Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

2012-03-22 Thread James Rankin
That sounds like some spammers/scammers have a sense of humour. Admittedly,
it's quite funny - if you're not the idiot who's bank account is being
emptied.

On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patsy Mark?
 YGtBFKM.

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Smith 
 m...@gatewayindustries.orgwrote:

 I recently missed an opportunity to obtain a 45 million dollar
 inheritance that was being held for me in an “ESCROW account with the HSBC
 Bank in 

 London by order of the African DevelopmentBank”.  My dithering over the
 uncertainty of replying with to the email with my name, SSN, bank account
 and routing information likely cost me dearly.

 ** **

 I don’t know why I was hesitant, after all how could I doubt a message
 signed by “Dr Patsy Mark”?

 ** **

 *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:37 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

 ** **

 do NOT fall for it !  Doctor Peter McWealth is related to Scrooge McDuck
 , and you know how fickle and nefarious those cartoon animals can be !***
 *

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:54 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 I just received an email from the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery
 Prizes, signed in the glorious name of Doctor Peter McWealth. I am
 thoroughly convinced of its authenticity, having read that name.

 The fact that the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes' esteemed
 Doctor of Riches uses a Yahoo.com email address as well only makes me more
 determined to give them my bank details.

 The sad thing is, for this approach to have made it out there, means it
 must have worked at some point? Surely not?

 --
 http://appsensebigot.blogspot.​co.ukhttp://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/

 IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

 I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
 received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
 anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
 legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must
 never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent,
 sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted,
 amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm
 animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent
 minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent
 in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but
 it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of
 said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway,
 but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung,
 drawn and quartered.

 I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
 been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't
 responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so
 I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions
 are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit
 of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that
 statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an
 opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would
 provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
 addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
 for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some
 level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in
 some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward
 disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be
 unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell
 makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement
 immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the
 sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending
 emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my
 status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of
 my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or insert
 country name here's Got Talent.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.​com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/​
 ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.​com/read/my_forums/http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to 
 listmanager@lyris.​sunbeltsoftware.comlistmana

Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

2012-03-22 Thread Jonathan Link
I wonder if it was some paid translator somewhere...

Sure, I'll translate this letter for you.  And the best name for you to use
is Patsy Mark.  Mark Patsy also works if you need to mix up genders.  It's
a twofer...

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.comwrote:

 That sounds like some spammers/scammers have a sense of humour.
 Admittedly, it's quite funny - if you're not the idiot who's bank account
 is being emptied.

 On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patsy Mark?
 YGtBFKM.

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Smith 
 m...@gatewayindustries.orgwrote:

 I recently missed an opportunity to obtain a 45 million dollar
 inheritance that was being held for me in an “ESCROW account with the HSBC
 Bank in 

 London by order of the African DevelopmentBank”.  My dithering over the
 uncertainty of replying with to the email with my name, SSN, bank account
 and routing information likely cost me dearly.

 ** **

 I don’t know why I was hesitant, after all how could I doubt a message
 signed by “Dr Patsy Mark”?

 ** **

 *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:37 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

 ** **

 do NOT fall for it !  Doctor Peter McWealth is related to Scrooge McDuck
 , and you know how fickle and nefarious those cartoon animals can be !**
 **

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:54 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 I just received an email from the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery
 Prizes, signed in the glorious name of Doctor Peter McWealth. I am
 thoroughly convinced of its authenticity, having read that name.

 The fact that the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes' esteemed
 Doctor of Riches uses a Yahoo.com email address as well only makes me more
 determined to give them my bank details.

 The sad thing is, for this approach to have made it out there, means it
 must have worked at some point? Surely not?

 --
 http://appsensebigot.blogspot.​co.ukhttp://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/

 IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

 I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
 received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
 anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
 legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must
 never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent,
 sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted,
 amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm
 animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent
 minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent
 in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but
 it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of
 said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway,
 but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung,
 drawn and quartered.

 I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
 been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't
 responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so
 I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions
 are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit
 of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that
 statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an
 opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would
 provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
 addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
 for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some
 level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in
 some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward
 disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be
 unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell
 makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement
 immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the
 sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending
 emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my
 status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of
 my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or insert
 country name here's Got Talent.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.​com/Business

Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

2012-03-22 Thread James Rankin
Amusingly, GMail marked my message as spam. I have unmarked it but wonder
if I am now going to get a load of mails from Patsy Mark of HSBC.

On 22 March 2012 14:45, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:

 That sounds like some spammers/scammers have a sense of humour.
 Admittedly, it's quite funny - if you're not the idiot who's bank account
 is being emptied.


 On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patsy Mark?
 YGtBFKM.

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Smith 
 m...@gatewayindustries.orgwrote:

 I recently missed an opportunity to obtain a 45 million dollar
 inheritance that was being held for me in an “ESCROW account with the HSBC
 Bank in 

 London by order of the African DevelopmentBank”.  My dithering over the
 uncertainty of replying with to the email with my name, SSN, bank account
 and routing information likely cost me dearly.

 ** **

 I don’t know why I was hesitant, after all how could I doubt a message
 signed by “Dr Patsy Mark”?

 ** **

 *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:37 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

 ** **

 do NOT fall for it !  Doctor Peter McWealth is related to Scrooge McDuck
 , and you know how fickle and nefarious those cartoon animals can be !**
 **

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:54 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 I just received an email from the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery
 Prizes, signed in the glorious name of Doctor Peter McWealth. I am
 thoroughly convinced of its authenticity, having read that name.

 The fact that the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes' esteemed
 Doctor of Riches uses a Yahoo.com email address as well only makes me more
 determined to give them my bank details.

 The sad thing is, for this approach to have made it out there, means it
 must have worked at some point? Surely not?

 --
 http://appsensebigot.blogspot.​​co.ukhttp://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/

 IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

 I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
 received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
 anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
 legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must
 never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent,
 sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted,
 amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm
 animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent
 minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent
 in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but
 it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of
 said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway,
 but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung,
 drawn and quartered.

 I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
 been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't
 responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so
 I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions
 are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit
 of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that
 statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an
 opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would
 provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
 addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
 for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some
 level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in
 some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward
 disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be
 unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell
 makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement
 immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the
 sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending
 emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my
 status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of
 my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or insert
 country name here's Got Talent.

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.​​com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise

Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

2012-03-22 Thread Jonathan Link
Gmail has been doing that for some of my messages coming from Sunbelt for a
while now.
I adjusted the filter to account for it (filters now have an option to
never mark something coming from a source as SPAM).

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:32 PM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Amusingly, GMail marked my message as spam. I have unmarked it but wonder
 if I am now going to get a load of mails from Patsy Mark of HSBC.


 On 22 March 2012 14:45, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:

 That sounds like some spammers/scammers have a sense of humour.
 Admittedly, it's quite funny - if you're not the idiot who's bank account
 is being emptied.


 On 22 March 2012 14:42, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patsy Mark?
 YGtBFKM.

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Smith 
 m...@gatewayindustries.orgwrote:

 I recently missed an opportunity to obtain a 45 million dollar
 inheritance that was being held for me in an “ESCROW account with the HSBC
 Bank in 

 London by order of the African DevelopmentBank”.  My dithering over the
 uncertainty of replying with to the email with my name, SSN, bank account
 and routing information likely cost me dearly.

 ** **

 I don’t know why I was hesitant, after all how could I doubt a message
 signed by “Dr Patsy Mark”?

 ** **

 *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:37 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

 ** **

 do NOT fall for it !  Doctor Peter McWealth is related to Scrooge
 McDuck , and you know how fickle and nefarious those cartoon animals can be
 !

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:54 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
 wrote:

 I just received an email from the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery
 Prizes, signed in the glorious name of Doctor Peter McWealth. I am
 thoroughly convinced of its authenticity, having read that name.

 The fact that the World Fund For Unclaimed Lottery Prizes' esteemed
 Doctor of Riches uses a Yahoo.com email address as well only makes me more
 determined to give them my bank details.

 The sad thing is, for this approach to have made it out there, means it
 must have worked at some point? Surely not?

 --
 http://appsensebigot.blogspot.​​co.ukhttp://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/

 IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER

 I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
 received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
 anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
 legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must
 never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent,
 sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted,
 amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm
 animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent
 minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent
 in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but
 it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of
 said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway,
 but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung,
 drawn and quartered.

 I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has
 been sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't
 responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so
 I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions
 are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit
 of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that
 statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an
 opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would
 provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.

 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
 addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
 for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some
 level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in
 some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward
 disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be
 unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell
 makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement
 immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the
 sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending
 emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my
 status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of
 my stupidity

RE: OT: Utterly convincing spam

2012-03-22 Thread John Hornbuckle
We use Postini, and it regularly quarantines messages from this list.



John Hornbuckle, MSMIS, PMP
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us





From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Utterly convincing spam

Gmail has been doing that for some of my messages coming from Sunbelt for a 
while now.
I adjusted the filter to account for it (filters now have an option to never 
mark something coming from a source as SPAM).
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:32 PM, James Rankin 
kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Amusingly, GMail marked my message as spam. I have unmarked it but wonder if I 
am now going to get a load of mails from Patsy Mark of HSBC.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin