[okular] [Bug 492358] Values of some form fields are not shown in non-forms mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492358 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- I opened a corresponding poppler issue with some additional information at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/1529. However, it is not clear at this point whether this is really a poppler problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 494343] PDF misrendered
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494343 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- This is likely to be a poppler bug. (Poppler is the library used by Okular to do the actual rendering). Can you try to convert your file to png using the pdftoppm tool? If this also shows the misrendering then please close the bug here and open another one at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493623] After digitally signing, Okular window shows "doesn't react"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493623 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- It seems like https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/merge_requests/1611 fixes this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493622] Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493622 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander --- Thank you Sune! I tested the patch and it does indeed solve the issue for me! Incidentally, it also seems to fix https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493623 for me (where Okular wouldn't react for a while after signing). Maybe it was embedding all those fonts that make Okular unresponsive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493622] Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493622 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- Is that intentional? Is that necessary? All of a sudden Thunderbird warns me when I want to send a signed one-page text document, because the file is so big. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493622] Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493622 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- The original document is the one attached to this bug report. ~/tmp> pdffonts hallo-welt.pdf name type encoding emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- - BA+LiberationSerif TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 11 0 ~/tmp> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493623] New: After digitally signing, Okular window shows "doesn't react"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493623 Bug ID: 493623 Summary: After digitally signing, Okular window shows "doesn't react" Classification: Applications Product: okular Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: PDF backend Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Target Milestone: --- With the new signing UX, after I have clicked on the "finish signing" button, Okular becomes unresponsive for a few seconds. During that time, the entire Okular window fades to grey and the window title says "Okular reagiert nicht (Okular doesn't react)". I guess that this is simply the time it takes Okular to do the actual signing. A better progress indicator would be appreciated, but the real problem is that Okular doesn't come back properly. After a few seconds, the new signature appears together with the "this document is digitally signed" message. However, the window remains grey, and the "doesn't react" message does not go away. Only after I switch the focus to another window and then back Okular does everything go back to normal. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.11 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.115.0 Qt Version: 5.15.13 Kernel Version: 6.10.9-amd64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: offscreen Processors: 8 × Intel® Core™ i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz Memory: 15.3 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® UHD Graphics 620 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493622] Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493622 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- I can't attach the signed test file (it's too big), but you can download it from https://datashare.tu-dresden.de/s/XDjHYGzpdd2jtCo . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 493622] New: Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493622 Bug ID: 493622 Summary: Signing a small pdf document increases its size tremendously Classification: Applications Product: okular Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: PDF backend Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 174060 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=174060&action=edit Test file Signing a small pdf file increases its size a lot. The attached test file goes from 24KB to 17MB. I guess a bit of size increase is expected, but not that much. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.11 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.115.0 Qt Version: 5.15.13 Kernel Version: 6.10.9-amd64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: offscreen Processors: 8 × Intel® Core™ i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz Memory: 15.3 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® UHD Graphics 620 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 369111] please add option to build mobile or not in CMakeLists.txt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369111 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- I see such an option in the current CMakeLists.txt. Please open a new, more specific bug report if that option doesn't do what it is supposed to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 286825] Okular should generate PDFs when printing instead of GhostScript
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286825 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #20 from Oliver Sander --- The patch https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/1046 got merged recently. With this, Okular really does now send the pdf file directly to the printer in a lot of important cases. With this, let's consider the bug fixed. Please reopen if you disagree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 492358] Values of some form fields are not shown in non-forms mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492358 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- pdftoppm does not show the date either. Is this rather a poppler bug, then? pdftoppm prints Syntax Error: Unknown font tag 'Helvetica' Syntax Error (315229): No font in show This may be where to start looking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 491780] Autoplay does not work for movies in Screen annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491780 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- Thanks for the patch. Can you please submit it as a merge request at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests ? It makes reviewing it much easier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 486681] Display comments created by latex pdfcomment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486681 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- Thank you! Please also attach the LaTeX source file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 486681] Display comments created by latex pdfcomment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486681 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Please provide a simple test file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482363] Checkboxes on forms do not show as checked even though they are checked
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363 --- Comment #11 from Oliver Sander --- Is this maybe a font issue? Because I do see the checkmark in the box even with disabled 'forms' mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482363] Checkboxes on forms do not show as checked even though they are checked
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander --- Do you have access to Adobe professional? Then you could try to strip the problematic of all the confidential parts. Really, the/a file is needed to fix this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482363] Checkboxes on forms do not show as checked even though they are checked
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482363 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- You can find the word processor that generated your particular document by looking at "File -> Properties". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 478540] Can't edit form field after entering invalid character
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478540 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Is this possibly a duplicate of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474889 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Removing import Postscript as PDF feature?
I'm also trying to flip it around a bit. If this was proposed today where we have a postscript generator in okular, would we accept this feature? Also, don't you get the same functionality by loading the postscript as postscript, and then printing it to a file (at least in principle)? I'd consider that way of converting postscript to pdf more natural. Best, Oliver smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 474889] New: Form field misuse leads to 'NaN' which won't disappear
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474889 Bug ID: 474889 Summary: Form field misuse leads to 'NaN' which won't disappear Classification: Applications Product: okular Version: 23.08.1 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: PDF backend Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 161880 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=161880&action=edit The problematic document I have a pdf document with a form field that should (I guess) only accept numbers. By deliberate entering a non-digit I can make it show NaN. Afterwards, it is not possible to remove this NaN again. STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Open the attached document; click on 'show forms' 2. Click on the top left square (below "70 Liter") 3. Enter the letter X 4. Click outside of that square --> the X changes to NaN 5. Click into the square again --> the NaN changes back to X 6. Replace the X by a 2 7. Click on "hide forms" OBSERVED RESULT Instead of the number "2" the "NaN" is shown again. EXPECTED RESULT I am not quite sure what to expect. Should I be prevented from entering non-digits in the first place? At the very least I would expect to see a "2" at the end of the seven steps, not NaN. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Betriebssystem: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE-Plasma-Version: 5.27.5 KDE-Frameworks-Version: 5.103.0 Qt-Version: 5.15.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 474888] Signing requires (empty) password in document that has password-restriction for modification
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474888 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Created attachment 161879 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=161879&action=edit Acrobat security settings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 474888] New: Signing requires (empty) password in document that has password-restriction for modification
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474888 Bug ID: 474888 Summary: Signing requires (empty) password in document that has password-restriction for modification Classification: Applications Product: okular Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: PDF backend Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org Reporter: oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 161878 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=161878&action=edit The problematic document The attached pdf file contains a signature form field. However, when trying to sign it I am asked for a password. Using the empty string as the password allows me to sign the document. The reason is apparently that in this document the *modification* of the document is password-restricted. Please see the attached Acrobat security settings (German only, sorry. The blue line says: "Admissible changes: Filling-out form fields and signing existing signature fields".) SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Betriebssystem: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE-Plasma-Version: 5.27.5 KDE-Frameworks-Version: 5.103.0 Qt-Version: 5.15.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 --- Comment #24 from Oliver Sander --- I would still be interested to see what your Utils::realDpi method does. Have you been able to get your local Okular to link yet? Looking at the code again I see that if the system reports different dpi for x and y (which are then ignored) it issues a warning: qCDebug(OkularCoreDebug) << "QScreen calculation returned a non square dpi." << res << ". Falling back"; Do you see this message when you enable Okular debug output with kdebugdialog5? (KDE gurus: please correct me if something else is needed to enable the warning). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471422] Okular crashes when opening specific PDF files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471422 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Backtrace: #0 getCertificateInfoFromCERT (cert=0x5679e5e0) at /home/sander/poppler/poppler/NSSCryptoSignBackend.cc:619 #1 0x7fffa946d674 in NSSSignatureVerification::getCertificateInfo (this=0x567776a0) at /home/sander/poppler/poppler/NSSCryptoSignBackend.cc:658 #2 0x7fffa934bf29 in FormFieldSignature::validateSignature (this=0x55bade30, doVerifyCert=doVerifyCert@entry=true, forceRevalidation=forceRevalidation@entry=false, validationTime=-1, ocspRevocationCheck=, enableAIA=enableAIA@entry=false) at /home/sander/poppler/poppler/Form.cc:2419 #3 0x7fffa934bfd8 in FormWidgetSignature::validateSignature (this=this@entry=0x567789b0, doVerifyCert=doVerifyCert@entry=true, forceRevalidation=forceRevalidation@entry=false, validationTime=, ocspRevocationCheck=, enableAIA=enableAIA@entry=false) at /home/sander/poppler/poppler/Form.cc:578 #4 0x7fffbda685ff in Poppler::FormFieldSignature::validate (this=this@entry=0x567779b0, opt=opt@entry=1, validationTime=...) at /home/sander/poppler/qt5/src/poppler-form.cc:1021 #5 0x7fffbda688f1 in Poppler::FormFieldSignature::validate (this=0x567779b0, opt=Poppler::FormFieldSignature::ValidateVerifyCertificate) at /home/sander/poppler/qt5/src/poppler-form.cc:971 #6 0x7fffbdb11d9d in PopplerFormFieldSignature::PopplerFormFieldSignature (this=0x56786fc0, field=std::unique_ptr = {...}) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/generators/poppler/formfields.cpp:400 #7 0x7fffbdafe571 in PDFGenerator::getFormFields (this=0x55aaba90, popplerPage=0x567782c0) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp:1934 #8 0x7fffbdaf8603 in PDFGenerator::loadPages (this=0x55aaba90, pagesVector=..., rotation=0, clear=false) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp:873 --Type for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--c #9 0x7fffbdaf7cca in PDFGenerator::init (this=0x55aaba90, pagesVector=..., password=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp:734 #10 0x7fffbdaf789a in PDFGenerator::loadDocumentWithPassword (this=0x55aaba90, filePath=..., pagesVector=..., password=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp:678 #11 0x7fffe8207abb in Okular::DocumentPrivate::openDocumentInternal (this=0x557d8c40, offer=..., isstdin=false, docFile=..., filedata=..., password=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/core/document.cpp:942 #12 0x7fffe8211571 in Okular::Document::openDocument (this=0x557af760, docFile=..., url=..., _mime=..., password=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/core/document.cpp:2460 #13 0x7fffe04d1184 in Okular::Part::doOpenFile (this=0x556254f0, mimeA=..., fileNameToOpenA=..., isCompressedFile=0x7fffd077) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/part/part.cpp:1465 #14 0x7fffe04d20e6 in Okular::Part::openFile (this=0x556254f0) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/part/part.cpp:1599 #15 0x77f50785 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Parts.so.5 #16 0x77f5187e in KParts::ReadOnlyPart::openUrl(QUrl const&) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5Parts.so.5 #17 0x7fffe04d3a86 in Okular::Part::openUrl (this=0x556254f0, _url=..., swapInsteadOfOpening=false) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/part/part.cpp:1825 #18 0x7fffe04d363a in Okular::Part::openUrl (this=0x556254f0, url=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/part/part.cpp:1773 #19 0x55572980 in Shell::openUrl (this=0x5578d2c0, url=..., serializedOptions=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/shell/shell.cpp:418 #20 0x555724e0 in Shell::openDocument (this=0x5578d2c0, url=..., serializedOptions=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/shell/shell.cpp:362 #21 0x5556e290 in Okular::main (paths=..., serializedOptions=...) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/shell/okular_main.cpp:216 #22 0x5556b4fc in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffdc08) at /home/sander/kde-invent/okular/shell/main.cpp:97 (gdb) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470734] Printing is extremely slow (Win10)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470734 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- > Assumption: Okular sends (large) rendered bitmaps to the printer (sub system > of Windows) where Acrobat Reader sends (small) texts. That's essentially correct. The code is in the method PDFGenerator::print in the file generator_pdf.cpp. Improving the situation is not particularly difficult, but it needs somebody with both the time to do it and a Windows machine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Feature request/enquiry: Overprint support
No problems, I've reached out to a company we've previously had discussions with - if that's not fruitful, do you have any specific recommendations? (Happy if you'd prefer to email me directly/off list) My employer has hired KDAB [CCed] several times for Okular/Poppler work, and we have always been very satisfied with the results. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 126942] Kghostview can't show any overprint preview
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126942 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- Can you please attach an example file? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Feature request/enquiry: Overprint support
Hi Bernard, Turns out, there was already a bug raised in 2006(!): https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126942 thanks for finding this. I've added links back to this mailing list thread - is there any way I am able to raise the profile of this ticket to get it looked at (beyond having this discussion)? to be honest I think you need professional support for this. Overprint support is a bit exotic, and you are very unlikely to find a volunteer with the motivation, the time and the skills to implement this. In a previous email you mentioned that you write on behalf of a company. I strongly suggest that you ask them for money to hire one of the companies that offers professional Okular support. Best, Oliver smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Feature request/enquiry: Overprint support
Bernard, can you explain more precisely what it is that you need? Without it I don't think you will get a better answer. Sorry for this: I just found your last email which gives more information. Let me digest those first. Maybe open a feature request at bugs.kde.org -- that's more easily kept track of. That I think is still a good idea. Best, Oliver Cheers, Oliver On 29.05.23 21:49, Laura David Hurka wrote: Hi Bernard, I don’t know exactly what overprinting is, or what your requirements are. I understand it as a feature similar to PDF layers. Okular has a side panel for layers, you can try it with the last page of what a quick internet search gave me: https://www.edcfiresafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Using-Layerd-PDFs-with-Sample-Map.pdf I assume your requirement is to display the document correctly, only on your screen of your local desktop computer. My conclusion is that Poppler (the PDF library normally used by Okular) will need to support “overprinting”. If a user interface is necessary, that should be a sensible addition to Okular, similar to how layers already have a user interface. Cheers, David Hi everyone, We are currently supporting a very old version of 32 bit adobe reader on our ubuntu 22.04/kde desktops, due to the requirement for support for a PDF feature called "Overprint" which is used by our label printing supplier (I work for an Australian winery) [...] Is this feature something Okular would be interested in developing? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Feature request/enquiry: Overprint support
Hi, poppler does have overprinting support (to a certain extent). See for example the manpage of pdftops. Bernard, can you explain more precisely what it is that you need? Without it I don't think you will get a better answer. Maybe open a feature request at bugs.kde.org -- that's more easily kept track of. Cheers, Oliver On 29.05.23 21:49, Laura David Hurka wrote: Hi Bernard, I don’t know exactly what overprinting is, or what your requirements are. I understand it as a feature similar to PDF layers. Okular has a side panel for layers, you can try it with the last page of what a quick internet search gave me: https://www.edcfiresafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Using-Layerd-PDFs-with-Sample-Map.pdf I assume your requirement is to display the document correctly, only on your screen of your local desktop computer. My conclusion is that Poppler (the PDF library normally used by Okular) will need to support “overprinting”. If a user interface is necessary, that should be a sensible addition to Okular, similar to how layers already have a user interface. Cheers, David Hi everyone, We are currently supporting a very old version of 32 bit adobe reader on our ubuntu 22.04/kde desktops, due to the requirement for support for a PDF feature called "Overprint" which is used by our label printing supplier (I work for an Australian winery) [...] Is this feature something Okular would be interested in developing? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 470108] Touchscreen zoom not working as expected
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470108 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- See https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/134 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 --- Comment #21 from Oliver Sander --- Did you get Okular to build and link on your computer in the meantime? My apologies, but I am not the one who can help with linker problems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 461371] PDFs digitally signed with Okular become locked in Adobe Acrobat so no one else can sign it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461371 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- I asked the colleague I mentioned above to test this, and it seems that the issue is indeed fixed for us as well. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469044] Crash when closing an PDF file with digital sign
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469044 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Can you try this with a very new poppler and Okular? The signature code is being worked on and your problem may have been fixed already. Also, does this happen with every document with a signature? Can you share such a document? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 468819] The application's title bar is set to the title in the PDF doc, instead of the filename
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468819 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- The sixth option in settings --> okular settings --> general (actual names may differ, my Okular UI is not English) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 468112] Use Cairo backend for Poppler wrapper used in Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468112 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/merge_requests/546 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 468017] Percentage value not localised
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468017 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Is this fixed by your patch https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/675 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: segmentation fault 22.04.3
Thank you Albert. The pdf file is not relevant here though. Not when other viewers such as xpdf handle the file without a problem. The pdf file is certainly relevant. It is very difficult to fix a crash in a particular file without having the file. Please open an issue on bugs.kde.org and attach the file. Best, Oliver smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Digital signature: font & content of the rectangle
Hi Guillaume, most of what is missing has been implemented in https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/537 Best, Oliver On 15.03.23 18:31, Guillaume Gheysen wrote: Dear Okular developers, I am using Okular to e-sign documents (using Belgian Eid) and I really appreciate your work. However, I don't find the options to configure the signature drawn on the pdf (font, content, etc.) and I need to make a huge rectangle to have a visible signature (which is not often possible). It is possible to have information about this configuration or do you know when this feature will be available ? Thank you. Best regards, Guillaume Gheysen smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 467328] Okular mismanages fonts embedded in PDF document when printing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328 --- Comment #13 from Oliver Sander --- 1) Yes, poppler is used 2) On Windows, rasterization resolution follows the printer. Elsewhere, 300dpi is hardcoded. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 467328] Okular mismanages fonts embedded in PDF document when printing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328 --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- I fully agree that `force rasterization` is only a workaround. Okular currently converts pdf files to postscript and sends that to the printer (I forgot why exactly). Presumably it is the conversion step that goes wrong in your case. If you want to have a look at the code: That's at `generator_pdf.cpp:1366`. There used to be a patch that made Okular send the pdf file straight to the printer, but I can't seem to find it right now. And then there's the official Qt way of printing: Render everything to a `QPrinter` object. Code for that is at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/411 , but that has its own set of problems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 467328] Okular mismanages fonts embedded in PDF document when printing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467328 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- Printing in Okular is a bit special. I conjecture that you can print your document if you select the 'force rasterization' option in the print dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 459174] okular crashes after signature checking
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459174 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander --- Without having tried this myself: There has been a great number of bug reports similar to this one, and they have all been solved by updating to newer versions. Please try to get the latest flatpack version of Okular or build it from source and report back if the bug is still there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 --- Comment #15 from Oliver Sander --- Building Okular is described at https://okular.kde.org/build-it/ > But I guess, when I compile my own okular, it will display a circle - > murphy's law :-) That's possible. But then you will have free time to fix some other Okular bug if you are interested. There are lot's. :-) BTW, have you checked whether your issue persists if you change from X11 to Wayland or vice versa? I don't think hidden config files have anything to do with this, but I may be wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 --- Comment #13 from Oliver Sander --- Relax. This is just very difficult to debug without being able to reproduce it locally. Access to dpi information is gathered in the method `realDpi` in the file `utils.cpp`. Are you able to build your own Okular (it is not very difficult)? If so, this is the place to start looking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander --- What happens when you swap the monitors? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 465055] All PDFs are shown stretched in y-axis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465055 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- Well, even if it is, it must be something subtle, because most people see a rendering of the circle in just the way it should be. Albert and me, for example. Is your setup a laptop with a built-in screen? Can you reproduce the problem if you use another screen? Another computer? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 464716] Very slow render time on restaurant menu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464716 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- I can confirm the multi-second pauses, even with the recent efficiency improvements in PagePainter. The document is indeed a single page, with custom size 452 x 2529 m. It contains a single image with 2312 x 12943 pixels. Okular apparently renders only the visible parts, and that seems to take a while. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 443403] Reduce the size of the digital signature display
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443403 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #15 from Oliver Sander --- This is probably fixed by https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/537 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 423360] Viewport blinks (flashes, disappears) while scrolling or dragging at moderate or high zoom levels
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423360 --- Comment #9 from Oliver Sander --- Is this still an issue now that https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/665 has been merged? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 460681] Laggy scrolling on high DPI display - profiling indicates excessive copying in PagePainter::paintCroppedPageOnPainter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460681 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- Fixed by merging https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/665 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 462579] the barcodes disappear in the printed edition under okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462579 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 457739] Okular handbook confused on annotations
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457739 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/commit/0136eddb ||12151530bd162fd9b8862926a55 ||007e3 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- Git commit 0136eddb12151530bd162fd9b8862926a55007e3 by Oliver Sander, on behalf of Paul Worrall. Committed on 01/12/2022 at 15:29. Pushed by sander into branch 'master'. Handbook: Select Browse to edit/delete annotations Minor change to handbook to say that the Browse tool has to be selected before you can edit or delete annotations M +2-2doc/index.docbook https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/commit/0136eddb12151530bd162fd9b8862926a55007e3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 462304] Okular and other poppler related tools cannot handle some pdf pages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462304 --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- Yes please. You should be able to reproduce the bug with the `pdftoppm` tool (which is part of poppler). That way, your bug report becomes independent from Okular. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 462304] Okular and other poppler related tools cannot handle some pdf pages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462304 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- Can you post a poppler bug for this, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 436742] Involuntary scrolling when annotations encounter edge of page
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436742 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/commit/e6002e79 ||8d06cf52a71d9d35716c4d0b9c2 ||82d99 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- Git commit e6002e798d06cf52a71d9d35716c4d0b9c282d99 by Oliver Sander, on behalf of Nikola Nikolic. Committed on 15/11/2022 at 13:30. Pushed by sander into branch 'master'. Fix: Involuntary scrolling when annotations encounter the edge of the page There are three reasons why scrolling happens (first two cases of scrolling are actually due to viewport transition that is triggered by annotation being traslated/created): 1. VisiblePageRect are NormalizedRect and should be represented by four values in [0, 1] interval. Due to rounding errors caused by using QRect, they only reach the [0, 0.999] interval. That means that right and bottom edge of the page are never visible so if annotation is translated along the right/bottom edge viewport transition occurs (fixed in PageView::slotRequestVisiblePixmaps) 2. For freehand line there are some constants (dX, dY) that make a line to be drawn outside the page borders causing viewport transition. Removing these constants solves the problem (fixed in SmoothPathEngine::event) 3. Browse mode is activated as soon as the cursor is moved outside the viewport. Instead, we should forward the move event to the annotation which than can ignore the event (fixed in PageView::mouseMoveEvent) M +8-10 part/annotationtools.cpp M +11 -6part/pageview.cpp https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/commit/e6002e798d06cf52a71d9d35716c4d0b9c282d99 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 315930] Ability to sign a PDF with my scanned signature (i.e. picture file) like in Adobe Acrobat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315930 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #11 from Oliver Sander --- It's in the pipeline: https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/537 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 461371] PDFs digitally signed with Okular become locked in Adobe Acrobat so no one else can sign it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461371 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- A colleague of mine just confirmed this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 460681] Laggy scrolling on high DPI display - profiling indicates excessive copying in PagePainter::paintCroppedPageOnPainter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460681 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Some of the calls to `setDevicePixelRatio` where probably introduced by me. The deep-copying was not intentional. I am not very proficient in Qt programming, and I wasn't even aware that these calls trigger a deep copy. Does https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/612 fix your issue by any chance? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 458723] PDF document isn't shown - "Please wait ..." message is shown instead
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- I haven't checked this particular case, but documents that show this warning message typically contain XFA forms. These forms are described in a document several hundred pages long, and nobody has ever had the nerve to start an open implementation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 458722] Bad rendering of data matrix code in Okular (blurry in some conditions)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458722 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- xpdf does not use poppler. Instead, poppler is a (partial) fork of xpdf. The two codes are similar but not identical. To convince yourself that poppler is the culprit try to render the file with `pdftoppm`. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 455115] Show pop-up notes text more directly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455115 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- >From reading the description of your workflow it seems that your last suggestion (having the annotation texts visible/accessible from the review pane, in the side bar) seems most helpful. In an ideal world you would even be able to navigate there with the keyboard alone, for increased speed. Would you be able to code such a feature? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Please fix one thing about Okular ..
Hi John-Albert, for me, highlighting only goes off if I *right*-click in the document. Left- and middle-clicks keep the highlighter selected. Do you happen to use a fairly old version of Okular? The annotation GUI got a big rewrite a while ago. Please get a recent version of Okular and try that. Best regards, Oliver On 13.05.22 03:49, John-Albert Eadie wrote: Long time since I developed anything but I *love* Okular for yellow highlighting and saving .pdfs of research. However for me there is one BIG PROBLEM ... If I click on the document in any way *including the right mouse button*, highlighting goes off and I have to go up and choose Yellow Highlighter again. Very annoying. Because I'm slighty shaky, it happens many times during my edit. I recommend switching off the Yellow Highlighter only when left mouse click happens, not any mouse click turning it off. Even better, only left mouse click on Yellow Highlighter itself. Please. Thanks, -jae Ps: I am a million miles (50 years) away from coding but would it be possible to compile a version of my own? How massive? Thanks again. -- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ *both.and.e...@gmail.com* ‘King of Spaghetti Code’ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 449717] When zooming with 2 fingers on a touchscreen, Okular also scrolls through the document, causing me to lose my place.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449717 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- I reckon this is fixed by https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/134 Somebody would need to finish that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
D10455: Add RTL support for search, copy & paste in pdf
sander added a comment. Step 1 would be to open a merge request at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests . Can you do that? REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D10455 To: fahadalsaidi, #okular, aacid, ltoscano Cc: sander, guysoft, davidhurka, yaron, okular-devel, chfanzil, ngraham, anaumann, johnzh, andisa, siddharthmanthan, maguirre, fbampaloukas, joaonetto, kezik, darcyshen, aacid
[okular] [Bug 383651] Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other readers can see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651 --- Comment #33 from Oliver Sander --- If all you need is printing, then enabling 'force rasterization' in the print dialog will probably circumvent the problem for you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 450887] Change font for plain text files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450887 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- You can do that. It's under "preferences -> set up display modules -> text" (or something like that, I'm translating from my German UI). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 449808] butt caps shown as rounded
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449808 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- This appear to be a bug in poppler, the library used by Okular to render pdf files. I can reproduce the problem with pdftoppm 20.09.0. Can you please open a bug at the poppler bugtracker: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 449043] underline
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043 --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- I confirm this. Underlining both lines separately makes both underlines thin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 449043] underline
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043 --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- Created attachment 145852 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=145852&action=edit Small pdf file showing the problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 449043] underline
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449043 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- Indeed, I can confirm that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 448735] Bad path format for embedded documents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448735 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- I don't have a Windows machine to test with anyways. Can you, by any chance, embed some file in a test pdf file on Windows and upload that? That should fail on my Linux, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 448735] Bad path format for embedded documents
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448735 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Can you attach such a pdf file? If the embedded file is truly embedded then its path shouldn't matter, should it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 448448] Okular unable to print to LAN printer - status: rendering completed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448448 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- I think I have seen this error message as well, but I can't reproduce it now. As a workaround: Does printing work if you enable "force rasterization"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 447589] printi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447589 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- This doesn't look like a serious bug report. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 446549] Digital signature feature confusing for new users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446549 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- I understand your point, but please no additional dialog box. It would mean an additional click for everyone. How about: * An additional menu entry like "graphically sign" right next to "digitally sign" * An explanatory dialog popping up when people click on "digitally sign" without having certificates installed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 446549] Digital signature feature confusing for new users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446549 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander --- Albert, by and large I agree with you. However, I think Nicolai's suggestion to grey out the 'digitally sign' menu entry when there are no certificates is worth considering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 443446] Add "previous view" and "next view" buttons
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443446 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Sander --- I think you can already have such a button. Go to preference -> toolbar settings -> anotation toolbar, and there should be 'forward' and 'backward' actions. [The menu names may be slightly different, I translated them from my German UI.] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 443446] Add "previous view" and "next view" buttons
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443446 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Have you tried shift+alt+left? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 442280] Okular does not take /UserUnit into account (page size incorrect for certain files)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Comment #26 from Oliver Sander --- Can you guys please move the mupdf discussion elsewhere? While it is certainly interesting, it is only tangentially related to this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 442280] Okular does not take /UserUnit into account (page size incorrect for certain files)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #10 from Oliver Sander --- Can you reproduce the problem using one of the poppler command line tools like pdfinfo or pdftocairo? It may be a poppler bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 420571] Feature Request: Export/Import annotations to/from an XML file or the clipboard, using a toolbar button or context menu entry in the Reviews/Annotations side panel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420571 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander --- The two phabricator diffs mentioned in the first post look interesting in their own right. David, can I motivate you to submit them as gitlab merge requests (and maybe even adopt them wholesale)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 409644] [Wayland] Panning in Okular is laggy with 4K monitor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409644 --- Comment #11 from Oliver Sander --- > Why is devicePixelRatio here forced to be 1...? That part of the code was reworked in a recent merge request. Maybe it'll help you: https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/371 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 409644] [Wayland] Panning in Okular is laggy with 4K monitor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409644 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- Do you also see the problem without scaling? Screen scaling works differently under Wayland, and you may[0] end up with an 8K temporary bitmap. That is simply a lot of data, and maybe the lagging is for that? [0] I am not 100% about this, but it is worth checking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Where is the install folder on Ubuntu?
Hi Julius, The instructions say to run this command at one point: cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/your/install/dir .. I googled around a bit and my understanding is that there is a particular directory where system-wide installations are put - is that /local, on Ubuntu, or something else? What path should I give, above? you can choose that path yourself, and it usually points to somewhere in your home directory. For example, my own Okular installation is in /home/sander/okular-inst Best, Oliver smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 --- Comment #14 from Oliver Sander --- > But not in 20.12 maybe? No, not in 20.12. And I never tested it myself on Windows. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 --- Comment #12 from Oliver Sander --- > Okular uses qApp->devicePixelRatio() in some places to get the screen scaling. I thought I fixed all that, but I may be wrong. The only remaining per-screen-scaling issue I know of is https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/368 (which only bites if you use presentation mode). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 --- Comment #9 from Oliver Sander --- What about the nightly builds mentioned at https://okular.kde.org/download/ ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- This is what I expected. Per-screen-scaling hasn't seen much love until recently, because on Linux you won't get it anyway unless you use wayland. That being said, there have been a few patches recently. Can you try the 21.04 release, please, and report back? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Sander --- Is it blurry on both monitors? Is it blurry if you set scaling to 100%? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438980] display blurred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438980 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- What is your operating system? Do you use screen scaling? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 438923] PDF contents tab doesn't respect empty page label number style
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438923 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #7 from Oliver Sander --- I wouldn't mind seeing both, the number and the page label (empty if there is no label). If there is a general consensus against showing the page number, then showing nothing at all if there is no page label is okay for me, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Blue Angel for Okular
Hi Cornelius, that sounds like a worthy goal. Thanks for all your effort! Best, Oliver On 12.06.21 14:40, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: Dear Okular developers, you might have heard about the Blue Angel[1]. It's an ecolabel which is awarded by the German government for environmentally friendly design. It covers a broad range of different products, from recycled paper to eco-friendly ship design. Last year a category for resource and energy efficient software products was added[2]. The award criteria for this new category include energy-efficiency as well as other factors such as influence on hardware obsolescence and user autonomy. They match quite well with values we have in the KDE community and how we develop our software. Up to now there is no product yet which has been awarded with the label in the new software category. We can change that. Okular is an ideal candidate as it is a popular application and matches the criteria quite well. I have put together a first draft for an application[3]. It includes the documentation for all the criteria and how Okular matches them, as well as measurements, which have been executed by students from the Umwelt-Campus Birkenfeld[4]. The goal is to submit it for certification as soon as the data is complete. KDE e.V. will act as official applicant. While Okular itself already matches the criteria from my point of view, there are a few things which are asked in terms of documentation, which could be made more transparent on the Okular web site. I will submit a merge request with suggestions for corresponding changes shortly. This is an exciting project to give KDE more visibility in what it is doing for sustainable computing. If you are interested to learn more or to join, please feel free to get in touch with me. We also have a mailing list to talk about energy efficiency and topics around that [5]. Feel free to join there as well if you are interested and ask any questions you might have. Kind Regards, Cornelius [1]: https://www.blauer-engel.de/en [2]: https://www.blauer-engel.de/en/products/electric-devices/resources-and-energy-efficient-software-products [3]: https://invent.kde.org/cschumac/blue-angel-application/-/tree/master/applications/okular [4]: https://www.umwelt-campus.de/en/ [5]: https://mail.kde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/energy-efficiency smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: on "This document has XFA forms, which are currently unsupported."
Hi Mario, XFA forms are not part of the PDF standard, and supporting them would be a lot of work. Besides, they are deprecated in PDF 2.0: https://www.pdfa.org/pdf-2-0-the-worldwide-standard-for-electronic-documents-has-evolved/ In other words, support for them in Okular is very unlikely to come. It's better to avoid them altogether if you can. Best, Oliver On 16.06.21 15:33, mario chiari wrote: Hi I am writing as a user. I appreciate a quick update on pro/cons of support of XFA forms. Thanks for any good (entry-level) reference on the issue too. Thanks Best wishes mario smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[okular] [Bug 437926] Non-ASCII characters in certificate names are not printed on a signed document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437926 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #6 from Oliver Sander --- Let me ignore the whole "discrimination" and "offense" business. Johannes, this is a Poppler bug and needs to be fixed there. Johannes, can you reproduce the problem using the pdfsig problem (which is part of Poppler)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 436709] Autoplaying of renditions (audio/video)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436709 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- > I think that the current handling of "AutoPlay" is wrong for Renditions. Did you check what Acrobat does? Okular would usually strive to do the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 436301] Support non standard Libreoffice Embedded files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436301 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #12 from Oliver Sander --- Reading https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66580 (an old duplicate of your bug report), it seems quite clear that the LO folks are unhappy about their nonstandard way of embedding odt files into pdf files, and would rather see that changed. It is therefore extremely unlikely that Okular will ever implement support for the current LibreOffice way of embedding documents. Any developer effort is much better spent making LibreOffice standard-compatible. I will therefore close this bug report. Thanks for your interest in Okular! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 436301] Embedded Libreoffice files are not shown as embedded files in the File menu.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436301 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #1 from Oliver Sander --- Please attach such a file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 402017] Cannot save PDF when loaded file has been deleted
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402017 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #66 from Oliver Sander --- > I don't really understand why this bug is still open after so many users Because there is nobody who has both the skills and the free time to fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.