or so.  They poison the opposition's workers.  It doesn't
 matter that we aren't about competing with them, they see us as a
 threat to be crushed.

 I am beginning to believe I should have stayed in the arctic.

 Civileme



-- 
Cheers,

John

Fablor now Webhosting?? What on earth for??  
Info here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(it's only an Autoresponder)  :-)




Re: [newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-22 Thread civileme

On Saturday 21 July 2001 21:24, Robert wrote:
 I tend to disagreeevery MS users needs to know this.
 rob

Interesting and frightening.

The mos frightening is their sharred source  Initiative.  If unwary open 
source coders sign up for a peek at the microsoft software, thereafter the 
companies they work for don't dare use them on open-source projects, because 
they'll be hauled into court for stealing microsoft ideas.  It doesn't matter 
if the claim is utter crap--Microsoft can afford to keep them in court longer 
than they can affiord to stay.  This reminds me of IBM tactics about 1977 or 
so.  They poison the opposition's workers.  It doesn't matter that we 
aren't about competing with them, they see us as a threat to be crushed.

I am beginning to believe I should have stayed in the arctic.

Civileme

  Hi all,
 
  Read this:
 
  In a preliminary license for its wireless Internet tools, the software
  giant appears to be floating a trial balloon by explicitly banning the
  use of open source code. Microsoft's language, which could become part of
  its commercial licensing terms, specifically bans use of the Linux (news
  - web sites) open source operating system (OS), which Microsoft seems to
  find especially objectionable.
 
  Full article at
  http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010702/tc/ms_attacks_open_source_1.html
 
  I'm sorry, maybe this is not the place to put this kind of stuff and it
  may be even old news, but I think it's important that EVERY linuxer knows
  what's M$ is up to...
 
  mv -f window$  /dev/null
  if [ -f $BOSS_COMPLAINTS ] ; then mv $BOSS 2 /dev/null ; fi
   --Jeferson L. Zacco aka Wooky
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Linux registered user #221896
   -
   Computers are used to solve problems that wouldn't exist if computers
  weren't invented in the first place.




[newbie] Of M$ attacks

2001-07-21 Thread Jeferson Lopes Zacco

Hi all,

Read this:

In a preliminary license for its wireless Internet tools, the software
giant appears to be floating a trial balloon by explicitly banning the use
of open source code. Microsoft's language, which could become part of its
commercial licensing terms, specifically bans use of the Linux (news - web
sites) open source operating system (OS), which Microsoft seems to find
especially objectionable.

Full article at
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010702/tc/ms_attacks_open_source_1.html

I'm sorry, maybe this is not the place to put this kind of stuff and it may
be even old news, but I think it's important that EVERY linuxer knows what's
M$ is up to...

mv -f window$  /dev/null
if [ -f $BOSS_COMPLAINTS ] ; then mv $BOSS 2 /dev/null ; fi
 --Jeferson L. Zacco aka Wooky
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Linux registered user #221896
 -
 Computers are used to solve problems that wouldn't exist if computers
weren't invented in the first place.