[Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
Thanks Ivan! How did I not think to use the axis. ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
You can try reading that FBX into an Axis node instead. Usually you should be able to get the local transforms for any given object. If there's parented transforms, you can chain up different Axis nodes to replicate the same hierarchy you had in Maya. That failing... try StickyProject ;-) On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, thoma wrote: > ahhh yes. I guess i was remembering UVproject as having a bit more > functionality than it does. In that case...not having used stickyProject, > does anyone know how to get transformational data out of an fbx that doesn't > include it in the dropdowns? I have some geo with an animated parent > transform in maya but the parent node/transformation matrix doesn't show in > nuke. It only is accessible by enabling 'all objects' and 'read transform > from file' on the fbx node. Is there any way to pull it out? (in this case > to make my own little sticky projection) > > Thanks > Thomas > > ___ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
[Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
ahhh yes. I guess i was remembering UVproject as having a bit more functionality than it does. In that case...not having used stickyProject, does anyone know how to get transformational data out of an fbx that doesn't include it in the dropdowns? I have some geo with an animated parent transform in maya but the parent node/transformation matrix doesn't show in nuke. It only is accessible by enabling 'all objects' and 'read transform from file' on the fbx node. Is there any way to pull it out? (in this case to make my own little sticky projection) Thanks Thomas ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
Hi Thoma,
My problem is that I'm using an FBX with animated geo
>
If I understand correctly your situation, I'm not sure UVProject has ever
worked the way you expect it to.
I think UVProject does do its job correctly. The reason you don't get your
textures to "stick" is that your UV-baking is happening for each frame of
the animated geo. As in, on every frame, UV project is doing its job
correctly, but on the next frame the baked UVs will be replaced again (with
those corresponding to the projection onto the new position of the geo).
The wording is a bit confusing, but hope it makes sense.
If you want to bake UVs based on the projection at a certain reference
frame (and therefore have the textures stick to the animated geo), you can
try StickyProject from Nukepedia.
http://www.nukepedia.com/plugins/3d/stickyproject/
Hope that helps.
Ivan
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, thoma
wrote:
> **
> Hi Deke,
>
> I can't post exactly what I'm working on but I'll provide a general
> illustration of what I'm talking about below. My problem is that I'm using
> an FBX with animated geo and the transforms for that geo aren't accessible
> seperately within nuke. Plus it's the principle that this node doesn't seem
> to work anymore! So before anyone says it - my real world scenario doesn't
> allow for the parented projector camera example below
>
> *Code:*
>
> set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
> version 6.3 v4
> BackdropNode {
> inputs 0
> name BackdropNode3
> tile_color 0x99ff
> note_font_size 25
> selected true
> xpos -3153
> ypos 2802
> bdwidth 1339
> bdheight 760
> }
> Camera2 {
> inputs 0
> name Camera12
> selected true
> xpos -2278
> ypos 3327
> }
> push $cut_paste_input
> Axis2 {
> translate {{curve i x1 0 x20 0.2} {curve i x1 0} {curve i x1 0 x20 0}}
> name Axis3
> selected true
> xpos -2278
> ypos 3046
> }
> set N2f2977d0 [stack 0]
> push $N2f2977d0
> Camera2 {
> name Camera13
> selected true
> xpos -2311
> ypos 3147
> }
> CheckerBoard2 {
> inputs 0
> name CheckerBoard4
> selected true
> xpos -2152
> ypos 3030
> }
> RotoPaint {
> curves {AnimTree: "" {
> Version: 1.2
> Flag: 0
> RootNode: 1
> Node: {
> NodeName: "Root" {
>Flag: 512
>NodeType: 1
>Transform: 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 1 S 0 1 S 0 0 S 0 1024 S 0 578
>NumOfAttributes: 11
>"vis" S 0 1 "opc" S 0 1 "mbo" S 0 1 "mb" S 0 1 "mbs" S 0 0.5 "fo" S 0 1
> "fx" S 0 0 "fy" S 0 0 "ff" S 0 1 "ft" S 0 0 "pt" S 0 0
> }
> NumOfChildren: 1
> Node: {
>NodeName: "Bezier1" {
> Flag: 576
> NodeType: 3
> CurveGroup: "" {
> Transform: 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 1 S 1 120 1 S 1
> 120 0 S 1 120 1274.83 S 1 120 730.333
> Flag: 0
> NumOfCubicCurves: 2
> CubicCurve: "" {
> Type: 0 Flag: 8192 Dim: 2
> NumOfPoints: 36
> 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 2 0 0 S 1 120 1524 S 1 120 880 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1
> 120 -2 0 0 S 1 120 4 S 1 120 -2 0 0 S 1 120 1434 S 1 120 944 0 0 S 1 120 -4
> S 1 120 2 0 0 S 1 120 34 S 1 120 32 0 0 S 1 120 1206 S 1 120 870 0 0 S 1
> 120 -34 S 1 120 -32 0 0 S 1 120 14 S 1 120 10 0 0 S 1 120 1128 S 1 120 800
> 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120 -10 0 0 S 1 120 32 S 1 120 20 0 0 S 1 120 1062 S 1
> 120 762 0 0 S 1 120 -32 S 1 120 -20 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 8 0 0 S 1 120
> 1016 S 1 120 632 0 0 S 1 120 8 S 1 120 -8 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 4 0 0 S 1
> 120 1042 S 1 120 606 0 0 S 1 120 8 S 1 120 -4 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120 -8 0
> 0 S 1 120 1178 S 1 120 582 0 0 S 1 120 14 S 1 120 8 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120
> -4 0 0 S 1 120 1206 S 1 120 596 0 0 S 1 120 14 S 1 120 4 0 0 S 1 120 -212 S
> 1 120 30 0 0 S 1 120 1352 S 1 120 644 0 0 S 1 120 212 S 1 120 -30 0 0 S 1
> 120 -4 S 1 120 -28 0 0 S 1 120 1594 S 1 120 676 0 0 S 1 120 4 S 1 120 28 0
> 0 S 1 120 6 S 1 120 -6 0 0 S 1 120 1556 S 1 120 772 0 0 S 1 120 -6 S 1 120
> 6 0
> }
> CubicCurve: "" {
> Type: 0 Flag: 8192 Dim: 2
> NumOfPoints: 36
> 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 2 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120
> -2 0 0 S 1 120 4 S 1 120 -2 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 -4 S 1 120
> 2 0 0 S 1 120 34 S 1 120 32 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 -34 S 1 120
> -32 0 0 S 1 120 14 S 1 120 10 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1
> 120 -10 0 0 S 1 120 32 S 1 120 20 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 -32 S
> 1 120 -20 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 8 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 8 S
> 1 120 -8 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 4 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 8 S 1
> 120 -4 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120 -8 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 14 S
> 1 120 8 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120 -4 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 14 S
> 1 120 4 0 0 S 1 120 -212 S 1 120 30 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120 212
> S 1 120 -30 0 0 S 1 120 -4 S 1 120 -28 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120
> 4 S 1 120 28 0 0 S 1 120 6 S 1 120 -6 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 0 0 S 1 120
> -6 S 1 120 6 0
> }
> NumOfAttributes: 44
> "vis" S 0 1 "r" S 0 1 "g" S 0 1 "b" S 0 1 "a" S 0 1 "ro" S 0 0 "go" S
> 0 0 "bo" S 0 0 "ao
Re: [Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
all
toolbar_source_transform_scale {1 1}
toolbar_source_transform_center {320 240}
colorOverlay 0
lifetime_type "all frames"
lifetime_start 120
lifetime_end 120
motionblur_shutter_offset_type centred
source_black_outside true
createNewTrack {{-1} "-1\t(none)\t-1" "1000\tNew Track Layer\t1000"}
name RotoPaint15
selected true
xpos -1234
ypos 1429
}
Card2 {
control_points {3 3 3 6
1 {-0.5 -0.5 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0
{0 0 0}
1 {0 -0.5 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865 0} 0
{0 0 0} 0 {0.5 0 0}
1 {0.5 -0.5 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0
{1 0 0}
1 {-0.5 0 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0 {0
-0.166716 0} 0 {0 0.5 0}
1 {0 0 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0 {0
-0.166716 0} 0 {0.5 0.5 0}
1 {0.5 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0 {0
-0.166716 0} 0 {1 0.5 0}
1 {-0.5 0.5 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 -0.166865 0} 0
{0 1 0}
1 {0 0.5 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0
-0.166865 0} 0 {0.5 1 0}
1 {0.5 0.5 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 -0.166865 0} 0
{1 1 0} }
name Card4
selected true
xpos -1234
ypos 1476
}
UVProject {
inputs 2
render_mode textured
frustum_culling true
name UVProject4
selected true
xpos -1234
ypos 1534
}
TransformGeo {
translate {{curve i x1 0 x20 0.4} {curve i x1 0 x20 0.2} {curve i x1
-4.70424 x20 -4.5042}}
name TransformGeo1
selected true
xpos -1234
ypos 1603
}
push 0
ScanlineRender {
inputs 3
output_motion_vectors_type accurate
name ScanlineRender6
selected true
xpos -1234
ypos 1664
}
Howard
>
> From: thoma
>To: nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
>Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012, 19:15
>Subject: [Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
>
>
>Hi Deke,
>
>I can't post exactly what I'm working on but I'll provide a general
>illustration of what I'm talking about below. My problem is that I'm using an
>FBX with animated geo and the transforms for that geo aren't accessible
>seperately within nuke. Plus it's the principle that this node doesn't seem
>to work anymore! So before anyone says it - my real world scenario doesn't
>allow for the parented projector camera example below
>
>
>Code:
>
>
>set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
>version 6.3 v4
>BackdropNode {
> inputs 0
> name BackdropNode3
> tile_color 0x99ff
> note_font_size 25
> selected true
> xpos -3153
> ypos 2802
> bdwidth 1339
> bdheight 760
>}
>Camera2 {
> inputs 0
> name Camera12
> selected true
> xpos -2278
> ypos 3327
>}
>push $cut_paste_input
>Axis2 {
> translate {{curve i x1 0 x20 0.2} {curve i x1 0} {curve i x1 0 x20 0}}
> name Axis3
> selected true
> xpos -2278
> ypos 3046
>}
>set N2f2977d0 [stack 0]
>push $N2f2977d0
>Camera2 {
> name Camera13
> selected true
> xpos -2311
> ypos 3147
>}
>CheckerBoard2 {
> inputs 0
> name CheckerBoard4
> selected true
> xpos -2152
> ypos 3030
>}
>RotoPaint {
> curves {AnimTree: "" {
> Version: 1.2
> Flag: 0
> RootNode: 1
> Node: {
> NodeName: "Root" {
> Flag: 512
> NodeType: 1
> Transform: 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 1 S 0 1 S 0 0 S 0 1024 S 0 578
> NumOfAttributes: 11
> "vis" S 0 1 "opc" S 0 1 "mbo" S 0 1 "mb" S 0 1 "mbs" S 0 0.5 "fo" S 0 1
>"fx" S 0 0 "fy" S 0 0 "ff" S 0 1 "ft" S 0 0 "pt" S 0 0
> }
> NumOfChildren: 1
> Node: {
> NodeName: "Bezier1" {
> Flag: 576
> NodeType: 3
> CurveGroup: "" {
> Transform: 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 1 S 1 120 1 S 1 120
>0 S 1 120 1274.83 S 1 120 730.333
> Flag: 0
> NumOfCubicCurves: 2
> CubicCurve: "" {
> Type: 0 Flag: 8192 Dim: 2
> NumOfPoints: 36
> 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120 2 0 0 S 1 120 1524 S 1 120 880 0 0 S 1 120 0 S 1 120
>-2 0 0 S 1 120 4 S 1 120 -2 0 0 S 1 120 1434 S 1 120 944 0 0 S 1 120 -4 S 1
>120 2 0 0 S 1 120 34 S 1 120 32 0 0 S 1 120 1206 S 1 120 870 0 0 S 1 120 -34 S
>1 120 -32 0 0 S 1 120 14 S 1 120 10 0 0 S 1 120 1128 S 1 120 800 0 0 S 1 120
>-14 S 1 120 -10 0 0 S 1 120 32 S 1 120 20 0 0 S 1 120 1062 S 1 120 762 0 0 S 1
>120 -32 S 1 120 -20 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 8 0 0 S 1 120 1016 S 1 120 632 0 0
>S 1 120 8 S 1 120 -8 0 0 S 1 120 -8 S 1 120 4 0 0 S 1 120 1042 S 1 120 606 0 0
>S 1 120 8 S 1 120 -4 0 0 S 1 120 -14 S 1 120 -8 0 0 S 1 120 1178 S 1 120 582 0
>0 S 1 120 14 S
Re: [Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
can you post an example with checkerboards? -deke On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:46 AM, thoma wrote: > ** > Has anyone gotten an answer to this one? Those workarounds are helpful but > should we really need them at all when the functionality of UVproject was > fine before? I'm having the same issues - essentially UVproject behaving > the same way as Project3D - and I'm pretty certain that the last time i > used the node it was working as advertised (sticky projection with new > frustrum derived UVs). Unless I'm simply doing it wrong I'm thinking > bug report? > > ___ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
[Nuke-users] Re: UVProject not sticking?
Has anyone gotten an answer to this one? Those workarounds are helpful but should we really need them at all when the functionality of UVproject was fine before? I'm having the same issues - essentially UVproject behaving the same way as Project3D - and I'm pretty certain that the last time i used the node it was working as advertised (sticky projection with new frustrum derived UVs). Unless I'm simply doing it wrong I'm thinking bug report? ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
