RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Greg Olson
Yep all nice and free:

http://www.infocom-if.org/downloads/downloads.html


From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

  I had all three Zorks for the Commodore 64 but I only completed the 
first one. Are any of those still out there that will run on something newer? I 
wouldn't mind spending a few hours with Zork again. LOL. I bet my wife wouldn't 
like it any better this time than last time.

Len
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Maglinger, Paul 
mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>> wrote:
Zork!  Leisure Suit Larry!


From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:22 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like "go 
right" or "look right."
Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program to win.

Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
From: stevey...@gmail.com
To: 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott 
mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, 
Paulmailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>> wrote:
>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games - if
>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
>
> They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if
> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.  And
> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!
 I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!

 The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.

 Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
1, 1980 was a Tuesday."

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~






Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See 
how.











--
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Link
Yeah, that didn't come out right.
Without VC or a SAN, the process doesn't to seem to be any harder than ESXi.



On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Jonathan Link wrote:

> I may not have played with HyperV very much, but I didn't find moving VM's
> to be any easier than with ESXi.
> Of course with a SAN and/or VirtualCenter moving VM's is fairly trivial.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
>
>> No to VMWare server.
>>
>> Qualified yes to ESXi - it's damned painful if you have to move VMs
>> between machines, and getting SSH running is not terribly intuitive,
>> but it's definitely doable.
>>
>> Sun has a virtualization product called VirtualBox, but I don't know
>> its licensing status or capabilities, and there's also Virtual Iron,
>> which I've heard good things about but haven't used, and also don't
>> know the licensing for.
>>
>> This is a decent place to start looking:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 14:15, Matthew W. Ross
>> wrote:
>> > Greetings, List.
>> >
>> > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
>> it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
>> solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently looking
>> at the free products:
>> >
>> > VMWare Server 2.0
>> > ESXi
>> > XenServer
>> > Hyper-V
>> > Any others I've missed.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
>> and express any useful experiences you've had.
>> >
>> > Thanks all,
>> >
>> >
>> > --Matt Ross
>> > Ephrata School District
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> > ~   ~
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~   ~
>>
>>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Link
I may not have played with HyperV very much, but I didn't find moving VM's
to be any easier than with ESXi.
Of course with a SAN and/or VirtualCenter moving VM's is fairly trivial.


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

> No to VMWare server.
>
> Qualified yes to ESXi - it's damned painful if you have to move VMs
> between machines, and getting SSH running is not terribly intuitive,
> but it's definitely doable.
>
> Sun has a virtualization product called VirtualBox, but I don't know
> its licensing status or capabilities, and there's also Virtual Iron,
> which I've heard good things about but haven't used, and also don't
> know the licensing for.
>
> This is a decent place to start looking:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 14:15, Matthew W. Ross
> wrote:
> > Greetings, List.
> >
> > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
> it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
> solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently looking
> at the free products:
> >
> > VMWare Server 2.0
> > ESXi
> > XenServer
> > Hyper-V
> > Any others I've missed.
> >
> > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
> and express any useful experiences you've had.
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> >
> > --Matt Ross
> > Ephrata School District
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Benjamin Zachary - Lists
I have esx just about everywhere that the machine can handle it. In hurricane 
land it just makes sense even if it’s a 1:1 to be able to quickly take a 
snapshot offsite.

Vmware Server 2.0 works and has a few more features than 1.x albeit the web 
interface is slightly annoying (it does integrate with vcenter and vm client on 
lvl4 hardware)


I am interested enough to check out HyperV for the fact that Windows7 can boot 
into it. I don’t know what the overhead of HyperV looks like compared to ESX 
but we are ramping up a lab to at least play with it.




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Len Hammond
  I had all three Zorks for the Commodore 64 but I only completed the
first one. Are any of those still out there that will run on something
newer? I wouldn't mind spending a few hours with Zork again. LOL. I bet my
wife wouldn't like it any better this time than last time.

Len

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:

>  Zork!  Leisure Suit Larry!
>
>  --
> *From:* paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:22 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>   And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like
> "go right" or "look right."
> Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program to
> win.
>
> --
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
> Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
> From: stevey...@gmail.com
> To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
>
> Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul
> wrote:
> >> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games -
> if
> >> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
> >> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
> >
> > They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> > There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if
> > there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.  And
> > once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!
>
>  I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
> never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
> big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
> the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
> remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!
>
>  The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
> came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
> in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.
>
>  Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
> 1, 1980 was a Tuesday."
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See 
> how.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Kurt Buff
No to VMWare server.

Qualified yes to ESXi - it's damned painful if you have to move VMs
between machines, and getting SSH running is not terribly intuitive,
but it's definitely doable.

Sun has a virtualization product called VirtualBox, but I don't know
its licensing status or capabilities, and there's also Virtual Iron,
which I've heard good things about but haven't used, and also don't
know the licensing for.

This is a decent place to start looking:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 14:15, Matthew W. Ross wrote:
> Greetings, List.
>
> There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and it's 
> time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server solution. As 
> our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently looking at the free 
> products:
>
> VMWare Server 2.0
> ESXi
> XenServer
> Hyper-V
> Any others I've missed.
>
> I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products, and 
> express any useful experiences you've had.
>
> Thanks all,
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Steven Peck
With both HyperV bare metal and ESXi you lose the need to manage,
maintain and update the host OS.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Damien
Solodow wrote:
> In my case at least it's nothing resembling hate, it is a capability/benefit 
> analysis that vmware server loses to esxi on every count.
> There is nothing VMware server can do that ESXi can't (assuming you're 
> dedicating a server to virtualization) and a number of things that ESXi can 
> do that Server can't. Given that, the only reason that could exist to choose 
> Server would be price. But since that's the same...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:10 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, 
> XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
>
> Just curious, but why the hate on VMWare Server 2.0?
>
> Looks like ESXi is going to be a weekend project for me. Now I need to find a 
> compatible computer to test it on...
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Steven Peck
> [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
> Sent: Thu, 11 Jun 2009
> 14:57:48 -0700
> Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware
> Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
>
>
>> Agree with dumping VMware Server 2.0 from your list.
>>
>> Go with either ESXi or the HyperV.  HyperV has a larger list of
>> hardware it will install on where ESXi is a bit more picky.  They have
>> just released v4 of ESXi and the 2008r2 version of HyperV is just
>> around the corner.
>>
>> If you have the time, I'd download both (as they are both free) fire
>> them up and install them for a week or two each.  Preferably at the
>> same time period.
>>
>> We have an older ESX environment where I work, but I have been playing
>> with HyperV at home for my test lab.
>>
>> Steven
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Damien
>> Solodow wrote:
>> > If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
>> > suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list.
>> > Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
>> > reason to go with vmware server over esxi.
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
>> > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
>> > XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
>> >
>> > Greetings, List.
>> >
>> > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
>> > it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
>> > solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
>> > looking at the free products:
>> >
>> > VMWare Server 2.0
>> > ESXi
>> > XenServer
>> > Hyper-V
>> > Any others I've missed.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
>> > and express any useful experiences you've had.
>> >
>> > Thanks all,
>> >
>> >
>> > --Matt Ross
>> > Ephrata School District
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> > ~   ~
>> >
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> > ~   ~
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~   ~
>>
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Damien Solodow
In my case at least it's nothing resembling hate, it is a capability/benefit 
analysis that vmware server loses to esxi on every count.
There is nothing VMware server can do that ESXi can't (assuming you're 
dedicating a server to virtualization) and a number of things that ESXi can do 
that Server can't. Given that, the only reason that could exist to choose 
Server would be price. But since that's the same...

