Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Joseph Wright wrote:

Hans: Thanks for the quick reply. I'll suggest to the LaTeX team that we 
treat table modules as ConTeXt-specific/reserved, and will think of a 
different name.


How about `package`?

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-29 Thread Joseph Wright

On 28/10/2018 16:06, Joseph Wright wrote:

Hello all,

Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), 
I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct


     if not modules then modules = { } end
     modules[" From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for third-parties to use 
this construct, or is it 'ConTeXt maintainers only'? I'm wondering for 
code used generically: it would be good to use the same approach, but I 
don't want to tread on any reserved namespaces.


Joseph


Somehow I've managed to loose Hans' reply, but I've seen it in the 
archive :)


Hans: Thanks for the quick reply. I'll suggest to the LaTeX team that we 
treat table modules as ConTeXt-specific/reserved, and will think of a 
different name.


Joseph
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-28 Thread Hans Hagen

On 10/28/2018 5:06 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:

Hello all,

Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), 
I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct


     if not modules then modules = { } end
     modules[" From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for third-parties to use 
this construct, or is it 'ConTeXt maintainers only'? I'm wondering for 
code used generically: it would be good to use the same approach, but I 
don't want to tread on any reserved namespaces.
Hard to say ... the only generic code is the fontloader and the only 
check done there is the toplevel 'context' table, so there is not much 
change on a clash I guess. We can hardly claim a namespace, but now at 
least it's possible to see if something is meant for context (and 
originates on context, fwiw).


Anyway, I don't expect much generic code to show up. One problem I see 
is that currently, as context uses that namespace, there are no 
duplicates. So, it being used more general,  probably means that I need 
to add a mechanism that will refuse to (over)load code, but even then i 
cannot oversee implications ... For latex you can consider 
'latexmodules' ... up to you. It's too late now to change it to 
contextmodules.


Hans



-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

[NTG-context] Table "modules"

2018-10-28 Thread Joseph Wright

Hello all,

Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...), 
I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct


if not modules then modules = { } end
modules["From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for third-parties to use 
this construct, or is it 'ConTeXt maintainers only'? I'm wondering for 
code used generically: it would be good to use the same approach, but I 
don't want to tread on any reserved namespaces.


Joseph
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___