[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-28 Thread Matthew Walton
I had some of the same feelings myself. It definitely wasn't in the
mould of the traditional music for the pipes, and while I do like to see
composers and players branching out into other types of music for
instruments from time to time, in a lot of cases unless one does stick
close to the traditional style, one doesn't get the most out of the
instrument (this is something I've also observed on the recorder,
although modern recorder music is something quite evil which relies on
techniques fit to drive you mad).

But as you say, Kathryn played it well. There were some bits in there
which I definitely wouldn't have wanted to attempt on any instrument!

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 18:24 -0400, Richard Shuttleworth wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up.  I managed to catch it but was quite disappointed. 
> The pipes were under-recorded most of the time and were often drowned out by 
> the orchestra.  The second (slow) movement raised my hopes for a while but 
> sadly missed a golden opportunity to showcase the pipes, almost as though to 
> composer didn't really know how to treat the instrument and tried to bend it 
> into a classical mold instead of taking advantage of the traditional gendre 
> that the pipes could have made available to him.
> 
> None of the above detracts from Kathryn's playing, she was superb!
> 
> Just my 2 pence work,
> 
> Richard
> 
> Matthew wrote:
> 
> > It's working right now as I'm in the middle of the relevant piece.
> > Probably won't be available after today though, as they take them down
> > after seven days - may not even be available later this evening.
> >
> > I'm in no position to comment on Kathryn's playing style but it
> > certainly doesn't sound like the sort of pipe music she usually plays on
> > her albums. Of course, on her albums she's not got the Northern Sinfonia
> > playing with her either.
> >
> > Tis good.
> >
> > On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 23:47 +0200, Bart Blanquart wrote:
> >> WILLIAM REEDER wrote:
> >> > Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to find 
> >> > it.
> >>
> >> The BBC seems to be having difficulty with the archiving feature; they
> >> have 'Performance on 3' archived for all days this week but friday.
> >>
> >> At the top of their radio player
> >> (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio3.shtml) it currently says "We
> >> regret that many programmes are unavailable. We are working to restore
> >> normal service"... so hopefully it'll show up soon.
> >>
> >> Bart
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To get on or off this list see list information at
> >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >>
> >
> > -- 
> 
> 
> 

--


[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-28 Thread GibbonsSoinne
Regular readers will know I'm not a fan of KT's usual playing style, but  Max 
has got some good piping out of her. Some of the crispest rapid  staccato 
I've ever heard her play. Some open fingered trills too, mind - are  they Max's 
or hers, or did they agree on them?
 
The piece is good to listen to - but Max didn't attempt to stick to a  
Northumbrian style - what traditional elements there are come from Orkney. At  
least 
with this he has accepted the necessity with NSP of working within  the range 
of the pipes - the harmonics in his 'Cross Lane Fair' were  very unhappy. Cor 
anglais playing with NSP gives a blend of sounds worth  hearing again, and 
perhaps this is enough justify the piece.
 
The mic placement was maybe a problem - but string quartet, cor anglais and  
double bass can make quite a loud noise together if the players have to -  NSP 
is stuck with a steady mf.
 
John
 
 

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-28 Thread Chris Ormston

I managed to listen for a few minutes, then had to switch off.  The little
that I heard clearly demonstrated the composer's lack of understanding of
the instrument and its music.  Bagpipe music is all about the relationship
between melody and drones, yet we were subjected to strange intervals that
neither sit comfortably on the chanter nor relate to the drone
accompaniment.  Previous works by this composer have included a piece for
pipes which goes beyond the range of the chanter - enough said??? More
high-brow, emperor's-new-clothes fodder using the pipes as a gimmick!

Chris

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 October 2006 08:47
To: Richard Shuttleworth
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

I had some of the same feelings myself. It definitely wasn't in the
mould of the traditional music for the pipes, and while I do like to see
composers and players branching out into other types of music for
instruments from time to time, in a lot of cases unless one does stick
close to the traditional style, one doesn't get the most out of the
instrument (this is something I've also observed on the recorder,
although modern recorder music is something quite evil which relies on
techniques fit to drive you mad).

But as you say, Kathryn played it well. There were some bits in there
which I definitely wouldn't have wanted to attempt on any instrument!

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 18:24 -0400, Richard Shuttleworth wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up.  I managed to catch it but was quite
disappointed. 
> The pipes were under-recorded most of the time and were often drowned out
by 
> the orchestra.  The second (slow) movement raised my hopes for a while but

> sadly missed a golden opportunity to showcase the pipes, almost as though
to 
> composer didn't really know how to treat the instrument and tried to bend
it 
> into a classical mold instead of taking advantage of the traditional
gendre 
> that the pipes could have made available to him.
> 
> None of the above detracts from Kathryn's playing, she was superb!
> 
> Just my 2 pence work,
> 
> Richard
> 
> Matthew wrote:
> 
> > It's working right now as I'm in the middle of the relevant piece.
> > Probably won't be available after today though, as they take them down
> > after seven days - may not even be available later this evening.
> >
> > I'm in no position to comment on Kathryn's playing style but it
> > certainly doesn't sound like the sort of pipe music she usually plays on
> > her albums. Of course, on her albums she's not got the Northern Sinfonia
> > playing with her either.
> >
> > Tis good.
> >
> > On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 23:47 +0200, Bart Blanquart wrote:
> >> WILLIAM REEDER wrote:
> >> > Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to
find 
> >> > it.
> >>
> >> The BBC seems to be having difficulty with the archiving feature; they
> >> have 'Performance on 3' archived for all days this week but friday.
> >>
> >> At the top of their radio player
> >> (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio3.shtml) it currently says "We
> >> regret that many programmes are unavailable. We are working to restore
> >> normal service"... so hopefully it'll show up soon.
> >>
> >> Bart
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To get on or off this list see list information at
> >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >>
> >
> > -- 
> 
> 
> 

--







[NSP] Piping Modernism

2006-10-28 Thread Stephen Douglass
Maxwell Davies comes from the musical influences of modernism, and  
pieces like Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire..

