Re: Nutch web site
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote: Hi, It looks like Nutch web site was updated with site built from latest trunk - the only problem is it contains tutorial for unreleased (yet) version 0.8. I think we talked about it and agreed to keep tutorial for latest release on the Web. I have just updated site in svn (branch-0.7) with latest changes (forrest 0.7 compatibility and mailing list archives) and rebuilt it using forrest 0.7. If no objections I can switch web site to use version from branch instead of trunk. +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Nutch web site
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote: It looks like Nutch web site was updated with site built from latest trunk - the only problem is it contains tutorial for unreleased (yet) version 0.8. I think we talked about it and agreed to keep tutorial for latest release on the Web. I have just updated site in svn (branch-0.7) with latest changes (forrest 0.7 compatibility and mailing list archives) and rebuilt it using forrest 0.7. If no objections I can switch web site to use version from branch instead of trunk. +1 Thanks! Doug
Re: Nutch web site
Andrzej Bialecki wrote: +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Piotr
RE: Nutch web site
No that sounds good to me. I also think that the whole web vs. crawl needs to be better explained. I will write a bug/patch for it tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Piotr Kosiorowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:13 AM To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Nutch web site Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more > people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and > later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the > tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? > I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Piotr
Re: Nutch web site
I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Hi, would you add both tutorials directly to the wiki so that we could improve them all together? Thanks Matthias
Re: Nutch web site
Personally I would like to have a "stable" minimal tutorial kept in version control and tagged with releases. But feel fre to copy the contents to Wiki and improve it - we will have extended version there. regards Piotr On 3/7/06, Matthias Jaekle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 > > version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. > > Anyone against it? > Hi, > would you add both tutorials directly to the wiki so that we could > improve them all together? > Thanks > Matthias >
Re: Nutch web site
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote: Andrzej Bialecki wrote: +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Sounds like a good plan. -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Nutch web site
Piotr, is there a reason why this (among other) documentation (for all relevant versions) could not be maintained in trunk? -- Sami Siren Piotr Kosiorowski wrote: Andrzej Bialecki wrote: +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Piotr
Re: Nutch web site
It was maintained in branch as we agreed public website should contain docs for released version. I have nothing against moving it to trunk and maintaining it there. Sorry for late response but I am back from vacation and going through all these emails. Regards, Piotr Sami Siren wrote: Piotr, is there a reason why this (among other) documentation (for all relevant versions) could not be maintained in trunk? -- Sami Siren Piotr Kosiorowski wrote: Andrzej Bialecki wrote: +1, yes it would be really confusing. Since there are more and more people trying 0.8, could we perhaps include a short note that 0.8 and later is NOT compatible with this tutorial, and a reference to the tutorial for 0.8 (or the trunk/ branch in general)? I can add both tutorials to Nutch web site named Tutorial for 0.7 version and Tutorial for 0.8 version. It should make things clear. Anyone against it? Piotr
