RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread pascal . girard
Hi Robert,

Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work. 

I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion: 
$SIZES LIM1 = 2 
and I got the following error : 
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

So I tried also the default value for LIM1:
$SIZES LIM1=1 
and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii
$SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500
and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message.

I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find 
any relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion?

Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able 
to use the multi-cores when you have such long runs. 

Kind regards

Pascal Girard, PhD
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
Global Exploratory Medicine
Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
Cell: +41.79.508.7898




From:   Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com
To: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, 
nmusers@globomaxnm.com nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Cc: orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com, 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com
Date:   11/07/2012 18:55
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn
Sent by:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com



Pascal:
I cannot help regarding having all console messages sent to the proper 
files in the PSN environment, but I can assist in avoiding your present 
NONMEM error.  If you insert at the beginning of the control stream file
$SIZES LIM1=??
and insert a large enough value for ??, then file buffer 10 will not be 
used, and the error is avoided.  The value should be at least as large as 
the number of data records (lines) in your data file (see section I.6 of 
..\guides\nm720.pdf).
 
Although nmfe72 in parallel mode has been tested successfully in our hands 
to use the file buffers for large data sets, it may not work in all grid 
environments.  Setting the LIM values large enough avoids using buffer 
files, and utilizes only memory. The problem also runs faster when buffer 
files are not used.
 
Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D. 
Vice President, Pharmacometrics, RD
ICON Development Solutions
7740 Milestone Parkway
Suite 150
Hanover, MD 21076
Tel: (215) 616-6428
Mob: (925) 286-0769
Email: robert.ba...@iconplc.com
Web: www.iconplc.com
 

From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com] 
On Behalf Of pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:19 AM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Cc: orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com; 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com
Subject: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn

Dear All, 

We are using psn version: 3.4.2 together with NONMEM 7.2.0  on a Linux Sun 
Grid Engine (SGE). When using multi-cores run on SGE, it happens sometimes 
that NONMEM returns a log file where the MONITORING OF SEARCH starts and 
nothing is reported. 

Looking into the psn directory, I found files which have the name of my 
script file + an extension made of letters and numbers that contains an 
error message that is not shown on the log file. For example my nm-tran 
script file is run003.mod and my log file run003.lst ends with: 

 MONITORING OF SEARCH: 

Stop Time: 
Wed Jul  10 21:05:18 CEST 2012 

Then I recover a file named run003.mod.o9501 in run003/NM_run1 directory 
created by psn. Sometimes this file contains an explicit  error message, 
sometimes more cabalistic information as: 
WARNINGS AND ERRORS (IF ANY) FOR PROBLEM1 
  
 (WARNING  2) NM-TRAN INFERS THAT THE DATA ARE POPULATION. 
 CREATING MUMODEL ROUTINE... 
Recompiling certain components 

 USING PARALLEL PROFILE mpi_12cores.pnm 
 MPI TRANSFER TYPE SELECTED 
Exit status = 1 
IN MPI 
Starting MPI version of nonmem execution ... 
License Registered to: Merck KGaA 
Expiration Date:14 SEP 2013 
Current Date:   11 JUL 2012 
Days until program expires : 428 


 Iterative Two Stage (No Prior) 
 MONITORING OF SEARCH: 

At line 240 of file  (unit = 10, file = 'WK1_FILE10') 
Fortran runtime error: End of file 
Fatal error in MPI_Send: Other MPI error, error stack: 
MPI_Send(174).: MPI_Send(buf=0xde71a0, count=80030, 
MPI_INTEGER, dest=1, tag=1, MPI_COMM_WORLD) failed 
MPIDI_CH3I_Progress(150)..: 
MPID_nem_mpich2_blocking_recv(948): 
MPID_nem_tcp_connpoll(1720)...: 
state_commrdy_handler(1556)...: 
MPID_nem_tcp_recv_handler(1446)...: socket closed 
rank 1 in job 1  deda1x0481_36189   caused collective abort of all ranks 
  exit status of rank 1: return code 2 

Questions: 
1) Is there a way to force psn and/or NONMEM to collect the error message 
in the log file when using multi-cores run ? 
2) What about cabalistic error messages as the one above? 

Thank you for your help, 

Kind regards

Pascal Girard, PhD 

RE: [NMusers] Question about interoccation variability

2012-07-12 Thread Mats Karlsson
Dear Claire,

 

If you have data only from oral doses and covariances between disposition
parameters (CL; V), then you will not get any further improvement by
introducing variability in F1. 

 

Best regards,

Mats

 

Mats Karlsson, PhD

Professor of Pharmacometrics

 

FIRST WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHARMACOMETRICS, 5-7 September 2012, Seoul (
http://www.go-wcop.org/ www.go-wcop.org)

 

Dept of Pharmaceutical Biosciences

Faculty of Pharmacy

Uppsala University

Box 591

75124 Uppsala

 

Phone: +46 18 4714105

Fax + 46 18 4714003

 

From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com] On
Behalf Of Xu, Claire
Sent: 12 July 2012 15:11
Cc: nmusers
Subject: Re: [NMusers] Question about interoccation variability

 

Hi Nick,

Thanks for your helpful comment. I will test BOV + BSV on my absorption
model parameters first.

Sorry for my typo. I meant neither of the models improved the fit.

Thanks again for your help.

Best,

Claire

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Nick Holford n.holf...@auckland.ac.nz
wrote:

Claire,

See below: 



On 11/07/2012 9:45 p.m., Xu, Claire wrote:

Hi Nick,
Thank you a lot for clarifying how to incorporate BOV in the model.
I tested BOV on F1 with the same option as well as variable BOVs on F1 from
different occasions. But either of them improved the fitting. 

 

I am not sure what you mean here. Do you mean that NEITHER of them improved
the fit? If that is the case then it would be compatible with your other
observation that AUC is very similar across occasions  which suggests that
there is negligible BOV in CL or F. I find that a bit surprising but it is
not impossible. 





Actually according to the results from non-compartmental analysis, AUC0-inf
are very similar across different occasions, while a trend of difference in
Cmax and Tmax was observed. Do you think that more complex absorption models
would help?

 

Because you are do see BOV in Cmax and Tmax then it seems you should try to
focus on looking for BSV+BOV on your absorption model parameters (Ka, Tlag).
Of course you can also work on the absorption model structure as well. 





Open to any comments.
Thanks again for your great input.
Best,
Claire



 

-- 
Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology

First World Conference on Pharmacometrics, 5-7 September 2012
Seoul, Korea http://www.go-wcop.org http://www.go-wcop.org/ 

Dept Pharmacology  Clinical Pharmacology, Bldg 505 Room 202D
University of Auckland,85 Park Rd,Private Bag 92019,Auckland,New Zealand
tel:+64(9)923-6730 tel:%2B64%289%29923-6730  fax:+64(9)373-7090
tel:%2B64%289%29373-7090  mobile:+64(21)46 23 53
tel:%2B64%2821%2946%2023%2053 
email: n.holf...@auckland.ac.nz
http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford








-- 
Xu, Claire
Ph.D Candidate
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Wishard Hospital
Indiana University School of Medicine
1001 West 10th Street, Myers W7122
Indianapolis, IN  46202
T - 317/7558242



RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread pascal . girard
Hi Nastia,

I tried your trick which would have broken the first table law rule The 
first NM-TRAN control record must be a $PROBLEM record  and put $SIZES as 
very first record and got following error:

_read_problems: First non-comment line in modelfile run.mod is not a 
$PROB record. NONMEM syntax violation.

So the first table law rule still resists or you may have a different 
NONMEM version.  :-)

I also checked the bug list 
ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf , but nothing 
is mentioned.

Anyway, thanks for the suggestion!

Kind regards

Pascal 




From:   Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca
To: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
robert.ba...@iconplc.com
Date:   12/07/2012 16:13
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid



Hi Pascal,
 
$SIZES goes at the begginning of your control stream, before $PROB.
 
I hope it helps.
 
Best regards,
 
Nastya
 

Nastya Kassir, Pharm.D.

Senior Scientist 

Pharsight Consulting Services(tm)
A division of Certara(tm)
Email: nkas...@pharsight.com mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com 

Phone: 1 (514) 789-2180 # 2157 
Mobile: 1 (438) 862-0935   
Fax: (514) 789-2192 

www.pharsight.com http://www.pharsight.com/ 




From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com on behalf of 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 09:21
To: Bauer, Robert
Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com; olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; 
owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid


Hi Robert, 

Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work. 

I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion: 
$SIZES LIM1 = 2 
and I got the following error : 
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid 

So I tried also the default value for LIM1: 
$SIZES LIM1=1 
and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii 
$SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500 
and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message. 

I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find 
any relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion? 


Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able 
to use the multi-cores when you have such long runs. 

Kind regards 

Pascal Girard, PhD 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
Global Exploratory Medicine
Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
Cell: +41.79.508.7898




From:Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, 
nmusers@globomaxnm.com nmusers@globomaxnm.com 
Cc:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com, 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
Date:11/07/2012 18:55 
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn 
Sent by:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com 






Pascal: 
I cannot help regarding having all console messages sent to the proper 
files in the PSN environment, but I can assist in avoiding your present 
NONMEM error.  If you insert at the beginning of the control stream file 
$SIZES LIM1=?? 
and insert a large enough value for ??, then file buffer 10 will not be 
used, and the error is avoided.  The value should be at least as large as 
the number of data records (lines) in your data file (see section I.6 of 
..\guides\nm720.pdf). 
 
Although nmfe72 in parallel mode has been tested successfully in our hands 
to use the file buffers for large data sets, it may not work in all grid 
environments.  Setting the LIM values large enough avoids using buffer 
files, and utilizes only memory. The problem also runs faster when buffer 
files are not used. 
 

Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D. 

Vice President, Pharmacometrics, RD 

ICON Development Solutions 

7740 Milestone Parkway 

Suite 150 

Hanover, MD 21076 

Tel: (215) 616-6428 

Mob: (925) 286-0769 

Email: robert.ba...@iconplc.com 

Web: www.iconplc.com http://www.iconplc.com/ 






From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com 
mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com ] On Behalf Of 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:19 AM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Cc: orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com; 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com
Subject: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn

Dear All, 

We are using psn version: 3.4.2 together with NONMEM 7.2.0  on a Linux Sun 
Grid Engine (SGE). When using multi-cores run on SGE, it happens sometimes 
that NONMEM returns a log file where the MONITORING OF SEARCH starts and 
nothing is reported. 

Looking into the 

RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread Kassir Nastya
Hi Pascal,
 
I have already used it with NONMEM 72 and it works, but not in psn.
 
$SIZES LIM6=1000
$PROBLEM XX
 
Best regards,
 
Nastya
 



From: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com [mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com]
Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 11:09
To: Kassir Nastya; Bauer, Robert; nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal 
Error: Record SIZES is not valid


Hi Nastia, 

I tried your trick which would have broken the first table law rule The first 
NM-TRAN control record must be a $PROBLEM record  and put $SIZES as very first 
record and got following error: 

_read_problems: First non-comment line in modelfile run.mod is not a $PROB 
record. NONMEM syntax violation. 

So the first table law rule still resists or you may have a different NONMEM 
version.  :-) 

I also checked the bug list 
ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf 
ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf  , but nothing 
is mentioned. 

Anyway, thanks for the suggestion! 

Kind regards

Pascal 




From:Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca 
To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
Date:12/07/2012 16:13 
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid 






Hi Pascal,

$SIZES goes at the begginning of your control stream, before $PROB.

I hope it helps.

Best regards,

Nastya


Nastya Kassir, Pharm.D.

Senior Scientist 

Pharsight Consulting Services(tm)
A division of Certara(tm)
Email: nkas...@pharsight.com mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com 
mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com   

Phone: 1 (514) 789-2180 # 2157  
Mobile: 1 (438) 862-0935
  
Fax: (514) 789-2192 

www.pharsight.com http://www.pharsight.com/ http://www.pharsight.com/   




From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com on behalf of pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 09:21
To: Bauer, Robert
Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com; olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal 
Error: Record SIZES is not valid


Hi Robert, 

Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work. 

I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion: 
   $SIZES LIM1 = 2   
and I got the following error : 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid 

So I tried also the default value for LIM1: 
   $SIZES LIM1=1 
and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii 
   $SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500 
and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message. 

I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find any 
relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion? 

Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able to 
use the multi-cores when you have such long runs. 

Kind regards 

Pascal Girard, PhD 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
Global Exploratory Medicine
Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
Cell: +41.79.508.7898




From:Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, 
nmusers@globomaxnm.com nmusers@globomaxnm.com 
Cc:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com, olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
Date:11/07/2012 18:55 
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn 
Sent by:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com 






Pascal: 
I cannot help regarding having all console messages sent to the proper files in 
the PSN environment, but I can assist in avoiding your present NONMEM error.  
If you insert at the beginning of the control stream file 
$SIZES LIM1=?? 
and insert a large enough value for ??, then file buffer 10 will not be used, 
and the error is avoided.  The value should be at least as large as the number 
of data records (lines) in your data file (see section I.6 of 
..\guides\nm720.pdf). 
 
Although nmfe72 in parallel mode has been tested successfully in our hands to 
use the file buffers for large data sets, it may not work in all grid 
environments.  Setting the LIM values large enough avoids using buffer files, 
and utilizes only memory. The problem also runs faster when buffer files are 
not used. 
 

Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D. 

Vice President, Pharmacometrics, RD 

ICON Development Solutions 

7740 Milestone Parkway 

Suite 150 

Hanover, MD 21076 

Tel: (215) 616-6428 

Mob: (925) 286-0769 

Email: 

Re: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread Bill Knebel
Pascal,  

That error looks like a PSN error rather than NONMEM.  I can confirm that for 
NM7.2 the $SIZES record must be the first record of the control stream. You 
might try bypassing PSN if possible and I bet you will not get that error.

Bill



Bill Knebel, PharmD, PhD
Principal Scientist II


Metrum Research Group LLC
2 Tunxis Road,  Suite 112
Tariffville, CT  06081

  

O: 860.735.7043

C: 860.930.1370

F: 860.760.6014





On Thursday, July 12, 2012 at 11:09 AM, pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com wrote:

 Hi Nastia,  
  
 I tried your trick which would have broken the first table law rule The 
 first NM-TRAN control record must be a $PROBLEM record  and put $SIZES as 
 very first record and got following error:  
  
 _read_problems: First non-comment line in modelfile run.mod is not a $PROB 
 record. NONMEM syntax violation.  
  
 So the first table law rule still resists or you may have a different NONMEM 
 version.  :-)  
  
 I also checked the bug list 
 ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf , but nothing is 
 mentioned.  
  
 Anyway, thanks for the suggestion!  
  
 Kind regards
  
 Pascal  
  
  
  
  
 From:Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca 
 (mailto:nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca)  
 To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com), Bauer, Robert 
 robert.ba...@iconplc.com (mailto:robert.ba...@iconplc.com)  
 Date:12/07/2012 16:13  
 Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn 
 == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid  
  
  
  
 Hi Pascal,
  
 $SIZES goes at the begginning of your control stream, before $PROB.
  
 I hope it helps.
  
 Best regards,
  
 Nastya
  
  
 Nastya Kassir, Pharm.D.
  
 Senior Scientist  
  
 Pharsight Consulting Services(tm)
 A division of Certara(tm)
 Email: nkas...@pharsight.com (mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com) 
 mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com   
  
 Phone: 1 (514) 789-2180 # 2157   
 Mobile: 1 (438) 862-0935  
  
 Fax: (514) 789-2192  
  
 www.pharsight.com http://www.pharsight.com/   
  
  
 
  
 From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com (mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com) on 
 behalf of pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com (mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com)
 Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 09:21
 To: Bauer, Robert
 Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com (mailto:nmusers@globomaxnm.com); 
 olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com)@merck.de; 
 orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com)@merck.de; 
 owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com (mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com)
 Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == 
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid
  
  
 Hi Robert,  
  
 Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work.  
  
 I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion:  
$SIZES LIM1 = 2
 and I got the following error :  
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid  
  
 So I tried also the default value for LIM1:  
$SIZES LIM1=1  
 and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii  
$SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500  
 and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message.  
  
 I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find any 
 relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion?  
  
 Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able to 
 use the multi-cores when you have such long runs.  
  
 Kind regards  
  
 Pascal Girard, PhD  
 pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com (mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com)
 Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
 Global Exploratory Medicine
 Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
 Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
 Cell: +41.79.508.7898
  
  
  
  
 From:Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
 (mailto:robert.ba...@iconplc.com)  
 To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com) pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com), nmusers@globomaxnm.com 
 (mailto:nmusers@globomaxnm.com) nmusers@globomaxnm.com 
 (mailto:nmusers@globomaxnm.com)  
 Cc:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com) 
 orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com), 
 olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com) 
 olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
 (mailto:olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com)  
 Date:11/07/2012 18:55  
 Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn  
 Sent by:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com 
 (mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com)  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 Pascal:  
 I cannot help regarding having all console 

RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread pascal . girard
Hi Nastya,

You were right : it is my psn installation that refuses to see something 
else than $PROB as first line as I just checked by running it directly 
from nmfe72 

You cannot stop the progress!

Thanks again and Kind regards 

Pascal 



From:   Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca
To: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
robert.ba...@iconplc.com, nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Date:   12/07/2012 17:25
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid



Hi Pascal,
 
I have already used it with NONMEM 72 and it works, but not in psn.
 
$SIZES LIM6=1000
$PROBLEM XX
 
Best regards,
 
Nastya
 



From: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com [mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com]
Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 11:09
To: Kassir Nastya; Bauer, Robert; nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid


Hi Nastia, 

I tried your trick which would have broken the first table law rule The 
first NM-TRAN control record must be a $PROBLEM record  and put $SIZES as 
very first record and got following error: 

_read_problems: First non-comment line in modelfile run.mod is not a 
$PROB record. NONMEM syntax violation. 

So the first table law rule still resists or you may have a different 
NONMEM version.  :-) 

I also checked the bug list 
ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf 
ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf  , but 
nothing is mentioned. 

Anyway, thanks for the suggestion! 

Kind regards

Pascal 




From:Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca 
To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
Date:12/07/2012 16:13 
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid 






Hi Pascal,

$SIZES goes at the begginning of your control stream, before $PROB.

I hope it helps.

Best regards,

Nastya


Nastya Kassir, Pharm.D.

Senior Scientist 

Pharsight Consulting Services(tm)
A division of Certara(tm)
Email: nkas...@pharsight.com mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com 
mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com  

Phone: 1 (514) 789-2180 # 2157 
Mobile: 1 (438) 862-0935   
Fax: (514) 789-2192 

www.pharsight.com http://www.pharsight.com/ http://www.pharsight.com/  
 




From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com on behalf of 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 09:21
To: Bauer, Robert
Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com; olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com@merck.de; 
owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid


Hi Robert, 

Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work. 

I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion: 
   $SIZES LIM1 = 2 
and I got the following error : 
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid 

So I tried also the default value for LIM1: 
   $SIZES LIM1=1 
and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii 
   $SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500 
and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message. 

I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find 
any relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion? 


Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able 
to use the multi-cores when you have such long runs. 

Kind regards 

Pascal Girard, PhD 
pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
Global Exploratory Medicine
Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
Cell: +41.79.508.7898




From:Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com 
To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, 
nmusers@globomaxnm.com nmusers@globomaxnm.com 
Cc:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com, 
olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com 
Date:11/07/2012 18:55 
Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and 
psn 
Sent by:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com 






Pascal: 
I cannot help regarding having all console messages sent to the proper 
files in the PSN environment, but I can assist in avoiding your present 
NONMEM error.  If you insert at the beginning of the control stream file 
$SIZES LIM1=?? 
and insert a large enough value for ??, then file buffer 10 will not be 
used, and the error is avoided.  The value should be at least as large as 
the number of data records (lines) in your data file (see section I.6 of 
..\guides\nm720.pdf). 
 
Although nmfe72 in parallel mode has been tested successfully in our hands 
to use the file buffers for 

[NMusers] Mixture model

2012-07-12 Thread Fisher Dennis
Colleagues

I am analyzing data in which there are two distinct populations as a result of 
CYP2D6 deficiency.  In one dataset, there are 18 subjects with rich data; one 
of these subjects is markedly different.  In that the incidence of 2D6 
deficiency is reported to be  10%, one would expect only 1-2 deficient 
subjects in this sample (consistent with the data here).  

I was planning to use a mixture model as part of the analysis.  However, with 
only one subject in the deficient population, I am not sure if that is 
appropriate. 

Does anyone have any relevant experience or insight into this issue?

Dennis

Dennis Fisher MD
P  (The P Less Than Company)
Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784)
Fax: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784)
www.PLessThan.com



Re: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

2012-07-12 Thread Julia Korell University
Hi Pascal

According to the documentation PsN 3.4.8 and later supports $SIZES.
http://psn.sourceforge.net/pdfdocs/PsN_and_NONMEM7.pdf

We are running version 3.5.3 and that works fine.

Regards
Julia


*If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it? Albert Einstein*

*
*

http://nz.linkedin.com/in/juliakorell
LinkedInhttp://nz.linkedin.com/in/juliakorell
[image: Skype] juliakorell


On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:42 AM, pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com wrote:

 Hi Nastya,

 You were right : it is my psn installation that refuses to see something
 else than $PROB as first line as I just checked by running it directly from
 nmfe72 

 You cannot stop the progress!

 Thanks again and Kind regards

 Pascal



 From:Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca
 To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
 robert.ba...@iconplc.com, nmusers@globomaxnm.com
 Date:12/07/2012 17:25
 Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and
 psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid
 --



 Hi Pascal,

 I have already used it with NONMEM 72 and it works, but not in psn.

 $SIZES LIM6=1000
 $PROBLEM XX

 Best regards,

 Nastya


 

 From: pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com 
 [mailto:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.compascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
 ]
 Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 11:09
 To: Kassir Nastya; Bauer, Robert; nmusers@globomaxnm.com
 Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn ==
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid


 Hi Nastia,

 I tried your trick which would have broken the first table law rule The
 first NM-TRAN control record must be a $PROBLEM record  and put $SIZES as
 very first record and got following error:

 _read_problems: First non-comment line in modelfile run.mod is not a
 $PROB record. NONMEM syntax violation.

 So the first table law rule still resists or you may have a different
 NONMEM version.  :-)

 I also checked the bug list
 ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf 
 ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem720/nm720_bug_list.pdf  , but
 nothing is mentioned.

 Anyway, thanks for the suggestion!

 Kind regards

 Pascal




 From:Kassir Nastya nastya.kas...@umontreal.ca
 To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com, Bauer, Robert 
 robert.ba...@iconplc.com
 Date:12/07/2012 16:13
 Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and
 psn == Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

 




 Hi Pascal,

 $SIZES goes at the begginning of your control stream, before $PROB.

 I hope it helps.

 Best regards,

 Nastya


 Nastya Kassir, Pharm.D.

 Senior Scientist

 Pharsight Consulting Services(tm)
 A division of Certara(tm)
 Email: nkas...@pharsight.com 
 mailto:nkas...@pharsight.comnkas...@pharsight.com
 mailto:nkas...@pharsight.com nkas...@pharsight.com 

 Phone: 1 (514) 789-2180 # 2157
 Mobile: 1 (438) 862-0935

 Fax: (514) 789-2192

 www.pharsight.com http://www.pharsight.com/ http://www.pharsight.com/
 


 

 From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com on behalf of
 pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
 Sent: Thu 7/12/2012 09:21
 To: Bauer, Robert
 Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com; olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com@merck.de;
 orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com@merck.de;
 owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com
 Subject: RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and psn ==
 Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid


 Hi Robert,

 Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I could not make it work.

 I have 17,000 records. So just after $PROB. I inserted your suggestion:
   $SIZES LIM1 = 2
 and I got the following error :
Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid

 So I tried also the default value for LIM1:
   $SIZES LIM1=1
 and also the example given on page 166 of Help guide viii
   $SIZES LIM1=3 MAXFCN=200 NO=500
 and always got the Fatal Error: Record SIZES is not valid message.

 I looked into Help guide viii (pp 166-167 and 463-464) but did not find
 any relevant information how to set $SIZES. What would be your suggestion?

 Thanks again for your help, because it's highly frustrating not being able
 to use the multi-cores when you have such long runs.

 Kind regards

 Pascal Girard, PhD
 pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com
 Head of Modeling  Simulation - Oncology
 Global Exploratory Medicine
 Merck Serono S.A. · Geneva
 Tel:  +41.22.414.3549
 Cell: +41.79.508.7898




 From:Bauer, Robert robert.ba...@iconplc.com
 To:pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com pascal.gir...@merckgroup.com,
 nmusers@globomaxnm.com nmusers@globomaxnm.com
 Cc:orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com 
 orestis.papasoulio...@merckgroup.com, olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com
 olaf.lichtenber...@merckgroup.com
 Date:11/07/2012 18:55
 Subject:RE: [NMusers] Error files when using multicore runs and
 psn
 Sent by:

RE: [NMusers] Mixture model

2012-07-12 Thread Gobburu, Joga
Dear Dennis - Some approaches for you to consider:


1.   Brute Force Model: I hope there is some prior information about the CL 
for poor and extensive metabolizers.  I am also assuming the difference between 
PM and EM is meaningful. In that case, simply assume that this subject is a PM 
and estimate a fixed effect for the same. The objective function and 
uncertainty around parameter estimates should support this model over no CYP2D6 
model.

2.   Kind-of-Bayesian Model: Assuming you have the prior information on CL, 
provide a prior for the prevalence and magnitude of difference in PMs with 
perhaps a low uncertainty. This approach formally recognizes prior information, 
but materially wouldn't be different from the BFM.

Either case, in my opinion, you would want to do justice to the 11 subjects who 
you think are non-PMers with respect to point estimate and variance. The single 
PM subject is unlikely to add conclusive information especially when a key 
covariate (genotype) is missing.

[cid:image001.png@01CD6061.1420F1D0]
Joga Gobburu, PhD, FCP, MBA |  Professor | School of Pharmacy  |  School of 
Medicine
Executive Director |Center for Translational Medicine
N407, 20 N Pine, Baltimore, MD-21201
Office: (410) 706-5907   |   E-mail: 
jgobb...@rx.umaryland.edumailto:shai...@rx.umaryland.edu
To receive latest Pharmacometrics news subscribe at 
http://www.pharmacy.umaryland.edu/ctm/
To unsubscribe, send email to 
ctm-unsubscr...@lists.umaryland.edumailto:ctm-unsubscr...@lists.umaryland.edu

From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com] On 
Behalf Of Fisher Dennis
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:25 PM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: [NMusers] Mixture model

Colleagues

I am analyzing data in which there are two distinct populations as a result of 
CYP2D6 deficiency.  In one dataset, there are 18 subjects with rich data; one 
of these subjects is markedly different.  In that the incidence of 2D6 
deficiency is reported to be  10%, one would expect only 1-2 deficient 
subjects in this sample (consistent with the data here).

I was planning to use a mixture model as part of the analysis.  However, with 
only one subject in the deficient population, I am not sure if that is 
appropriate.

Does anyone have any relevant experience or insight into this issue?

Dennis

Dennis Fisher MD

P  (The P Less Than Company)

Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784)

Fax: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784)

www.PLessThan.comhttp://www.PLessThan.com

inline: image001.png