Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-31 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

By "failed" I mean it physically broke. After 2 years of use, the drive 
failed for the first time. My distributor sent me a new one (after about 4 
months waiting!), and this one failed after only a few months. In the lead-up 
to the failure I had many bad blocks cropping up. It made clunky and 
high-pitched scratchy noises. It sounded as if the drive arm could not keep 
itself up and it kept falling down, scraping something in the process. My 
third drive appears to be working fine after a few months of use, but I'm 
being cautious...

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:35, Jeff wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > That's funny... My 12GB Bigfoot TX drive has failed on me *twice* this
> > year, taking a lot of data with it (although I was more prepared the
> > second time round). Fortunately, I am under warranty until June 2001.
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:18, Jeff wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > >
> > > Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till
> > > Mandrake 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted
> > > Win98, BeOS, Slack 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it
> > > all worked well for me.  Now it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package
> > > revisions short of official) and all is well.  Hope this helps you.
>
> When you say failed do you mean the drive just quit working?  I havent had
> anything like that happen to me (same drive) and my drive is around 2 years
> old.  I dont think it would make a difference but this drive came factory
> with an hp pc.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
"One World, One Web, One Programme." - Microsoft Promotional Ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer." - Adolf Hitler





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-30 Thread Romanator

I'm feeling better already.

Roman

"Ronald J. Hall" wrote:

> Romanator wrote:
>
> > I have finally decided to stay away from Windows. If all goes well, I'll
> > be Windose free by the end of the week. Yes!!
> >
> > --
> > Roman
> > Registered Linux User #179293
>
> Congratulations Roman. I'm sure you'll not regret your decision...I know I
> didn't! ;-)
>
> --
>
>/\
>Dark>\/

--
Roman
Registered Linux User #179293






Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-30 Thread Romanator

That's it. I'm buying a large Quantum drive but will my older BIOS support it?

Roman

James Boeck wrote:

> I work in a company that has about 25-35 computers with quantum 3.0 gigs and
> I have owned both a 4.3 and 3.0 gig drives without problems myself.  I can
> not say that about other companys...
>
> James Boeck
>
> >From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives
> >Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:35:37 -0500
> >
> >On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > That's funny... My 12GB Bigfoot TX drive has failed on me *twice* this
> >year,
> > > taking a lot of data with it (although I was more prepared the second
> >time
> > > round). Fortunately, I am under warranty until June 2001.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:18, Jeff wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > > >
> > > > Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till
> > > > Mandrake 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted
> >Win98,
> > > > BeOS, Slack 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all
> >worked
> > > > well for me.  Now it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions
> >short
> > > > of official) and all is well.  Hope this helps you.
> >
> >When you say failed do you mean the drive just quit working?  I havent had
> >anything like that happen to me (same drive) and my drive is around 2 years
> >old.  I dont think it would make a difference but this drive came factory
> >with
> >an hp pc.
> >
>
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.

--
Roman
Registered Linux User #179293






Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-30 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

That's funny... My 12GB Bigfoot TX drive has failed on me *twice* this year, 
taking a lot of data with it (although I was more prepared the second time 
round). Fortunately, I am under warranty until June 2001.


On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:18, Jeff wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
>
> Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till
> Mandrake 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted Win98,
> BeOS, Slack 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all worked
> well for me.  Now it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions short
> of official) and all is well.  Hope this helps you.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan
"One World, One Web, One Programme." - Microsoft Promotional Ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer." - Adolf Hitler





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-30 Thread James Boeck

I work in a company that has about 25-35 computers with quantum 3.0 gigs and 
I have owned both a 4.3 and 3.0 gig drives without problems myself.  I can 
not say that about other companys...

