RE: Backup Slow

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

What abt LAN response ?

> --
> From: Dominick Romano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:01 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  Backup Slow
> 
> Hello, we backup our servers with a Dell DLT 7000 7 Slot Tape Drive, using
> Veritas Backup Exec. Ver. 8. For some strange reason it is taking double
> the amount of time to backup than it used to. Does anyone have any ideas?
> Thanks.
> 
> Dominick Romano 
> Junior NT Administrator 
> Kravet Fabrics, Inc. 
> Tel:  516-293-2000 Ext: 637 
> Fax: 516-293-2158 
> < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> 
> Want to unsub? Do that here:
> http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
> Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
> http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
> 
> 

Want to unsub? Do that here:
http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub
Need a good FAQ? Try this one first:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/

RE: Nimda issue

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

HI,

 First diable TFTP by changing the line tftp 69/udp to tftp 0/udp in
services file located  drivers\etc  to avoids the spreading of virus .
> --
> From: James Costa[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:30 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  Nimda issue
> 
> Hi guys.
> I'm new to this list.  Was wondering if anyone had a problem getting rid
> of the Nimda virus?  I use InoculateIT from Computer Associates as my
> virus scanner, with newest virus update.  I think I have a pretty secure
> machine, but that's only an opinion.  I speculate I was infected thru IIS,
> as I did not have any email with the readme.exe file, and I have already
> patched the MIME header problem.  Anyways, I noticed through my firewall
> that TFTP.EXE (Trivial FTP) was trying to gain access to the internet,
> about 32 times in the middle of the night in fact.  I did not give it
> explicit access, so it's basically in my machine and can't get out, if
> it's even still on here.  I noticed, however, from my firewall logs, that
> TFTP.EXE was trying to connect to local DSL routers, and all IP's that it
> was trying to connect to had the same first two octets, and always tried
> to connect from port 69.  I speculate this is the Nimda virus, from the
> way it is randomly scanning for more computers to infect.  TFTP.EXE is a
> listening app, I believe, that waits for a signal from RIS from a remote
> machine to re-install windows.  Has anyone had this similar problem?
> Maybe I am not clear enough, do I need to specify something?  Maybe I am
> just a monkey and you guys don't want to hear about my problems?  Well, I
> appreciate any attention in advance, and if this isn't appropriate for
> this list, do not hesitate to let me know.  Thanks.
>  
> James Costa
>  
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

My point is this is a  NTlist not an Linux list,where you have to give what
NT deserves,If you don't like my comment ignore it.

> --
> From: Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:47 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled?  how to...
> 
> 
> Yeah yeah stop crying. I run openbsd. Try hacking that with apache running
> on it. I use tons of MS software. I like a lot of it. I am simply stating
> what a lot of MS people hate to admit.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: September 19, 2001 6:07 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
> 
> 
> 
> Pls keep in mind this is a NT list before your comments,I,am also a fan of
> linux but that does n't warrant such a comments in this list.
> 
> For your Information:
> 
>  Even Linux have lot of holes.
> 
> 
> 
> > --
> > From:   Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To:   NT System Admin Issues
> > Sent:   Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:03 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled?  how to...
> >
> >
> > He has a point. Even a devout MS bigot has got to be pissed at the
> number
> > of
> > patches they have had to install over the last year. Not to mention how
> > many
> > applications don't work as advertised. If he can't do MS you're going to
> > send him to a linux package?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: September 19, 2001 1:20 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
> >
> >
> >
> > You may want to watch your attitude first off -this is an NT sys admin
> > list,
> > we all have jobs because we support MS products.
> >
> > There are plenty of free proxy servers and web servers.  Check out
> > http://www.debian.org/ or any Linux site, as well.
> >
> > -K
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Matthew Western" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:23 AM
> > Subject: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
> >
> >
> > > Hi People,
> > > We like the rest of the world are getting annoyed at microsnot.  How
> do
> > i
> > > disable all web server IIS junk and keep the MX proxy enabled?  if i
> > disable
> > > the IIS in services it kills proxy too...  i've already broken one
> proxy
> > > trying to do this.
> > > regards
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: W32/Nimda.A@mm

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

I need a tool like a FixSircam Version1.0 which was released by Symantec 

> --
> From: Stuart
> Pittwood[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:57 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: W32/Nimda.A@mm
> 
> Sophos and trend scanmail can remove this as I'm sure most of the AV
> software will be able to
> 
> Stu
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 September 2001 11:41
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: W32/Nimda.A@mm
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Is any one having link for the any tool to remove W32/Nimda.A@mm worm.
> 
> 
> shankar
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

W32/Nimda.A@mm

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Hi,

 Is any one having link for the any tool to remove W32/Nimda.A@mm worm.


shankar


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Pls keep in mind this is a NT list before your comments,I,am also a fan of
linux but that does n't warrant such a comments in this list.

For your Information:

 Even Linux have lot of holes.



> --
> From: Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:03 AM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled?  how to...
> 
> 
> He has a point. Even a devout MS bigot has got to be pissed at the number
> of
> patches they have had to install over the last year. Not to mention how
> many
> applications don't work as advertised. If he can't do MS you're going to
> send him to a linux package?
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: September 19, 2001 1:20 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
> 
> 
> 
> You may want to watch your attitude first off -this is an NT sys admin
> list,
> we all have jobs because we support MS products.
> 
> There are plenty of free proxy servers and web servers.  Check out
> http://www.debian.org/ or any Linux site, as well.
> 
> -K
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Western" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:23 AM
> Subject: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
> 
> 
> > Hi People,
> > We like the rest of the world are getting annoyed at microsnot.  How do
> i
> > disable all web server IIS junk and keep the MX proxy enabled?  if i
> disable
> > the IIS in services it kills proxy too...  i've already broken one proxy
> > trying to do this.
> > regards
> > Matthew
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Have you installed NTdriverupdate for Inoculan particularly for NT platform.


> --
> From: Horst Hinz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:28 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
> 
> You can set which files to scan, I've set mine to scan for all file types.
> My problem is that inoculam stops working all the time on my server and I
> need to reboot the server to make it work again... what a pain in the but
> this software is.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:12 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
> 
> 
> I had several servers with the same problem using Inoculan for Exchange
> Server.  The problem was that only certain file types are scanned (.exe,
> .com, .bat, etc. . .) and on my servers .lnk and .pif were not scanned,
> two
> file type of which Sircam tries to send viruses as.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Said Samman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
> 
> 
> 
> I'm getting Lots of SirC32.exe viruses found on win98 and W2K stations
> 
> File Path: C:\RECYCLED\SirC32.exe
> 
> Also many of those .tmp infected files on my Norton AntiVirus Corporate
> Edition Server
> installed on NT4 SP6a
> 
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ115.tmp
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ75.tmp
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ17E.tmp
> 
> I looked everywhere and can't find any particular reason for repeated
> infections
> 
> My mail server is protected by a mail scanner
> 
> 
> Did anybody see this before.
> 
> 
> Said Samman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 416.966.4000
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

The type of files that can be scanned can be configured can be configured in
Inoculan

> --
> From: Geoff Waycik[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:41 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
> 
> I had several servers with the same problem using Inoculan for Exchange
> Server.  The problem was that only certain file types are scanned (.exe,
> .com, .bat, etc. . .) and on my servers .lnk and .pif were not scanned,
> two
> file type of which Sircam tries to send viruses as.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Said Samman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
> 
> 
> 
> I'm getting Lots of SirC32.exe viruses found on win98 and W2K stations
> 
> File Path: C:\RECYCLED\SirC32.exe
> 
> Also many of those .tmp infected files on my Norton AntiVirus Corporate
> Edition Server
> installed on NT4 SP6a
> 
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ115.tmp
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ75.tmp
> File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ17E.tmp
> 
> I looked everywhere and can't find any particular reason for repeated
> infections
> 
> My mail server is protected by a mail scanner
> 
> 
> Did anybody see this before.
> 
> 
> Said Samman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 416.966.4000
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

OT:Advance Part of Marines land in Pakistan

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Reports of US troops landing in Pakistan are seenin Indian and Pakistan
Media .See the link for details

http://www.hinduonnet.com/holnus/01151603.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Lot of loss on the side of isreal also

> --
> From: Mikelist (E-mail)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:06 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> sort of like what Israel is doing by targeting the terrorist heads?
> everyone including some americans have condemned israel's actions but its
> really the only way.
>  
> 
> --
>  
> Michael D. Plotsker 
> Technology Consultant 
> KJ Technology Consulting, Inc. 
> T. 718-575-1595 
> C. 917-406-4215 
> F. 212-202-5013 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:38 PM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   I agree.  It's time our vaunted various special forces, perhaps in
> cooperation with other special forces, start quietly putting down the
> rabid dogs without hurting the innocent. 
>
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Phillips, Glen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:28 AM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
> 
>   While those who did this (and weren't on the planes) must
> get what they deserve, does flattening a whole town or village to get just
> one of them make the US any better than them?
>
> 
>
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Banyas, Pat F. Civ
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 17:24
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
> 
>   Those that advocate waiting for a full and complete
> accounting to determine blame are WRONG.  We should retaliate NOW against
> ANY terrorist group that have EVER in the past taken ANY type of action
> against the US.  50,000 people deserve RETRIBUTION and those of us still
> here DEMAND a strong deterrent for the future.
>
>   Pat Banyas
>   US Naval Hospital Guantanamo Bay
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Phillips, Glen
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:48 AM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   My girlfrinds uncle has a law firm "next door to the
> towers"..its sure gonna be a lng day
>
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 16:44
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   Daughter just told me news reports say estimated
> 20,000 total in the two towers at that time of day.
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:41
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   I heard 50+ thousand
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:44
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   any stats on how many people work/live in the WTC
> and/or area?  i estimated around 25k-50k ...
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: MLewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:37
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   Both World Trade Center buildings have fallen.
> There is only rubble where these historic structures stood.
>
>   Marcella D. Lewis
>   Network Administrator
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>"Excellence is in the details. Give attention to
> the details and excellence will come."  (Perry Paxton)
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Roger

RE: Afgan

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

This is one of the civil wars were US sowed the seeds of terrorism at
afghanistan  for its fight against Communism.After the harvest is reaped
,The same fields have now  become full of weeds like OSMA BIN LADEN as a
result of  which now there are  more destruction to the US, Russia
(Chechenya) China(Xinjiang),EGYPT(Lowers parts of Nile
Valley),INDIA(Kashmir) with the weeds now spreading to the nieghbouring
fields of Pakistan . CHINA,RUSSIA and the other CIS states(Called Shanghai
Five) have formed a group to fight against Taliban which is one of the trees
propping  these weeds.India  along with shangai group is now trying to prop
UP Northern Alliance in afgahnisthan headed by AhmedShah Masood an Moderate
democratic  against the fight with Taliban after an Indian  plane was
hijacked last year from Kathmandu.Peshawar in pakistan is now the important
centre for all the major terrorist groups around the world actively
supported by Pakistan Intelligence agencies ISI * in bid to make India
bleeding.


   US turned blind eye for the following facts

ISI is known as  Inter Services Intelligence brain child of CIA  for it's
fight against USSR in afghanisthan which operates independent of Pakistan
goverment with it's own unaccounted  secret budget and by drug money got
peddeling drugs from Afghanistan .
 
US was unhappy that the  countries like China & Russia coming together for
the fight against Terrorism and turned a blind eye to the request from those
countries.


Threatening against INDIA when it tried to carry air strikes in the
terrorist camps in pakistan which are used by terrorist group for their
activities in India.
 
   Everyone gets wise with Experience.


If the attack is carried out by bin laden ,then there is a possibility that
nationals from pakistan or Arab nations may be involved.


 
> --
> From: Decker, Jeff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:58 AM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Afgan
> 
> Just a civil war.  The US had nothing to do with it. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: David N. Precht [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: Afgan 
> 
> 
> Confirmed ? 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 18:10 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: Afgan 
> 
> 
> 
> I also heard a radio report that Baghdad and Belgrade are under attack. 
> 
> 
> 
> Gordon Olson 
>  c.com> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>  cc: 
> 09/11/2001   Subject: RE: Afgan 
> 03:01 PM 
> Please 
> respond to 
> "NT System 
> Admin Issues" 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> anyone else see anything? 
>  -Original Message- 
>  From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>  Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:05 PM 
>  To: NT System Admin Issues 
>  Subject: Afgan 
> 
>  I am seeing missile fire in afghan on CNN?? what do we know? 
>  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> 
> 
> _ 
> 
> Do You Yahoo!? 
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Most possible culprit could be Osma bin laden afghan based terrorist,bcoz of
the kind of resources used or  it could be any one from within America

> --
> From: Phillips, Glen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:18 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> Apparently some Palestinian organisation has claimed responsibility. The
> Islamic groups have denied it all.
>  
>  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 16:43
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   You can't retaliate for the sake of retaliating.  It could be
> Americans.  
>   -Original Message-
>   From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:45 AM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>   I don't mean to promote war, but we as a country HAVE to
> retaliate to this...
>   F00k the 3rd world countries that harbor terrorists...
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:33 AM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
> 
> 
>
>
>   I watched over the television. The structures of
> both north and south towers of WTO came down with a huge blast and now
> they are basically a heap of rubble.
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:30 AM
>   To: NT System Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
>
>   Could you confirm either more or less whether the
> structures are basically now grade level? 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Roman Bogdanov [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:24 
>   To: NT System Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 
>
>   Im about 40 blocks from the towers and we were all
> told we can go home 
>   but all the bridges and subways are closed so here i
> am trying to figure 
>   out a way to get to brooklyn. 
>   Roman Bogdanov 
>   Head of IT Support 
>   Jnana Technologies Corp. 
>   www.jnana.com 
>   212-560-9151 ext. 202 
>   212-560-9066 fax 
>
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Richard Newton Jr. [
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:24 AM 
>   To: NT System Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 
>
>   Us in Jersey City, NJ (just across the water) were
> evacuated and sent 
>   home. 
>   Its going to be a long day for all. 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:26 AM 
>   To: NT System Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 
>
>   and it doesn't seem to be over yet. 
>   Jeff 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Andrew Baker [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:19 AM 
>   To: NT System Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 
>
>   This is an incredibly tragic day. 
>   Probably the most tragic for the US since the
> assassination of JFK 
> 
>   - ASB 
> 
>
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Richard McMahon [
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:07 AM 
>   To: NT System Admin Issues 
>   Subject: NewYork Terrorist Attack 
>
>

RE: Removal of computer accts

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Say 1 month

> --
> From: Martin Blackstone[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:58 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Removal of computer accts
> 
> And what is an appropriate amount of time.
> I have seen servers and desktops sit for months without use, then
> suddenly pulled back in.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:21 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removal of computer accts
> 
> 
> Is there is any option by tweaking the registry.Invalid accts are those
> which are not used over a period of time(customizable)
> 
> > --
> > From:   Andrew Baker[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To:   NT System Admin Issues
> > Sent:   Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:56 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Removal of computer accts
> > 
> > What would you consider an Invalid account, and what would happen if 
> > it was removed (automatically) by mistake?
> > 
> > You could always script something with NETDOM
> > 
> >  
> > - ASB
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:21 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Removal of computer accts
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >   Is any one in the list aware of any methods for the removal of 
> > invalid computer accounts from the servermanager  automatically other 
> > than manually deleting the same from the server manager in an NT4.0 
> > domain environment.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Removal of computer accts

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Is there is any option by tweaking the registry.Invalid accts are those
which are not used over a period of time(customizable)

> --
> From: Andrew Baker[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:56 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Removal of computer accts
> 
> What would you consider an Invalid account, and what would happen if it
> was
> removed (automatically) by mistake?
> 
> You could always script something with NETDOM
> 
>  
> - ASB
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Removal of computer accts
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>   Is any one in the list aware of any methods for the removal of invalid
> computer accounts from the servermanager  automatically other than
> manually
> deleting the same from the server manager in an NT4.0 domain environment.
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Removal of computer accts

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Hi,

  Is any one in the list aware of any methods for the removal of invalid
computer accounts from the servermanager  automatically other than manually
deleting the same from the server manager in an NT4.0 domain environment.


Thanks in advance.


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: What do you use for worldwide internet access?

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

My preferences are

uunet,worldcom

> --
> From: John Saurer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:28 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  What do you use for worldwide internet access?
> 
> Does anyone have a reccommendation for planetwide ISP? We are a small
> company and are expanding our sales force out of the country. They will
> need Internet access in Europe and Southeast Asia. I have received less
> than favorable feedback on ATT Worldnet. What do you folks use for your
> remote sales people?
> 
> TIA
> John Saurer
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: audit

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

The line which they mentioned 
 "If not set appropriately, 
 these accounts
can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to the network."does not hold
any water ,they same can done at business hours,It only reduces the risk.

  They have only added the  above line in order to "raise suspicion"
and also to validate their VALUE ADDED.







> --
> From: Roger Seielstad[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:56 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: audit
> 
> And if you listen to silly advice from a public forum, foo on you.
> 
> Certain institutions (including financialinstitutions) usually subject
> themselves to audits to earn certain certifications, such as SAS70. These
> certifications ensure the other companies they deal with that they meet a
> certain minimum set of criteria for infosec practices, physical access
> control, etc. Its a fairly detailed audit, and I could easily see why a
> credit union would want to pursue something like it.
> 
> One of our divisions runs a SAS70 certified network, because of the
> business
> they are in. There were a LOT of things that came out of it that were very
> much needed improvements. I would say less than 10% fell into the fluff
> category.
> 
> Roger
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> http://www.peregrine.com
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Herr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:04 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: audit
> > 
> > 
> > auditors are usually untrained in all aspects of network issues.
> > they usually come in and try to "raise suspicion" in order to 
> > validate their
> > VALUE ADDED.
> > 
> > if your management buys it, too bad for you.
> > 
> > if your management questions it, good for them, give them 
> > good solid answers
> > to alleviate their fears.
> > 
> > make them all happy and "re-evaluate" your security 
> > environ..reduce the
> > allowed logon windowsmaybe bump all off from 11pm to 5amas an
> > "added" security measure.
> > 
> > 
> > your management has auditors in there to do a job.like it or not.
> > go along with themshow your boss your bigger than they are.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shirley Laliberte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:04 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: audit
> > 
> > 
> > Our auditors just wrote us up.  
> > Here's their statement "The credit Union is not utilizing time/day
> > restrictions in Windows.  These setting restrict users from 
> > gaining network
> > access during non-business hours. If not set appropriately, 
> > these accounts
> > can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to the network".
> > 
> > We have not dial up connections to the network.  The only 
> > thing we have
> > setup is to allow a connection to the Exchange server for 
> > internet email.
> > We have eight digit passwords and an account is locked out 
> > after 3 invalid
> > attempts.  
> > 
> > I don't believe having logon hour restrictions will improve 
> > security but I
> > would like other opinions.
> > 
> > Opinions???
> > 
> > Shirley Laliberte
> > Quincy Municipal Credit Union
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: STRANGE undeletable directory

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

Is perl is installed on the said IIS server then there is a possibility.

shankar


> --
> From: Bunting, Jeff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:01 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> No, you misunderstood; I'm not trying to remove a directory.  I was trying
> to figure out *how* they are created.  If you look at the log xylog
> posted:
> 
> 07:55:14 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/ 257
> 
> it appears an anonymous FTP user created this directory.  I was
> experimenting on a couple of machines here but couldn't get them to create
> a
> directory that starts with "com1".  Jason showed me how to do it from a
> command line, but that doesn't work via FTP.  I tried some variations on
> it
> but haven't hit on anything yet.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> Did you try the POSIX utility rm.exe from the resource kit?
> 
> If you don't solve it soon, I've got a coworker who has solved it in the
> past with an old utility.  I'll ask him when he gets in later.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:10 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> Thanks!  I'd tried several variations but hadn't come up with that one
> yet.
> Have you got a trick to do it via FTP?
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Hodson, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:58 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> md \\.\c:\com1
>  
> to remove:
>  
> rd \\.\c:\com1
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:36 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> That is interesting; I can't seem to be able to create a directory that
> starts with "com1" by any normal means.
> -Original Message-
> From: xylog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:16 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> Just FYI these log entries are from a Windows 2KS running IIS 5.0
> 
> xylog
> - Original Message - 
> From: Bunting, Jeff 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:34 PM
> Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> This is what I was talking about earlier when it was suggested the server
> was hacked because of the funny directory names.  I was speculating there
> might be a way to create those directories with the normal permissions
> given
> to the anonymous account in a write enabled directory.  The original post
> about the server with the "aux" directory could very well have been
> hacked,
> I just wasn't sure if the presence of those directories in a public FTP
> folder was enough evidence to jump to that conclusion without looking at
> the
> logs.
> 
> I did some experimenting and found I can't create the
> "com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/" directory under IIS5.  Perhaps it can be
> done
> in IIS4?  I'm running Serv-U FTP on all of the IIS4 machines so I can't
> test
> it there.  The "+++COM2" and "null.upload" are legal though and can be
> deleted by normal means.
> 
> On a related note, I've been getting some of the same people connecting to
> my server, some warez guys from France.  I was watching their activity
> closely for awhile because they don't have download permissions from the
> uploads directory yet they continued to upload files which didn't make a
> lot
> of sense to me.  I saw attempts at downloading, but nothing to indicate
> they
> were successful or coming in by other means, so I've just started banning
> their ip ranges because I'm tired of cleaning up all of the garbage on the
> ftp site.
> 
> Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: xylog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Fw: STRANGE undeletable directory
> 
> 
> OK here is one with the "undeletable" directory. The last one was just
> plain
> dirs:
> 
> #Fields: time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status 
> 07:53:08 217.128.73.112 [10]USER anonymous 331
> 07:53:08 217.128.73.112 [10]PASS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 230
> 07:53:32 217.128.73.112 [11]USER anonymous 331
> 07:53:32 217.128.73.112 [11]PASS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 230
> 07:54:29 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD Tagged+By+Gru+++/+++/ 257
> 07:54:42 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD Tagged+By+Gru+++/+++Board/ 257
> 07:55:14 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/ 257
> < 07:55:31 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++COM2/ 257
> < 07:55:54 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD null.upload.by.derfy+++/+++/ 257
> < 07:56:11 217.128.7

RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

yes ,we need to have the same

shankar

> --
> From: Kevin Miller[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> 
> But the teaming is something that you had have third part drivers for
> from the nic builder right?
> 
> Kevinm
> ~~~
> All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
> ~~~
> please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:36 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> 
> 
> You can implement this in W2K. I have 2 NICS in all
> my production servers. They are teamed but could be
> configured as fault tolerant.
> Kent
> 
> --- Ray Zorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok. Just throwing it out as a possible explanation
> > why they have 4 nics,
> > although I would think some of these solutions would
> > work by now in w2k:
> >  
> >
> http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3957
> >
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Miller
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:10 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> > 
> > 
> > That is generally a hardware based solution. it is
> > not really supported with
> > win2k software.
> >  
> >  
> > Kevinm
> > ~~~
> > All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob
> > Barker
> > ~~~
> > please respond back to rent this ad space for your
> > needs
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:09 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Isn't there a way to combine Nics for load balancing
> > and/or better
> > throughput? I forget the term for that.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Miller [
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  ] 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:00 AM 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues 
> > Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> > 
> > 
> > Why on Earth do you have 4 nics? That would be a
> > much better way to
> > start, 
> > 
> > Kevinm
> > ~~~ 
> > All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob
> > Barker 
> > ~~~ 
> > please respond back to rent this ad space for your
> > needs 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Timothy Lowery [
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  ] 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:56 AM 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues 
> > Subject: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> > 
> > 
> > Doing a small Windows 2000 installation with 4
> > servers.  2 of the
> > servers have 4 NICs installed.  Haven't done any
> > tweaking beyond 
> > dropping the OS on the machines.  The two machines
> > with the multiple 
> > cards take almost an hour for the logon process to
> > complete.  What could 
> > be causing this problem? 
> > 
> > Please email any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  My
> > access to the
> > Internet is somewhat limited in the field, but I can
> > get my email. 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > tim
> > 
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
> 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> >
> 
> >  
> > 
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

You can do so by NIC teaming which has to be supported by the Driver of that
card.

> --
> From: Ray Zorz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:38 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> 
> Isn't there a way to combine Nics for load balancing and/or better
> throughput? I forget the term for that. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:00 AM 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> 
> 
> Why on Earth do you have 4 nics? That would be a much better way to 
> start, 
> 
> Kevinm 
> ~~~ 
> All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker 
> ~~~ 
> please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Timothy Lowery [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:56 AM 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> 
> 
> Doing a small Windows 2000 installation with 4 servers.  2 of the 
> servers have 4 NICs installed.  Haven't done any tweaking beyond 
> dropping the OS on the machines.  The two machines with the multiple 
> cards take almost an hour for the logon process to complete.  What could 
> be causing this problem? 
> 
> Please email any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  My access to the 
> Internet is somewhat limited in the field, but I can get my email. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> tim 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics

[Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy]

You can do so by NIC teaming which has to be supported by the Driver of that
card.

> --
> From: Ray Zorz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:38 PM
> To:   NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
> 
> Isn't there a way to combine Nics for load balancing and/or better
> throughput? I forget the term for that. 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:00 AM 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> 
> 
> Why on Earth do you have 4 nics? That would be a much better way to 
> start, 
> 
> Kevinm 
> ~~~ 
> All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker 
> ~~~ 
> please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Timothy Lowery [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:56 AM 
> To: NT System Admin Issues 
> Subject: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics 
> 
> 
> Doing a small Windows 2000 installation with 4 servers.  2 of the 
> servers have 4 NICs installed.  Haven't done any tweaking beyond 
> dropping the OS on the machines.  The two machines with the multiple 
> cards take almost an hour for the logon process to complete.  What could 
> be causing this problem? 
> 
> Please email any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  My access to the 
> Internet is somewhat limited in the field, but I can get my email. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> tim 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm