[nycwireless] NYCwireless January Meeting - TOMORROW Wed, Jan. 25th: VOIP over Wifi Design

2006-01-24 Thread Joe Plotkin


NYCwireless January Meeting Announcement
All are invited - please re-post everywhere!

TOMORROW NIGHT!
Wednesday, January 25th, 2006 at 7:15pm

Bway.net
568 Broadway at Prince St, NE corner
Suite 404
New York, NY 10012
[Please note: Everybody will need to sign-in in the lobby.]

Agenda:
1. Dustin Goodwin: Designing Wifi Network for VOIP
So you think you can just buy a couple of Wifi VOIP phones and start 
using them on your office network? Well unfortunately it's not that 
easy. Wifi networks designed for data are probably not well enough 
engineered to handle VOIP phones with a high degree of quality. If 
you want to learn about design factors for VOIP over WiFi, don't miss 
this presentation.


2. tba

3. Workshop breakout sessions: small group discussions from novice to 
advanced questions


===

Dustin Goodwin, VOIP expert and NYCwireless Board member - Dustin has 
shared his expertise many times at NYCw meetings, his presentations 
are always informative, and not to be missed.

Dustin's Bio: http://nycwireless.net/tiki-index.php?page=About
 (scroll down to Board of Directors)
===
NYCwireless is a non-profit organization that advocates for, and 
enables the growth of free, public wireless networks.


NYCw monthly meetings are held on the last Wednesday of the month. 
They are free, and open to all, RSVP not required.

===

--
===
Joe Plotkin
DSL/Marketing
Bway.net - NYC's Best Internet
===
Bway.net
Note--> new address:
568 Broadway Suite 404
New York, NY  10012

vox: 212.982.9800
fax:  212.982.5499
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xDSL info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.bway.net
===
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


[nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

2006-01-24 Thread Dana Spiegel


Begin forwarded message:


From: "Timothy Karr, Campaign Director" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 24, 2006 2:33:28 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

Dear Dana Spiegel:

After destroying TV and radio, mega-media corporations are scheming  
to control what content you can view and which services you can use  
online.


Streaming video, Internet phones, podcasting and online games are  
the future of the Internet. But companies like Verizon, AT&T and  
Comcast want Congress to let them deliver only their own products  
at super-high speeds ... while sticking the rest of us in the slow  
lane.


This predatory scheme would be a dead end for independent voices  
and Internet innovators: bloggers, producers, and any new channels  
and services that might compete with the conglomerates.


The only way to stop them is to raise hell right now:

Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http:// 
www.freepress.net/action/neutrality


From its beginnings, the Internet was built on a cooperative,  
democratic ideal. The infrastructure’s only job was to move data  
between users — regardless of where it came from or what it contained.


This “network neutrality” fostered a medium that did not exclude  
anyone, allowed for far-reaching innovations, and created the  
Internet as we know it.


Past experience shows that when large media companies are left to  
their own devices, the result is content and services that serve  
nothing but their bank accounts. An open and independent Internet  
is the antidote to these media gatekeepers.


If big media companies are allowed to limit the fastest services to  
those who can pay their toll, upstart Web services, consumers,  
bloggers and new media makers alike all would be cut off from the  
digital revolution.


Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http:// 
www.freepress.net/action/neutrality


Free Press will deliver a letter to the CEO of your broadband  
provider and send copies to your members of Congress, urging them  
to write “network neutrality” into law.


Act now. We must defend our Net freedoms before we lose them  
altogether.


Onward,

Timothy Karr
Campaign Director
www.freepress.net

P.S. Please forward this e-mail right now to everyone you know who  
uses the Internet.


P.P.S Check out the new Free Press Web site — Dead End for the  
Internet? — to learn more about net neutrality and how to ensure  
that the Web remains an open road. Go to http://www.freepress.net/ 
deadend/

/*Your email ID. --*/


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


RE: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

2006-01-24 Thread Jim Henry
Shame on those evil big companies for wanting to make a profit!  Shame on
them for wanting to control how the very networks which they built and run,
with their stockholders' money, are run!


Sorry sometimes I just can't resist!

Jim

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Dana Spiegel
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:39 PM
> To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
> Subject: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Timothy Karr, Campaign Director" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: January 24, 2006 2:33:28 PM EST
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now
> >
> > Dear Dana Spiegel:
> >
> > After destroying TV and radio, mega-media corporations are scheming
> > to control what content you can view and which services you 
> can use  
> > online.
> >
> > Streaming video, Internet phones, podcasting and online games are
> > the future of the Internet. But companies like Verizon, AT&T and  
> > Comcast want Congress to let them deliver only their own products  
> > at super-high speeds ... while sticking the rest of us in the slow  
> > lane.
> >
> > This predatory scheme would be a dead end for independent voices
> > and Internet innovators: bloggers, producers, and any new channels  
> > and services that might compete with the conglomerates.
> >
> > The only way to stop them is to raise hell right now:
> >
> > Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http://
> > www.freepress.net/action/neutrality
> >
> > From its beginnings, the Internet was built on a cooperative,
> > democratic ideal. The infrastructure's only job was to move data  
> > between users - regardless of where it came from or what it 
> contained.
> >
> > This "network neutrality" fostered a medium that did not exclude
> > anyone, allowed for far-reaching innovations, and created the  
> > Internet as we know it.
> >
> > Past experience shows that when large media companies are left to
> > their own devices, the result is content and services that serve  
> > nothing but their bank accounts. An open and independent Internet  
> > is the antidote to these media gatekeepers.
> >
> > If big media companies are allowed to limit the fastest services to
> > those who can pay their toll, upstart Web services, consumers,  
> > bloggers and new media makers alike all would be cut off from the  
> > digital revolution.
> >
> > Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http://
> > www.freepress.net/action/neutrality
> >

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


RE: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

2006-01-24 Thread Billy Bob
I don't believe that anyone begrudges a private corporation a reasonable
profit... It's when they have humongous profits from products that have
become a "necessity" of life for most of us, that we have a problem. 

I don't believe that we would be squabbling about the price of gas for our
vehicles, if the corporations providing us the gas, were having a great year
instead of the outrageous triple digit percentage profit gains at our
expense. Especially when the general public sees no need for the high prices
we pay, that are producing those outrageous profits.

We will probably look at the Internet providers the same way. Why can't we
go where we want to after paying to get on? And why should anyone be
directing how I use my computer or what applications I prefer to use? I
believe that my ISP already, and has all along, stated that I get "x"
bandwidth per month for a price. If I go over that, I have to pay more. I
think that is reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable for my ISP to tell
me how I can use my bandwidth like my utility company doesn't tell me how I
can use my electricity if the application is legal under the law.


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Henry
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:34 PM
To: 'Dana Spiegel'; nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

Shame on those evil big companies for wanting to make a profit!  Shame on
them for wanting to control how the very networks which they built and run,
with their stockholders' money, are run!


Sorry sometimes I just can't resist!

Jim

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana 
> Spiegel
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:39 PM
> To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
> Subject: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Timothy Karr, Campaign Director" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: January 24, 2006 2:33:28 PM EST
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now
> >
> > Dear Dana Spiegel:
> >
> > After destroying TV and radio, mega-media corporations are scheming 
> > to control what content you can view and which services you
> can use
> > online.
> >
> > Streaming video, Internet phones, podcasting and online games are 
> > the future of the Internet. But companies like Verizon, AT&T and 
> > Comcast want Congress to let them deliver only their own products at 
> > super-high speeds ... while sticking the rest of us in the slow 
> > lane.
> >
> > This predatory scheme would be a dead end for independent voices and 
> > Internet innovators: bloggers, producers, and any new channels and 
> > services that might compete with the conglomerates.
> >
> > The only way to stop them is to raise hell right now:
> >
> > Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http:// 
> > www.freepress.net/action/neutrality
> >
> > From its beginnings, the Internet was built on a cooperative, 
> > democratic ideal. The infrastructure's only job was to move data 
> > between users - regardless of where it came from or what it
> contained.
> >
> > This "network neutrality" fostered a medium that did not exclude 
> > anyone, allowed for far-reaching innovations, and created the 
> > Internet as we know it.
> >
> > Past experience shows that when large media companies are left to 
> > their own devices, the result is content and services that serve 
> > nothing but their bank accounts. An open and independent Internet is 
> > the antidote to these media gatekeepers.
> >
> > If big media companies are allowed to limit the fastest services to 
> > those who can pay their toll, upstart Web services, consumers, 
> > bloggers and new media makers alike all would be cut off from the 
> > digital revolution.
> >
> > Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http:// 
> > www.freepress.net/action/neutrality
> >

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

2006-01-24 Thread Dana Spiegel

Thanks Bill Bob.

And frankly, it has nothing to do with small or large profits. It has  
only to do with the co-option and private-gating of a public resource  
that everyone has helped to build.


How would you feel if some private organization contracted with your  
city to manage sidewalks, and then afterwards erected fences to only  
let those who paid them an entry fee (at a price _they_ determined)  
to walk on those sidewalks, or those who ran stores paid them to  
leave the sidewalk in front of their store open (again at a price the  
management company determined)? What if there were two private  
companies that did this in your town, and claimed that they were  
competing because there were 2 of them. Meanwhile, you still can't  
use the sidewalk unless you pay one of them.


Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422

Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Billy Bob wrote:

I don't believe that anyone begrudges a private corporation a  
reasonable
profit... It's when they have humongous profits from products that  
have

become a "necessity" of life for most of us, that we have a problem.

I don't believe that we would be squabbling about the price of gas  
for our
vehicles, if the corporations providing us the gas, were having a  
great year

instead of the outrageous triple digit percentage profit gains at our
expense. Especially when the general public sees no need for the  
high prices

we pay, that are producing those outrageous profits.

We will probably look at the Internet providers the same way. Why  
can't we

go where we want to after paying to get on? And why should anyone be
directing how I use my computer or what applications I prefer to  
use? I

believe that my ISP already, and has all along, stated that I get "x"
bandwidth per month for a price. If I go over that, I have to pay  
more. I
think that is reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable for my ISP  
to tell
me how I can use my bandwidth like my utility company doesn't tell  
me how I

can use my electricity if the application is legal under the law.




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim  
Henry

Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:34 PM
To: 'Dana Spiegel'; nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

Shame on those evil big companies for wanting to make a profit!   
Shame on
them for wanting to control how the very networks which they built  
and run,

with their stockholders' money, are run!


Sorry sometimes I just can't resist!

Jim


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana
Spiegel
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:39 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: [nycwireless] Fwd: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now



Begin forwarded message:


From: "Timothy Karr, Campaign Director" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 24, 2006 2:33:28 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet Freedom Under Fire: Act Now

Dear Dana Spiegel:

After destroying TV and radio, mega-media corporations are scheming
to control what content you can view and which services you

can use

online.

Streaming video, Internet phones, podcasting and online games are
the future of the Internet. But companies like Verizon, AT&T and
Comcast want Congress to let them deliver only their own products at
super-high speeds ... while sticking the rest of us in the slow
lane.

This predatory scheme would be a dead end for independent voices and
Internet innovators: bloggers, producers, and any new channels and
services that might compete with the conglomerates.

The only way to stop them is to raise hell right now:

Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http://
www.freepress.net/action/neutrality

From its beginnings, the Internet was built on a cooperative,
democratic ideal. The infrastructure's only job was to move data
between users - regardless of where it came from or what it

contained.


This "network neutrality" fostered a medium that did not exclude
anyone, allowed for far-reaching innovations, and created the
Internet as we know it.

Past experience shows that when large media companies are left to
their own devices, the result is content and services that serve
nothing but their bank accounts. An open and independent Internet is
the antidote to these media gatekeepers.

If big media companies are allowed to limit the fastest services to
those who can pay their toll, upstart Web services, consumers,
bloggers and new media makers alike all would be cut off from the
digital revolution.

Tell Big Media and Congress: Hands Off Our Internet. Go to http://
www.freepress.net/action/neutrality



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/ 
nycwireless/

Archives: http://lists.nycwirel