Re: Workstation Naming Standards

2001-09-27 Thread Brian Steele
Title: RE: Workstation Naming Standards



I use something simple - three letter office code, one letter 
code for equipment type (in this case "W"), and a two digit base-36 code (00 to 
ZZ) to identify the PC. PCs are therefore named GNDW01, GNDW02,  and so 
on.
 
I tried the spreadsheet/database approach for keeping track of 
who's using what PC, but it quickly became unmanageable (read: too lazy / no 
time to keep manually updating it) - I needed something that updated that info 
real-time.  So I replaced the manually updated database with 
an exe in the logon process that records who's using what 
PC, along with other information, to a central location so there's no need to 
try and squeeze user and other info into the node name. 
 
 
Brian
  

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:11 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Workstation Naming 
  Standards
  
  
  I 
  still use non-descript names. In my case, car names, because they’re plentiful 
  and easier to remember than XXY-003DC-7T. So, my computers are named things 
  like Camry, Chevelle, Viper, Yukon, etc…. and then I just keep a spreadsheet 
  of who’s using what computer, what its IP address is, etc… That way, if 
  someone moves from one machine to another, I only have to note the change in 
  one place. 
   
  Of course, we’re small (42 
  workstations) too, so YMMV.
   
  One interesting side note 
  is that some users get really confused by this. For example, in 1995 I bought 
  a screaming fast 100MHz Pentium, and named it Mustang. Now, over the years, 
  that Mustangs is looking slower and slower, and as I got less creative at 
  finding car names, I had to settle for whatever I could find. One of our CAD 
  guys almost fell off his chair laughing when he found out his new dual 1GHz 
  Pentium III machine was named… Chevette 
  
   
  Evan
   
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:06 
  PMTo: NT System Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Workstation Naming Standards
   
  I use the user name, but 
  I've got a small 50 person installation. I change the name if the person 
  changes.  It simplifies figuring out who's having a problem, because I 
  know everyone. Tougher in a large organization. 
  I sure as heck wouldn't 
  agonize over it. You want to be able to browse a list to pinpoint who's having 
  a problem. And if necessary tie that back to some inventory/allocation 
  information.  Serial Number would probably work if you have a good 
  inventory system.   
  -Original 
  Message- 
  From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 
  27, 2001 10:11 AM 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Subject: RE: Workstation Naming 
  Standards 
  
   
  I don't use user 
  names.  What happens when that employee quits? You have to rename their 
  machine as part of setting up a new user? I would use City_Dept_JobFunction then 
  add a number for multiple job functions. DJ 
  -Original 
  Message- 
  From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:05 
  PM 
  To: NT System Admin 
  Issues 
  Subject: Workstation Naming 
  Standards 
  
   
  hi, 
  we will be deploying Win2K 
  from scratch on the user's machines (around 700) replacing NT 4. SO I 
  was reviewing our machine naming convention. 
  Our Offices are located in 
  two cities, one single domain. So far we would use something like 
  "CityName-Department-User Real Name" (where city name and department are 
  abbrevations) to name workstations. 
  Usually the NT Names are 
  the users Company ID, which is unique. 
  I was wondering how you 
  guys/girls are naming your workstations and users. 
  regards 
  Uso 
  Want to unsub? Do that 
  here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this 
  one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ 
  Want to unsub? Do that 
  here: 
  http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this 
  one first: 
  http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ 
  Want to unsub? 
  Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? 
  Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want 
  to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a 
  good FAQ? Try this one 
first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: Files keep disappearing from the winnt dir

2001-09-27 Thread Brian Steele
Title: Out of Buffer Error



WAG: Is the Task Scheduler running?  Check to see if 
anyone's set anything nasty to run.
 
Brian
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John Cesta - 
  Lists 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:07 
  AM
  Subject: Files keep disappearing from the 
  winnt dir
  
   
  I am 
  having a sort of weird problem on one of my NT4.0 SP6a servers. A while back I 
  had to clean the server - chkdsk - seemed to work ok.
   
  After that this problem keeps occurring. One day I noticed that the 
  files - not any directories just files -  in the c:\winnt directory 
  were gone except for two of them. I copied the files from another identical NT 
  box in to this server's winnt directory. A day or so later they were gone 
  again. I copied them into the dir again, a day later they are gone. I KNOW 
  that the server does not have any viruses. I can only figure that the server 
  may have a corrupt file system and needs to be cleaned once more. 
  
   
  Any 
  suggestions?
   
  John 
  Cesta
Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/





Re: SirCam Virus Problem Exchange Server

2001-09-24 Thread Brian Steele

Sounds like EXACTLY the same thing I'm going through  - a Home.com user's
system is peppering my inbox with infected messages.  Unfortunately, the
messages don't have a "From" address, so there's no way to contact the
sender about the problem!

I tried sending a message about it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but just got a form
e-mail in reply.  (Hint: If you don't want to receive the SirCam form e-mail
from Home.com, don't mention "SirCam" in your message).  In my second
attempt, I replaced SirCam with S*i*r*C*a*m and received a different form
e-mail.  No further response as yet.

so, at the moment I'm trying to configure my e-mail server to treat the
home.com server (will specifically sdc1.sfba.home.com) as a spam relay, and
block all e-mail from that server.  When the hundreds of infected messages
remain on their server instead of getting delivered to mine, perhaps then
they'll pay more attention to the problem :-).


Regards,
Brian


- Original Message -
From: "Murray Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:22 AM
Subject: SirCam Virus Problem Exchange Server


> Our webmaster seems to have found a "friend" who apparently doesn't know
she
> has the SirCam virus. We're being sent hundreds of emails from this one
> account to our webmaster. We've set up a rule to forward all these emails
to
> our webmasters delete folder, but apparently that's creating problems as
> well. Our webmaster doesn't want us to shut down that alias, so does
anyone
> have any other ideas to somehow eliminate the problem. All the email is
> coming from an address at HOME.COM.
>
> Murray
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




Re: Microsoft Has Nimda

2001-09-20 Thread Brian Steele

It's fairly easy to determine which directory you've used to install
Windows, so this can be considered only as a minor deterrent. Now, if you
were to also (1) install IIS on a different partition, and (2) configure IIS
to use host headers for all sites...


Brian

- Original Message -
From: "Clayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:31 PM
Subject: RE: Microsoft Has Nimda


How many people out there still install Windows (what ever version) into
the Winnt or Windows directory? How many of these stupid worms would die
if Windows was installed into a directory with some other name?
H.

Clayton Doige
IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I
Gameday International N.V.
Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space...

T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537
C: +5 999 563 1845
F: +5 999 733 1259
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: McCarthy, Kathleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 20, 2001 3:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft Has Nimda

Hey, I agree too.  From what I've read about Nimda thus far, it uses
exploits that there have been patches out for for months.  And the
spreading
through file sharing issue takes advantage of systems that haven't
locked
down their permissions.  I've kept my servers and workstations patched
with
the most current and I lock down my machines - I don't leave any default
permissions, I remove/disable services that aren't needed, etc.  I
haven't
been infected by anything for over 2 years now - but I have plenty of
logs
to show that I've been attacked, just none have been successful as of
yet.

I'm sure that there are/will be worms developed to exploit
vulnerabilities
that there aren't already patches for, but it seems to me that the
majority
of the worms circulating all exploit vulnerabilities that there are
already
fixes for. If someone gets hit with something there are already patches
for,
I can't feel sorry for them.

Kathleen McCarthy

-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 14:15
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft Has Nimda

I was beginning to think I was the only person who held this opinion!


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




Re: Hiub recommendations

2001-09-10 Thread Brian Steele

The SMC TigerSwitch 6724L2?  We've got one of those.  No complaints.   And
at that price you can afford to buy two and keep one as a spare :-).

Brian


- Original Message -
From: "Charles Whitby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: Hiub recommendations


>
> You can get an SMC 10/100 24-port managed switch for $652.00 from CDW
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




Re: Slightly OT: Win2K Video Capture Cards

2001-09-06 Thread Brian Steele

Just in case no-one's piped up with a solution yet...!


The ATI TV Wonder tuner card ($70) can be used to capture stills. Dead easy,
just select the video-in instead of cable-in, then use the camera icon to
grab any pics.  Alternatively, you can the digital VCR utility to record the
entire video signal to disk, then go back and grab and stills that you want.
The ATI TV Wonder VE can what you want as well, for

For more info,

http://www.ati.com/na/pages/products/pc/tv_wonder/index.html


Of course, being able to watch cable-TV on the PC comes in handy too at
times :-).

Not sure about the quality though - if you want, I can try grabbing a few
pics off my camera and send you the images so you can judge the quality for
yourself.

Note: Once properly set up, the ATI Multimedia Utilities are easy to use.
However, ATI's driver installation process seem to be in permanent beta
mode, so expect a few "issues" when trying to install them.  Once installed
though, they seem to work well.

My card was provided with older drivers that don't support W2K.  However,
you can download drivers that do support W2K from their website.

http://support.ati.com/products/pc/tuners/atitvwonder_drivers.html


Alternatively, you could simply use one of ATI's All-In-Wonder cards that
works as a normal video card as well as providing video/still capturing
facilities.  That way you can get the still-capturing without having to add
an extra card to the system.


Regards,
Brian

PS: Totally OT: Is your David Clark the creator of DUMAX?


- Original Message -
From: "Sullivan, Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: Slightly OT: Win2K Video Capture Cards


> Can anyone suggest a good video capture card for a Windows 2000 Pro
machine,
> where the normal everyday user is NOT an admin?  It doesn't need to
capture
> video, just good quality stills off of a video signal.
>
> Our Materials Lab is purchasing a "video camera" for their stereoscope
> (read: microscope) that has a video signal feed, and they would like to be
> able to capture high quality stills.
>
> TIA for any help y'all can provide...
>
> Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I  MCDBA
> David Clark Company Inc.
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm