Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: > hey! > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8 > support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake > architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from > PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github. > > just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in > Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy? > wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since > there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2 > That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2. Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's what pretty much all other projects do. Cheers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] NumPy Development Meeting Tomorrow - Triage Focus
Hi all, Our bi-weekly triage-focused NumPy development meeting is tomorrow (Wednesday, June 3rd) at 11 am Pacific Time (18:00 UTC). Everyone is invited to join in and edit the work-in-progress meeting topics and notes: https://hackmd.io/68i_JvOYQfy9ERiHgXMPvg I encourage everyone to notify us of issues or PRs that you feel should be prioritized or simply discussed briefly. Just comment on it so we can label it, or add your PR/issue to this weeks topics for discussion. Best regards Sebastian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:31 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> hey! >> >> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8 >> support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake >> architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from >> PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github. >> >> just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in >> Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy? >> wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since >> there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2 >> > > That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the > wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2. > > Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it > back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's > what pretty much all other projects do. > > NumPy has always used zip since PyPI limited the number of source releases. We did that before SciPy. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:15 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:31 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >>> hey! >>> >>> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris >>> wrote: >>> > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8 >>> support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake >>> architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from >>> PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github. >>> >>> just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in >>> Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy? >>> wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since >>> there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2 >>> >> >> That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the >> wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2. >> >> Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it >> back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's >> what pretty much all other projects do. >> >> > NumPy has always used zip since PyPI limited the number of source > releases. We did that before SciPy. > > And I did upload the source file 947 twine upload release/installers/*.whl 948 twine upload release/installers/*.zip Wonder what happened to it? Maybe I missed an upload failure? Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:19 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:15 PM Charles R Harris > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:31 AM Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> hey! On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8 support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github. just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy? wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2 >>> >>> That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the >>> wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2. >>> >>> Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it >>> back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's >>> what pretty much all other projects do. >>> >>> >> NumPy has always used zip since PyPI limited the number of source >> releases. We did that before SciPy. >> >> > And I did upload the source file > > 947 twine upload release/installers/*.whl > 948 twine upload release/installers/*.zip > > Wonder what happened to it? Maybe I missed an upload failure? > > Should be fixed. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
> Should be fixed. indeed it is, thanks! -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
