Re: [onap-discuss][integration] vcpe bpmn error

[Yang Bin]

Hi Kang,

   The wiki 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/vCPE+Use+Case+Tutorial%3A+Design+and+Deploy+based+on+ONAP#vCPEUseCaseTutorial:DesignandDeploybasedonONAP-Downloadandmodifyautomationcode
 mentioned there should be image created before deploy vCPE usecase, and I 
noticed there are multiple copies of the same image (e.g. 
vbng-base-ubuntu-16-04)
 , each for dedicated openstack project. So is that the intention to keep them 
dedicated to specific project, or we can make these image be shared across all 
projects of the Integration lab?

Thanks

Best Regards,
Bin Yang,Solution Engineering Team,Wind River
ONAP Multi-VIM/Cloud PTL
Direct +86,10,84777126Mobile +86,13811391682Fax +86,10,64398189
Skype: yangbincs993

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11995): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11995
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24532548/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

[Chuyi Guo]

 

 

Hello, Jessie,

  The Network Service model corresponds to the link is not only NSD, it 
includes different classes, and has been discussed and voted in Service IM 
call, I39m sorry you didn39t catch the call.

The current NS model is coordinated with the requirements of VF-C, not 
simply copy the ETSI specifications. Since the scope of development plan for 
C-release has been settled, other specific requirements should be proposed and 
discussed in the later releases.

   As for the issues you mentioned,  I think you are right about the 
NsVirtualLink, the type of VirtualLinkDesc is NsVirtualLinkDesc.

   For 4 and 5, the details of Sapd, Vnffgd and etc.,  haven39t been discussed 
yet, so is for VnfExtCp.

   From my understanding, ConnectivityType should be in the NsVirtualLinkDesc, 
which hasn39t been put in the papyrus class diagram , I think it is the point 
where should update.







BR,

Chuyi.







 

 




 
邮件原文发件人：Jessie Jewitt 收件人："yangxu 
(H)" 抄　送: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
发送时间：2018-08-21 00:41:12主题：Re: [onap-discuss] 
[modeling] Network Service Descriptor modelHi Xu- The link you refer to in 
your email to Network Service (which I assume is Descriptor) is not a model 
that is acceptable to me. I certainly don39t remember voting on this in R2. 
Here are some of the reasons I personally cannot accept it:
1. There is no class diagram showing the relationships between entities, so I 
don39t really know what concepts you are trying to model. 
2. The relationship that should exist is between NSD and VirtualLinkDesc, and 
not NsVirtualLink. The attribute in NSD called virtualLinkDesc (which should be 
the endpoint of the association) is of type string. That is incorrect.
3. I believe you mean NsVirtualLink to VirtualLinkDesc, as the first attribute 
is virtualLinkDescId.
4. Many of the attributes in NSD refer to types that are not defined in the 
model (Sapd, Vnffgd, NsDf...)
5. Same comment above regarding NsVirtualLink. It contains types that are not 
in your model, like SecurityParameters
6. ConnectivityType, as a datatype, has been moved to our Common model, which 
we will need to define as part of our final resource IM in clean, and not a NSD 
model. The benefit of putting datatypes like these in "Common" is that we 
define them once, and then reference them from multiple models, like Resource 
(where NSD lives) and VNF.
7. There is nothing in the model that refers to a VnfExtCp and its relationship 
to NSD.

These are just some of the issues.
I believe a better approach is to take the NSD model defined that is based on 
ETSI (that addresses the above issues) and pare it down to something 
equivalent, if you want.  I39d be happy to update the NSD model to show what it 
would look like.

-Jessie




On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:35 AM, yangxu (H)  wrote:

Hi All,


 


Thank you for joining today’s resource IM call and having the meaningful 
discussion.


My apologize for not allocating much time reviewing the NSD model, as M3 is 
approaching, I think we need to trigger offline discussion to help accelerate  
the progress.


 


The main issue I see for the NSD model is the scope for R3 documentation. The 
current proposal from Jessie is based on IFA014 spec, while the model  agreed 
in R2 (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService) is only subset of the 
spec. And whether we need to include PNFD model as part of the NSD model (like 
ETSI does), and how we document  the PNFD model in R3 remains a question.


 


My suggestion is we keep aligned with the previous agreement and implementation 
in R3. Which means we only document the trimmed NSD in R3 and try  to capture 
the PNFD model which would be implemented by the SDC team.


 


Please share your opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the clean 
model before the deadline, thanks.


 


Best regards,


Xu


 


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 3:09 AM To: onap-discuss 
 Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network 
Service Descriptor model


 


Please review and provide comments by 8/13 (on the wiki) for the proposed 
Network Service Descriptor model. It was aligned with ETSI IFA014 v2.4.4.


 



Thanks,



Jessie




 








 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11994): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11994
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24212025/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

[denghui (L)]

Dear Modeling subcommittee

I would like sincerely nominate myself as a candidate of chair of modeling 
subcommittee.

The goal of next year of modeling subcommittee needs to achieve the following 
goals
1) The internal data model design based on consensus.
2) Resource information model design, especially align with Data model.
3) Service model design with help from Architecture committee and impacted 
projects.
4) Infrastructure modeling design together with Multicloud in order to support 
Azure, K8S, .. et al.
5) Support other model spec from other committees like close loop policy, data 
collection VES .. et al.
6) Clarify more detail of the high level requirement together with use case 
committee and impacted projects.

If I were elected,  I would do my best to lead the group in taking the 
following opportunities for modeling subcommittee
1) Since the market of NFV has already taken off, most of them are based on 
SDOs, I would bring theirs experience into ONAP which could help ONAP become 
more success.
2) There are many standard delegate's involvement at the moment, I would revise 
some current process to better transfer SDO delegate's involvement into 
productive deliverables for ONAP community.
3) I would like to establish more mutual communication and setup activities 
with other SDOs like: ETSI NFV, TMF, MEF, ONF, IETF .. et al.

