Re: Some short remarks

2017-06-15 Thread Libman
> Libman, I hope you will come back to the thread and correct false critics? 
> Dom already does it very well, but I guess he has to do more important stuff.

Yeah, I didn't return there fast enough, and dom96 has already made all the 
important points. But I did add my own rant or two 
[(ex)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/6gwv4a/a_glance_at_the_pythonlookalike_nim_programming/diy8v04/).
 

Is there anything specific you'd like me to further address?


Re: Some short remarks

2017-06-15 Thread scriptkiddy
I went in and did my best to correct some misconceptions I saw in the thread.

It was baffling to me that there was a single user who was spouting off a bunch 
of incorrect nonsense about Nim as if they knew what they were talking about. 
Luckily, Dom corrected that user pretty quickly. I dropped my two cents there 
as well.

I think threads like the linked thread are definitely a good way to see what 
direction nim should be heading in for the most part. However, there seems to 
be a strange rivalry between Rust, Go, and Nim that I'm seeing develop.

I can see why Rust and Go developers would think that Nim is trying to steal 
their market share. Considering that Go and Rust aren't even really 
competitors, I think that it's impressive that Nim can stand up to both in 
terms of productivity, performance, and feature set.

People will always fear what they don't understand I guess.