Re: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-27 Thread KompuKit

How do you check for multiple instances of apache running...?
that could be my problem also...netscape keeps freezing on me,
for some reason...and that could be WHY.

Charles Ulwelling wrote:
 
 Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats apache
 and it screwed me earlier today...
 
 later
 charles Ulwelling
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HAL 9000
 Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 8:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [newbie] slow Linux
 
 hello all.. i just installed Mandrake and i used a larger swap
 partition.  now its acting a bit laggy.  i have SETI@Home running, but
 it has never acted the way it is now.  i can watch the windows
 maximizing and iconifying aand its a bit "jumpy when that happens.  any
 ideas?  thanks
 
 seth

-- 
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===




RE: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-27 Thread Charles Ulwelling

I'm not in linux right now... but you can run a app called ktop... you just
type ktop and it should pop up a graphical system monitor, I would change it
so you could see all the processes that are running(Its a drop down menu at
the bottom of the app) and see if you have a bunch of httpd's.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of KompuKit
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] slow Linux


How do you check for multiple instances of apache running...?
that could be my problem also...netscape keeps freezing on me,
for some reason...and that could be WHY.

Charles Ulwelling wrote:

 Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats
apache
 and it screwed me earlier today...

 later
 charles Ulwelling

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HAL 9000
 Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 8:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [newbie] slow Linux

 hello all.. i just installed Mandrake and i used a larger swap
 partition.  now its acting a bit laggy.  i have SETI@Home running, but
 it has never acted the way it is now.  i can watch the windows
 maximizing and iconifying aand its a bit "jumpy when that happens.  any
 ideas?  thanks

 seth

--
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===





Re: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-27 Thread Anthony Huereca

At the moment SETI@Home is taking 97% of my CPU (PII 450), and I'm having no
problems with speed at all.


 Charles Ulwelling wrote:
  
  Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats apache
  and it screwed me earlier today...
  
  later
  charles Ulwelling
 
 
 nope, not one instance of httpd  seti@home is taking up about 27% of
 my CPU... would that greatly affect the performance??
 
 seth
-- 
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Press any key to continue and any other key to quit




RE: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-27 Thread Charles Ulwelling

It would be really easy to see if seti@home is the problem... just don't run
it, and see if your speed improves.  If it does then you probably have the
priority on seti bumped up above lowest, if your speed doesn't improve then
its not seti that is the culprit.

later,
Charles Ulwelling


-Original Message-
From: Anthony Huereca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] slow Linux


At the moment SETI@Home is taking 97% of my CPU (PII 450), and I'm having no
problems with speed at all.


 Charles Ulwelling wrote:
 
  Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats
apache
  and it screwed me earlier today...
 
  later
  charles Ulwelling


 nope, not one instance of httpd  seti@home is taking up about 27% of
 my CPU... would that greatly affect the performance??

 seth
--
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Press any key to continue and any other key to quit





RE: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-26 Thread Charles Ulwelling

Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats apache
and it screwed me earlier today...

later
charles Ulwelling

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HAL 9000
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] slow Linux


hello all.. i just installed Mandrake and i used a larger swap
partition.  now its acting a bit laggy.  i have SETI@Home running, but
it has never acted the way it is now.  i can watch the windows
maximizing and iconifying aand its a bit "jumpy when that happens.  any
ideas?  thanks

seth





Re: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-26 Thread HAL 9000

Charles Ulwelling wrote:
 
 Check to see if you have a bunch of instances of httpd running, thats apache
 and it screwed me earlier today...
 
 later
 charles Ulwelling


nope, not one instance of httpd  seti@home is taking up about 27% of
my CPU... would that greatly affect the performance??

seth




Re: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-26 Thread Mike Fieschko

 "HAL" == HAL 9000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]

HAL nope, not one instance of httpd  seti@home is taking up
HAL about 27% of my CPU... would that greatly affect the
HAL performance??

Hello, HAL.

Yes.

(Why is _HAL_ running seti@home, anyway ?  ;-) )

-- 
Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1.8 XEmacs and random-sig.el
Kernel 2.2.15-0.17mdk
http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm
Mar 27 St John Damascene
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go
against it." - [G.K. Chesterton, in Everlasting Man, 1925]




Re: [newbie] slow Linux

2000-03-26 Thread Rial Juan


Uhhm...

I'd say there's something wrong there...

First of all, let me state that seti@home, even if it consumes all available
CPU, isn't neccessarily a drag on the system. I run 2 seti@homes myself on a
dual celeron (because one wouldn't grab all available CPU-time since it's not
written multithreaded) and I don't even feel it. That's because seti plays nice
to other apps.

However, if you have a slow computer, it might tie up the processor too much,
giving you a somewhat sluggish response. So in fact it depends on what computer
you're using.

But... The stuff that worries me is: "seti@home is taking up about 27% of my
CPU"... Seti takes all the CPU it can get, meaning that there's only 27% free
for seti to grab.

Where's the other 73% going into? I think _that_ should be your main concern,
and not the seti@home app. If you can eliminate something in the 73%
CPU-consumption slice, drastically cutting that one down, and your PC is still
slow, try loosing seti@home.

ps: to make sure seti plays as nice as possible to other apps, start it with the
"-nice 19" option. The highter the number of "niceness", the nicer it'll play to
other apps. "Niceness" can range from -20 (maximum priority) to 19 (real nice to
other apps).


On Mar 27 Mike Fieschko wrote:

  "HAL" == HAL 9000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 [snip]
 
 HAL nope, not one instance of httpd  seti@home is taking up
 HAL about 27% of my CPU... would that greatly affect the
 HAL performance??
 
 Hello, HAL.
 
 Yes.
 
 (Why is _HAL_ running seti@home, anyway ?  ;-) )
 
 

-- 

Rial Juanhttp://nighty.ulyssis.org
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Belgiumtel:(++32) 89/856533
ulyssis system admininstrator   http://www.ulyssis.org

The little critters in nature; they don't know they're ugly.
That's very funny... A fly marying a bumble-bee...



Sign the petition at http://www.libranet.com/petition.html
Help bring us more Linux Drivers