[newbie] Blocking linked webpages
Greetings. Please excuse this post, as I was not able to find anything in the faq which mentions script that would either block outside links from one's own server. Take such as a link from an offencive or pornographic website that linked one's web server to its front page. Is there a way to block such a link from say www.pornpictures.com (a bogus address just for example) so that all who clicked on this link from the offencive site would either get an error or be re-directed? Thank you for your time. John __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] blocking popup windows using Guidescope or Junkbusters
Hello list, I am curious if anybody is using either of these programs to block popups on a firewall/router? I am currently using MD8.2 as a firewall/router to share our cable connection with clients running MD 9.0, Win98se2 and WinMe and would like to know if anybody has any prefs or things to watch out for when installing and setting up either of those programs. My goal is to set up either of these programs on the firewall/router and have it block popups for all the clients. Is there anything else out there that someone would recommend over these programs? TIA Steve -- Linux user #280097 Machine #162480 http://counter.li.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] blocking popup windows using Guidescope or Junkbusters
Check out Privoxy (www.privoxy.org) - based on Junkbuster, I use it currently, works a treat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:newbie-owner;linux-mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jeppesen Sent: 26 October 2002 15:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] blocking popup windows using Guidescope or Junkbusters Hello list, I am curious if anybody is using either of these programs to block popups on a firewall/router? I am currently using MD8.2 as a firewall/router to share our cable connection with clients running MD 9.0, Win98se2 and WinMe and would like to know if anybody has any prefs or things to watch out for when installing and setting up either of those programs. My goal is to set up either of these programs on the firewall/router and have it block popups for all the clients. Is there anything else out there that someone would recommend over these programs? TIA Steve -- Linux user #280097 Machine #162480 http://counter.li.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] blocking popup windows using Guidescope or Junkbusters
Thank you for your help Dave, I now have Privoxy up and running and so far so good! I did have to update chkconfig and install rpm-helper in order to install the privoxy rpm you sent me. I just have to figure out a way of using privoxy without hampering my daughters web creation process! I do not feel like adding a new allow rule everytime she creates a java script popup for her web page. Back to the books - or rather www.privoxy.org! Thanks again Steve On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:32:32 +0100 dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will privatly send you the rpm i have for Privoxy, Mandrake. I also had the same problem with downloading the source from the website. -- Linux user #280097 Machine #162480 http://counter.li.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Blocking websites from displaying in Konqueror?
Yes there is a fairly simple way. On the 8.1 discs is an application called junkbuster. This is a proxy server which you run as a daemon, and you point your browsers to the proxy instead of to the internet. Any time doubleclick or any other domain you despise tries to hijack your browser junkbuster will intercept it and display a graphic in its place. Now you have 8.0 so junkbuster is not on your disc set (I think) you can get it off the web, but be aware there are two versions. A new one which is fairly experimental (I gave up on it), and an old one which is reliable but not very sophisticated. Try a Google search and you will find it. HTH Derek On Saturday 08 December 2001 03:20, you wrote: I have a question: There are some websites which I never want to browse or load from, ever. Is there a way to tell Konqueror to never fetch anything from a certain domain? Specificly, I never want Konq to fetch anything from doubleclick.net for any reason. I just have no interest in anything on that site. Surely there is a way to do this? This is with Mandrake 8.0. I am also using iptables firewalling, but that is IP addr only, which won't catch everything I want to catch. Thanks Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [[newbie] Blocking websites from displaying in Konqueror?]
Thanks for the tip on Junkbuster. I used to use it but it definitely doesn't work for some sites. I'm not sure why. Wouldn't this be an awesome feature for Konq? Have a menu where you can list domains that should never ever be visited? It seems like it would be a really easy feature to add. Just when Konq is about to call gethostbyname, before it does that, see if the domain is on a blacklist. Would this be difficult? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] Blocking websites from displaying in Konqueror?
I have a question: There are some websites which I never want to browse or load from, ever. Is there a way to tell Konqueror to never fetch anything from a certain domain? Specificly, I never want Konq to fetch anything from doubleclick.net for any reason. I just have no interest in anything on that site. Surely there is a way to do this? This is with Mandrake 8.0. I am also using iptables firewalling, but that is IP addr only, which won't catch everything I want to catch. Thanks Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] blocking??
