Re: [nlug] Re: Ubuntu for Server

2010-10-17 Thread Richard Thomas

On 10/15/2010 5:03 PM, Chris McQuistion wrote:
I agree that you are almost always better off with Linux software 
RAID, compared to onboard fakeraid.  Typically, Linux software RAID 
outperforms those fakeraid controllers and you have easy software 
access to the health of the array and you an initiate rebuilds, change 
drives and such fairly easily with software RAID.  The top reason for 
me, however, is the portability of Linux software RAID.  If you have a 
motherboard completely die, you can move a Linux software RAID array 
to a completely different machine, with very different hardware.  You 
typically cannot do that with fakeraid.  This is a very real-world 
issue that I've run into several times.


Chris


Another cool thing about software raid is the ability to mirror at the 
partition level. In my main server, I have a six partition 100GB drive 
mirrored to a 500GB drive with the remaining 400 on the second 
un-mirrored and used for junk that I don't care about losing. Of course, 
if I wasn't cheap, I would have just bought 2 500GB drives and had done 
with but there you go.


--
*Richard Thomas Consulting*
301 Murrel St
Dickson, TN 37055
http://www.rtcons.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en


Re: [nlug] Re: Ubuntu for Server

2010-10-16 Thread Michael Chaney
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Chris McQuistion
cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
 I agree that you are almost always better off with Linux software RAID,
 compared to onboard fakeraid.  Typically, Linux software RAID outperforms
 those fakeraid controllers and you have easy software access to the health
 of the array and you an initiate rebuilds, change drives and such fairly
 easily with software RAID.  The top reason for me, however, is the
 portability of Linux software RAID.  If you have a motherboard completely
 die, you can move a Linux software RAID array to a completely different
 machine, with very different hardware.  You typically cannot do that with
 fakeraid.  This is a very real-world issue that I've run into several

He speaks the truth.  Don't use hardware raid unless it's a well-known
controller type and easy to get a replacement.  You're almost always
better off just using software raid.

Michael
-- 
Michael Darrin Chaney, Sr.
mdcha...@michaelchaney.com
http://www.michaelchaney.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en


Re: [nlug] Re: Ubuntu for Server

2010-10-15 Thread Chris McQuistion
I agree that you are almost always better off with Linux software RAID,
compared to onboard fakeraid.  Typically, Linux software RAID outperforms
those fakeraid controllers and you have easy software access to the health
of the array and you an initiate rebuilds, change drives and such fairly
easily with software RAID.  The top reason for me, however, is the
portability of Linux software RAID.  If you have a motherboard completely
die, you can move a Linux software RAID array to a completely different
machine, with very different hardware.  You typically cannot do that with
fakeraid.  This is a very real-world issue that I've run into several
times.

Chris

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Dave Tomlin davetom...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just wondering if I made the right decision to use linux software raid
 vs the fakeraid controller on my motherboard.  Most forums say you're
 better off with software raid.  Any thoughts?

 Also, do you get a lot of errors in your dmesg log in Ubuntu?

 I get an amd64_edac error because my board doesn't support ecc.  I get
 an iommu error because my board doesn't support that either.  I have
 an address collision with my first PCI device, and a MMIO error from
 shpchp.  Fun stuff!  :). This is on two new gigabye motherboards.

 On 10/15/10, Chris McQuistion cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
  I've used Linux Software Raid very frequently on RedHat-based distros,
 but
  not on Ubuntu, specifically.
 
  Do you have any specific questions or issues with software RAID?
 
  Chris
 
  On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Dave Tomlin davetom...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Is anyone using software raid for Ubuntu?  How many of you are using
  fakeraid controllers?
 
  On 10/14/10, Perkins, Jerry je...@jperkins.us wrote:
   Dave Tomlin wrote:
   Is anyone using Ubuntu Server 10.04.1 for production servers.  Seems
   like most say to go with CentOS, but I'm partial to .deb and the
   abundance of packages for Ubuntu.  Thanks.
  Tried Ubuntu.   Nothing like Debian for the server.   Also use it
 on
   the laptop and desktop.  Never down.
  
   --
   Jerry Perkins - http://jperkins.us/
  
   Are you better off today than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?
  
  
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups
   NLUG group.
   To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 nlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 
   For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
  
 
  --
  Sent from my mobile device
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
  NLUG group.
  To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 nlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
 
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  NLUG group.
  To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
 

 --
 Sent from my mobile device

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 NLUG group.
 To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comnlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en


Re: [nlug] Re: Ubuntu for Server

2010-10-14 Thread Alex Smith (K4RNT)
I'll be either using RAIDZ with ZFS or I'll be utilizing my Smart
Array 5i onboard my ProLiant DL360...

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 22:29, Dave Tomlin davetom...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is anyone using software raid for Ubuntu?  How many of you are using
 fakeraid controllers?

 On 10/14/10, Perkins, Jerry je...@jperkins.us wrote:
 Dave Tomlin wrote:
 Is anyone using Ubuntu Server 10.04.1 for production servers.  Seems
 like most say to go with CentOS, but I'm partial to .deb and the
 abundance of packages for Ubuntu.  Thanks.
    Tried Ubuntu.   Nothing like Debian for the server.   Also use it on
 the laptop and desktop.  Never down.

 --
 Jerry Perkins - http://jperkins.us/

 Are you better off today than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 NLUG group.
 To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en


 --
 Sent from my mobile device

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 NLUG group.
 To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en




-- 
 ' With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech
censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied,
chains us all irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron
Satie as wisdom and warning... The first time any man's freedom is
trodden on we’re all damaged. - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron
Satie, Star Trek: TNG episode The Drumhead
- Alex Smith (K4RNT)
- Murfreesboro, Tennessee USA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en