RE: Backup Slow
What abt LAN response ? -- From: Dominick Romano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Backup Slow Hello, we backup our servers with a Dell DLT 7000 7 Slot Tape Drive, using Veritas Backup Exec. Ver. 8. For some strange reason it is taking double the amount of time to backup than it used to. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks. Dominick Romano Junior NT Administrator Kravet Fabrics, Inc. Tel: 516-293-2000 Ext: 637 Fax: 516-293-2158 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
RE: Nimda issue
HI, First diable TFTP by changing the line tftp 69/udp to tftp 0/udp in services file located drivers\etc to avoids the spreading of virus . -- From: James Costa[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Nimda issue Hi guys. I'm new to this list. Was wondering if anyone had a problem getting rid of the Nimda virus? I use InoculateIT from Computer Associates as my virus scanner, with newest virus update. I think I have a pretty secure machine, but that's only an opinion. I speculate I was infected thru IIS, as I did not have any email with the readme.exe file, and I have already patched the MIME header problem. Anyways, I noticed through my firewall that TFTP.EXE (Trivial FTP) was trying to gain access to the internet, about 32 times in the middle of the night in fact. I did not give it explicit access, so it's basically in my machine and can't get out, if it's even still on here. I noticed, however, from my firewall logs, that TFTP.EXE was trying to connect to local DSL routers, and all IP's that it was trying to connect to had the same first two octets, and always tried to connect from port 69. I speculate this is the Nimda virus, from the way it is randomly scanning for more computers to infect. TFTP.EXE is a listening app, I believe, that waits for a signal from RIS from a remote machine to re-install windows. Has anyone had this similar problem? Maybe I am not clear enough, do I need to specify something? Maybe I am just a monkey and you guys don't want to hear about my problems? Well, I appreciate any attention in advance, and if this isn't appropriate for this list, do not hesitate to let me know. Thanks. James Costa http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
Pls keep in mind this is a NT list before your comments,I,am also a fan of linux but that does n't warrant such a comments in this list. For your Information: Even Linux have lot of holes. -- From: Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... He has a point. Even a devout MS bigot has got to be pissed at the number of patches they have had to install over the last year. Not to mention how many applications don't work as advertised. If he can't do MS you're going to send him to a linux package? -Original Message- From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 19, 2001 1:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... You may want to watch your attitude first off -this is an NT sys admin list, we all have jobs because we support MS products. There are plenty of free proxy servers and web servers. Check out http://www.debian.org/ or any Linux site, as well. -K - Original Message - From: Matthew Western [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:23 AM Subject: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... Hi People, We like the rest of the world are getting annoyed at microsnot. How do i disable all web server IIS junk and keep the MX proxy enabled? if i disable the IIS in services it kills proxy too... i've already broken one proxy trying to do this. regards Matthew http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
W32/Nimda.A@mm
Hi, Is any one having link for the any tool to remove W32/Nimda.A@mm worm. shankar http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: W32/Nimda.A@mm
I need a tool like a FixSircam Version1.0 which was released by Symantec -- From: Stuart Pittwood[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: W32/Nimda.A@mm Sophos and trend scanmail can remove this as I'm sure most of the AV software will be able to Stu -Original Message- From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 September 2001 11:41 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: W32/Nimda.A@mm Hi, Is any one having link for the any tool to remove W32/Nimda.A@mm worm. shankar http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to...
My point is this is a NTlist not an Linux list,where you have to give what NT deserves,If you don't like my comment ignore it. -- From: Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... Yeah yeah stop crying. I run openbsd. Try hacking that with apache running on it. I use tons of MS software. I like a lot of it. I am simply stating what a lot of MS people hate to admit. -Original Message- From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 19, 2001 6:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... Pls keep in mind this is a NT list before your comments,I,am also a fan of linux but that does n't warrant such a comments in this list. For your Information: Even Linux have lot of holes. -- From: Rocky Stefano[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:RE: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... He has a point. Even a devout MS bigot has got to be pissed at the number of patches they have had to install over the last year. Not to mention how many applications don't work as advertised. If he can't do MS you're going to send him to a linux package? -Original Message- From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 19, 2001 1:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... You may want to watch your attitude first off -this is an NT sys admin list, we all have jobs because we support MS products. There are plenty of free proxy servers and web servers. Check out http://www.debian.org/ or any Linux site, as well. -K - Original Message - From: Matthew Western [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:23 AM Subject: IIS disabled but proxy enabled? how to... Hi People, We like the rest of the world are getting annoyed at microsnot. How do i disable all web server IIS junk and keep the MX proxy enabled? if i disable the IIS in services it kills proxy too... i've already broken one proxy trying to do this. regards Matthew http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
The type of files that can be scanned can be configured can be configured in Inoculan -- From: Geoff Waycik[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found I had several servers with the same problem using Inoculan for Exchange Server. The problem was that only certain file types are scanned (.exe, .com, .bat, etc. . .) and on my servers .lnk and .pif were not scanned, two file type of which Sircam tries to send viruses as. -Original Message- From: Said Samman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SirC32 lots of them viruses found I'm getting Lots of SirC32.exe viruses found on win98 and W2K stations File Path: C:\RECYCLED\SirC32.exe Also many of those .tmp infected files on my Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition Server installed on NT4 SP6a File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ115.tmp File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ75.tmp File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ17E.tmp I looked everywhere and can't find any particular reason for repeated infections My mail server is protected by a mail scanner Did anybody see this before. Said Samman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 416.966.4000 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found
Have you installed NTdriverupdate for Inoculan particularly for NT platform. -- From: Horst Hinz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found You can set which files to scan, I've set mine to scan for all file types. My problem is that inoculam stops working all the time on my server and I need to reboot the server to make it work again... what a pain in the but this software is. -Original Message- From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SirC32 lots of them viruses found I had several servers with the same problem using Inoculan for Exchange Server. The problem was that only certain file types are scanned (.exe, .com, .bat, etc. . .) and on my servers .lnk and .pif were not scanned, two file type of which Sircam tries to send viruses as. -Original Message- From: Said Samman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SirC32 lots of them viruses found I'm getting Lots of SirC32.exe viruses found on win98 and W2K stations File Path: C:\RECYCLED\SirC32.exe Also many of those .tmp infected files on my Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition Server installed on NT4 SP6a File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ115.tmp File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ75.tmp File Path: C:\WINNT\Temp\APQ17E.tmp I looked everywhere and can't find any particular reason for repeated infections My mail server is protected by a mail scanner Did anybody see this before. Said Samman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 416.966.4000 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
OT:Advance Part of Marines land in Pakistan
Reports of US troops landing in Pakistan are seenin Indian and Pakistan Media .See the link for details http://www.hinduonnet.com/holnus/01151603.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
Most possible culprit could be Osma bin laden afghan based terrorist,bcoz of the kind of resources used or it could be any one from within America -- From: Phillips, Glen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack Apparently some Palestinian organisation has claimed responsibility. The Islamic groups have denied it all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 16:43 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack You can't retaliate for the sake of retaliating. It could be Americans. -Original Message- From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack I don't mean to promote war, but we as a country HAVE to retaliate to this... F00k the 3rd world countries that harbor terrorists... -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack I watched over the television. The structures of both north and south towers of WTO came down with a huge blast and now they are basically a heap of rubble. -Original Message- From: Rogers, Jeff L (OM) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack Could you confirm either more or less whether the structures are basically now grade level? -Original Message- From: Roman Bogdanov [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:24 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack Im about 40 blocks from the towers and we were all told we can go home but all the bridges and subways are closed so here i am trying to figure out a way to get to brooklyn. Roman Bogdanov Head of IT Support Jnana Technologies Corp. www.jnana.com 212-560-9151 ext. 202 212-560-9066 fax -Original Message- From: Richard Newton Jr. [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack Us in Jersey City, NJ (just across the water) were evacuated and sent home. Its going to be a long day for all. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack and it doesn't seem to be over yet. Jeff -Original Message- From: Andrew Baker [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack This is an incredibly tragic day. Probably the most tragic for the US since the assassination of JFK - ASB -Original Message- From: Richard McMahon [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NewYork Terrorist Attack Check out this link.
RE: Afgan
This is one of the civil wars were US sowed the seeds of terrorism at afghanistan for its fight against Communism.After the harvest is reaped ,The same fields have now become full of weeds like OSMA BIN LADEN as a result of which now there are more destruction to the US, Russia (Chechenya) China(Xinjiang),EGYPT(Lowers parts of Nile Valley),INDIA(Kashmir) with the weeds now spreading to the nieghbouring fields of Pakistan . CHINA,RUSSIA and the other CIS states(Called Shanghai Five) have formed a group to fight against Taliban which is one of the trees propping these weeds.India along with shangai group is now trying to prop UP Northern Alliance in afgahnisthan headed by AhmedShah Masood an Moderate democratic against the fight with Taliban after an Indian plane was hijacked last year from Kathmandu.Peshawar in pakistan is now the important centre for all the major terrorist groups around the world actively supported by Pakistan Intelligence agencies ISI * in bid to make India bleeding. US turned blind eye for the following facts ISI is known as Inter Services Intelligence brain child of CIA for it's fight against USSR in afghanisthan which operates independent of Pakistan goverment with it's own unaccounted secret budget and by drug money got peddeling drugs from Afghanistan . US was unhappy that the countries like China Russia coming together for the fight against Terrorism and turned a blind eye to the request from those countries. Threatening against INDIA when it tried to carry air strikes in the terrorist camps in pakistan which are used by terrorist group for their activities in India. Everyone gets wise with Experience. If the attack is carried out by bin laden ,then there is a possibility that nationals from pakistan or Arab nations may be involved. -- From: Decker, Jeff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Afgan Just a civil war. The US had nothing to do with it. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Afgan Confirmed ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 18:10 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Afgan I also heard a radio report that Baghdad and Belgrade are under attack. Gordon Olson golson@rsd-tTo: NT System Admin Issues c.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: 09/11/2001 Subject: RE: Afgan 03:01 PM Please respond to NT System Admin Issues anyone else see anything? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Afgan I am seeing missile fire in afghan on CNN?? what do we know? http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: Removal of computer accts
Is there is any option by tweaking the registry.Invalid accts are those which are not used over a period of time(customizable) -- From: Andrew Baker[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Removal of computer accts What would you consider an Invalid account, and what would happen if it was removed (automatically) by mistake? You could always script something with NETDOM - ASB -Original Message- From: Sankaranarayanan_Ganapathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Removal of computer accts Hi, Is any one in the list aware of any methods for the removal of invalid computer accounts from the servermanager automatically other than manually deleting the same from the server manager in an NT4.0 domain environment. Thanks in advance. http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: STRANGE undeletable directory
Is perl is installed on the said IIS server then there is a possibility. shankar -- From: Bunting, Jeff[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory No, you misunderstood; I'm not trying to remove a directory. I was trying to figure out *how* they are created. If you look at the log xylog posted: 07:55:14 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/ 257 it appears an anonymous FTP user created this directory. I was experimenting on a couple of machines here but couldn't get them to create a directory that starts with com1. Jason showed me how to do it from a command line, but that doesn't work via FTP. I tried some variations on it but haven't hit on anything yet. Jeff -Original Message- From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory Did you try the POSIX utility rm.exe from the resource kit? If you don't solve it soon, I've got a coworker who has solved it in the past with an old utility. I'll ask him when he gets in later. -Original Message- From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory Thanks! I'd tried several variations but hadn't come up with that one yet. Have you got a trick to do it via FTP? Jeff -Original Message- From: Hodson, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory md \\.\c:\com1 to remove: rd \\.\c:\com1 -Original Message- From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory That is interesting; I can't seem to be able to create a directory that starts with com1 by any normal means. -Original Message- From: xylog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: STRANGE undeletable directory Just FYI these log entries are from a Windows 2KS running IIS 5.0 xylog - Original Message - From: Bunting, Jeff To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:34 PM Subject: RE: STRANGE undeletable directory This is what I was talking about earlier when it was suggested the server was hacked because of the funny directory names. I was speculating there might be a way to create those directories with the normal permissions given to the anonymous account in a write enabled directory. The original post about the server with the aux directory could very well have been hacked, I just wasn't sure if the presence of those directories in a public FTP folder was enough evidence to jump to that conclusion without looking at the logs. I did some experimenting and found I can't create the com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/ directory under IIS5. Perhaps it can be done in IIS4? I'm running Serv-U FTP on all of the IIS4 machines so I can't test it there. The +++COM2 and null.upload are legal though and can be deleted by normal means. On a related note, I've been getting some of the same people connecting to my server, some warez guys from France. I was watching their activity closely for awhile because they don't have download permissions from the uploads directory yet they continued to upload files which didn't make a lot of sense to me. I saw attempts at downloading, but nothing to indicate they were successful or coming in by other means, so I've just started banning their ip ranges because I'm tired of cleaning up all of the garbage on the ftp site. Jeff -Original Message- From: xylog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Fw: STRANGE undeletable directory OK here is one with the undeletable directory. The last one was just plain dirs: #Fields: time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status 07:53:08 217.128.73.112 [10]USER anonymous 331 07:53:08 217.128.73.112 [10]PASS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 230 07:53:32 217.128.73.112 [11]USER anonymous 331 07:53:32 217.128.73.112 [11]PASS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 230 07:54:29 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD Tagged+By+Gru+++/+++/ 257 07:54:42 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD Tagged+By+Gru+++/+++Board/ 257 07:55:14 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++/ 257 NOTICE com1 07:55:31 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD com1.scanned.by.zog+++/+++COM2/ 257 COM2 07:55:54 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD null.upload.by.derfy+++/+++/ 257 dont know what this null thingy is 07:56:11 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD null.upload.by.derfy+++/+++COM1/ 257 07:56:29 217.128.73.112 [11]MKD
RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
You can do so by NIC teaming which has to be supported by the Driver of that card. -- From: Ray Zorz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Isn't there a way to combine Nics for load balancing and/or better throughput? I forget the term for that. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Why on Earth do you have 4 nics? That would be a much better way to start, Kevinm ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs -Original Message- From: Timothy Lowery [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Doing a small Windows 2000 installation with 4 servers. 2 of the servers have 4 NICs installed. Haven't done any tweaking beyond dropping the OS on the machines. The two machines with the multiple cards take almost an hour for the logon process to complete. What could be causing this problem? Please email any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My access to the Internet is somewhat limited in the field, but I can get my email. Thanks, tim http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics
yes ,we need to have the same shankar -- From: Kevin Miller[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics But the teaming is something that you had have third part drivers for from the nic builder right? Kevinm ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs -Original Message- From: Spencer Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics You can implement this in W2K. I have 2 NICS in all my production servers. They are teamed but could be configured as fault tolerant. Kent --- Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok. Just throwing it out as a possible explanation why they have 4 nics, although I would think some of these solutions would work by now in w2k: http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3957 http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3957 -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics That is generally a hardware based solution. it is not really supported with win2k software. Kevinm ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Isn't there a way to combine Nics for load balancing and/or better throughput? I forget the term for that. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Why on Earth do you have 4 nics? That would be a much better way to start, Kevinm ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs -Original Message- From: Timothy Lowery [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Very slow logon with Multiple Nics Doing a small Windows 2000 installation with 4 servers. 2 of the servers have 4 NICs installed. Haven't done any tweaking beyond dropping the OS on the machines. The two machines with the multiple cards take almost an hour for the logon process to complete. What could be causing this problem? Please email any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My access to the Internet is somewhat limited in the field, but I can get my email. Thanks, tim http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