-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, 
XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

Just curious, but why the hate on VMWare Server 2.0?

Looks like ESXi is going to be a weekend project for me. Now I need to find a 
compatible computer to test it on...


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Steven Peck
[mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 11 Jun 2009
14:57:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware
Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...


> Agree with dumping VMware Server 2.0 from your list.
> 
> Go with either ESXi or the HyperV.  HyperV has a larger list of
> hardware it will install on where ESXi is a bit more picky.  They have
> just released v4 of ESXi and the 2008r2 version of HyperV is just
> around the corner.
> 
> If you have the time, I'd download both (as they are both free) fire
> them up and install them for a week or two each.  Preferably at the
> same time period.
> 
> We have an older ESX environment where I work, but I have been playing
> with HyperV at home for my test lab.
> 
> Steven
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Damien
> Solodow wrote:
> > If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
> > suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list.
> > Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
> > reason to go with vmware server over esxi.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
> > XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
> >
> > Greetings, List.
> >
> > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
> > it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
> > solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
> > looking at the free products:
> >
> > VMWare Server 2.0
> > ESXi
> > XenServer
> > Hyper-V
> > Any others I've missed.
> >
> > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
> > and express any useful experiences you've had.
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> >
> > --Matt Ross
> > Ephrata School District
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
> 
> 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Just curious, but why the hate on VMWare Server 2.0?

Looks like ESXi is going to be a weekend project for me. Now I need to find a 
compatible computer to test it on...


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Steven Peck
[mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 11 Jun 2009
14:57:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware
Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...


> Agree with dumping VMware Server 2.0 from your list.
> 
> Go with either ESXi or the HyperV.  HyperV has a larger list of
> hardware it will install on where ESXi is a bit more picky.  They have
> just released v4 of ESXi and the 2008r2 version of HyperV is just
> around the corner.
> 
> If you have the time, I'd download both (as they are both free) fire
> them up and install them for a week or two each.  Preferably at the
> same time period.
> 
> We have an older ESX environment where I work, but I have been playing
> with HyperV at home for my test lab.
> 
> Steven
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Damien
> Solodow wrote:
> > If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
> > suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list.
> > Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
> > reason to go with vmware server over esxi.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
> > XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
> >
> > Greetings, List.
> >
> > There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
> > it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
> > solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
> > looking at the free products:
> >
> > VMWare Server 2.0
> > ESXi
> > XenServer
> > Hyper-V
> > Any others I've missed.
> >
> > I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
> > and express any useful experiences you've had.
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> >
> > --Matt Ross
> > Ephrata School District
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
> 
> 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread John Cook
FWIW VMware supports a lot more guest OSs than the others, something to 
consider
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
 Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

- Original Message -
From: Steven Peck 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Thu Jun 11 17:57:48 2009
Subject: Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, 
XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

Agree with dumping VMware Server 2.0 from your list.

Go with either ESXi or the HyperV.  HyperV has a larger list of
hardware it will install on where ESXi is a bit more picky.  They have
just released v4 of ESXi and the 2008r2 version of HyperV is just
around the corner.

If you have the time, I'd download both (as they are both free) fire
them up and install them for a week or two each.  Preferably at the
same time period.

We have an older ESX environment where I work, but I have been playing
with HyperV at home for my test lab.

Steven

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Damien
Solodow wrote:
> If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
> suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list.
> Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
> reason to go with vmware server over esxi.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
> XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
>
> Greetings, List.
>
> There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
> it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
> solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
> looking at the free products:
>
> VMWare Server 2.0
> ESXi
> XenServer
> Hyper-V
> Any others I've missed.
>
> I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
> and express any useful experiences you've had.
>
> Thanks all,
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Steven Peck
Agree with dumping VMware Server 2.0 from your list.

Go with either ESXi or the HyperV.  HyperV has a larger list of
hardware it will install on where ESXi is a bit more picky.  They have
just released v4 of ESXi and the 2008r2 version of HyperV is just
around the corner.

If you have the time, I'd download both (as they are both free) fire
them up and install them for a week or two each.  Preferably at the
same time period.

We have an older ESX environment where I work, but I have been playing
with HyperV at home for my test lab.

Steven

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Damien
Solodow wrote:
> If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
> suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list.
> Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
> reason to go with vmware server over esxi.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
> XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...
>
> Greetings, List.
>
> There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
> it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
> solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
> looking at the free products:
>
> VMWare Server 2.0
> ESXi
> XenServer
> Hyper-V
> Any others I've missed.
>
> I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
> and express any useful experiences you've had.
>
> Thanks all,
>
>
> --Matt Ross
> Ephrata School District
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Reimer, Mark
I've only played with ESXi. My needs, so far, have been to consolidate
low usage servers to one box to save on energy costs, and to save
purchasing new servers. I don't have to worry about fail-over, or even
"off-server" storage.

ESXi installs very easily, and works just great for me.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

Greetings, List.

There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
looking at the free products:

VMWare Server 2.0
ESXi
XenServer
Hyper-V
Any others I've missed.

I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
and express any useful experiences you've had.

Thanks all,


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Damien Solodow
If you're going to be using this in a production setting, I'd strongly
suggest striking vmware server 2.0 from your list. 
Unless you have hardware that isn't on the HCL for ESXi there is no
reason to go with vmware server over esxi.

-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi,
XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

Greetings, List.

There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and
it's time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server
solution. As our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently
looking at the free products:

VMWare Server 2.0
ESXi
XenServer
Hyper-V
Any others I've missed.

I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products,
and express any useful experiences you've had.

Thanks all,


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Free Server Virtualization Options: VMware Server, ESXi, XenServer, Hyper-V, and others...

2009-06-11 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Greetings, List.

There are so many available Virtual Server solutions available now, and it's 
time for us to look at moving from our current VMWare 1.0 server solution. As 
our budget has been greatly reduced, we are currently looking at the free 
products:

VMWare Server 2.0
ESXi
XenServer
Hyper-V
Any others I've missed.

I'm wondering if anybody can vouch for or against any of these products, and 
express any useful experiences you've had.

Thanks all,


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Leather Goddesses of Phobos...



From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009



Colossal Cave.

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Zork!  Leisure Suit Larry!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like
"go right" or "look right."  
Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program
to win.  



Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
From: stevey...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott 
wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul
wrote:
>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games
- if
>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
>

> They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell
if
> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.
And
> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!

 I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!

 The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.

 Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
1, 1980 was a Tuesday."

-- Ben


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


 

 

 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Colossal Cave.

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Zork!  Leisure Suit Larry!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like
"go right" or "look right."  
Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program
to win.  



Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
From: stevey...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott 
wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul
wrote:
>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games
- if
>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
>

> They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell
if
> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.
And
> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!

 I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!

 The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.

 Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
1, 1980 was a Tuesday."

-- Ben


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


 

 

 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Zork!  Leisure Suit Larry!



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009


And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like
"go right" or "look right."  
Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program
to win.  




Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
From: stevey...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott 
wrote:


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger,
Paul wrote:
>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that
contained games - if
>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required.
And then
>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
>

> They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't
always tell if
> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a
comma.  And
> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette
recorder!


 I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we
could
never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to
leave a
big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and
hope
the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.
I
remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high
tech!

 The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not
only
came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had
MS-DOS
in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.

 Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that
January
1, 1980 was a Tuesday."

-- Ben


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~
~   ~




 


 




Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Spiceworld

2009-06-11 Thread Phillip Partipilo
Have any of you ever been to one of these Spiceworld events?  I have been
bombarded by these emails ever since I tried Spiceworks out way back in v3
or something, and it was never really something I got around to
implementing... Seemed slow.  But anyway, the next one is in Orlando on a
Friday, and not terribly expensive at $295, and that would be a great excuse
to hit up Universal/Islands/Epcot... 

So, what are they like?  A big cowd? Or two dozen people crammed into a
little room like drivers improvement course?  Free food?  Goody bags full of
crap to take home?

 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 



THIS ELECTRONIC MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL
AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION IS 
INTENDED FOR USE BY THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. ANY OTHER INTERCEPTION,
COPYING, ACCESSING, OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY
NOTIFY THE SENDER AND DELETE THIS MAIL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS. DO NOT
FORWARD THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SENDER. 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


recover powerpoint from tmp file ?

2009-06-11 Thread Erik Goldoff
Anyone have any tricks to recover a powerpoint PPT file from the tmp file ?
Simply renaming to *.PPT did not work in one instance, in that case says it
cannot find the outline in the file, and has no text converter for that
filetype...
 
( university professor USB memory stick was corrupt, actual PPT file nowhere
to be found or recovered )
 
Thanks
 

Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread paul chinnery

And remember the old text based adventure games?  Simple commands like "go 
right" or "look right."  
Many were written in BASIC so it was pretty easy to "hack" the program to win.  

Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
From: stevey...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott  wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:


>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games - if

>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then

>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040

>

> They had those in the Commodore magazine.

> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if

> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.  And

> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!



  I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could

never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a

big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope

the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I

remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!



  The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only

came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS

in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.



  Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January

1, 1980 was a Tuesday."



-- Ben



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~   ~






 



 


_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: http://www.oovoo.com/

2009-06-11 Thread Owens, Michael
I havent tried it, but skype has always treated me well.



From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: http://www.oovoo.com/

Anyone used it?  Thoughts?

What is ooVoo?
ooVoo is FREE video calling. See up to six friends, family or colleagues at the 
same time - with video quality that's like being face-to-face the same room!

*
  Video Chat
   with up to six people at the same time.
*
  Experience
   great video and audio.
*
  See
   people without the expense of travel.
*
  Easy to Use
   for customers and businesses.




Sam Cayze
Information Technology Administrator
ROLLOUTS
ONSITE * ON DEMAND
952.279.6218...Direct Dial
612.386.3946...Mobile
877.471.6495...eFax
www.Rollouts.comhttp://www.Rollouts.com>
www.e-Technicians.net

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachment(s) are intended only for 
the designated recipient(s).   Rollouts Incorporated prohibits use, 
distribution or transmittal by or to an unintended recipient without Rollouts' 
express written approval.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
this email and notify Rollouts.








This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Juned Shaikh wrote:
> My understanding was if a script is run as
> \\domainname\netlogon\Logon.bat it will run under Logged-in user context

  I'm pretty sure your understanding is wrong.  :-)

  The path/location of the script doesn't matter.

  User logon/logoff scripts run as the user who is logging on/off.
This is the same regardless of whether the logon script is configured
via account properties or GPO.

  Machine startup/shutdown scripts run as the machine account.  The
machine account has system privileges on the machine it corresponds
to.

> If that's the case, any idea how do you run the registry keys directly as 
> part of the
> GPO and not as script within a GPO.

  I don't think you can do that.

  In your original message, you mention deleting a registry key from
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE.  You can do that from a script started by GPO, as
long as it is a computer startup script (and not a user logon script).
 The GPO will have to be assigned to the computer(s) you want to
target.  It can't be done on a per-user basis, since you can only
assign user logon/logoff scripts to users, and we've already
established that they don't have the proper permissions.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


RE: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Damien Solodow
There are two different places to run a script in a gpo. It can run as a user 
script, or a computer script. A computer script runs as localsystem. 
However, the GPO for that script has to be applied to the computer object(s) 
not the users.

-Original Message-
From: Juned Shaikh [mailto:jsha...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GPO Security Context

hmmm..

My understanding was if a script is run as 

\\domainname\netlogon\Logon.bat it will run under Logged-in user context

But the same script if run as part of GPO - It runs under LocalSystem Context.. 

If that's the case, any idea how do you run the registry keys directly as part 
of the GPO and not as script within a GPO.

Thanks in advance,
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: AD 2008 anomaly

2009-06-11 Thread Free, Bob
I wonder if it could be same issue as with the old acctinfo.dll , reason
given being it was  property page extension, and it was only available
when you navigated to a user and selected them versus doing a query (AKA
find) because a different set of properties are returned by a query.. As
opposed to a later version (acctinfo2.dll) which was a Display
Specifier. This required a DLL to be registered (like a normal COM
component) and the Display specifier for the locale you are in to be
updated in the configuration container. 

 

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AD 2008 anomaly

 

Does anyone know why when you browse to a user or group object in 2008
ADUC, you can view the "Attribute Editor" in the properties dialog, but
when you do a "Find" for a user or group, you can't view Attribute
Editor in the Properties dialog? Or is it just me?

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Juned Shaikh
hmmm..

My understanding was if a script is run as 

\\domainname\netlogon\Logon.bat it will run under Logged-in user context

But the same script if run as part of GPO - It runs under LocalSystem Context.. 

If that's the case, any idea how do you run the registry keys directly as part 
of the GPO and not as script within a GPO.

Thanks in advance,
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steve Ens
Hey I had the Tandy 1000 too!  With colour monitor...wow!

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Ben Scott  wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul
> wrote:
> >> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games -
> if
> >> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
> >> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
> >
> > They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> > There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if
> > there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.  And
> > once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!
>
>   I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
> never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
> big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
> the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
> remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!
>
>  The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
> came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
> in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.
>
>  Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
> 1, 1980 was a Tuesday."
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

http://www.oovoo.com/

2009-06-11 Thread Sam Cayze
Anyone used it?  Thoughts?
 
What is ooVoo?
ooVoo is FREE video calling. See up to six friends, family or colleagues
at the same time - with video quality that's like being face-to-face the
same room!
 
*
  Video Chat
   with up to six people at the same time.
*
  Experience
   great video and audio.
*
  See
   people without the expense of travel.
*
  Easy to Use
   for customers and businesses.
 
