Re: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-31 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
Here are a couple of other UI enhancements that would make managing VIPRE scan 
detections easier, both in the home-user version (which I use on my personal 
machines and which some of my clients's employees use) and in the VSE Console 
(which I use for clients).  

1. When your in the Detections panel, have the ability to copy the path to 
the detected item to the Windows clipboard.  I'd use this to submit the 
detections to VirusTotal to see if it's really a detection or probably an FP.  

In fact, incorporating VT's Submit tool directly into the VSE Console would 
be a Very Good Thing, and making it easy to add to the home-user's console 
would also be a VGT.  As it is now, I have to browse to the infection's folder 
and then submit it manually.  

Ideally this would allow highlighting a range of detections and submitting them 
all at once [grin].  

2. The size of the Risk Details pane and the column widths should be 
sticky.  When I'm working on a wide-screen monitor, I like to widen the Risk 
Details pane and also widen the Information column so I can see the entire 
path.  But when I close the RD pane, those settings are not preserved and I 
have to widen or maximize  the window again each time.  

3. The right-click drop-down menu on the Set Recommended Action should have a 
Flag for Rescan option (see earlier message on this idea).  The console 
should toggle this flag off when it's rescanned but keep a count of the 
rescans, since sometimes it can be a day or two before the FP detection logic 
is updated enough to quit finding the FP.  

4. There should be an Admin-level config area where admins can Always Allow 
all the Nirsoft tools in one click, all the SysInternals (PS)tools in one 
click, and so on for common administrator tool sets.  BTW, I'm curious what the 
AA logic is.  Is it \\path\to\filename-only, filename-only (any file with 
this name) or do you keep MD5 sums of Always Allowed items so you can detect 
that the file has changed even though the filename remains unchanged?  


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-30 Thread Alex Eckelberry
This is actually a really good idea.


From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:an...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: Alex Eckelberry
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?

On 26 Jul 2010 at 9:08, Jeff Cain wrote:

 These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please let 
 us know right
 away.

IMHO VIPRE needs a Rescan Quarantined Files option -- an auto-recover from 
FP feature.

The Rescan should allow us to select, from the console, an agent or set of 
agents, and allow us to tell each agent to rescan its quarantined items using 
the current set of defs, which presumably has corrected the FP.  There should 
be an option to unquarantine -- to restore -- anything that scans clean, with 
an option to email the report to the administrator either way. There should be 
an option to time-limit the items being rescanned so we only scan a given date 
range, this would allow us to limit the scanning to the last day or week of 
quarantined items.  We should be able to schedule the rescan, too, so the scan 
happens when it won't interfere with work.

This would allow us to recover easily from an episode of False Positives that 
erroneously quarantines files on multiple systems (as long as those systems are 
still bootable and the VSE Agent is running there).  It is tolerable if you 
have a few machines with FPs.  I can't imagine cleaning up an FP episode on 
hundreds of machines.

We all understand that all AV products either suffer from FPs or infections 
that get by.  I'd rather have the FPs, but having a Rescan Quarantine would 
really set VIPRE apart from other AV products.  I don't know of any other 
product which offers this.

Discussion welcome.

Angus

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-30 Thread Kurt Buff
Agreed.

I just got done submitting (several days late) to virustotal.com a set
of .LNK files that were marked on our file server. By the time I had
submitted them, nobody thought that they were dangerous (except esafe,
which is really weird.)

They were marked as report only, so it was no big deal, but if I'd had
to rescue them, it would have been more interesting.

Kurt

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 15:52, Alex Eckelberry
al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:
 This is actually a really good idea.





 From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:an...@geoapps.com]
 Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:43 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Cc: Alex Eckelberry
 Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?



 On 26 Jul 2010 at 9:08, Jeff Cain wrote:



 These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please
 let us know right

 away.



 IMHO VIPRE needs a Rescan Quarantined Files option -- an auto-recover
 from FP feature.



 The Rescan should allow us to select, from the console, an agent or set of
 agents, and allow us to tell each agent to rescan its quarantined items
 using the current set of defs, which presumably has corrected the FP.  There
 should be an option to unquarantine -- to restore -- anything that scans
 clean, with an option to email the report to the administrator either way.
 There should be an option to time-limit the items being rescanned so we only
 scan a given date range, this would allow us to limit the scanning to the
 last day or week of quarantined items.  We should be able to schedule the
 rescan, too, so the scan happens when it won't interfere with work.



 This would allow us to recover easily from an episode of False Positives
 that erroneously quarantines files on multiple systems (as long as those
 systems are still bootable and the VSE Agent is running there).  It is
 tolerable if you have a few machines with FPs.  I can't imagine cleaning up
 an FP episode on hundreds of machines.



 We all understand that all AV products either suffer from FPs or infections
 that get by.  I'd rather have the FPs, but having a Rescan Quarantine
 would really set VIPRE apart from other AV products.  I don't know of any
 other product which offers this.



 Discussion welcome.



 Angus





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~



Re: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Richard Stovall
You are not alone...

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:

  Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
 servers?  Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my
 2008 servers.  The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.
 Same thing this weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm
 working on with support now that looks like another false positive.  I am
 wondering if this is Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my
 servers?  I run deep scan several times a week on those systems in any
 case.  The first thing I do not want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and
 Sunday morning is pages of Vipre notifications.

 I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.
 This is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are
 DCs, others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't
 have anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.






 Tom Miller
 Engineer, Information Technology
 Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
 757-788-0528

 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
 the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
 distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.







~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

Re: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Eric Wittersheim
Same here

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:

 You are not alone...

 On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:

  Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
 servers?  Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my
 2008 servers.  The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.
 Same thing this weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm
 working on with support now that looks like another false positive.  I am
 wondering if this is Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my
 servers?  I run deep scan several times a week on those systems in any
 case.  The first thing I do not want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and
 Sunday morning is pages of Vipre notifications.

 I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.
 This is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are
 DCs, others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't
 have anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.






 Tom Miller
 Engineer, Information Technology
 Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
 757-788-0528

 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
 the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
 distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.












~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Jeff Cain
These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please let us know 
right away.

Thanks,

Jeff Cain - supp...@sunbeltsoftware.commailto:supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst

Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
www.sunbeltsoftware.comhttp://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/
Tel: 1-877-757-4094
Fax: +1 727-562-3402

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?

Same here
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not alone...

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller 
tmil...@hnncsb.orgmailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008 servers?  
Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my 2008 servers.  
The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.  Same thing this 
weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm working on with 
support now that looks like another false positive.  I am wondering if this is 
Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my servers?  I run deep scan 
several times a week on those systems in any case.  The first thing I do not 
want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and Sunday morning is pages of Vipre 
notifications.

I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.  This 
is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are DCs, 
others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't have 
anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.






Tom Miller
Engineer, Information Technology
Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
757-788-0528

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Tom Miller
Working on the second on this weekend now Jeff.  Here are sample
details: 
 
Machine:  RVSDWIN  (10.40.1.9)
User: 
Scan Date:7/26/2010 6:28 AM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6640
Policy:   Servers
  
-
 
Threat: Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT
Category:   Trojan
Severity:   High Risk
Action: UnKnown
 
Traces Found:
 
File:  C:\Windows\System32\Oobe.exe
 

-
 
Threat: Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT
Category:   Trojan
Severity:   High Risk
Action: UnKnown
 
Traces Found:
 
File:  C:\Windows\System32\ProvisionStorage.exe
 

 Jeff Cain je...@sunbelt-software.com 7/26/2010 9:08 AM 

These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please let
us know right away.
 
Thanks,
 
Jeff Cain – supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst
 
Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
www.sunbeltsoftware.com
Tel: 1-877-757-4094
Fax: +1 727-562-3402
 
From:Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?
 
Same here

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are not alone...

 

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org
wrote:

Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
servers?  Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of
my 2008 servers.  The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false
positive.  Same thing this weekend, and again a false positive.  I have
a third I'm working on with support now that looks like another false
positive.  I am wondering if this is Vipre or possibly my policy
configuration for my servers?  I run deep scan several times a week on
those systems in any case.  The first thing I do not want to see in my
Inbox on Saturday and Sunday morning is pages of Vipre notifications.

 

I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003
Servers.  This is getting really old.  Nothing special about these
servers.  Some are DCs, others member servers, others just for apps or
storage.  Most don't have anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS
installed.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Miller
Engineer, Information Technology
Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
757-788-0528 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
  

 
  

 
  

 
 

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread John Aldrich
I got notifications for .lnk files that are harmless. L I'm not particularly
worried about it, but I think Vipre is a little *too* cautious on .lnk
files.

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?

 

Same here

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:

You are not alone...

 

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:

Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008
servers?  Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my
2008 servers.  The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.
Same thing this weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm
working on with support now that looks like another false positive.  I am
wondering if this is Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my
servers?  I run deep scan several times a week on those systems in any case.
The first thing I do not want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and Sunday
morning is pages of Vipre notifications.

 

I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.
This is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are
DCs, others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't
have anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Miller
Engineer, Information Technology
Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
757-788-0528 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~image001.jpgimage002.jpg

RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Jeff Cain
Everyone,

   AV Lab is aware of the FPs and they should be resolved late this 
morning.

Thanks,

Jeff Cain – supp...@sunbeltsoftware.commailto:supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst

Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
www.sunbeltsoftware.comhttp://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/
Tel: 1-877-757-4094
Fax: +1 727-562-3402

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Vipre false positives?

Working on the second on this weekend now Jeff.  Here are sample details:

Machine:  RVSDWIN  (10.40.1.9)
User:
Scan Date:7/26/2010 6:28 AM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6640
Policy:   Servers

-

Threat: Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT
Category:   Trojan
Severity:   High Risk
Action: UnKnown

Traces Found:

File:  C:\Windows\System32\Oobe.exe


-

Threat: Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT
Category:   Trojan
Severity:   High Risk
Action: UnKnown

Traces Found:

File:  C:\Windows\System32\ProvisionStorage.exe


 Jeff Cain je...@sunbelt-software.commailto:je...@sunbelt-software.com 
 7/26/2010 9:08 AM 
These should have been addressed in def version 6636. If not please let us know 
right away.

Thanks,

Jeff Cain – supp...@sunbeltsoftware.commailto:supp...@sunbeltsoftware.com
Technical Support Analyst

Sunbelt Software, part of the GFI Software family
www.sunbeltsoftware.comhttp://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/
Tel: 1-877-757-4094
Fax: +1 727-562-3402

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?

Same here
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not alone...

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller 
tmil...@hnncsb.orgmailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008 servers?  
Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my 2008 servers.  
The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.  Same thing this 
weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm working on with 
support now that looks like another false positive.  I am wondering if this is 
Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my servers?  I run deep scan 
several times a week on those systems in any case.  The first thing I do not 
want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and Sunday morning is pages of Vipre 
notifications.

I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.  This 
is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are DCs, 
others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't have 
anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.






Tom Miller
Engineer, Information Technology
Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
757-788-0528

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.




















Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


RE: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Alex Eckelberry
Fwiw, there is a very serious zero day .lnk exploit going around.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179339/Windows_shortcut_attack_code_goes_public

Apparently our heuristics were a little too aggressive...




Alex


From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 10:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Vipre false positives?

I got notifications for .lnk files that are harmless. :( I'm not particularly 
worried about it, but I think Vipre is a little *too* cautious on .lnk files.

[cid:343474514@26072010-07C0][cid:343474...@26072010-07c7]

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Vipre false positives?

Same here
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Richard Stovall 
rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not alone...

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tom Miller 
tmil...@hnncsb.orgmailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Anyone having issue with Vipre false positives on their Windows 2008 servers?  
Last weekend, Friday night's scan reported a virus on each of my 2008 servers.  
The Sunbelt team investigated and it was a false positive.  Same thing this 
weekend, and again a false positive.  I have a third I'm working on with 
support now that looks like another false positive.  I am wondering if this is 
Vipre or possibly my policy configuration for my servers?  I run deep scan 
several times a week on those systems in any case.  The first thing I do not 
want to see in my Inbox on Saturday and Sunday morning is pages of Vipre 
notifications.

I have not seen false positives on our XP/Win 7 machines or 2003 Servers.  This 
is getting really old.  Nothing special about these servers.  Some are DCs, 
others member servers, others just for apps or storage.  Most don't have 
anything other than the Windows 2008 NOS installed.






Tom Miller
Engineer, Information Technology
Hampton-Newport News Community Services Board
757-788-0528

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.



















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpg

Re: Vipre false positives?

2010-07-26 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 26 Jul 2010 at 10:09, John Aldrich  wrote:

 I got notifications for .lnk files that are harmless. L I´m not
 particularly worried about it, but I think Vipre is a little *too* cautious
 on .lnk files. 

Agree.

I'll bet none of these is a real exploit.

= Included Stuff Follows =

Machine:  (192.168.1.48)
Scan Date:7/25/2010 12:56 AM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6634
Policy:   Default-Office

-

Threat: Exploit.LNK.CVE-2010-2568 (v)
Category:   Exploit
Severity:   Severe Risk
Action: Quarantined

Traces Found:

File:  C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\NVIDIA
nView Desktop Manager.lnk 
File:  C:\Documents and
Settings\Administrator\Desktop\Shortcut to Add or Remove Programs.lnk
File:  C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\System.lnk

=

Machine:   (192.168.1.52)
Scan Date:7/25/2010 12:00 AM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6634
Policy:   Default-Office

-

Threat: Exploit.LNK.CVE-2010-2568 (v)
Category:   Exploit
Severity:   Severe Risk
Action: Quarantined

Traces Found:

File:  C:\projects\bin\Mouse.lnk


-

=
Machine:  xx (192.168.1.18)
Scan Date:7/24/2010 11:56 PM
Software Version: 4.0.3275
ThreatDB Version: 6634
Policy:   Default-Office

-

Threat: Exploit.LNK.CVE-2010-2568 (v)
Category:   Exploit
Severity:   Severe Risk
Action: Quarantined

Traces Found:

File:  C:\backups\95\c\RECYCLED\DC26.LNK
File:  C:\backups\95\c\RECYCLED\DC29.LNK


-

= Included Stuff Ends =


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~