Below are my short Bio.
Hui DENG obtained his Doctor degree from Dept. Computer Science and Technology 
at Tsinghua University in 2002. He worked as chief researcher in Hitachi 
(China) R&D Cooperation from 2002 to 2007, and worked as Principal staff 
between 2007 and 2016 in China Mobile. He joined Huawei and working on NFV 
related topic since 2016. He acted as the co-chair of IETF MIF working group. 
And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance) between 
2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 2014-2016 and 1st 
board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation. He is the current 
chair of modeling subcommittee in ONAP.

2017 - 2018 Chair of modeling subcommittee, ONAP
2016 - 2016 1st Board of Chairman, OPEN-O
2014 - 2016 Board of Director (officer), OPNFV
2012 - 2014 Board of Director, WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance)
2009 - 2016 Co-chair, MIF(Multiple Interfaces) WG, IETF
2016 – now ETSI NFV ISG coordinator of Huawei

Professional experience
2016 – Now Chief NFV Strategy Officer, Huawei
2007 – 2016 Principal Staff, China Mobile
2002 – 2007 Chief Researcher, Hitachi

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 4:41 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections 
Call for Self-Nominations

As per Subcommittee Chair 
Elections
 I am officially opening the self-nomination period for the Modeling 
Subcommittee Chair elections.
The nomination period will end on Friday, Aug 24 @ 2:00 Pm Pacific

The members eligible to be a voting member is set to V118 of the Modeling 
Subcommittee Membership Page
I have updated that page, adding a column for Company and a column that says 
"Voting Member", and removing 3 individuals I know are no longer involved with 
ONAP.  One of them never even set up a wiki account.

The "Voting Member" column usage is simple. If you are the person from your 
company that will be casting the vote, then put "Yes" in that column. If not, 
leave it blank.


Who is eligible to Run: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the wiki 
page)

Who is eligible to Vote: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the 
wiki page) AND as controlled within the context of Section 
4.4.1.4
 of the Community Document

Process:

Self-Nomination Phase
When appropriate a call for nominations will be sent by the LF to the 
appropriate distribution list, using the subcommittee's specific email tag.  
Individuals interested in running for the Subcommittee Chair position must 
reply-all to that email with your intention to run.  It is recommended that 
candidates include a biography and statement of intent on why you would be a 
good person to hold this position.
·
·

 *   The nomination phase begins with the receipt of the announcement ( as 
verified by checking the appropriate list in groups.io 
)
 *   The nomination phase ends four (4) full business days after the 
announcement in the same time zone the poll was initiated from

Election Phase
A Condorcet election will be held using the CIVS voting 
system.  All 
subcommittee members (as indicated above) will receive an invitation to vote.
·
·

 *   The election

[onap-discuss] Add application to Nexus IQ

[Sudhakar Reddy]

Hi,

What is the procedure to add a new application to Nexus IQ to run the clm job?

I tried adding from the Nexus IQ portal but it is showing me "Insufficient 
privileges" error.

Thanks & Regards
Sudhakar Reddy

“Amdocs’ email platform is based on a third-party, worldwide, cloud-based 
system. Any emails sent to Amdocs will be processed and stored using such 
system and are accessible by third party providers of such system on a limited 
basis. Your sending of emails to Amdocs evidences your consent to the use of 
such system and such processing, storing and access”.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11992): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11992
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24917147/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

答复: [onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance

[Yan Yang]

Hi Prakash,

 

VoLTE usecase use UUI(usecase ui) to do the service LCM operation not VID in 
Amsterdam and Beijing release. 

 

You can find the valid VNF csar in 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SDC+Component

 

During integration testing, we also recode the demo video in 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Beijing+Release+VoLTE+Integration+Test+Status. 
Hope it helps you .

 

 

Best Regards,

Yan

发件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] 代表 
Prakash via Lists.Onap.Org
发送时间: 2018年8月21日 20:13
收件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
主题: [onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance

 

Hello Team,

 

Basically I'm trying to test the voLTE use case. Kindly help me get started 
with the below things;


1.  The Createvfmoduleinfra.bpmn gets called when I create vfmodule in VID. 
Similarly I don't see any option to call CreateCustomE2EServiceInstance.bpmn 
which is oly for voLTE use cases. 

2.  Where can I find the certified csar package for voLTE use case used by 
integration team/or any working package .

3.  Is the on boarding of voLTE VNF Package same as vLB?

4.  How the voLTE service instance creation done from VID ?

5.  Is there any demo video available for voLTE use case?

 

 

-- 

Regards,
Prakas P,
Network and Technology IT,
VDSI - Olympia – Chennai

VoIP: 72184 | Direct: +91 44 4394 2184

Mailto  |   prakas...@verizon.com

 

  We Are VERIZON

  INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . 
ACCOUNTABILITY




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11991): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11991
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24917000/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [PTL] Zoom record capability - fixing permissions for existing PTLs - gathering list #zoom

[Yang Bin]

Multi-VIM/Cloud is one of them as well.

List :
Logging-analytics (Tue 1500UTC - https://zoom.us/j/519971638 meeting 
6) - for Michael O'Brien 
LF:michaelobrien
OOM (Wed 1400UTC - https://zoom.us/j/118908904 meeting 5 ) = Mike Elliott 
LF:melliott
POMBA (Thu 1200UTC - https://zoom.us/j/415990613 meeting 
6) = Sharon Chisholm LF:chiz99
Multi-VIM/Cloud (Wed UTC 13:00 https://zoom.us/j/810387508 meeting 7) =  
Bin Yang LF:biny993

Thanks

Best Regards,
Bin Yang,Solution Engineering Team,Wind River
ONAP Multi-VIM/Cloud PTL
Direct +86,10,84777126Mobile +86,13811391682Fax +86,10,64398189
Skype: yangbincs993

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Michael O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 3:05 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [PTL] Zoom record capability - fixing permissions for 
existing PTLs - gathering list #zoom

