[onap-discuss] [integration] integration/csit has been branched

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The integration/csit repo has been branched.  Please feel free to start working 
on post-casablanca CSIT test changes there.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12824): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12824
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26727945/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

[Gary Wu]

The use of http on port 80 seems to be defined in the distributionManagement 
block in CCSDK here: 
https://git.onap.org/ccsdk/parent/tree/odlparent/odlparent-lite/pom.xml?id=c3dde295948318a40bd1a78319e197299b47e153

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 12:06 PM
To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Gildas Lanilis ; agrimb...@linuxfoundation.org; 
FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Gary Wu ; LEFEVRE, 
CATHERINE ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

Jess,

I took a closer look at that error below.  Not only is the staging plugin using 
port 80, but it's using http, not https.  I checked my configuration and 
verified that I'm using https://nexus.onap.org   not http://nexus.onap.org.  I 
have no clue where that's coming from, unless our settings.xml in Jenkins is 
somehow messed up (I can't see that directly)

Dan

-- 
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP Development
ONAP Project Technical Lead : CCSDK and SDNC 
 
Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
 for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.
 

On 10/3/18, 11:26 AM, "TIMONEY, DAN"  wrote:

Jess,

I'm still seeing this problem this morning.

You ask an excellent question about port 80.  I checked my configuration 
and verified that we're using https://nexus.onap.org with no port specified - 
so it should be port 443, not 80.  This error is happening within the staging 
plugin, which I personally have been railing against for over a year now ... 
this is just the latest in a series of problems with that wonderful plugin, the 
others being:

1) It occasionally loses track of which is the latest version of a jar 
file (which I think Andrew created a workaround for last year).
2) For zip files (which we use as installation bundles), if you try to 
pull a specific version from the staging repository, you'll consistently get 
the very first copy ever pushed, not the latest.  You can see that actually if 
you look at the artifacts in the nexus web page  - for jar files, you'll see a 
list of autogenerated repos but for zip files you'll only see the first.

So, it looks like yet another issue in the staging plugin  if you don't 
explicitly provide a port, it defaults to 80 even for https, which is just 
plain wrong.

I'll try seeing if I can get around this by explicitly setting the port to 
443 in the staging url, but if that's the problem ,we should really get 
Sonatype to fix it.  

Dan
-- 
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP Development
ONAP Project Technical Lead : CCSDK and SDNC 
 
Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
 for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.
 

On 10/2/18, 6:49 PM, "Jessica Wagantall via RT" 
 wrote:

Hi Dan, 

Looking into this issue. 

Why are we using port 80? : 

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nexus.onap.org-3A80&d=DwIDaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Ms-DNhR23dO4sQFfYRm4ow&m=9BsdxCi7UWgNWFeVZnwuitt1LsK6wdh0bsG3J-s2mTE&s=8qfiU_gE41IyWoPbuFI1liIVFnxglXe9ybT4xnDI4Vo&e=:

Nothing changed for Nexus servers on Friday. The only migration that 
happened was for Gerrit. 

thanks a ton!
Jess

On Tue Oct 02 15:03:09 2018, dt5...@att.com wrote:
> All,
> 
> FYI - I hoped to work around this issue by commenting out a module
> that isn't critical from our build, hoping to reduce load.  Didn't
> help - just moved the problem to someplace else.
> 
> Here's the error I'm getting:
> 
> 18:43:05 [INFO] Installing /w/workspace/sdnc-oam-master-merge-
> java/pom.xml to /w/workspace/sdnc-oam-master-merge-
> java/admportal/target/nexus-staging/deferred/org/onap/sdnc/oam/sdnc-
> oam/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/sdnc-oam-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
> 18:43:05 [INFO] Deploying remotely...
>  18:43:05 [INFO] Bulk deploying locally gathered artifacts from
> directory:
> 18:43:05 [INFO]  * Bulk deploying locally gathered snapshot artifacts
> 18:45:14 Oct 02, 2018 6:45:14 PM
> 
org.apache.maven.wagon.providers.http.httpclient.impl.execchain.RetryExec
> execute
> 18:45:14 INFO: I/O exception (java.net.SocketException) caught when
> processing request to 
{}->https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nexus.onap.org-3A80&d=DwIDaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Ms-DNhR23dO4sQFfYRm4ow&m=9BsdxCi7UWgNWFeVZnwuitt1LsK6wdh0bsG3J-s2mTE&s=8qfiU_gE41IyWoPbuFI1liIVFnxglXe9ybT4xnDI4Vo&e=:
 Connection rese

[onap-discuss][integration] TestVNF demo and discussion

[Andrew Fenner]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:GMT Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T01
TZOFFSETFROM:+
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Andrew Fenner:MAILTO:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu
 s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Ajith Sree
 kumar:MAILTO:ajith.sreeku...@ericsson.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:Hi\,\n\nA discussion on the need for a TestVNF w
 ith a demonstration of a prototype of a possible approach to the solution.
 \n\n\nCan you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355
  for my initial thinking and look at
 \nhttps://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/BeijingDevForum2017-
 Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=1513294598000&api=v2
  @ 05:26:40\nand\nhttps://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing
 -onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf & https://schd.ws/hosted_files/onapbeijing2017/49/ONAP-Du
 mmyVNF.pptx\n\n\n\n/Andrew\n
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E00800F53AF62A5BD401000
 010009B46F299B3D79E4E85DA3F72C3430227
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:[onap-discuss][integration] TestVNF demo and discuss
 ion
DTSTART;TZID=GMT Standard Time:20181008T16
DTEND;TZID=GMT Standard Time:20181008T17
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20181003T185933Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:4
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:zoom call  https://zoom.us/j/44
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:4
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:394504162
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DONOTFORWARDMEETING:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-LOCATIONS:[{"DisplayName":"zoom call  https://zoom.us/j/448
 888"\,"LocationAnnotation":""\,"LocationUri":""\,"LocationStreet":""\,"Loc
 ationCity":""\,"LocationState":""\,"LocationCountry":""\,"LocationPostalCo
 de":""\,"LocationFullAddress":""}]
BEGIN:VALARM
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
ACTION:DISPLAY
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

[onap-discuss] [VNFPKG] VNF Package Modeling Call Canceled This Week

[Andy Mayer]

All,

Please note that the VNF Package Modeling Call will be canceled this Friday, we 
will resume next week.

Best Regards,
Andy

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, Network Cloud and Infrastructure | AT&T Labs | Phone: 
+1 (732) 420-9945 | am8...@att.com
[cid:image001.jpg@01D2E10C.0410C230]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12821): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12821
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26721242/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [portal] Weekly Meeting (updated Jan 29, 2018)

[Manoop Talasila]

Hello ONAP,

Someone is using the zoom link 
“https://zoom.us/j/895776501”
 right now. Can you please end the meeting so that I can use it for scheduled 
Portal team weekly meeting from 11AM – 12PM EST. Thanks.

Manoop

From: linuxfoundation.org_1rmtb5tpr3uc8f76fmflplo...@group.calendar.google.com
When: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM October 3, 2018
Subject: [portal] Weekly Meeting (updated Jan 29, 2018)
Location: https://zoom.us/j/895776501


more details 
»
[portal] Weekly Meeting (updated Jan 29, 2018)
When

Weekly from 8am to 9am on Wednesday from Wed Jan 31 to Wed Jan 9, 2019 Pacific 
Time

Where

https://zoom.us/j/895776501
 
(map)

Calendar

talas...@research.att.com

Who

•

kp...@linuxfoundation.org - creator

•

talas...@research.att.com

•

onap-discuss@lists.onap.org



Hi there,
ONAP Meeting 2 is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: 
https://zoom.us/j/895776501
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,895776501# or +16465588656,,895776501#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 
880 1246 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 895 776 501
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=LwXaLtGn_W0kK-Kgk7BoYbPLkOfvL3bm




Going?   All events in this series:   
Yes
 - 
Maybe
 - 
No

Re: [onap-discuss] [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source announcement

[Srini]

Hi Vimal,

Thank you for pitching in and your views are important.

Current ONAP code is expected to realize  “Service Orchestrator”.

Can a persona of ONAP be used as Edge Cloud Orchestrator?  My 2 cents is that 
ONAP source code has good functionality to realize ONAP as Edge Cloud 
Orchestrator too, except that we need to do some work on modularization so that 
unnecessary components can be taken off and add some functionality to provide 
multi-tenancy.  I understand there are concerns to increase the scope of ONAP, 
which I appreciate.  That is the debate which I think worth having before 
ruling out ONAP.

On deployment architecture:  When there is Edge Cloud Orchestrator for set of 
edges, as you say, there could be multiple application providers using this to 
deploy their applications.  Service Orchestrator used by operators also would 
be one of the consumers of this Edge cloud orchestrator instance if it needs to 
place VNFs in those edges.  It seems obvious, but wanted to get that 
confirmation.

Thanks
Srini


From: BEGWANI, VIMAL [mailto:vb1...@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 6:21 AM
To: Margaret Chiosi ; Ramki Krishnan 
; Addepalli, Srinivasa R ; 
Ranganathan, Raghu 
Cc: HEKMAT, ARASH ; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

There are several reasons why we might want to keep Edge Cloud and ONAP 
separate.  Enterprise customer might want to deploy their applications / 
content at the right edge location and pay only for the cloud services instead 
of paying for a fully ONAP managed applications or content.  While back AT&T 
had fully managed hosting and basic co-location services (we provided servers, 
basic connectivity check, customers managed their applications).  Co-location 
services was widely more popular than fully managed hosting services.  Customer 
might not want to go through the trouble of packing their applications that SDC 
can upload.  I can envision a scenario where Edge Cloud is an independent 
services that is being used by more than one operator (just like cell towers in 
US today or AWS or Azure).

Regards,
Vimal

From: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> On 
Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:08 AM
To: Ramki Krishnan mailto:ram...@vmware.com>>; Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: HEKMAT, ARASH mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

But it may be a passthrough for certain functions. Maybe it would be good to 
create a table with all the different cloud edge ‘management’ functions and 
talk through what ONAPs role is.
e.g. optimized location for app; scale out/in; availability; optimized server 
for a specific set of SLA (CPU speed or RAM speed or NIC specific or Linux 
version or CPU type….)
If cloud edge software covers all of this – then what is ONAP’s role. If cloud 
edge only does subset, then what is ONAP’s role.

Thank You,
Margaret Chiosi
VP Open Ecosystem Team

Admin: Sophie Johnson
sophie.johns...@huawei.com
+1 (908) 541-3590

Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
Fixed Network Solution CC
400 Crossing Blvd
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
(cell) +1-732-216-5507

[cid:image001.png@01CCE115.88302080]

From: Ramki Krishnan [mailto:ram...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:36 PM
To: Margaret Chiosi (A) 
mailto:margaret.chio...@huawei.com>>; Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: Arash Hekmat mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

Hi Margaret,

From Srini -- “That said, what are the reasons for application providers to go 
edge orchestrators directly instead of going via ONAP assuming that all edges 
are under that operator domain?”

I think the case Srini is bringing up is very specific – in this case, all the 
edges are under a specific operator domain. If the operator is using ONAP then 
all the edges should go through ONAP right?

Thanks,
Ramki

From: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> On 
Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:42 PM
To: Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: Arash Hekmat mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61706] nexus and nexus3 bottleneck

[Gary Wu]

Hi Jess,

Looks like nexus/nexus3 are again bogged down today.  Can you take a look?  
This is a showstopper.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 4:05 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #61706] nexus and nexus3 bottleneck

Looks like there might be a noisy neighbor using up a bunch of bandwidth which 
Ryan was able to detect. 

We are escalating this to our provider now. 

thanks!
Jess

On Tue Oct 02 18:46:46 2018, jwagantall wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this Gary.
> 
> I am looking into it with Ryan.
> I also noticed little bit slower since I was running a release of 8 
> binaries at once..
> 
> I will let you know for any updates from our findings.
> 
> thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Tue Oct 02 17:57:04 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> > Hi helpdesk,
> >
> > nexus and nexus3 have been exceedingly slow all day, which is 
> > causing many jobs to either take a long time or time-out outright.  
> > Can you take a look?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12818): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12818
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26718663/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Invitation: [changemgmt] Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Wednesday from Wed Mar 14 to Wed Feb 20, 2019 (PDT) (mahim...@research.att.com)

[Ajay Mahimkar]

Canceling today call – I will not be able to make it today because of 
dissertation committee commitments.
I will make up for it by scheduling for Friday. Sorry, I should have done the 
testing sync ups earlier. But we are getting there now ☺
I can see Tomek, Lukasz and Taka are already ahead !!

