[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #17 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120586
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120586&action=edit
test-2-xreader

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #16 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120585
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120585&action=edit
test-2-okular

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #15 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120584
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120584&action=edit
test-1b-xreader

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #14 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120583
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120583&action=edit
test-1b-okular

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #12 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120581
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120581&action=edit
test-1a-okular

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #13 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 120582
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120582&action=edit
test-1a-xreader

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #11 from yousifjka...@yahoo.com ---
Take screenshots that you asked me for.

I have to add that NOT ONLY SCANNED PDF affected by this ! Even formatted PDF
(text based PDF) also affected when black tone is lower in Okular & characters
less sharp ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408222] Okular is bad in displaying of scanned PDF ! Please fix this !

[David Hurka]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222

--- Comment #10 from David Hurka  ---
Created attachment 120580
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120580&action=edit
Pixels

Using Albert’s screenshot, one could say that Evince and Okular draw slightly
different. Indeed, where the arrow points, Evince is sharper than Okular,
resulting in a higher contrast and a differently perceived black tone.

Could have these reasons:
a) Both have a slightly different alignment of the scanned image, resulting in
different sampling of rendered pixels which are not exactly on image pixels.
b) Both have same alignment, but use different filtering. (Bilinear, Bicubic,
Nearest Neighbour,... In fact, Okular does not use nearest neighbour, causing
smeared edges on scans. Maybe Evince does?)
c) this happened just at random for exactly these zoom factors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

D21266: [WIP] Improve documentation of area classes

[David Hurka]

davidhurka updated this revision to Diff 59149.
davidhurka marked an inline comment as done.
davidhurka edited the summary of this revision.
davidhurka added a comment.


  Removed references to pages from methods.
  
  Now they refer to a reference area, and the description of the normalized 
coordinate system now explains how mapping to a “reference area” works, and how 
parameters xScale and yScale are related.
  
  Also added another example section, now covers transformation both to and 
from a page coordinate system. The second example touches rotation, I can 
remove that if demanded.
  
  ObjectRect still uses pages as reference area, because I consider ObjectRect 
coordinates  page related. (Document objects are located on pages.) For 
consistency, I can remove these references there too, if demanded.
  
  Annotation::Quad is related, but is already pretty well documented. Just 
clarified some things I consider relevant. (Only 4 points instead of 8 points, 
and things which are directly related to Bug 334297.)
  
  I think it makes sense to move text reordering to another patch.

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D21266?vs=58380&id=59149

BRANCH
  improve-area-classes-documentation

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D21266

AFFECTED FILES
  core/annotations.h
  core/area.h

To: davidhurka, #okular
Cc: aacid, okular-devel, joaonetto, tfella, ngraham, darcyshen

D15580: New annotation toolbar

[David Hurka]

davidhurka added a comment.


  In D15580#473824 , @ngraham wrote:
  
  > Sticky-by-default would probably be okay as long as we can make it //very// 
clear how to un-select the tool. Probably implementing multiple methods would 
be good (hit esc key, left-click again on the tool, right-click anywhere, etc).
  
  
  
  
  In D15580#473962 , @simgunz wrote:
  
  > To sum up, I would:
  >
  > - keep the sticky button to make the feature clearly visible to the user 
(see bug 358057). As it is now this feature is hard to discover, took me years 
to figure it exists.
  > - make the tool sticky by default on first installation, then save the 
state of the sticky button (if a user prefer non-sticky annotation, after 
unchecking the sticky button he will have it unchecked when he relaunch Okular)
  > - disable annotation on right click anywhere (as current Okular)
  > - disable annotation on left click on [activated] annotation [button] (as 
current Okular) [ I have sent a patch to Qt to modify QActionGroup, 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/255770)
  > - disable annotation on Esc (as current Okular)
  
  
  Seems both compatible and is what I consider optimal.
  
  If someone does (not) want sticky, the pin button can be set to the desired 
state, and then removed together with the shortcut, because it is a normal 
toolbar now, right?
  
  Or: Why is this still PageViewToolBar? It is not anymore in the PageView?

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D15580

To: simgunz, #okular
Cc: anthonyfieroni, davidhurka, knambiar, ngraham, tobiasdeiminger, 
okular-devel, joaonetto, tfella, darcyshen, aacid

[okular] [Bug 408273] Scaling mode "Print original size" is confusing

[David Hurka]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408273

--- Comment #1 from David Hurka  ---
See also the discussion about these new scaling options. (Pointing to one
comment explaining the issue.)

https://phabricator.kde.org/D7962#339567

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 408307] New: keep filter options visible in the thumbnail pane

[Jonas]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408307

Bug ID: 408307
   Summary: keep filter options visible in the thumbnail pane
   Product: okular
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
  Severity: wishlist
  Priority: NOR
 Component: general
  Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
  Reporter: jonas...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

SUMMARY

for me, one of the most useful features of okular is the filter bar in the
thumbnail pane. 

the dropdown menu with filter options on the right of the filter bar is also
useful, but it would be more convenient to have a "triger button" which would
show/hide the filter options between the filter bar and the thumbnails.

this way, it could choose to always have the selected options visible (in
practice I often find my self having to verify whether I have "match phrase" or
"match all words" selected).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 152585] Dual screen presentation mode

[Jan Wiele]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152585

Jan Wiele  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||j...@wiele.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

D19626: Remove find label and use a placeholder text instead

[Carl Schwan]

ognarb abandoned this revision.

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D19626

To: ognarb, #okular, #vdg
Cc: aacid, ngraham, okular-devel, joaonetto, tfella, darcyshen

[okular] [Bug 407140] Crash, QTextDocument chokes on input and ends up with negative pagecounts

[Christoph Feck]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407140

--- Comment #4 from Christoph Feck  ---
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-73730

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.