Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2

2014-02-27 Thread John Bradley
The Connect WG has a time 1pm - 3pm agenda and attendance confirmation page.   
https://openid-ietf-89.eventbrite.com

Durring the Proof of possession call Jan 28 there was consensus to have a F2F 
to discuss the drafts prior to the WG meeting. 
Some people were not arriving until the afternoon so on the call we decided to 
ask the IETF to extend the room for the Connect meeting to 5pm so that we could 
meet from 3-5 pm.

I subsequently made the noon to 5pm room request on the 28th.

At some point after that the OAuth WG chair contacted Lucy asking for the 
meeting to be from 10 - 3pm due to a conflict he had in the afternoon.

I am not a chair or any other furniture of the OAuth WG.   If people are 
unavailable in the morning and want to discuss OAuth things after the Connect 
meeting as originally planned and the room is available I will be there. 

Pleas direct further questions regarding OAuth meeting times to the appropriate 
furniture.

Deepest Regards
John B.

On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Lucy Lynch  wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, John Bradley wrote:
> 
>> I asked for the room from 12 to 5.  The chair had the time changed so we 
>> reserved the room from 10 to 3pm.
>> 
>> We would need to talk to Lucy to see if we could have the time extended past 
>> 3 for additional OAuth related meetings.
>> 
>> I don't know if the room is booked for something else after 3 but we could 
>> likely find out.
> 
> I can check - it would help if everyone agreed on times and topics.
> 
>> John B.
>> 
>> On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:57 AM, Anthony Nadalin  wrote:
>> 
>>> Agree, the OAUTH meeting should change to afternoon
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:56 PM
>>> To: John Bradley
>>> Cc: oauth
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2
>>> 
>>> Yes, I'm familiar with life and I'm aware that things do change. And I have 
>>> no doubt that scheduling this stuff is more than a little difficult. But 
>>> with these Sunday meetings and the vast majority of us traveling 
>>> internationally, it'd be really helpful if the timing can be nailed down as 
>>> early as is reasonable and changes can be avoided.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:58 PM, John Bradley  wrote:
 Yes.
 
 Things change that's life.
 
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Brian Campbell
 
 wrote:
 
 Wasn't this originally announced with a different start time and
 Connect and OAuth happening in the opposite order?
 
 
 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Lucy organized a room for our informal discussion about OAuth
> (followed by the OpenID Connect meeting). We will start at 10am and
> the room is reserved till 3pm. Palace C is the meeting room. At some
> point in time the OAuth meeting will turn into the OpenID Connect
> meeting. For those who are interested I will give a privacy tutorial at 
> 3pm in the Blenheim room.
> 
> Mike, Nat, John, and others might have more information about the
> agenda for the OpenID Connect meeting. For the OAuth meeting Derek
> and I were planning to use the time to prepare the security
> discussions for the official OAuth WG meeting. I am sure we will
> arrange further meeting slots during the week to give enough room for
> socializing and generating new ideas.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> 
> ___
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
 
 ___
 OAuth mailing list
 OAuth@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2

2014-02-27 Thread Anthony Nadalin
We agreed upon a time and then John decided to change it as some of the folks 
can't make it to the venue until after 1PM as they are flying in on Sunday

-Original Message-
From: Lucy Lynch [mailto:ly...@isoc.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:15 AM
To: John Bradley
Cc: Anthony Nadalin; Brian Campbell; oauth; Lucy Lynch
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, John Bradley wrote:

> I asked for the room from 12 to 5.  The chair had the time changed so 
> we reserved the room from 10 to 3pm.
>
> We would need to talk to Lucy to see if we could have the time 
> extended past 3 for additional OAuth related meetings.
>
> I don't know if the room is booked for something else after 3 but we 
> could likely find out.

I can check - it would help if everyone agreed on times and topics.

> John B.
>
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:57 AM, Anthony Nadalin  wrote:
>
>> Agree, the OAUTH meeting should change to afternoon
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian 
>> Campbell
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:56 PM
>> To: John Bradley
>> Cc: oauth
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, 
>> March 2
>>
>> Yes, I'm familiar with life and I'm aware that things do change. And I have 
>> no doubt that scheduling this stuff is more than a little difficult. But 
>> with these Sunday meetings and the vast majority of us traveling 
>> internationally, it'd be really helpful if the timing can be nailed down as 
>> early as is reasonable and changes can be avoided.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:58 PM, John Bradley  wrote:
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> Things change that's life.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Brian Campbell 
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wasn't this originally announced with a different start time and 
>>> Connect and OAuth happening in the opposite order?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig 
>>>  wrote:

 Hi all,

 Lucy organized a room for our informal discussion about OAuth 
 (followed by the OpenID Connect meeting). We will start at 10am and 
 the room is reserved till 3pm. Palace C is the meeting room. At 
 some point in time the OAuth meeting will turn into the OpenID 
 Connect meeting. For those who are interested I will give a privacy 
 tutorial at 3pm in the Blenheim room.

 Mike, Nat, John, and others might have more information about the 
 agenda for the OpenID Connect meeting. For the OAuth meeting Derek 
 and I were planning to use the time to prepare the security 
 discussions for the official OAuth WG meeting. I am sure we will 
 arrange further meeting slots during the week to give enough room 
 for socializing and generating new ideas.

 Ciao
 Hannes


 ___
 OAuth mailing list
 OAuth@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

>>>
>>> ___
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>> ___
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>

___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


Re: [OAUTH-WG] Reaction to the current assertion pair {framework, SAML}

2014-02-27 Thread Brian Campbell
Thanks Barry! I am very happy to hear that.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Barry Leiba  wrote:
>>> Any idea, on the two Assertion Documents, if there is or will be any
>>> feedback from the IESG and, if so, what form it might take?
>>
>> I'm sorry that I haven't been able to get to reviewing this yet --
>> I've had a bunch of pre-IETF travel, in addition to preparing for the
>> meeting.  I aim to have a look on the flights to London, so I hope to
>> get you feedback this Thursday.
>
> It's not Thursday yet, at least not in San Diego, but I've had time in
> the UA Club before flying out.  I haven't reviewed them in detail, but
> I looked through them with respect to the DISCUSS issues I'd raised
> before.
>
> You'll be happy to hear that on those issues, I think we understand
> each other and the current documents seem fine -- they define things
> in a way that I think people can implement interoperably without
> calling someone on the phone first.
>
> Thanks for sticking with this, understanding what I was on about, and
> sorting it out.
>
> Barry

___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth