RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-06 Thread Benjamin Zachary - Lists
After poking around for several nagios installs and looking how it connects
remotely we decided to go with Servers Alive newest version. It has a little
agent that connects over any port with ssh, and then lets me do anything
inside. The agents are 25 bucks, and the software was 400 dollars, but easy
to setup and use and runs on one of our mgmt vms already running windows so
from resource perspective its all good.

Thanks



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread John Hornbuckle
If you have a Unix machine to run it...



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us





From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Monitoring Remotely

Check out Nagios
You can't beat the price! (free!).

www.nagios.orghttp://www.nagios.org

Cheers,
Cameron


From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: May-02-09 12:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Monitoring Remotely

I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor their 
lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of remote 
clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.

The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im about 
to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something similar.

Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe event 
log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like the central 
unit to determine that first (something that servers alive *does* but mostly 
for the LAN so far).

Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs internally 
so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage effectively.

Thanks









~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Mayo, Bill
We use WhatsUp Gold.  I believe it does all that you describe. 

 

From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us] 
Sent: May-02-09 12:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Monitoring Remotely

 

I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor
their lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and
out of remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized
solution.

 

The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something
similar.

 

Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like
the central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive
*does* but mostly for the LAN so far).

 

Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
effectively.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Cameron
Check out Nagios

You can't beat the price! (free!).

 

www.nagios.org

 

Cheers,

Cameron

 

 

From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us] 
Sent: May-02-09 12:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Monitoring Remotely

 

I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor their
lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.

 

The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something similar.

 

Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like the
central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive *does*
but mostly for the LAN so far).

 

Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
effectively.

 

Thanks

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:06 AM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
 Check out Nagios
 You can’t beat the price! (free!).

 If you have a Unix machine to run it…

  There are these things called Virtual Machines, you should check
them out... ;-)

  FWIW, this Google search yields some promising results:

http://www.google.com/search?q=Nagios%20appliance

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
I don't think you understood Shawn, I have two separate Nagios
installations, on here on my internal network, and one at our colo
facility.  We do use service groups/host groups in those separate instances,
but they are on two different servers in two different locations.  I have
the colo Nagios instance monitoring some connections and such into my
internal network, I have the internal Nagios doing the same kind of
monitoring things to my colo.

On my internal Nagios I have 203 hosts and 573 services being monitored, on
the colo one it's 37 hosts and 503 services.  Some of that monitoring is
redundant, meaning the internal and external are monitoring the same things,
just from different directions.  If I bounce my Exchange server, both the
internal and external Nagios monitoring notices it, and alerts on  different
things.  This kind of redundancy means that we rarely have any surprises.

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Shawn Everett sh...@tandac.com wrote:

 Haven't finished reading the rest of the thread...

 Sherry: Why not just set up seperate service/host groups for each client.
 I use client config directories with all the config for a given client
 stored in that directory.

 Separate websites are only needed if you want an easier screen to look at
 or clients to see their own devices being monitored.

 Shawn

  +1 for Nagios.  And you can use just about any old server/workstation you
  have sitting around for linux, you could even use a virtual server for it
  if
  you needed to.
 
  We use Nagios for monitoring our internal network, numerous web-sites,
 vpn
  tunnels and a bunch of servers at our colo facility.  We actually run 2
  instances of Nagios, one internal and one at the colo, they provide
 checks
  for each other, and a couple of ways of reporting it via Nagios web-site
  and
  emails.  We use our internal linux box to run a variety of things
  including
  Nagios, LDAP, SyslogNG, Cacti and even an ET game server during lunch
 time
  ;)
 
  You would still have a separate web-site for each clients location with
  Nagios, however, you can centralize the email notifications.  Nagios can
  monitor probably everything that you could think of that you would want
 to
  monitor.  On a side note, Nagios actually stands for Notices All Glitches
  In
  Our Systems.
 
  On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.gov
  wrote:
 
   We use WhatsUp Gold.  I believe it does all that you describe.
 
 
 
  *From:* Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
  *Sent:* May-02-09 12:52 AM
  *To:* NT System Admin Issues
  *Subject:* Monitoring Remotely
 
 
 
  I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor
  their
  lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
  remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.
 
 
 
  The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
  about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something
  similar.
 
 
 
  Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
  event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like
  the
  central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive
  **does**
  but mostly for the LAN so far).
 
 
 
  Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
  internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
  effectively.
 
 
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Sherry Abercrombie
 
  Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  Arthur C. Clarke
 
  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Haslet, TX, United States

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Shawn Everett
Haven't finished reading the rest of the thread...

Sherry: Why not just set up seperate service/host groups for each client. 
I use client config directories with all the config for a given client
stored in that directory.

Separate websites are only needed if you want an easier screen to look at
or clients to see their own devices being monitored.

Shawn

 +1 for Nagios.  And you can use just about any old server/workstation you
 have sitting around for linux, you could even use a virtual server for it
 if
 you needed to.

 We use Nagios for monitoring our internal network, numerous web-sites, vpn
 tunnels and a bunch of servers at our colo facility.  We actually run 2
 instances of Nagios, one internal and one at the colo, they provide checks
 for each other, and a couple of ways of reporting it via Nagios web-site
 and
 emails.  We use our internal linux box to run a variety of things
 including
 Nagios, LDAP, SyslogNG, Cacti and even an ET game server during lunch time
 ;)

 You would still have a separate web-site for each clients location with
 Nagios, however, you can centralize the email notifications.  Nagios can
 monitor probably everything that you could think of that you would want to
 monitor.  On a side note, Nagios actually stands for Notices All Glitches
 In
 Our Systems.

 On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.gov
 wrote:

  We use WhatsUp Gold.  I believe it does all that you describe.



 *From:* Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
 *Sent:* May-02-09 12:52 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Monitoring Remotely



 I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor
 their
 lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
 remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.



 The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
 about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something
 similar.



 Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
 event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like
 the
 central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive
 **does**
 but mostly for the LAN so far).



 Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
 internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
 effectively.



 Thanks




















 --
 Sherry Abercrombie

 Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
 Arthur C. Clarke

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread John Hornbuckle
Finding a machine (physical or virtual) isn't the issue. The issue is that 
we're not a Unix shop. We have no Unix systems here, and no one has any 
experience with Unix.

Learning a new OS to run a single app isn't in the cards for us.




-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Monitoring Remotely

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:06 AM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
 Check out Nagios
 You can't beat the price! (free!).

 If you have a Unix machine to run it...

  There are these things called Virtual Machines, you should check
them out... ;-)

  FWIW, this Google search yields some promising results:

http://www.google.com/search?q=Nagios%20appliance

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
+1 for Nagios.  And you can use just about any old server/workstation you
have sitting around for linux, you could even use a virtual server for it if
you needed to.

We use Nagios for monitoring our internal network, numerous web-sites, vpn
tunnels and a bunch of servers at our colo facility.  We actually run 2
instances of Nagios, one internal and one at the colo, they provide checks
for each other, and a couple of ways of reporting it via Nagios web-site and
emails.  We use our internal linux box to run a variety of things including
Nagios, LDAP, SyslogNG, Cacti and even an ET game server during lunch time
;)

You would still have a separate web-site for each clients location with
Nagios, however, you can centralize the email notifications.  Nagios can
monitor probably everything that you could think of that you would want to
monitor.  On a side note, Nagios actually stands for Notices All Glitches In
Our Systems.

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Mayo, Bill bem...@pittcountync.gov wrote:

  We use WhatsUp Gold.  I believe it does all that you describe.



 *From:* Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
 *Sent:* May-02-09 12:52 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Monitoring Remotely



 I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor their
 lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
 remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.



 The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
 about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something similar.



 Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
 event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like the
 central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive **does**
 but mostly for the LAN so far).



 Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
 internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
 effectively.



 Thanks




















-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-04 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:33 AM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
 Finding a machine (physical or virtual) isn't the issue. The issue is that 
 we're
 not a Unix shop. We have no Unix systems here, and no one has any
 experience with Unix.

  The point of the virtual appliance scenario is that the underlying
OS is largely irrelevant.  Just like many of the physical appliances
you might have might run some form of *nix internally -- it's just a
platform to deliver the application.  You don't have to worry about
installing/configuring/maintaining an OS, you're just using the
appliance's application.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-02 Thread Graeme Carstairs
We use hounddog. They provide a central hosted monitoring agents on
client servers or desktops. Dashboard and email alerts etc , can
config 5 10 or 15 min checks throughout the day. Plus seperate daily
checks for av backup disk space etc. They are constantly adding new
features like service start asset checks etc

They are Dundee based but I cannot remember there ful URL

Graeme

On 02/05/2009, Benjamin Zachary - Lists li...@levelfive.us wrote:
 I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor their
 lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
 remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.



 The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
 about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something similar.



 Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
 event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like the
 central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive *does*
 but mostly for the LAN so far).



 Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
 internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
 effectively.



 Thanks


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-02 Thread Benjamin Zachary - Lists
Looks interesting, as a SAAS solution. Any idea how much? They want me to
fill out a form for a price guide. Im sure theres lots of different things,
just trying to get a general idea.

I see the new Servers Alive has a 'remote agent' feature. Looks promising
too, an 800k service taking 2mb ram to relay alerts back to a central
server. 

-Original Message-
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 4:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Monitoring Remotely

We use hounddog. They provide a central hosted monitoring agents on
client servers or desktops. Dashboard and email alerts etc , can
config 5 10 or 15 min checks throughout the day. Plus seperate daily
checks for av backup disk space etc. They are constantly adding new
features like service start asset checks etc

They are Dundee based but I cannot remember there ful URL

Graeme

On 02/05/2009, Benjamin Zachary - Lists li...@levelfive.us wrote:
 I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor
their
 lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
 remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.



 The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
 about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something similar.



 Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
 event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like
the
 central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive *does*
 but mostly for the LAN so far).



 Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
 internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
 effectively.



 Thanks


 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Monitoring Remotely

2009-05-02 Thread Graeme Carstairs
Off the top of my head I cant remember,
We have 15 different customers running approx 22 servers being monitored
with hounddog.

The costs vary depending if you want 5 or 15 minute checks, how many
servers, client confidence notes etc.

We have some customers getting notes.

Basically we get the daily check results e-mailed to us by 9am, then have
untill 10:30 to fix any alerts, then the client confidence notes are sent to
the customer, saying that all tests are passed.

Thenb throughout the rest of the day we get alerts if any of the 24 x 7
checks fail, service stopped, communication lost to agent and pings etc that
can be configured.

Works well for us and our customers like the client confidence notes (though
we only offer it to those we think are intelligent enough to understand them
:) )

I think our monthly houndog bill is approx £45 - 90 but then it was a long
time ago i set up the deal with them, and the pricing may have changed.

Also the agent can be branded so it installs and runs as Benjamins
Monitoring Agent., as does the confidence notes etc., so client sees it as
yours.

Graeme


2009/5/2 Benjamin Zachary - Lists li...@levelfive.us

 Looks interesting, as a SAAS solution. Any idea how much? They want me to
 fill out a form for a price guide. Im sure theres lots of different things,
 just trying to get a general idea.

 I see the new Servers Alive has a 'remote agent' feature. Looks promising
 too, an 800k service taking 2mb ram to relay alerts back to a central
 server.

 -Original Message-
 From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 4:40 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Monitoring Remotely

 We use hounddog. They provide a central hosted monitoring agents on
 client servers or desktops. Dashboard and email alerts etc , can
 config 5 10 or 15 min checks throughout the day. Plus seperate daily
 checks for av backup disk space etc. They are constantly adding new
 features like service start asset checks etc

 They are Dundee based but I cannot remember there ful URL

 Graeme

 On 02/05/2009, Benjamin Zachary - Lists li...@levelfive.us wrote:
  I have been using Servers Alive for a lot of my clients who I monitor
 their
  lan. However, its getting a little large and tedious to go in and out of
  remote clients and I was hoping for like a more centralized solution.
 
 
 
  The newest Servers Alive has a remote agent that talks over ssh that Im
  about to test, but was wondering if anyone else knew of something
 similar.
 
 
 
  Basically I would like to monitor cpu/ram/disk/a few services, and maybe
  event log would be nice. However, if the internet goes down I would like
 the
  central unit to determine that first (something that servers alive *does*
  but mostly for the LAN so far).
 
 
 
  Right now I simply ping and/or port test remotely and then SA runs
  internally so I have it covered but its too much at this point to manage
  effectively.
 
 
 
  Thanks
 
 
  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


 --
 Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~




-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

Steve Martin http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/steve_martin.html
- I've got to keep breathing. It'll be my worst business mistake if I
don't.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~