(some might switch that piece off after 30 seconds)

The piping in the composition was unlikely to be expected, resolving  
or traditionally presented.

It still managed to make it to Radio 3 though (and the "play again"  
button) . no publicity is bad publicity...eh?

Steve Douglass




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Piping Modernism

2006-10-28 Thread Simon Knight

My reaction on first hearing was negative. After I recorded the stream,
enhanced the sound and played it on a decent hi-fi the pipes were much more
audible. They're quiet but well recorded and separated in the mix on the far
right. If you listen on headphones or computer speakers they're lost.

The same musical doubts remain though - there's little of the Northumbrian
tradition and harmonically the piece is foreign to the sound of the pipes. I
think Chris hit the right issue -  there must be some tuning and harmonics
challenges with a just G scale and the other instruments, especially with
the 'modern' scales and harmonies. But there are some melodic sections I
like and the blend with cor anglais works at times.

Instruments out of their métier seldom seem to satisfy ( I play the bassoon
and wonder why people try to play jazz on them), but after a few hearings
the piece is beginning to grow on me. 

Simon

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Douglass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:02 AM
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Piping Modernism

Maxwell Davies comes from the musical influences of modernism, and  
pieces like Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire..

(some might switch that piece off after 30 seconds)

The piping in the composition was unlikely to be expected, resolving  
or traditionally presented.

It still managed to make it to Radio 3 though (and the "play again"  
button) . no publicity is bad publicity...eh?

Steve Douglass




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[NSP] Re: Piping Modernism

2006-10-28 Thread Richard Shuttleworth

Hi Simon,

Your comments are very interesting.  How did you record this piece?  I only 
managed to listen to it the once, maybe it would grow in me if I heard it 
several times on a decent sound system (like you mentioned, my computer 
speakers were not up to the challenge).

Richard

Simon Knight wrote:

>
> My reaction on first hearing was negative. After I recorded the stream,
> enhanced the sound and played it on a decent hi-fi the pipes were much 
> more
> audible. They're quiet but well recorded and separated in the mix on the 
> far
> right. If you listen on headphones or computer speakers they're lost.
>
> The same musical doubts remain though - there's little of the Northumbrian
> tradition and harmonically the piece is foreign to the sound of the pipes. 
> I
> think Chris hit the right issue -  there must be some tuning and harmonics
> challenges with a just G scale and the other instruments, especially with
> the 'modern' scales and harmonies. But there are some melodic sections I
> like and the blend with cor anglais works at times.
>
> Instruments out of their métier seldom seem to satisfy ( I play the 
> bassoon
> and wonder why people try to play jazz on them), but after a few hearings
> the piece is beginning to grow on me.
>
> Simon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Douglass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:02 AM
> To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Subject: [NSP] Piping Modernism
>
> Maxwell Davies comes from the musical influences of modernism, and
> pieces like Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire..
>
> (some might switch that piece off after 30 seconds)
>
> The piping in the composition was unlikely to be expected, resolving
> or traditionally presented.
>
> It still managed to make it to Radio 3 though (and the "play again"
> button) . no publicity is bad publicity...eh?
>
> Steve Douglass
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
> 




[NSP] Re: Piping Modernism

2006-10-28 Thread Simon Knight
My sound card has a mixer program so I can route the output from Real Player
into my recording software. Reading the terms of use of the BBC site, I can
make a recording for my own personal use (as I could with the live FM radio
broadcast) but I can't distribute it.

-Original Message-
From: Richard Shuttleworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 3:09 PM
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu; Simon Knight
Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: Piping Modernism


Hi Simon,

Your comments are very interesting.  How did you record this piece?  I only 
managed to listen to it the once, maybe it would grow in me if I heard it 
several times on a decent sound system (like you mentioned, my computer 
speakers were not up to the challenge).

Richard

Simon Knight wrote:

>
> My reaction on first hearing was negative. After I recorded the stream,
> enhanced the sound and played it on a decent hi-fi the pipes were much 
> more
> audible. They're quiet but well recorded and separated in the mix on the 
> far
> right. If you listen on headphones or computer speakers they're lost.
>
> The same musical doubts remain though - there's little of the Northumbrian
> tradition and harmonically the piece is foreign to the sound of the pipes.

> I
> think Chris hit the right issue -  there must be some tuning and harmonics
> challenges with a just G scale and the other instruments, especially with
> the 'modern' scales and harmonies. But there are some melodic sections I
> like and the blend with cor anglais works at times.
>
> Instruments out of their métier seldom seem to satisfy ( I play the 
> bassoon
> and wonder why people try to play jazz on them), but after a few hearings
> the piece is beginning to grow on me.
>
> Simon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Douglass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:02 AM
> To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Subject: [NSP] Piping Modernism
>
> Maxwell Davies comes from the musical influences of modernism, and
> pieces like Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire..
>
> (some might switch that piece off after 30 seconds)
>
> The piping in the composition was unlikely to be expected, resolving
> or traditionally presented.
>
> It still managed to make it to Radio 3 though (and the "play again"
> button) . no publicity is bad publicity...eh?
>
> Steve Douglass
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>