 

 

 

Sam Cayze
Information Technology Administrator
ROLLOUTS
ONSITE * ON DEMAND

952.279.6218...Direct Dial
612.386.3946...Mobile
877.471.6495...eFax
www.Rollouts.com http://www.Rollouts.com> 
www.e-Technicians.net  

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachment(s) are intended
only for the designated recipient(s).   Rollouts Incorporated prohibits
use, distribution or transmittal by or to an unintended recipient
without Rollouts' express written approval.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete this email and notify Rollouts.




 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Ditto for my experiences.

--
ME2


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Mayo, Bill  wrote:

> What Ben says matches my understanding.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:48 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: GPO Security Context
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Juned Shaikh wrote:
> > My understanding is that scripts running as part of Domain based GPO
> > run under LocalSystem security context right?
>
>  I believe computer start-up and shutdown scripts run under the context
> of the NT machine account in the domain.  (If the computer name is
> "FREDPC", the machine account name will be "FREDPC$".)
>
>  User logon and logoff scripts run as the user.
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>   ~
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Cassette-tape player volume control mastery was essential...

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul
> wrote:
> >> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games
> - if
> >> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And
> then
> >> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
> >
> > They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> > There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell
> if
> > there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.
> And
> > once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!
> 
>   I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
> never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
> big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
> the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
> remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!
> 
>   The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
> came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
> in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.
> 
>   Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
> 1, 1980 was a Tuesday."
> 
> -- Ben
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Mayo, Bill
What Ben says matches my understanding. 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: GPO Security Context

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Juned Shaikh wrote:
> My understanding is that scripts running as part of Domain based GPO 
> run under LocalSystem security context right?

  I believe computer start-up and shutdown scripts run under the context
of the NT machine account in the domain.  (If the computer name is
"FREDPC", the machine account name will be "FREDPC$".)

  User logon and logoff scripts run as the user.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Juned Shaikh wrote:
> My understanding is that scripts running as part of Domain based GPO run
> under LocalSystem security context right?

  I believe computer start-up and shutdown scripts run under the
context of the NT machine account in the domain.  (If the computer
name is "FREDPC", the machine account name will be "FREDPC$".)

  User logon and logoff scripts run as the user.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:
>> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games - if
>> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
>> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040
>
> They had those in the Commodore magazine.
> There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if
> there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.  And
> once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!

  I remember doing similar on a friend's Apple ][, except we could
never get the damn tape interface to work right, so we had to leave a
big note on the computer saying "DO NOT TOUCH OR TURN OFF!!" and hope
the power didn't go out, and only work on one program at a time.  I
remember when they got the upgrade to the floppy drive -- high tech!

  The first PC in my (parents) home was a Tandy 1000 SL.  It not only
came standard with floppy and a whopping 512 KB of RAM, it had MS-DOS
in *ROM* -- so you could turn it on and get right to a prompt.

  Plus it had a clock battery.  "Only IBM-PC users know that January
1, 1980 was a Tuesday."

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



GPO Security Context

2009-06-11 Thread Juned Shaikh
Hi,

Please help to understand the security context..

My understanding is that scripts running as part of Domain based GPO run under 
LocalSystem security context right? If that's the case than why am I getting 
"access denied" when I try and delete the key using command ===> reg.exe delete 
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run /v "something" /f

Please help me to understand this and what is other alternate to deleting a 
specific regitry entry.

Thanks in advance,
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Jake Gardner
I remember this book... and the hours I spent ...

 

http://www.atariarchives.org/basicgames/

 

Thanks,

 

Jake Gardner

TTC Network Administrator

Ext. 246



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Or programming in Qbasic, there is a shocker...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

My 1st computer was a Commodore PET - and then that fall, I took (and ended up 
being an asst. teacher) a programming class in 7th grade - they were using a 
mix of PET's and CBM's.

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer 
Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.  
That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola 6509 
chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory by 
piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer 
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and Alice. 
Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines 
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still 
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I need 
to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just gives me 
that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC 
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80 pages 
or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount price 
of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is easily 512mb 
for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb 
hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699, had a 
whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the 4gb-8gb range 
then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive 
was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that 
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how. 

  

 

 

 

 

Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association 

E-Mail: sean.r

Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Kurt Buff
I surely do!

Along with Creative Computing and Commodore64 magazine, and Byte, and

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:24, Christopher
Bodnar wrote:
> OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip….. I miss the old days when Computer
> Shopper was the size of a phone book and “The Hard Edge” with Bill and
> Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?
>
>
>
> Chris Bodnar, MCSE
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
> Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
> Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
> Phone: 610-807-6459
> Fax: 610-807-6003
>
> 
>
> From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines
> from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still
> trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I
> need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just
> gives me that “whatever”  face and laughs…
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
> ezi...@lifespan.org
>
> Phone:401-639-3505
>
> 
>
> From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
> Magazines from June 2000 ...
>
>
>
> Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons
>
>
>
> Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
> pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages
>
>
>
> Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
> price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
> easily 512mb for under $50
>
>
>
> Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb
> hard drives, and only cost around $2400
>
>
>
> Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
> had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
> 4gb-8gb range then )    ... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
> TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !
>
>
>
> I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost
>
>
>
> Erik Goldoff
>
> IT  Consultant
>
> Systems, Networks, & Security
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
> notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
> communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
> and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread David Lum
That's me, except it's Car & Driver back to about 1990...  Wanna know what they 
thought about the '92 SE-R? Oh lookie, it was on their 10-best! Hey look, the 
1990 'Vette has 245 horsepower wait, a 2008 CAMRY V-6 makes 268hp. DOH!

Dave

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines 
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still 
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I need 
to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just gives me 
that "whatever"  face and laughs...

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC 
Magazines from June 2000 ...

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80 pages 
or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount price 
of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is easily 512mb 
for under $50

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb 
hard drives, and only cost around $2400

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699, had a 
whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the 4gb-8gb range 
then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive 
was under $150 !

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security










~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Jacob
Adam. Tape cartilages instead of floppies.

 

From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

My 1st computer was a Commodore PET – and then that fall, I took (and ended
up being an asst. teacher) a programming class in 7th grade – they were
using a mix of PET’s and CBM’s.

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!

 

  _  

From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer
Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.
That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola
6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory
by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.


  _  

Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip….. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and “The Hard Edge” with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I
need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just
gives me that “whatever”  face and laughs…

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505

  _  

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb
hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  _  


This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 

  _  

Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
  

 

 

 

 

Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association 

E-Mail:   sean.rec...@vaopera.org
Phone:(757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}

  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season The One
You Love
Celebrate with a 2009-2010 Subscription:
 La Bohème,
 The Daughter of the
Regiment,   Don
Giovanni and   Porgy
and BessSM 
Visit us online at   www.vaopera.org or call
1-866-OPERA-VA 

  _  

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended re

RE: Clone an OS/2 Disk

2009-06-11 Thread John Aldrich
Try PartImage or PING. Both are Free / OpenSource. PartImage can be found at
www.partimage.org and PING can be found here: http://ping.windowsdream.com/

 

PING appears to be based on PartImage.

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Clone an OS/2 Disk

 

We have a large press controlled by an aging (and failing) OS/2 system.  I'd
like to at least clone the drive before it dies completely.

 

Will Symantec Ghost handle this task?  Perhaps Clonezilla?

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

  

ET E-mail Signature Logo

_

 

 

Creativity is no substitute for knowing what you are doing. 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.364 / Virus Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release Date: 06/11/09
05:53:00


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><><>

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Ziots, Edward
Or programming in Qbasic, there is a shocker...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

My 1st computer was a Commodore PET - and then that fall, I took (and ended up 
being an asst. teacher) a programming class in 7th grade - they were using a 
mix of PET's and CBM's.

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer 
Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.  
That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola 6509 
chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory by 
piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer 
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and Alice. 
Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines 
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still 
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I need 
to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just gives me 
that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC 
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80 pages 
or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount price 
of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is easily 512mb 
for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb 
hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699, had a 
whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the 4gb-8gb range 
then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive 
was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that 
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how. 

  

 

 

 

 

Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association 

E-Mail: sean.rec...@vaopera.org  
Phone:(757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}

Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season   The One You 
Love
Celebrate with a 2009-2010 Subscription: La Bohème 
 , The Daughter of the 
Regiment 

RE: server 08 firewall

2009-06-11 Thread Glen Johnson
I tried that and it still thought that network was a public net so it
blocks traffic on nic 1 also.
I understand that is fixed in 08 r2.
I did find something just after sending the original post, local
security policy.
Tell it any unidentified network is private.
We'll see if that works.
Steps.
1. run local security policy editor
2. select network list Manager Policies
3. At the right Side you can select & double click: Unidentified
Networks
4. In the location type select Private , which means that all
Unidentified networks will be consider as private profile network
5. you can also allow the user to change the Location profile

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: server 08 firewall

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Glen Johnson wrote:
> Every so often the second nic will think it is on a Public network and
then
> the windows firewall blocks lots of connectivity on all the nics.

  Can't you just disable Win Firewall for that NIC entirely?  If it's
just a crossover cable to a storage appliance, it's not like there's
much danger of unwanted traffic.  It might even help performance (I
dunno if there's a significant difference in speed between "firewalled
'Private'" and "firewall disabled", but there conceivably could be.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Gosh!  I was right.  Cool!



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


WEBES cleaner fixed it. Thanks guys.



From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


How to troubleshoot RPC Endpoint Mapper errors
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839880
 
 
Also, try running DCDiag from the Res Kit against your domain
controller. 

- Original Message - 
From: Owens, Michael   
To: NT System Admin Issues
  
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Sorry it is 2003 -  but the firewall service is disabled on both
of them.



From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the
unwanted behaviour stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the
following ports open: 
 
LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80. 

- Original Message - 
From: Maglinger, Paul   
To: NT System Admin Issues
  
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try
uninstalling WEBES.



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time.
When I join a computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints
available from the endpoint mapper"
 
Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply
and since it is intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to
believe something is set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this
before?
 
Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a
public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it
in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 



 



 



 



 



 






This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public
record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in
accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 



 



 

 




This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Free, Bob
That error indicates the RPC endpoint mapper is having trouble mapping the 
ephemeral ports (those >1024 that RPC services run on)  It sounds like it could 
be a problem with either the build or the connectivity from the location you 
are joining from if it is intermittent versus a problem with you domain 
infrastructure.

 

After starting with the obvious- making sure the RPC services are running, 
startup depends on OS and role but RPC Service should always be started and 
automatic and the RPC Locator should be at least manual and you have proper 
network connectivity to a DC, I'd troubleshoot the offending client by first 
looking in the %windir%\DEBUG\netsetup.log. That has provided me the source of 
join problems on numerous occasions. I usually don't have to look any further. 
It is cumulative and will have all the domain joining attempts. It's also very 
cool in that it persists renames so you can get a nice little history of a 
problem member server or workstation.

 

If that doesn't help, I'd work through the steps about ¾ of the way down in KB 
839880 under the "How to resolve RPC Endpoint Mapper errors" heading.

 

These 2 articles will usually work out RPC client errors

 

http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?id=839880 Troubleshooting RPC 
Endpoint Mapper errors using the Windows Server 2003 Support Tools from the 
product CD

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/325930/  How to troubleshoot 
connectivity issues that are caused by RPC client protocol registry entries

 

 

From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain

 

This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

 

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

 

Thanks guys,

Mike

 



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: AD 2008 anomaly

2009-06-11 Thread Don Guyer
Same behavior if you have the Exchange tools loaded. Can't see those
Exch related tabs when doing a Find in ADUC.

 

Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

don.gu...@prufoxroach.com

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AD 2008 anomaly

 

I have seen that, but don't know why. I recall over the years and
versions that there were always things missing from the property tabs
when you did a find.

 

 

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AD 2008 anomaly

 

Does anyone know why when you browse to a user or group object in 2008
ADUC, you can view the "Attribute Editor" in the properties dialog, but
when you do a "Find" for a user or group, you can't view Attribute
Editor in the Properties dialog? Or is it just me?

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Oops, I just re-read the post.  It's probably not WEBES.  Apologies for
the goose-chase.



From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


How to troubleshoot RPC Endpoint Mapper errors
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839880
 
 
Also, try running DCDiag from the Res Kit against your domain
controller. 

- Original Message - 
From: Owens, Michael   
To: NT System Admin Issues
  
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Sorry it is 2003 -  but the firewall service is disabled on both
of them.



From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the
unwanted behaviour stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the
following ports open: 
 
LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80. 

- Original Message - 
From: Maglinger, Paul   
To: NT System Admin Issues
  
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try
uninstalling WEBES.



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time.
When I join a computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints
available from the endpoint mapper"
 
Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply
and since it is intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to
believe something is set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this
before?
 
Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a
public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it
in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 



 



 



 



 



 






This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public
record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in
accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 


 



 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: server 08 firewall

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Glen Johnson wrote:
> Every so often the second nic will think it is on a Public network and then
> the windows firewall blocks lots of connectivity on all the nics.

  Can't you just disable Win Firewall for that NIC entirely?  If it's
just a crossover cable to a storage appliance, it's not like there's
much danger of unwanted traffic.  It might even help performance (I
dunno if there's a significant difference in speed between "firewalled
'Private'" and "firewall disabled", but there conceivably could be.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Owens, Michael
WEBES cleaner fixed it. Thanks guys.


From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain

How to troubleshoot RPC Endpoint Mapper errors
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839880

Also, try running DCDiag from the Res Kit against your domain controller.
- Original Message -
From: Owens, Michael
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Sorry it is 2003 -  but the firewall service is disabled on both of them.


From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain

Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the unwanted behaviour 
stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the following ports open:

LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80.
- Original Message -
From: Maglinger, Paul
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.


From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain

This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike


This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.














This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.










This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Orland, Kathleen
How to troubleshoot RPC Endpoint Mapper errors
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839880

Also, try running DCDiag from the Res Kit against your domain controller. 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Owens, Michael 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:04 AM
  Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


  Sorry it is 2003 -  but the firewall service is disabled on both of them.



--
  From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


  Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the unwanted 
behaviour stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the following ports open: 

  LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80. 
- Original Message - 
From: Maglinger, Paul 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.




From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a 
computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the 
endpoint mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.




 



 



 


--
  This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
  thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
  with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.




 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

server 08 firewall

2009-06-11 Thread Glen Johnson
Got one here I hope someone can help with.

Server 08 with 2 nics.

Nic 1 joined to the domain, no problem here.

Second nic connected to a Drobo Pro for iscsi use.  Direct connect, no
switches, routers or nothing.  Just a straight cable.

Nic 2 has a static IP of 192.168.50.x, same subnet as drobo.  No
gateway, no dns, just IPv4 and subnet are configured.

The 50 subnet is unique to the drobo, nowhere else on our LAN.

Every so often the second nic will think it is on a Public network and
then the windows firewall blocks lots of connectivity on all the nics.

I can manually change nic2 back to private and connectivity is restored.

Anyone know how to force nic2 to never switch to public.

Thanks.

Glen.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Tim Evans
And Dell was PC Limited


...Tim

From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer 
Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.  
That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola 6509 
chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory by 
piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.

Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC:
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com
OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer 
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and Alice. 
Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines 
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still 
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I need 
to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just gives me 
that "whatever"  face and laughs...

Z

Edward Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
ezi...@lifespan.org
Phone:401-639-3505

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC 
Magazines from June 2000 ...

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80 pages 
or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount price 
of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is easily 512mb 
for under $50

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM, 8gb 
hard drives, and only cost around $2400

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699, had a 
whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the 4gb-8gb range 
then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive 
was under $150 !

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security













This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that 
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments. Thank you.

Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See 
how.




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
They had those in the Commodore magazine.  
There was almost always a typo somewhere, or you couldn't always tell if
there was a space (or how many), or if that was a period or a comma.
And once you got it right, you could save it to your cassette recorder!
Hey, tape backup!  What a concept!



From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009


I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games -
if you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040halcyon days


2009/6/11 paul chinnery 


Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW
was Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  




Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com



OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when
Computer Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with
Bill and Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003





From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM 

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009



 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT
Pro magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling,
my Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505





From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a
couple PC Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were
about 80 pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain
discount price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory
today is easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have
64mb RAM, 8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for
only $699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server
drives in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago,
a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 
 

 
 


 





This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution,
copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
Thank you. 




Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 



 


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a 

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
See if it's running in Task Manager as a process.  Look for
Desta-something-or-other...
To remove, go here...
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/support/svctools/webes/webesdownloads.html#cle
anup
Or if you have a valid service contract on it, you can install the new
version and it will shut up for a year.



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


There are two domain controllers. (both a DL380 G4) I was not the one
who originally installed this- and I do not see WEBES on them. I looked
in services.msc and I lookedd add remove programs. I did not see it. Do
I removie it via smart start?



From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a
computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available
from the endpoint mapper"
 
Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe
something is set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?
 
Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 

 

 

 




This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread James Rankin
And God forbid that you eat a packet of crisps in the middle of it...rubber
keys and greasy ten-year-old fingers, a perfect combo!

2009/6/11 Steven M. Caesare 

>  And that’s not hard at all on a membrane keyboard…
>
>
>
> -sc
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:09 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games - if
> you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
> finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040halcyon days
>
> 2009/6/11 paul chinnery 
>
> Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer
> Discount Warehouse.
> Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.
> That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola
> 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory
> by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.
>
>  --
>
> Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
> To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> CC:
> From: christopher_bod...@glic.com
>
> OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip….. I miss the old days when Computer
> Shopper was the size of a phone book and “The Hard Edge” with Bill and
> Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?
>
>
>
> Chris Bodnar, MCSE
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
> Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
> Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
> Phone: 610-807-6459
> Fax: 610-807-6003
>   --
>
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
>
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
> magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife
> is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but
> what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004,
> she just gives me that “whatever”  face and laughs…
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
> ezi...@lifespan.org
>
> Phone:401-639-3505
>   --
>
> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
> Magazines from June 2000 ...
>
>
>
> Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons
>
>
>
> Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
> pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages
>
>
>
> Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
> price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
> easily 512mb for under $50
>
>
>
> Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
> 8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400
>
>
>
> Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
> had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
> 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
> TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !
>
>
>
> I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost
>
>
>  Erik Goldoff
>
> *IT  Consultant*
>
> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
>
> *This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
> notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
> communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
> and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. *
>   --
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See 
> how.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Sean Rector
My 1st computer was a Commodore PET - and then that fall, I took (and
ended up being an asst. teacher) a programming class in 7th grade - they
were using a mix of PET's and CBM's.

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

 

 

Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season The One You Love
Celebrate with a 2009-2010 Subscription: La Boh?me, The Daughter of the 
Regiment, Don Giovanni and Porgy and BessSM 
Visit us online at www.vaopera.org or call 1-866-OPERA-VA

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as 
recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or 
opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not necessarily 
represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have been taken to 
ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steven M. Caesare
And that's not hard at all on a membrane keyboard...

 

-sc

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games -
if you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040halcyon days

2009/6/11 paul chinnery 

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread James Rankin
I remember buying magazines for the ZX Spectrum that contained games - if
you had the patience to type in every line of code required. And then
finding there was a syntax error somewhere on line 5040halcyon days

2009/6/11 paul chinnery 

>  Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
> Computer Discount Warehouse.
> Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.
> That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola
> 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory
> by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.
>
>
> --
> Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
> To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> CC:
> From: christopher_bod...@glic.com
>
>  OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip….. I miss the old days when Computer
> Shopper was the size of a phone book and “The Hard Edge” with Bill and
> Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?
>
>
>  Chris Bodnar, MCSE
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
> Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
> Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
> Phone: 610-807-6459
> Fax: 610-807-6003
>   --
>
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
> magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife
> is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but
> what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004,
> she just gives me that “whatever”  face and laughs…
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
> ezi...@lifespan.org
>
> Phone:401-639-3505
>   --
>
> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
> Magazines from June 2000 ...
>
>
>
> Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons
>
>
>
> Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
> pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages
>
>
>
> Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
> price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
> easily 512mb for under $50
>
>
>
> Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
> 8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400
>
>
>
> Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
> had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
> 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
> TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !
>
>
>
> I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost
>
>
>  *Erik Goldoff*
>
> *IT  Consultant*
>
> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> * This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
> notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
> communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail
> and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. *
>
> --
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See 
> how.
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Owens, Michael
Sorry it is 2003 -  but the firewall service is disabled on both of them.


From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain

Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the unwanted behaviour 
stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the following ports open:

LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80.
- Original Message -
From: Maglinger, Paul
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.


From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain

This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike


This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.














This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steven M. Caesare
Ditto Assembled from a kit.

 

16K RAM pack FTW!.

 

-sc

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!

 



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Owens, Michael
There are two domain controllers. (both a DL380 G4) I was not the one who 
originally installed this- and I do not see WEBES on them. I looked in 
services.msc and I lookedd add remove programs. I did not see it. Do I removie 
it via smart start?


From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain

Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.


From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain

This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike


This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.










This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Orland, Kathleen
Also, use the DCDiag tool which can help you diagnose the state of your DC's 
and help you troubleshoot the RPC endpoint mapper: 

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839880 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Orland, Kathleen 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:58 AM
  Subject: Re: Error joining PC to a domain


  Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the unwanted 
behaviour stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the following ports open: 

  LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80. 
- Original Message - 
From: Maglinger, Paul 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.




From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a 
computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the 
endpoint mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.




 



 



 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steve Kelsay
And I remember programming for that environment! Wow. 16 K. Heavenly!

 

From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  



Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
I had a Timex Sinclair.  Cutting edge!!!



From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009


Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was
Computer Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo)
magazines.  That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with
it's Motorola 6509 chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember
doubling the memory by piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set
of chips to give me 16k.  




Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com



OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003




From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 
 

 
 


 





This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 




Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
  

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Orland, Kathleen
Server 2003? Disable the firewall if it's on and see if the unwanted behaviour 
stops. If you don't want to do that, leave the following ports open: 

LDAP 389, DNS 53, SMTP 25 or 587, POP3 110, FTP 21, HTTP 80. 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Maglinger, Paul 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:43 AM
  Subject: RE: Error joining PC to a domain


  Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.



--
  From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


  This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

  Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

  Thanks guys,
  Mike


--
  This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
  thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
  with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.




 



 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread paul chinnery

Yes, I remember Computer Shopper. I can also remember when CDW was Computer 
Discount Warehouse.
Actually, I kinda wish I had kept my old Color Computer (CoCo) magazines.  
That's back when TRS came out with their Color Computer with it's Motorola 6509 
chip.  Came with a whole 8k of memory.  I remember doubling the memory by 
piggy-backing the mem chips onto the second set of chips to give me 16k.  

Subject: RE: OT :  2000 .vs. 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:24:02 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CC: 
From: christopher_bod...@glic.com
























OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip…..
I miss the old days when Computer Shopper was the size of a phone book and “The
Hard Edge” with Bill and Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi
Cola?

 



Chris Bodnar, MCSE

Sr. Systems Engineer

Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services

Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com

Phone: 610-807-6459

Fax: 610-807-6003












From: Ziots, Edward
[mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44
AM

To: NT
 System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009



 

Smile want to see what is in my home
office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the
floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them
out, and I tell her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure
issue from like 2004, she just gives me that “whatever”  face
and laughs…

 

Z

 



Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +,
Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505











From: Erik Goldoff
[mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
6:11 PM

To: NT
 System Admin Issues

Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009



 



cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a
couple PC Magazines from June 2000 ...





 





Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 





 





Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues
were about 80 pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages





 





Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the
bargain discount price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day  
/   memory  today is easily 512mb for under $50





 





Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000
to have 64mb RAM, 8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 





 





Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard
Drive" for only $699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember
scsi server drives in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in
2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !





 





I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost





 



Erik Goldoff

IT 
Consultant

Systems,
Networks, & Security 



 



 


 

 


 


 



 










This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that 
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message 
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments.  Thank you.


_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Ziots, Edward
NICE, 

 

Of course my Wife isn't a Pack rat, I guess I am...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Lucky you. My wife would have just chucked them without a word,
especially since I threw out her stinking old slippers without asking
:-)

2009/6/11 Ziots, Edward 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Is this an HP server?  Are you running WEBES?  Try uninstalling WEBES.



From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Error joining PC to a domain


This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a
computer to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available
from the endpoint mapper"
 
Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe
something is set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?
 
Thanks guys,
Mike



This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Steven M. Caesare
H...

 

I remember the fellas from l0pht and cDc (BO for fun and profit!).

 

Loft of Doom?

 

-sc

 

From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip. I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or
communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Webster
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] 
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip... I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Also when Computer Shopper had sections for just about every PC OS on the
market.  I thought it was the Lab of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

 

Webster

  _  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro magazines
from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife is still
trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but what if I
need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004, she just
gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs.

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: DPM-2007

2009-06-11 Thread Ralph Smith
Here's a link to a Microsoft page here:

http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/dataprotectionmanager/en/us/soluti
ons-services-partners.aspx

 

Cristalink   

"Cristalink's Firestreamer allows DPM to access a wide range of non-tape
storage media, making possible long-term and off-site retention of data
without the need for tape drives."

 



From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DPM-2007

 

Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use
removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage.

I can't believe that MS didn't think of this or at least considering it.

I'm not finding much googling or binging now.

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: 

--



This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and 
destroy all copies of the original message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Error joining PC to a domain

2009-06-11 Thread Owens, Michael
This is a random event, it doesnt happen all the time. When I join a computer 
to the domain, I get "There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint 
mapper"

Everything that comes up on google doesn't seem to apply and since it is 
intermintant, it is hard to test it just leads me to believe something is 
set up incorrectly somehwhere. Has anyone seen this before?

Thanks guys,
Mike


This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Christopher Bodnar
OK, if we are on a nostalgia trip... I miss the old days when Computer
Shopper was the size of a phone book and "The Hard Edge" with Bill and
Alice. Who remembers the Loft of Doom and Pepsi Cola?

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife
is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but
what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004,
she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs.

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505

  _  

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Opensource Windows FTP servers with AD support

2009-06-11 Thread Christopher Bodnar
Have you looked at the new FTP service with IIS 7 in Windows Server 2008?
It now supports SSL. 

 

http://www.iis.net/extensions/ftp

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Opensource Windows FTP servers with AD support

 

Can anyone recommend a windows FTP server that supports AD/LDAP
authentication which isn't Filezilla (as that doesn't support LDAP) ?

 

Olly

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: AD 2008 anomaly

2009-06-11 Thread Kennedy, Jim
I have seen that, but don't know why. I recall over the years and versions that 
there were always things missing from the property tabs when you did a find.



From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: AD 2008 anomaly

Does anyone know why when you browse to a user or group object in 2008 ADUC, 
you can view the "Attribute Editor" in the properties dialog, but when you do a 
"Find" for a user or group, you can't view Attribute Editor in the Properties 
dialog? Or is it just me?





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Question using Godaddy ssl cert in ISA2006

2009-06-11 Thread Todd Lemmiksoo
Has anyone been able to install/use a Godaddy SSL cert with ISA2006?

Todd Lemmiksoo
Network Administrator

All-Mode Communications, Inc.
1725 Dryden Road
Freeville, New York  13068
(607) 347-4164 x440
1-877-ALLMODE  (toll free)
http://www.all-mode.com


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: DPM-2007

2009-06-11 Thread Steve Burkett
There was a 'How to Manage Microsoft System Center Data Protection
Manager 2007 in Large Enterprises' webcast yesterday, and a 'Cheaper,
Better Backups with Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager
2007' one coming up Friday next week, perhaps get on there and pose the
question Glen?

 

DPM 2007 Webcasts:
http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/technetmms.aspx?tab=webcasts&id=4
2555

 

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Sent: 11 June 2009 10:56
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM-2007

 

Including documentation...

 

Been working with PSS for several weeks now trying to get this product
working with SharePoint in a least privilege environment, where the
backend data is on a shared enterprise SQL Server cluster. It's not
really obvious what the requirements are permissions wise...

 

Cheers

Ken

 



From: Brian Desmond [br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 4:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM-2007

It'd be all of the above from your list.

 

It does some very slick stuff but unfortunately needs A LOT of polish
still.

 

Thanks,

Brian Desmond

br...@briandesmond.com

 

c - 312.731.3132

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM-2007

 

Good luck finding much at all about DPM... Seems like either no one is
using it, or there is just very little info on it anywhere.  The way DPM
uses tape is not very straight forward.  

 

Bob Fronk

P Please print only as needed.

 

 

 

 

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DPM-2007

 

Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use
removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage.

I can't believe that MS didn't think of this or at least considering it.

I'm not finding much googling or binging now. 
 
=== 
STEMCOR CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER NOTICE 
This e-mail is intended only for the addressees named in it. The contents 
should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. Any views or 
opinions presented are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily 
represent those of Stemcor unless otherwise specifically stated. Stemcor does 
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message nor 
responsibility for any change made to it after it was sent by the original 
sender. You are advised to carry out a virus check before opening any 
attachment as Stemcor does not accept liability for any damage sustained as a 
result of any software viruses. You should be aware that Stemcor reserves the 
right to read incoming and outgoing emails. 
===

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: DPM-2007

2009-06-11 Thread Kevin Lundy
We have had a case open with PSS on the same issue.  Only difference
is we aren't going against a cluster.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
> Including documentation...
>
> Been working with PSS for several weeks now trying to get this product
> working with SharePoint in a least privilege environment, where the backend
> data is on a shared enterprise SQL Server cluster. It's not really obvious
> what the requirements are permissions wise...
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> 
> From: Brian Desmond [br...@briandesmond.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 4:17 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DPM-2007
>
> It’d be all of the above from your list.
>
>
>
> It does some very slick stuff but unfortunately needs A LOT of polish still.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian Desmond
>
> br...@briandesmond.com
>
>
>
> c - 312.731.3132
>
>
>
> From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:19 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DPM-2007
>
>
>
> Good luck finding much at all about DPM... Seems like either no one is using
> it, or there is just very little info on it anywhere.  The way DPM uses tape
> is not very straight forward.
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
> P Please print only as needed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:21 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: DPM-2007
>
>
>
> Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use
> removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage.
>
> I can’t believe that MS didn’t think of this or at least considering it.
>
> I’m not finding much googling or binging now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



Re: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread James Rankin
Lucky you. My wife would have just chucked them without a word, especially
since I threw out her stinking old slippers without asking :-)

2009/6/11 Ziots, Edward 

>  Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
> magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my Wife
> is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell her, but
> what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from like 2004,
> she just gives me that “whatever”  face and laughs…
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
> ezi...@lifespan.org
>
> Phone:401-639-3505
>   --
>
> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT : 2000 .vs. 2009
>
>
>
> cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
> Magazines from June 2000 ...
>
>
>
> Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons
>
>
>
> Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
> pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages
>
>
>
> Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
> price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
> easily 512mb for under $50
>
>
>
> Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
> 8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400
>
>
>
> Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only $699,
> had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives in the
> 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a 1.5tb, yes
> TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !
>
>
>
> I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost
>
>
>  *Erik Goldoff*
>
> *IT  Consultant*
>
> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: DPM-2007

2009-06-11 Thread Rob Bonfiglio
On camfor Shooky baby?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Steve Ens  wrote:

> LOL, I've binged myself already!
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
> michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> binging?  really?
>>
>> --
>> ME2
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Glen Johnson  wrote:
>>
>>>  Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use
>>> removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage.
>>>
>>> I can’t believe that MS didn’t think of this or at least considering it.
>>>
>>> I’m not finding much googling or binging now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

2009-06-11 Thread Ziots, Edward
Smile want to see what is in my home office closet, Windows IT Pro
magazines from 7 years ago, stacked from the floor to the ceiling, my
Wife is still trying to get me to throw some of them out, and I tell
her, but what if I need to look something up in some obscure issue from
like 2004, she just gives me that "whatever"  face and laughs...

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

ezi...@lifespan.org

Phone:401-639-3505



From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT : 2000 .vs. 2009

 

cleaning out some old clutter in my home office, and found a couple PC
Magazines from June 2000 ...

 

Some amazing/fun/sad comparisons 

 

Although PC Mag is now out of production, the last issues were about 80
pages or so, June 2000 had 238 pages

 

Crucial was advertising memory upgrades of 64mb for the bargain discount
price of $59 versus the $110+ retail of the day   /   memory  today is
easily 512mb for under $50

 

Laptops with 'up to' 14.1" screens were touted in 2000 to have 64mb RAM,
8gb hard drives, and only cost around $2400 

 

Article from June 2000 about IBM's "Really Big Hard Drive" for only
$699, had a whopping 75gb capacity  ( I do remember scsi server drives
in the 4gb-8gb range then )... in 2009, a couple months ago, a
1.5tb, yes TERAbyte SATA drive was under $150 !

 

I almost hate to throw those old issues away  almost

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Opensource Windows FTP servers with AD support

2009-06-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What's wrong with IIS?

From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Opensource Windows FTP servers with AD support

Can anyone recommend a windows FTP server that supports AD/LDAP authentication 
which isn't Filezilla (as that doesn't support LDAP) ?

Olly





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

AD 2008 anomaly

2009-06-11 Thread James Rankin
Does anyone know why when you browse to a user or group object in 2008 ADUC,
you can view the "Attribute Editor" in the properties dialog, but when you
do a "Find" for a user or group, you can't view Attribute Editor in the
Properties dialog? Or is it just me?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: DPM-2007

2009-06-11 Thread Ken Schaefer
Including documentation...

Been working with PSS for several weeks now trying to get this product working 
with SharePoint in a least privilege environment, where the backend data is on 
a shared enterprise SQL Server cluster. It's not really obvious what the 
requirements are permissions wise...

Cheers
Ken


From: Brian Desmond [br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 4:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM-2007

It’d be all of the above from your list.

It does some very slick stuff but unfortunately needs A LOT of polish still.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

c - 312.731.3132

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM-2007

Good luck finding much at all about DPM... Seems like either no one is using 
it, or there is just very little info on it anywhere.  The way DPM uses tape is 
not very straight forward.

Bob Fronk
P Please print only as needed.




From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DPM-2007

Just learning this thing and wondering if anyone has found a way to use 
removable/portable esata drives instead of tapes for long term storage.
I can’t believe that MS didn’t think of this or at least considering it.
I’m not finding much googling or binging now.













~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Opensource Windows FTP servers with AD support

2009-06-11 Thread Oliver Marshall
Can anyone recommend a windows FTP server that supports AD/LDAP authentication 
which isn't Filezilla (as that doesn't support LDAP) ?

Olly

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~