Team,
Kenny is very busy so I thought it would be good if we could get a list of 
those PTL's that are not able to hit the record button on their ZOOM meetings.
So far I have 3 - when we get the full list (by 9AM EDT Monday before the 
PTL meet) I will create a LF ticket and cc Kenny to get them fixed in one run.
Note: it looks like any PTL new since the original Amsterdam release may 
not have record rights

Page 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/calendar/260b8a93-05dd-476a-ab6c-ce5f14d46a34?calendarName=ONAP%20Meetings%20and%20Events

List :
Logging-analytics (Tue 1500UTC - https://zoom.us/j/519971638 meeting 
6) - for Michael O'Brien 
LF:michaelobrien
OOM (Wed 1400UTC - https://zoom.us/j/118908904 meeting 5 ) = Mike Elliott 
LF:melliott
POMBA (Thu 1200UTC - https://zoom.us/j/415990613 meeting 
6) = Sharon Chisholm LF:chiz99
.reply with any others

Thank you
/michael
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11990): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11990
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24910465/21656
Mute #zoom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=zoom&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [cia] Container Image Minimization Guidelines

[Adolfo Perez-Duran]

Team,

I have reviewed your comments on the container images best practices. One
of the comments received during the review, and a issue that was
consistently brought up as a pain point in meetings with ONAP projects, is
the need for guidelines to minimize the size of container images.

Responding to that need, I have created a wiki page to capture and
socialize these guidelines.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Container+Image+Minimization+Guidelines

The guidelines are far from complete. They must be considered just a
starting point.

You can open the wiki page here

to contribute to enhancing (add missing suggestions, add examples, etc) the
guidelines.

Thanks,

Adolfo

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11989): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11989
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24915826/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] #lfn #modeling [modeling] Subcommittee Chair/Vice Chair Poll #poll

[Kenny Paul]

A new poll has been created:

It has been suggested that the poll taken at last week's Modeling Subcommittee 
meeting should be re-run similar to what is being done in groups.io for the Use 
case Subcommittee.  The reason cited is that many folks at the meeting were 
unfamiliar with using the raise-hand and chat functions in zoom.  I can 
understand unfamiliarity with the raise-hand function as it has not been used a 
great deal. However, I am dismayed by the prospect that anyone involved in 
modeling one of the largest open source networking projects in the world would 
not know how to type "+1" into a chat window.  Nonetheless, in the interest of 
fairness I will put this poll out there. Modeling Subcommittee members please 
respond before 2pm Pacific, Friday Aug. 24th.

Poll Question: How would you like to see the Chair elections handled?

(Note: there is no concept of a subcommittee Co-Chair in the Community Document 
which is why that as an option is not included. How the Modeling Subcommittee 
should chose to delegate responsibility with regards to an elected Chair and 
Vice-Chair to perform the duties listed in Section 4.4.1.2 ( 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Technical+Community+Document#ONAPTechnicalCommunityDocument-4.4.1.2SubcommitteeChair/ViceChair
 )  of the Community Document would basically up to the subcommittee)

Thanks!
-kenny

1. Chair Only
2. Chair & Vice Chair (elected via the top vote getter and 1st runner up 
respectively)
3. Chair & Vice Chair (elected via two separate elections, Chair 1st, then 
Vice-Chair)

Vote Now: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/vote?pollid=2453

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11988): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11988
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24914592/21656
Mute #modeling: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=modeling&subid=2740164
Mute #poll: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=poll&subid=2740164
Mute #lfn: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=lfn&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Complete details required - OANP to VNF via openstack

[Michael O'Brien]

Nice, thanks for including the community - I was planning on forwarding - your 
message was in my queue.
We currently deploy on kubernetes via OOM, details are below.
If you are looking for HEAT (VM) deployment - this method is deprecated and 
only used for testing.

See details and scripts on the official OOM RTD's pages
https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/oom.git/docs/oom_quickstart_guide.html
There are several (4) scripts to get your kubernetes system up either via fully 
automated scripts below or via embedded scripts in RTD above.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Native+Deployment
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/deploy
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/deployment/Azure_ARM_Template
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/deployment/heat/onap-oom

For resource requirements - there are several pages like a cost structure one 
for AWS - it needs updating 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Deployment+Specification+for+Finance+and+Operations#ONAPDeploymentSpecificationforFinanceandOperations-HardwareProfile
 - essentially you will need 96-128G of ram distributed among 3-9 VMs to handle 
the 172+ containers - ideally with a minimum total of 16 vCores (you will peak 
at 55 on startup), a 1+ Gbps pipe to get all the docker images, an NFS share 
that handles >5Gb and 80-100G HD (peaks at 4Gbps) per VM in your cluster.  I 
would keep the master VM separate from the cluster VMs where your pods will run 
- helm is installed only on the master.

Helm was just upgraded 
https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/oom_integration_helm/24628483?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,20,24628483
For VNFs - I only have experience with the vFW which runs less than an extra 
16g - specific to openstack (these are still VM/Heat orchestrated and are not 
containerized yet like the ONAP system itself)

Community will add to this discussion.

Thank you
/michael


From: Shubhra Garg 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:31 AM
To: Michael O'Brien ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: Complete details required - OANP to VNF via openstack



+ ONAP discuss.

From: Shubhra Garg
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 4:40 PM
To: frank.obr...@amdocs.com
Subject: Re: Complete details required - OANP to VNF via openstack


Gentle reminder!



Could you please share the right links for the onap integration with VNF , 
using kubernetes?

Note : i might not get the recommendations as I have opted out of ONAP mails.

Best Regards,
Shubhra

From: Shubhra Garg
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:38 PM
To: frank.obr...@amdocs.com
Subject: Complete details required - OANP to VNF via openstack


Hi Michael,



[ Need details from Scratch]: It's my humble request to please guide for the 
complete thing.



This mail is regarding ONAP integration with openstack and VNF.

I am looking for the right set of links for the integration.



On one of the machine - ONAP sits.

On other machine - openstack sits. Openstack we have installed via kubernetes.

On the same/other machine - VNF sits.



Now, I need those clear links/videos, which will lead to the integration of 
ONAP with openstack and NVF.



Note : The reason why I have mentioned the above setup is : When I was watching 
onap videos, I noticed that in openstack, ONAP modules are created as VM's. 
This creates confusion for us. We are following the above mentioned approach.



Also, how much total memory is required for the complete integration and 
lifecycle mgmt. of ONAP with VNF ?



Request you to please guide for the same!



Best Regards,

Shubhra


This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11987): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11987
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24913671/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [PTL] Zoom record capability - fixing permissions for existing PTLs - gathering list #zoom

[Michael O'Brien]

Team,
Kenny is very busy so I thought it would be good if we could get a list of 
those PTL's that are not able to hit the record button on their ZOOM meetings.
So far I have 3 - when we get the full list (by 9AM EDT Monday before the 
PTL meet) I will create a LF ticket and cc Kenny to get them fixed in one run.
Note: it looks like any PTL new since the original Amsterdam release may 
not have record rights

Page 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/calendar/260b8a93-05dd-476a-ab6c-ce5f14d46a34?calendarName=ONAP%20Meetings%20and%20Events

List :
Logging-analytics (Tue 1500UTC - https://zoom.us/j/519971638 meeting 
6) - for Michael O'Brien 
LF:michaelobrien
OOM (Wed 1400UTC - https://zoom.us/j/118908904 meeting 5 ) = Mike Elliott 
LF:melliott
POMBA (Thu 1200UTC - https://zoom.us/j/415990613 meeting 
6) = Sharon Chisholm LF:chiz99
.reply with any others

Thank you
/michael
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11986): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11986
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24910465/21656
Mute #zoom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=zoom&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [MULTICLOUD] - HPA telemetry

[Srini]

Hi Bin,

I am travelling.  Eric confirmed and he will talk about the feature and high 
level design.  If time permits, Dileep can show the A&AI schema proposal.

Hi Ramki and Raghu,
Since it is born out of Edge-automation working group, it would be good if you 
can attend the meeting.

Thanks
Srini


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of bounce+19846+11984+675801+2740...@lists.onap.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:38 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Addepalli, Srinivasa R 

Cc: Multanen, Eric W ; Ranganathan, Dileep 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [MULTICLOUD] - HPA telemetry

Hi Srini,

Before I can suggest, I would like to understand this feature more.
Would someone please present the idea/design to MultiCloud team?  Perhaps it's 
a good chance to do that during the upcoming MultiCloud weekly meeting.

Thanks

Bin

在 2018年8月21日，23:29，Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> 写道：
Hi Bin,

We have this EPIC as part of Edge automation: 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/MULTICLOUD-257

This is meant to ensure that placement decisions consider current available 
resources in addition to what we were doing with respect to capabilities till 
R2.

This work got started last week.

There would some source code development (We call it -  HPA Telemetry receiving 
service) which gets aggregated telemetry information, do any 
massaging/filtering necessary and updates A&AI DB.

There would be some additional development with respect rules for Prometheus 
aggregation service.

This is generic service required across Openstack, K8S and Azure. Is there any 
repository in Multi-Cloud we can use to put this code or do you suggest to 
request for a new repository?  Please advise.

Thanks
Srini




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11985): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11985
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24877170/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [MULTICLOUD] - HPA telemetry

[Yang Bin]

Hi Srini,

Before I can suggest, I would like to understand this feature more.
Would someone please present the idea/design to MultiCloud team?  Perhaps it's 
a good chance to do that during the upcoming MultiCloud weekly meeting.

Thanks

Bin

在 2018年8月21日，23:29，Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> 写道：

Hi Bin,

We have this EPIC as part of Edge automation: 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/MULTICLOUD-257

This is meant to ensure that placement decisions consider current available 
resources in addition to what we were doing with respect to capabilities till 
R2.

This work got started last week.

There would some source code development (We call it �C  HPA Telemetry 
receiving service) which gets aggregated telemetry information, do any 
massaging/filtering necessary and updates A&AI DB.

There would be some additional development with respect rules for Prometheus 
aggregation service.

This is generic service required across Openstack, K8S and Azure. Is there any 
repository in Multi-Cloud we can use to put this code or do you suggest to 
request for a new repository?  Please advise.

Thanks
Srini




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11984): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11984
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24877170/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss][POMBA]

[Sharon Chisholm]

All

In this week's meeting, we plan to demo those POMBA components available at 
this time in ONAP.  It won't be the final integration, but we will provide 
additional demos as more of the solution is integrated.

Information about our meetings can be found at
   https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/POMBA+Meetings

Thanks

Sharon
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11983): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11983
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24877216/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<>

[onap-discuss] [MULTICLOUD] - HPA telemetry

[Srini]

Hi Bin,

We have this EPIC as part of Edge automation: 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/MULTICLOUD-257

This is meant to ensure that placement decisions consider current available 
resources in addition to what we were doing with respect to capabilities till 
R2.

This work got started last week.

There would some source code development (We call it -  HPA Telemetry receiving 
service) which gets aggregated telemetry information, do any 
massaging/filtering necessary and updates A&AI DB.

There would be some additional development with respect rules for Prometheus 
aggregation service.

This is generic service required across Openstack, K8S and Azure. Is there any 
repository in Multi-Cloud we can use to put this code or do you suggest to 
request for a new repository?  Please advise.

Thanks
Srini



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11982): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11982
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24877170/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [E] Re: [onap-discuss] [cia] Towards better container images in ONAP

[Tal Liron]

On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:50 PM Michael Still  wrote:

> - Create a repo for "official ONAP base images", basing the contents off
> what is currently used in OOM -- so for example if there are lots of users
> of Ubuntu 16.04, then we just create a ubuntu-lts image in said repo.
>

Well, I don't think this approach gets us very far forward. There's no
advantage in hosting our own Ubuntu 16.04 as opposed to the official one.
The issue I am trying to solve in my proposal is to allow a choice of base
images to be used, and also to have them be unified across ONAP. So rather
than the base image being "ubuntu-lts" it would be "onap-base" (with a few
different tagged flavors), which could be customized as appropriate.


> This at least makes it clearer what we're using, as well as making it
> easier to then "push dependancies down" into those central base images. I
> think its pretty clear that we need to simplify what we depend on (15
> different JDK base images right now, 11 different specifications for the
> Ubuntu version, etc).
>

Again, I don't think "simplicity" is the main goal here. Simple is nicer,
but if it works, it works. The serious problem, as I see it, is that an
operator likely does not have support contracts for 15 different JDKs and
several different vendored operating systems.


> For reference, there are 96 unique "FROM" lines in ONAP Dockerfiles at the
> moment.
>

That's an intriguing (and scary) number! Can you share with us how you
derived it? It would be useful for tracking our progress.
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11981): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11981
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24626855/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

[Andy Mayer]

Dear ONAP Modeling Subcommittee Members,

I would like to formally self-nominate myself for consideration as a candidate 
for serving the ONAP community as the Chair of the ONAP Modeling Sub-Committee.

I feel that taking on a leadership role in our ONAP Modeling Sub-Committee will 
help promote ONAP collaboration in many areas including architecture, 
information modeling, data modeling, and API definition with a focus on driving 
towards the vision of a model driven ONAP supporting uses cases, and consistent 
API definition.

I would like our Sub-committee to evolve in the following ways:
• Better document and follow a consistent process for collaborative modeling 
with early and regular involvement of ONAP component stakeholders.
• Seek earlier and more comprehensive community review, model approval and 
change control.
• Collaborate better with the architecture team on model-driven software 
architecture evolution.

In addition, I believe that our Sub-committee should work together with the 
broader set of industry SDO communities, including ETSI, TM Forum, MEF, ONF, 
and others.

I have been involved with ONAP since its inception, and served as the Project 
Team Lead of ONAP’s External API Framework Project, and sub-lead of the VNF SDK 
Package Modeling team. Also, in MEF I currently serve as Co-Lead of MEF’s LSO 
Reference Architecture Phase 2 Project, and served as MEF’s Chief Architect for 
LSO, and was the main author of MEF 55 as well as many other MEF technical 
specifications.

I am part of the Network Cloud and Infrastructure team at AT&T Labs where I am 
focused on end-to-end information integration for orchestration. Before joining 
AT&T Labs in 2016, I was with Applied Communication Sciences (formerly 
Telcordia / Bellcore) for nearly 30 years. I am also considered a leading 
expert and trusted adviser in service orchestration, network management, 
information modeling, and policy based management for connectivity data 
services and advanced technologies, including SDN and NFV.

I hold a BS from Purdue University, as well as a MS and Ph.D. from Stevens 
Institute of Technology.

Thank you for your consideration,
Andy

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, Network Cloud and Infrastructure | AT&T Labs | Phone: 
+1 (732) 420-9945 | am8...@att.com

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 4:41 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections 
Call for Self-Nominations

As per Subcommittee Chair 
Elections
 I am officially opening the self-nomination period for the Modeling 
Subcommittee Chair elections.
The nomination period will end on Friday, Aug 24 @ 2:00 Pm Pacific

The members eligible to be a voting member is set to V118 of the Modeling 
Subcommittee Membership Page
I have updated that page, adding a column for Company and a column that says 
"Voting Member", and removing 3 individuals I know are no longer involved with 
ONAP.  One of them never even set up a wiki account.

The "Voting Member" column usage is simple. If you are the person from your 
company that will be casting the vote, then put "Yes" in that column. If not, 
leave it blank.


Who is eligible to Run: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the wiki 
page)

Who is eligible to Vote: Subcommittee members of record (as per v118 of the 
wiki page) AND as controlled within the context of Section 
4.4.1.4
 of the Community Document

Process:

Self-Nomination Phase
When appropriate a call for nominations will be sent by the LF to the 
appropriate distribution list, using the subcommittee's specific email tag.  
Individuals interested in running for the Subcommittee Chair position must 
reply-all to that email with your intention to run.  It is recommended that 
candidates include a biography and statement of intent on why you would be a 
good person to hold this position.
·
·

 *   The nomination phase begins with the receipt of the announcement ( as 
verified by checking the appropriate list in 
groups.io
 )

Re: [onap-discuss] [cia] Towards better container images in ONAP

[Tal Liron]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:56 PM Frank Sandoval <
frank.sando...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote:

> I believe our intent is to define a build chain and rules or guidelines
> that all projects use to build their reference images. As a general model
> (hopefully not too simplistic), an RI is composed of the following
> 'logical' layers (not Docker layers):
> 1. architecture
> 2. OS
> 3. libraries (e.g Java, Python, etc)
> 4. application
>
> Layers 1-3 can be 'standardized' for all ONAP projects.
>

Thanks, Frank, this is a pithy and precise categorization.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11979): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11979
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24242182/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

[Venkata Harish K Kajur]

Hi Keong,

When you are running the traversal image, can you add this flag -e 
DISABLE_UPDATE_QUERY=true and then run the container.
Then you shouldn't see any issues with trying to run the built docker images.
The updateQueryData shell script is responsible for creating widgets in AAI but 
it needs the haproxy to be up in order to successfully work.
The code was changed to handle this scenario a little differently in heat and 
oom so that’s why this code was there.
Later, we had this script disabled in both oom and heat and ensured but left it 
out.

Here is a jira task for cleaning it up.

https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-1529

Also, are you just trying to start the traversal microservice locally or 
planning to deploy all of AAI locally?
If you are planning to just do a simple test, then in resources, you will need 
to run this command to start locally.

mvn -pl aai-resources -PrunAjsc

Traversal:

mvn -pl aai-traversal -PrunAjsc

If you are planning to deploy all of AAI locally, then please follow this 
tutorial.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/How+to+Docker+setup+on+Single+VM


Thanks,
Harish
-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  On Behalf Of 
Keong Lim
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 12:38 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] How to build aai-resources and aai-traversal docker 
images and push to local docker repository? #aai #docker

Hi Harish,

I ran that mvn command to build the docker images in aai/resources and 
aai/traversal and both seemed to give BUILD SUCCESS.
However, when I run those containers, there are errors in the logs. Both 
containers give:

===
chown: cannot access '/var/chef': No such file or directory ===

The aai-traversal container has lots of these logs:

===
tee: /opt/app/aai-traversal/logs/misc/updateQueryData.sh.log.2018-08-20: No 
such file or directory Begin putTool for widget action-1.0.json
/opt/app/aai-traversal/bin/install/updateQueryData.sh[52]: 
/opt/app/aai-traversal/logs/misc/updateQueryData.sh.log.2018-08-20: cannot 
create [No such file or directory]
updateQueryData.sh: failed for 
service-design-and-creation/models/model/af593b4b-490e-4665-ad74-2f6351c0a7ce 
/opt/app/aai-traversal/resources/etc/scriptdata/widget-model-json/action-1.0.json
 on cmd 1 ===

Do I need to build more components? Or install more software?

Thanks,
Keong




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11978): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11978
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24818784/21656
Mute #aai: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=aai&subid=2740164
Mute #docker: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=docker&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [vid] VID weekly meeting minutes 8/21/2018

[Ofir Sonsino]

Dear community,

VID weekly meeting minutes can be found on VID wiki:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=38120788

Thanks,

Ofir Sonsino
Project Technical Lead, VID
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451417
Mobile: +972 (52) 4377782
E-mail: os0...@intl.att.com


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11977): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11977
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24876555/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

答复: [onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance

[gaoweitao]

Hi Prakash,

 You can find the volte sample VNF(vSBC) at here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Interest+Group+2018-06-04+Meeting+Minutes.
 Remember change the extension into .csar. This VNF also used in volte usecase 
and you could onboard this vnf package on SDC.
 Basically, VoLTE usecase use UUI(usecase ui) to do the service LCM 
operation. I think this link could help you : 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Beijing+Release+VoLTE+Integration+Test+Status

BR
Victor

发件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] 代表 
Prakash via Lists.Onap.Org
发送时间: 2018年8月21日 20:25
收件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
主题: Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance


Also I have tried to use the packages in the linke 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6593603. But SDC thrown 
invalid package error.

Kindly help me get through. Thank you!

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:42 PM Prakash P 
mailto:prakas...@verizon.com>> wrote:
Hello Team,

Basically I'm trying to test the voLTE use case. Kindly help me get started 
with the below things;

1.  The Createvfmoduleinfra.bpmn gets called when I create vfmodule in VID. 
Similarly I don't see any option to call CreateCustomE2EServiceInstance.bpmn 
which is oly for voLTE use cases.
2.  Where can I find the certified csar package for voLTE use case used by 
integration team/or any working package .
3.  Is the on boarding of voLTE VNF Package same as vLB?
4.  How the voLTE service instance creation done from VID ?
5.  Is there any demo video available for voLTE use case?


--
Regards,
Prakas P,
Network and Technology IT,
VDSI - Olympia – Chennai
VoIP: 72184 | Direct: +91 44 4394 2184
Mailto  | prakas...@verizon.com

We Are VERIZON

INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . 
ACCOUNTABILITY


--
Regards,
Prakas P,
Network and Technology IT,
VDSI - Olympia – Chennai
VoIP: 72184 | Direct: +91 44 4394 2184
Mailto  | prakas...@verizon.com

We Are VERIZON

INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . 
ACCOUNTABILITY


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11976): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11976
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24876539/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance

[Prakash via Lists.Onap.Org]

Also I have tried to use the packages in the linke
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6593603. But SDC thrown
invalid package error.

Kindly help me get through. Thank you!

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 5:42 PM Prakash P  wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> Basically I'm trying to test the voLTE use case. Kindly help me get
> started with the below things;
>
> 1.  The Createvfmoduleinfra.bpmn gets called when I create vfmodule in
> VID. Similarly I don't see any option to call
> CreateCustomE2EServiceInstance.bpmn which is oly for voLTE use cases.
> 2.  Where can I find the certified csar package for voLTE use case used by
> integration team/or any working package .
> 3.  Is the on boarding of voLTE VNF Package same as vLB?
> 4.  How the voLTE service instance creation done from VID ?
> 5.  Is there any demo video available for voLTE use case?
>
>
> --
> *Regards,*
> Prakas P,
> Network and Technology IT,
> VDSI - Olympia – Chennai
> *VoIP: *72184* | Direct: *+91 44 4394 2184
>
> *Mailto * *|* prakas...@verizon.com 
>
> *We Are VERIZON *
>
> *INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . ACCOUNTABILITY
> *
>


-- 
*Regards,*
Prakas P,
Network and Technology IT,
VDSI - Olympia – Chennai
*VoIP: *72184* | Direct: *+91 44 4394 2184

*Mailto * *|* prakas...@verizon.com 

*We Are VERIZON *

*INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . ACCOUNTABILITY
*

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11975): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11975
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24875702/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [SO] voLTE use case - E2EServiceInstance

[Prakash via Lists.Onap.Org]

Hello Team,

Basically I'm trying to test the voLTE use case. Kindly help me get started
with the below things;

1.  The Createvfmoduleinfra.bpmn gets called when I create vfmodule in VID.
Similarly I don't see any option to call
CreateCustomE2EServiceInstance.bpmn which is oly for voLTE use cases.
2.  Where can I find the certified csar package for voLTE use case used by
integration team/or any working package .
3.  Is the on boarding of voLTE VNF Package same as vLB?
4.  How the voLTE service instance creation done from VID ?
5.  Is there any demo video available for voLTE use case?


-- 
*Regards,*
Prakas P,
Network and Technology IT,
VDSI - Olympia – Chennai
*VoIP: *72184* | Direct: *+91 44 4394 2184

*Mailto * *|* prakas...@verizon.com 

*We Are VERIZON *

*INTEGRITY . RESPECT . PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE . ACCOUNTABILITY
*

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11974): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11974
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24875702/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

[Xin Miao]

One way of addressing this is that in case like this we may ‘provision’ 
(instead of hard coding) or modeling the policy triggering in a way that 
analytics or correlation component in general can publish multiple events 
driven by the output of the AAI loop up/query to DMAAP to trigger policy 
multiple times one time per service instance.

This could lead to CL requirement that supports any future use cases that one 
alarm from lower layer may affect multiple services at higher layer, i. e,
one CL multiple service instances cases.

Some thoughts.

Thanks,

Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;Guangrong 
Fumailto:steven20...@gmail.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: Re: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-21 06:15:21

I will not entertain such drastic change which will endanger the use cases that 
the Policy team did commit to.

The point of the CL event is to identify the SINGLE VM or VNF that is having 
issues. The Operational Policies express what services/vms/vnfs are going to be 
taken action upon, not the CL event.

There are many other reasons which I will not go into on this thread.

Pam

From: Xin Miao 
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 10:54 PM
To: Guangrong Fu , "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Cc: onap-discuss , guobiaomo 
, "fu.guangrong" 
Subject: RE: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

This really changes the json data format.
If we do it this way, the CL event for previous use cases will have to update 
their documents on CL event description at least.

Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab
From: Guangrong Fu
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L 
(PAM)mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Xin
 
Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-20 19:30:00

Hi Pam,

I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN use 
case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service instances. 
In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in order that 
Policy could digest it?

In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope": 
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a JSON 
object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope": 
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?

Best Regards,
Guagnrong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11973): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11973
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [Policy][DCAE][Holmes] CCVPN CL Test Steps for Phase 1

[Xin Miao]

Let’s continue with this thread for input as well as tracking all the issue 
discussion during the Pair and/or E2E CCVPN test.

Thanks.

Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
To: Xin Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Cc: Rama Subba Reddy 
Smailto:rama.subba.redd...@huawei.com>>;莫国彪mailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Vidyashree
 Ramamailto:vidyashree.r...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1
Time: 2018-08-20 11:40:06

Please follow https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Developer+Best+Practices

What you create should follow the tutorials underneath this wiki:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R3+Deploying+and+Debugging+the+Policy+Platform

Pam

From: Xin Miao 
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:21 PM
To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 
Cc: Rama Subba Reddy S , 莫国彪 
, Vidyashree Rama 
Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1

Hi, Pam,

We are modifying drools-applications code to support CCVPN closed loop with new 
SO recipes.

What will be the best way for us to conduct our unit or  module test? Is there 
any instruction or wiki page that we can follow?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [id:image001.jpg@01CD505D.C18C2420]

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com]
Sent: 2018年8月20日 AM 7:20
To: Xin Miao 
Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1

Abatement is optional �C but you should specify that in the policy so the 
policy enforcement knows to not wait for it.

We know that sometimes it is difficult in the DCAE side to determine if an 
abatement has happened, thus we enabled that option in the Policy Operational 
YAML specification.

Just be sure that we don’t get subsequent ONSET’s after we have done all the SO 
work. If that is not possible then utilize a Frequency Limiter Guard policy as 
a last resort to prevent the whole process from being initiated immediately 
after it was done. I would test and develop everything first, see how the 
system works before going down that route.

Pam

From: Xin Miao mailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:03 AM
To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 
mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1

Hi, Pam,

For CCVPN Closed loop phase 1 runtime test step below.  Do the last 3 steps 
have to be there? Or, these Abated steps/events processing are optional?

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image002.jpg@01D43882.DC5BE1A0]

From: Xin Miao
Sent: 2018年8月19日 PM 10:59
To: Rama Subba Reddy S 
mailto:rama.subba.redd...@huawei.com>>; 
Vidyashree Rama mailto:vidyashree.r...@huawei.com>>
Cc: Gaurav agrawal 
mailto:gaurav.agra...@huawei.com>>; yuchaode 
mailto:yucha...@huawei.com>>
Subject: CL Test Steps for Phase 1

Hi, Rama/Vidya,
The following are the closed loop test steps at runtime:

  *   Link between TP1 from site A and TP2 from site B is brought down
  *   ACTN from site A sends TP1 Status ‘down’ notification to Restconf 
collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP
  *   ACTN from site B sends TP2 Status ‘down’ notification to the same 
Restconf collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP
  *   Both of the notifications are consumed by VES Mapper and converted to VES 
Fault_Route_Status events.
  *   Holmes receives the two events
  *   Holmes does correlation of the two events and generate one signature 
event and sends it to Policy
  *   Policy triggers operational policy and healing action is sent to SO
  *   SO deletes  the associated 3 service instances.
  *   SO recreates these 3 service instances again over a new link between TP3 
and TP4 across site A and site B
Need to decide about if the following  steps has to be done at the closed loop: 
 (may not be necessary ??)

  *   Service ‘up’ notifications are sent from ACTN when service is recovered.
  *   Holmes does the event correlation and sends Clear signature event to 
Policy
  *   Policy stops the healing action

Thank you and best regards,

Xin Miao
American Network Technology Lab
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024
Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226
xin.m...@huawei.com
 [cid:image002.jpg@01D43882.DC5BE1A0]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11972): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11972
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24875324/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

[Pamela Dragosh]

I will not entertain such drastic change which will endanger the use cases that 
the Policy team did commit to.

The point of the CL event is to identify the SINGLE VM or VNF that is having 
issues. The Operational Policies express what services/vms/vnfs are going to be 
taken action upon, not the CL event.

There are many other reasons which I will not go into on this thread.

Pam

From: Xin Miao 
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 10:54 PM
To: Guangrong Fu , "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" 

Cc: onap-discuss , guobiaomo 
, "fu.guangrong" 
Subject: RE: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event

This really changes the json data format.
If we do it this way, the CL event for previous use cases will have to update 
their documents on CL event description at least.

Xin Miao
M: +1-4692685226
E: xin.m...@huawei.com
2012实验室-硅谷网络技术实验室
2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Network Technology Lab
From: Guangrong Fu
To: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L 
(PAM)mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Cc: 
onap-discussmailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;guobiaomomailto:guobia...@chinamobile.com>>;Xin
 
Miaomailto:xin.m...@huawei.com>>;fu.guangrongmailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>>
Subject: [policy][holmes]CCVPN CL Event
Time: 2018-08-20 19:30:00

Hi Pam,

I'm working with the CCVPN team to complete the control loop for the CCVPN use 
case. It requires Policy to perform some operations on three service instances. 
In this case, how do we put three instances into the CL event in order that 
Policy could digest it?

In the VoLTE use case, the CL event is like this:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "vVOLTE",
"policyScope": 
"resource=volte,service=VolteSErvice,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-VOLTE-SIG-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": {
"vserver.vserver-name": "dfw1lb01lb01",
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-id" : "TBD",
"generic-vnf.vnf-name" : "TBD"
},
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-VOLTE-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

Can we use the similar data format, changing only the "AAI" filed from a JSON 
object to a JSON array:
{
"closedLoopEventClient": "DCAE.HolmesInstance",
"policyVersion": "1.0.0.5",
"policyName": "CCVPN",
"policyScope": 
"service=SOTNService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=CL-CCVPN-d925ed73-8231-4d02-9545-db4e101f88f8",
"target_type": "VM",
"AAI": [
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-1",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
},
{
"service-instance.service-instance-id" : "service-instance-2",
...
}
],
"closedLoopAlarmStart": 1484677482204798,
"closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET",
"closedLoopControlName": 
"ControlLoop-CCVPN-2179b738-fd36-4843-a71a-a8c24c70c55b",
"version": "1.0.2",
"target": "vserver.vserver-name",
"requestID": "97964e10-686e-4790-8c45-bdfa61df770f",
"from": "DCAE"
}

If the answer is negative, how could we achieve our goal?

Best Regards,
Guagnrong

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11971): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11971
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24830650/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF

[Santiago]

Hi all,

this is just what i was looking for!!!

After some weeks configuring the ONAP platform in my local environment,
it's time to test it but the vFW onboarding process is a not simple task:
- robot's k8s-demo fails for me because my quuens openstack installation
changed the keystone API
- I was trying manually with
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1018474, but uses an old
version of SDC that does not match with mine (beijing)

What is the status of this "test VNF" task?
Is there any recent related documentation about how to test the platform
with a simply VNF?
@Andrew, is your dummy VNF available?

Thanks,
Santiago

2018-08-10 17:04 GMT+02:00 Eric Debeau :

> Yes, I know Guillaume ;-)
>
>
>
> I added a few guys working on that topic.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> *De :* FREEMAN, BRIAN D [mailto:bf1...@att.com]
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 10 août 2018 15:35
> *À :* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; PLATANIA, MARCO;
> andrew.fen...@ericsson.com
> *Cc :* Ajith Sreekumar; DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN
> *Objet :* RE: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
>
>
>
> SDNC supports netconf as well – it just needed to be activated – I asked
> Dan to include that in future SDNC persona’s (its can be done after the
> controller is brought up but its a one line change in the config to do it
> as part of initial install so might as well)
>
>
>
> WRT to the honeycomb VNF I think that is the right path since we would get
> both a config and operational tree to drive closed loops (with memory)
>
>
>
> I havent tried this but I got the reference from our OpenROADM folks who
> are working on TransportPCE with Orange and others.
>
>
>
> Maybe Eric knows guillaume.lamb...@orange.com (but its a big company)  ?
>
>
>
> https://github.com/opendaylight/transportpce/tree/master/tests/honeynode
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  *On
> Behalf Of *PLATANIA, MARCO
> *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2018 9:26 AM
> *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; andrew.fen...@ericsson.com
> *Cc:* Ajith Sreekumar 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
>
>
>
> Security Advisory:* This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
>
> Andrew,
>
>
>
> I think it’s a good idea. I remember we talked about this a while ago, and
> I still believe it’s worth the effort. In particular, I agree on
> implementing APIs that can be used by controllers to execute LCM operations
> against the VNFs. In this regard, we have experience with Honeycomb, which
> we extensively used for the vFW and vLB use cases. The good news is that
> Honeycomb supports both Netconf and Rest APIs, which makes it even more
> appealing, considering that we also want SDNC to be able to talk to the VNF
> (SDNC supports Rest at this time).
>
>
>
> Let’s talk on Wednesday during the integration meeting.
>
>
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Andrew Fenner <
> andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>
> *Reply-To: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , "
> andrew.fen...@ericsson.com" 
> *Date: *Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:22 AM
> *To: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
> *Cc: *Ajith Sreekumar 
> *Subject: *[onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need
> for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now.
>
>
>
> I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there
> is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back
> to the integration team with a way forward.
>
>
>
> Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355
> 
> for my initial thinking and look at
>
> https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/
> BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=
> 1513294598000&api=v2
> 
> @ 05:26:40
>
> and
>
> https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing-
> onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf
> 

Re: [onap-discuss] LAB Upgrade Progress - POD-ONAP-01

[Gooch, Stephen]

The lab has been upgraded to OpenStack pike, it is complete - let me know if 
you see/have any issues.

- Stephen

From: Gooch, Stephen
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 13:34
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: LAB Upgrade Progress - POD-ONAP-01

Hello,

Over the last 3 days 8 of the 13 compute nodes in the integration lab have been 
upgraded to PIKE.   The plan for the remaining 5 nodes was to upgrade one a day 
to minimize the removal of resources from the lab during the work week.  
However some nova commands associated with adding or modifying configurations 
are blocked while upgrades are in process.   The daily staging stacks need at 
least of these locked commands.   Because of this we will complete the upgrades 
for the 5 remaining nodes in the next few hours.   This will cause a resource 
constraint during this time.

I'll send out an update when the upgrade is complete, and the resources are 
back on line.

Br,
- Stephen

Stephen Gooch | Senior Member of Technical Staff | Wind River
+1.510.965.7909 , Skype ID: stephen.gooch


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11969): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11969
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24827197/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-