Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
Evolution will support threads I think when it is finally released. Right now it's in extreme beta form (it delets all the mail when you close it), but when it's finished it should be like a Linux version of Outlook (minus the security holes of course : ) > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the threads. Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort threads into some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still screwing around with my linux install. > > > > TIA > > -- Anthony http://binaryfusion.net Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
Ahh, I think I see the problem. I'm using Outlook Express. I'll have to install the Outlook with Office, and give it a try. Thanks for the info. dwyatt - Original Message - From: "Mark Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:56 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] hard to threads > Which verion of Outlook are you using cause on a lark one day while I had > Windows running for maintenence I downloaded my mail and used Outlook to > get it. I turned the threading on and it threads beautifully. I have > Office 2000 installed on my Win98 partition. I have to boot it everynow > and then to blow the cobwebs out, or fireup one of the graphics programs > cause I'm not real proficient with Gimp yet. > > -- > Mark > > ** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299 > ** <_||_> in the making of this | > ** =\/= message... | Registered Linux user #182496 > > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, dwyatt wrote: > > > Hmm, I don't have any option to "read the thread" under the context menu in > > Outlook. The problem with sorting by subject (btw, you just click on the > > column header "Subject" to sort ascending or descending) is that it doesn't > > collapse the messages into just one expandable header, like, for example, if > > this was a newsgroup. > > > > Thx for the response. > > > > > > dwyatt > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Carolina Kohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 5:51 AM > > Subject: Re: [newbie] hard to threads > > > > > > In windows, if you use Outlook then you select the message (any of the > > thread, > > the first one for example), right click, choose read the thread. And that's > > it. > > There are also other options you can change so that the messages get sorted > > by > > thread as they come in, but I don't remember how it is, have a look in > > tools, > > options or the like. > > > > Cheers, > > Carol^ > > > > El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > > > > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the > > threads. Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to > > sort threads into some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, > > cause I'm still screwing around with my linux install. > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > > dwyatt > > > > > > > > > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Content-Description: > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
Hmm, I don't have any option to "read the thread" under the context menu in Outlook. The problem with sorting by subject (btw, you just click on the column header "Subject" to sort ascending or descending) is that it doesn't collapse the messages into just one expandable header, like, for example, if this was a newsgroup. Thx for the response. dwyatt - Original Message - From: "Carolina Kohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 5:51 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] hard to threads In windows, if you use Outlook then you select the message (any of the thread, the first one for example), right click, choose read the thread. And that's it. There are also other options you can change so that the messages get sorted by thread as they come in, but I don't remember how it is, have a look in tools, options or the like. Cheers, Carol^ El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the threads. Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort threads into some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still screwing around with my linux install. > > TIA > > > dwyatt > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description:
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
dwyatt, Netscape Messenger does a beautiful job of orginizing message coming in from a mailing list. Both for Linux and Windows. It threads the message wonderfully and neatly. -- Mark ** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299 ** <_||_> in the making of this | ** =\/= message...| Registered Linux user #182496 On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, dwyatt wrote: > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the threads. >Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort threads into >some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still screwing >around with my linux install. > > TIA > > > dwyatt >
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
Carolina Kohler wrote: > Hi, > just want to add another tip: > In Outlook (Windows, of course) choose: > View, Sort By to sort your mail. > > Cheers, > Carol^ > > El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > In windows, if you use Outlook then you select the message (any of the thread, > > the first one for example), right click, choose read the thread. And that's it. > > There are also other options you can change so that the messages get sorted by > > thread as they come in, but I don't remember how it is, have a look in tools, > > options or the like. > > > > Cheers, > > Carol^ > > > > El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > > > > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the >threads. Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort >threads into some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still >screwing around with my linux install. > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > > dwyatt > > > > > > > > > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Content-Description: > > netscape - view - sort by - thread
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
Hi, just want to add another tip: In Outlook (Windows, of course) choose: View, Sort By to sort your mail. Cheers, Carol^ El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > In windows, if you use Outlook then you select the message (any of the thread, > the first one for example), right click, choose read the thread. And that's it. > There are also other options you can change so that the messages get sorted by > thread as they come in, but I don't remember how it is, have a look in tools, > options or the like. > > Cheers, > Carol^ > > El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the >threads. Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort >threads into some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still >screwing around with my linux install. > > > > TIA > > > > > > dwyatt > > > > > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Description: >
Re: [newbie] hard to threads....
In windows, if you use Outlook then you select the message (any of the thread, the first one for example), right click, choose read the thread. And that's it. There are also other options you can change so that the messages get sorted by thread as they come in, but I don't remember how it is, have a look in tools, options or the like. Cheers, Carol^ El jue, 14 sep 2000, escribiste: > > I hate mailing lists that are so active, it is real hard to follow all the threads. >Does anybody have any suggestions for a program or some method to sort threads into >some sort of hierarchical list? Preferably for windoze, cause I'm still screwing >around with my linux install. > > TIA > > > dwyatt > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description:
