Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ? NOW what for?

2002-03-14 Thread Rick [Kitty5]

 No.. Dreamweaver Can work w/ wine, however it does not work as
 quickly, nor is it as functional as on windows. (I personally coulnd't
 get it to install.)

I have managed to get a copy of flash5 installed on my windows partition
working with wine(using real win95 dlls), its not really usable as wine
gets into a knot with the daft palette/tool thingies and spends 90% of
its time redrawing them.


-- 
Rick

Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News  Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x231E1CEA




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ? NOW what for?

2002-03-13 Thread john rigby

Shane,
You are being very, very rude and are thus, probably very, very young.
I will however answer you.

The reason the *quiet moneymakers* use Frontpage and the early 98 version at
that, is because THE WORLD uses I. E. and I.E. compatibility.

Nobody in their right mind wouldn't design expressly for  I.E.  It is 90%+
of the users.
( Professional real world marketers tend to look to these sort of things)

No package known to me or that group, can do the cheap and quick product -
that the world demands - the way it can, and then allow a small client to
edit simply, on his own, using the freebie FP Express.

Finally, the whole point *is* that I have had completely untrained people in
the 100's install/upgrade their own Windows 98 on a simply prepared box over
the years. ( I founded and ran a very large computer users group for many
years).

FACT: I and obviously, *very few others* have ever successfully been able to
comfortably install Linux as is being proved on this list every day, by the
great range of problems.

I am returning to Mandrake's excellent community support once again, to see
if it has evolved into something I personally can use and recommend to my
friends. It appears that 8.1 was a big improvement over 8.0 and 8.2 beta is
claimed to be even better.

The vast majority of responses have been sincere attempts to enlighten me
toward the chances of finding M8+ useful in a real business environment.
Unfortunately, there are still very few users seriously using it except for
fun and their own amusement/challenges.
Serious use of it requires access to working/workable business programs at
least equal to those in the vast majority. So far there seems to be none.
Which leaves the Win4lin option.

John

 The only people to really fear are those who know that they are right -
especially those who are not
Kilneth

- Original Message -
From: shane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ?


 bullshit, really, seriously, FP is good only for creating MS documents for
 MSbrowsers, and anyone who thinks that is all you need will have a rude
 awakening when a combination of linux/mac/bsd users and AOL using gecko as
 their engine puts IE back under 40% on the browser share.

 front page is to the webpages what oil spills are to the environment, a
big
 stinking mess that someone will have to clean or will just keep on
 destroying.

 i was taking you seriously until now.  lets get one thing straight.
anyone
 who can install any other OS can install linux.  yes this leaves some
 people out, but those people couldn't install windows either.  shall we
 make them all use type writers?





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ? NOW what for?

2002-03-13 Thread Nelson Bartley

You know, I didn't want to say anything about this, however I should
just for relevence.

I currently do both PHP and ASP programming for various customers, as
well as myself. I use Frontpage for quite a few things. Yes it does
produce SOME bad code, however 2002 does produce acceptable code for the
basic layout. I do alot of rough work, and table planning and outlining
in frontpage, just because I find it handles it better then Dreamweaver.
Now, I'll admit that I don't polish these pages w/ Frontpage, that would
be silly as it honestly doesn't do a great job. But if I didn't want to
polish these pages they would be more then acceptable in either
Mozzilla, or IE. 

I personally found FP the nicest on code I put in manually. Too often
I've opened up a page in Dreamweaver and have it start to reformat the
HTML code on me. Not only that, but I really like the window switching
that was enabled in 2002 for multiple windows open. When I'm doing mass
edits (5+ files) I don't like having all 5 windows open w/
Dreamweaver... it becomes very clutered. The Child Window system of
Fronpage makes life alot easier.

As for the world running on unix, linux, freebsd, and other direvitives
(sp?) that's very true. It's also true that quite a few LARGE companies
who license a lot of microsoft products have a lot of intranet servers
running IIS just because it's easy for them to set up their windows file
share server with IIS for the various groups that want to have webpages.

Ohh... one last thing. For the person who said that really web designers
hand code HTML. That's fine. You code your complex table structure
manually. I personally will do it in a WYSIWYG editor myself... for me
it takes way less time.

Nelson

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 10:39, sda wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:28:50PM +1000, john rigby wrote:
  Shane,
  You are being very, very rude and are thus, probably very, very young.
  I will however answer you.
  
  The reason the *quiet moneymakers* use Frontpage and the early 98 version at
  that, is because THE WORLD uses I. E. and I.E. compatibility.
 
 
 You really are incorrect SIR. Being that Im in publishing and that
 includes  divisons that do *complete* Web design as well as SFX for
 filmwork and tradional publishing I'm qualified enough to give a
 rebuttal. I've been in this business for 15 years.
 
 Nobody and I mean nobody, uses FrontPage in the professional world. It
 would be like people doing professsional print design using M$ Pubisher
 as opposed to Quark, Framemaker, InDesign and PageMaker. The reason? The
 code generated by FrontPage is atrocious and only works `sometimes' with
 IE, and ASP, the whole WORLD doensn't use ASP or MIIS. Most professional 
 web design is done by designers who do the nice look using DreamWeaver 
 and/or GoLive. They both produce reasonably clean html. Some designers 
 actually use something like HomePage, or BBEdit as they prefer to tweak 
 raw code. Then the look is handed over to the second tier who do the 
 backend stuff, the programmers, who tie it all into PHP,ASP for serverside 
 dbases using Perl, Python and XSLT, in additon to other fine languages. Very 
 few of these operations run on M$ software. So FrontPage is useless, and 
 additonal time is spent fixing up the atrocious results, which isn't preferable 
 in a production environment. The hobbyists - like FrontPage as it's easy to 
 produce relatively nice looking pages in their default browser. But as soon 
 as db enter the eqation, and most corporate websites use them, FrontPage
 use is out of the question. 
 
  Nobody in their right mind wouldn't design expressly for  I.E.  It is 90%+
  of the users.
  ( Professional real world marketers tend to look to these sort of things)
 
 Again you really don't know whereof you speak. The software that runs
 the internet runs on Linux, BSD or Unix hardware/software - not M$.
 That's what counts. 
 
 -- 
   -^-   -^-
   ?   ?Steve
   ^
  ___   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 '   `

 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[OT] HTML editors. [Was: Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ? NOW what for?]

2002-03-13 Thread Robin Turner

On Wednesday 13 March 2002 20:25, Nelson Bartley wrote:

[snippets]

 I currently do both PHP and ASP programming for various customers, as
 well as myself. I use Frontpage for quite a few things. Yes it does
 produce SOME bad code, however 2002 does produce acceptable code for the
 basic layout. I do alot of rough work, and table planning and outlining
 in frontpage, just because I find it handles it better then Dreamweaver.
 Now, I'll admit that I don't polish these pages w/ Frontpage, that would
 be silly as it honestly doesn't do a great job. But if I didn't want to
 polish these pages they would be more then acceptable in either
 Mozzilla, or IE.

To be fair, a lot of the bloated, non-standard pages that litter the web are 
produced with Frontpage Express, rather than the full Frontpage, which I am 
told allows you to specify the HTML version you want.  And the really sucky 
pages are often produced, not with HTML editors, but with MS Word.  But I try 
not to blame the authors, many of whom are new to the web.  When I started, I 
too used Save as HTML and didn't notice anything was wrong until I started 
getting emails about my unreadable pages.  I was also pointed to a program 
called demoronizer which stripped MS smartquotes (an oxymoron).  I didn't 
know what to do with it, so I mailed back and got the reply, Just untar it 
and run it on the file, no arguments needed, or something like that.  Like 
Huh? That was my introduction to UNIX, which got me into Linux.

 Ohh... one last thing. For the person who said that really web designers
 hand code HTML. That's fine. You code your complex table structure
 manually. I personally will do it in a WYSIWYG editor myself... for me
 it takes way less time.

I asked a friend of mine who teaches web design what tools he had his 
students use.  His answer was pencil and paper.  Ironically, WYSIWYG tools 
work fine in the hands of people who learnt their HTML the hard way.

Sorry if this is way off topic, but I did mark it as such!  BTW, I'm happy to 
see off-topic mails on this list (I'd be a hypocrite if I wasn't) but I'd 
appreciate it if people could put OT or something in the header.  Then I 
can read those first ;-)

And please change the subject header when the subject gets too far from the 
original post.  Sometimes I miss really entertaining polemics because they 
still have a subject like Re: SB AWE64 drivers.

Robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Any First Go success stories ? NOW what for?

2002-03-13 Thread Nelson Bartley

No.. Dreamweaver Can work w/ wine, however it does not work as
quickly, nor is it as functional as on windows. (I personally coulnd't
get it to install.)

NB

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 20:13, FemmeFatale wrote:
 snip
 
 sda wrote:
  
  On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:28:50PM +1000, john rigby wrote:
   Shane,
 . Most professional
  web design is done by designers who do the nice look using DreamWeaver
  and/or GoLive. 
 
 snip
 
 As an aside, is it possible, as someone on this list wanted to give up
 M$ for Linux...but couldn't b/c dreamweaver won't work on Linux w/out
 problems.
 
 Is it possible instead to use Codeweavers Wine to help in that effort?
 
 Just curious  wondering, not that I know wtf Dreamweaver is :)
 
 Femme
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com