James Boeck


>From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives
>Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:35:37 -0500
>
>On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > That's funny... My 12GB Bigfoot TX drive has failed on me *twice* this 
>year,
> > taking a lot of data with it (although I was more prepared the second 
>time
> > round). Fortunately, I am under warranty until June 2001.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:18, Jeff wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > >
> > > Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till
> > > Mandrake 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted 
>Win98,
> > > BeOS, Slack 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all 
>worked
> > > well for me.  Now it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions 
>short
> > > of official) and all is well.  Hope this helps you.
>
>When you say failed do you mean the drive just quit working?  I havent had
>anything like that happen to me (same drive) and my drive is around 2 years
>old.  I dont think it would make a difference but this drive came factory 
>with
>an hp pc.
>

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-30 Thread Jeff

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> That's funny... My 12GB Bigfoot TX drive has failed on me *twice* this year, 
> taking a lot of data with it (although I was more prepared the second time 
> round). Fortunately, I am under warranty until June 2001.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:18, Jeff wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> >
> > Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till
> > Mandrake 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted Win98,
> > BeOS, Slack 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all worked
> > well for me.  Now it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions short
> > of official) and all is well.  Hope this helps you.

When you say failed do you mean the drive just quit working?  I havent had
anything like that happen to me (same drive) and my drive is around 2 years
old.  I dont think it would make a difference but this drive came factory with
an hp pc.




Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Ronald J. Hall

Romanator wrote:

> I have finally decided to stay away from Windows. If all goes well, I'll
> be Windose free by the end of the week. Yes!!
> 
> --
> Roman
> Registered Linux User #179293

Congratulations Roman. I'm sure you'll not regret your decision...I know I
didn't! ;-)

-- 
 
   /\
   Dark>


Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Vic

Cool thanks dude! :)


> Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till Mandrake
> 7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted Win98, BeOS, Slack
> 7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all worked well for me.  Now
> it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions short of official) and all
> is well.  Hope this helps you.




Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Jeff

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > > > Hello list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?

Iv'e been using a Quantum bigfoot 12.7 gig hd since Slackware 3.5 till Mandrake
7.2 (now).  Never had any problems.  At one point it booted Win98, BeOS, Slack
7, and Mandrake 7.0.  Besides being a tight fit it all worked well for me.  Now
it's just running 7.2 beta (a few package revisions short of official) and all
is well.  Hope this helps you.




Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Romanator

Hey Daniel,

I'll be looking at another drive. Maxtor sounds good. I've just tried
installing Redhat 6.1 and the installation indicated that the partitition table
is corrupt on hdd.
I juts ran a fdisk /MBR. Hopefully, that will fix it. However, I going to buy
System Commander to keep track of the different OS's on the drive.

--
Roman
Registered Linux User #179293


Daniel wrote:

> it don't sound like a BIOS prob. old BIOS's just allow upto 8.4 gb of drive
> to be used. it sounds like linux can't recognise yer drive, try another
> flavour!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Romanator
> Sent: 29 October 2000 15:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives
>
> That's all right. I've tried to install 7.0 with no success. I've pretty
> well given up
> on this computer.
>
> Roman
>
> Vic wrote:
>
> > Whups sorry about that dude, I shouldda specified
> > that I have a 10Gb running in 7.0-2 I'm was just
> > afraid to upgrade to 7.1 or beyond, I heard a rumour
> > in a newsgroup and wondered if it were true or
> > only a rumour.
> >
> > Thanx
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Romanator wrote:
> > > Do you think it may be an old BIOS? I'm having a terrible time
> configuring a
> > > Fujitsu 10Gig. I think Dell never tested anything over 8 Gig.
> > >
> > > Roman
> > >
> > >
> > > "Ronald J. Hall" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Vic wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello list
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> > > > > I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> > > > > the newsgroup or what?
> > > >
> > > > I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems
> (sometimes). The
> > > > latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying
> that, I've
> > > > got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems
> (yet). ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> /\
> > > >
> Dark> > > >





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Romanator

That's all right. I've tried to install 7.0 with no success. I've pretty well given up
on this computer.

Roman



Vic wrote:

> Whups sorry about that dude, I shouldda specified
> that I have a 10Gb running in 7.0-2 I'm was just
> afraid to upgrade to 7.1 or beyond, I heard a rumour
> in a newsgroup and wondered if it were true or
> only a rumour.
>
> Thanx
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Romanator wrote:
> > Do you think it may be an old BIOS? I'm having a terrible time configuring a
> > Fujitsu 10Gig. I think Dell never tested anything over 8 Gig.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> >
> > "Ronald J. Hall" wrote:
> >
> > > Vic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello list
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > > >
> > > > I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> > > > I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> > > > the newsgroup or what?
> > >
> > > I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems (sometimes). The
> > > latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying that, I've
> > > got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems (yet). ;-)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >/\
> > >Dark> > >\/





RE: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-29 Thread Daniel

it don't sound like a BIOS prob. old BIOS's just allow upto 8.4 gb of drive
to be used. it sounds like linux can't recognise yer drive, try another
flavour!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Romanator
Sent: 29 October 2000 15:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives


That's all right. I've tried to install 7.0 with no success. I've pretty
well given up
on this computer.

Roman



Vic wrote:

> Whups sorry about that dude, I shouldda specified
> that I have a 10Gb running in 7.0-2 I'm was just
> afraid to upgrade to 7.1 or beyond, I heard a rumour
> in a newsgroup and wondered if it were true or
> only a rumour.
>
> Thanx
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Romanator wrote:
> > Do you think it may be an old BIOS? I'm having a terrible time
configuring a
> > Fujitsu 10Gig. I think Dell never tested anything over 8 Gig.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> >
> > "Ronald J. Hall" wrote:
> >
> > > Vic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello list
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > > >
> > > > I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> > > > I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> > > > the newsgroup or what?
> > >
> > > I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems
(sometimes). The
> > > latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying
that, I've
> > > got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems
(yet). ;-)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
/\
> > >
Dark> > >
\/







Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-28 Thread Vic

Whups sorry about that dude, I shouldda specified
that I have a 10Gb running in 7.0-2 I'm was just
afraid to upgrade to 7.1 or beyond, I heard a rumour
in a newsgroup and wondered if it were true or
only a rumour.

Thanx

On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Romanator wrote:
> Do you think it may be an old BIOS? I'm having a terrible time configuring a
> Fujitsu 10Gig. I think Dell never tested anything over 8 Gig.
> 
> Roman
> 
> 
> "Ronald J. Hall" wrote:
> 
> > Vic wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello list
> > >
> > > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> > >
> > > I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> > > I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> > > the newsgroup or what?
> >
> > I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems (sometimes). The
> > latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying that, I've
> > got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems (yet). ;-)
> >
> > --
> >
> >/\
> >Dark> >\/




Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-28 Thread Romanator

Do you think it may be an old BIOS? I'm having a terrible time configuring a
Fujitsu 10Gig. I think Dell never tested anything over 8 Gig.

Roman


"Ronald J. Hall" wrote:

> Vic wrote:
> >
> > Hello list
> >
> > Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> > Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> >
> > I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> > I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> > the newsgroup or what?
>
> I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems (sometimes). The
> latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying that, I've
> got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems (yet). ;-)
>
> --
>
>/\
>Dark>\/





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-28 Thread Romanator

No problem with Quantum IDE but I am having a terrible time with Fujitsi
10 Gig. on an older Dell Dimension XPS 200 MMX ala 1997.

Roman


Vic wrote:

> Hello list
>
> Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
>
> I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> the newsgroup or what?





Re: [newbie] Quantum hard drives

2000-10-28 Thread Ronald J. Hall

Vic wrote:
> 
> Hello list
> 
> Has anyone had any trouble with their large (mine is 10Gb)
> Quantum ide drives with Mandrake 7.1 and above?
> 
> I am running 7.0-2 and am afraid to upgrade,
> I don't know whether it was just rumour on
> the newsgroup or what?

I think Western Digital is the only ones that have problems (sometimes). The 
latest issue of Linux Jounal talks about it. Note that, after saying that, I've
got a 10 gig WDC in my 'Nix box, and AFAIK, have had no problems (yet). ;-)

-- 
 
   /\
   Dark>