Hi all, Does anyone know a way using shell/perl scripting and ipchains to block all urls that request cmd.exe, root.exe, admin.dll and all the others??? (from port 80 of course) I am getting thousands of sustained requests from infected NT/2000 servers and its chewing alot of bandwidth.. I may have to shutdown my server for a couple of days if it doens't stop as its bound to cause a spike in usage and my bill.. anyone got any ideas??? rgds Frank Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell?
From: Ronald A. Yacketta I used @home for nearly 6 months in hotlanta. I use/used isinglass (ipchains firewal) and fwtk to block 99.9% of the crap I dont want (which included @home garbage collection) they (I presume) never knew seeing they never mentioned anything to me. I am currently do the same thing with roadrunner. Ron "Eric L. Damron" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/30/99 03:36:23 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Ronald A. Yacketta/958157/EKC) Subject: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell? I got tired of @HOME running scans on my system so I blocked them with: ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.140 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.141 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l Can they tell that they're blocked or does it just look like I'm not running any services? Thanks.
[newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell?
I got tired of @HOME running scans on my system so I blocked them with: ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.140 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.141 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l Can they tell that they're blocked or does it just look like I'm not running any services? Thanks.
Re: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell?
Are they running scans because they disallow running servers on home accounts? When I spoke to the salesguy, he told me that it's okay to run any server as long as the 128k/sec upload barrier will suffice for my needs. Is the salesguy just blowing smoke? Seve -Original Message- From: Eric L. Damron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, October 30, 1999 1:07 AM Subject: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell? I got tired of @HOME running scans on my system so I blocked them with: ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.140 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.141 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l Can they tell that they're blocked or does it just look like I'm not running any services? Thanks.
Re: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell?
Are they running scans because they disallow running servers on home accounts? When I spoke to the salesguy, he told me that it's okay to run any server as long as the 128k/sec upload barrier will suffice for my needs. Is the salesguy just blowing smoke? @Home service sucks. That is why he did not care. I have never seen 128k on a regular basis. Hey guys checkout the ATT mess where they stopped service, even said they have problems etc.. Now checkout Toshiba. They payout in a settlement worth over a billion for a bullshit case, the two people who started the class never had a problem (the problem being the data transfer to and from the floppy) and the lawyer gets 147 million. This is screwed up.
Re: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell?
On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Sevatio Octavio wrote: Are they running scans because they disallow running servers on home accounts? When I spoke to the salesguy, he told me that it's okay to run any server as long as the 128k/sec upload barrier will suffice for my needs. Is the salesguy just blowing smoke? Seve He actualy means kilobits not bytes(*), the acceptable use poilicy says you will not run any servers on thier network, however they may have laxed this after implementing the 128 upstream limits. (*) This isn't always exact either as it differs noc by noc, here in Denver they believe this means kbits not kbytes, while in michigan(sp?) the techs interpreted this as kbytes. So in Colorado its 16KB, yet in Michigan it's 128KB. Now here is the tricky part, the only way to know is to talk to a tech in your town (doesn't happen unless they are installing the modem or replaceing it), talk to someone who has the service and have them test it. -Original Message- From: Eric L. Damron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, October 30, 1999 1:07 AM Subject: [newbie] Blocking @HOME with ipchains - Can they tell? I got tired of @HOME running scans on my system so I blocked them with: ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.140 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 24.4.254.141 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY -l Can they tell that they're blocked or does it just look like I'm not running any services? Yes they can tell its a firewall. your machine will DENY packets routed to it but not destined for it. Note that ip is a proxy, in washington. Thanks. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
[newbie] Blocking access to my web server for a particular IP address... How?
How can I block access to my web server to a particular IP address? Thanks.
Re: [newbie] Blocking access to my web server for a particular IPaddress... How?
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Eric L. Damron wrote: How can I block access to my web server to a particular IP address? Thanks. via apache, edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, go down to the line -- Directory / -- This is line 369 in mine. insert below that (make a backup) -- order deny,allow deny from 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2 #-- Block these ips. allow from all -- save and close it. then rehash the server /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd restart or apachectl restart All done.. Or via kernel/ipchains, ipchains -I input -p TCP -s 127.0.0.1 -d 0/0 80 -j DENY # -l Replace 127.0.0.1 with the ip or mask to block, and remove the # if you want it to log all the DENY's -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
Re: [newbie] Blocking access to my web server for a particular IP address... How?
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote: How can I block access to my web server to a particular IP address? Thanks. Type "man ipchains" at a console prompt. I *think* that'll do the trick. :-) John