-   Ajay

-Original Appointment-
From: ONAP Meetings and Events 
[mailto:linuxfoundation.org_1rmtb5tpr3uc8f76fmflplo...@group.calendar.google.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:22 PM
To: ONAP Meetings and Events; MAHIMKAR, AJAY (AJAY); onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Invitation: [changemgmt] Weekly Meeting @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on 
Wednesday from Wed Mar 14 to Wed Feb 20, 2019 (PDT) (mahim...@research.att.com)
When: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:00 AM-12:00 PM America/New_York.
Where: https://zoom.us/j/725247460


more details 
»

[changemgmt] Weekly Meeting
When
Weekly from 8am to 9am on Wednesday from Wed Mar 14 to Wed Feb 20, 2019 
Pacific Time

Where

https://zoom.us/j/725247460
 
(map)

Calendar
mahim...@research.att.com

Who
•
kp...@linuxfoundation.org - creator

•
mahim...@research.att.com

•
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org



Hi there,

ONAP Meeting 6 is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: 
https://zoom.us/j/725247460
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16465588656,,725247460# or +16699006833,,725247460#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 646 558 8656 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll Free) or +1 877 
369 0926 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 725 247 460
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=weTArJIoD15uN00UvKtzabUsZzfAo5KY




Going?   All events in this series:   
Yes
 - 
Maybe
 - 
No

Re: [onap-discuss] Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy that includes multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release

[Michael O'Brien]

Update:
What works is adjusting the root pom for each module one at a time in 
dependency sequence - essentially simulating separate repos for each artifact.  
I could have done separate pom branches together like java and python.

Gildas,
The docker and release jobs for logging are fixed (am through 1 of 6 
releases) (just checking a recently red sonar)

Sending the release mail to Jessica for 1 of 6 so far
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/69736/
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/logging-analytics/job/logging-analytics-master-release-version-java-daily/254/
this is the sequence
remove all links between poms
at the root pom - enable a single jar/war project module one at a time - 
release and then fix the poms at the end of the release process
1) logging-slf4j (jar)
2) logging-slf4j-demo (jar)
3) logging-library (jar)
4) logging-mock-service (jar)
5) logging-demo (war)
6) pylog (py)

Skipping both root poms, kubernetes, docker modules

Thank you
/michael

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  On Behalf Of 
Michael O'Brien
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:15 PM
To: Gary Wu ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Prudence Au ; Jessica Wagantall 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy 
that includes multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release
Gary,
   Clearer - I'll follow this - won't do my two pom artifacts, I currently am 
verifying doing one branch starting with logging-sl4j up to the war that 
includes 3 jars - later I'll do the pylog and slf4j-demo branches (simulate 3 
repos by rotating through 3 split pom branches - after a talk with Prudence).  
I may bundle the entire pom project branch (3 jars + 1 war) into one release as 
you suggested
Part 2 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/69692/2

Thank you
/michael

From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 4:22 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Michael 
O'Brien mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com>>
Cc: Prudence Au mailto:prudence...@amdocs.com>>; 
Jessica Wagantall 
mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: RE: Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy that includes 
multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release

The ONAP way of doing releases is probably different from what you'd expect.  
This is how it's typically done right now:


  1.  We don't commit a change of the pom version to remove the "-SNAPSHOT" 
version; the "-SNAPSHOT" is left as-is in source control.
  2.   A separate daily job usually with "-version-" in the name runs a "mvn 
versions:set" to strip the "-SNAPSHOT" version at job build time, resulting in 
artifacts that are release-versioned and pushed to the nexus staging repo.
  3.  The "mvn versions:set" command is typically run against the root pom, and 
is smart enough to recursively make the same change through all its 
children/subtree poms, IF the children/subtree poms are set up correctly to 
have their versions inherited from the root pom.
  4.  Given the above, it is fine for the "-version-" job to do a staging build 
of multiple simultaneous artifacts from an entire tree.

This should work if all your artifact versions can be the same.  I don't know 
the specifics of your docker job, but if the above works for you on the 
Java/Maven side then maybe what you need is to run the "mvn versions:set" 
command within the docker job to strip the "-SNAPSHOT" from the poms like how 
it's done for the Java builds.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael O'Brien
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 12:46 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Prudence Au mailto:prudence...@amdocs.com>>; 
Jessica Wagantall 
mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy that 
includes multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release

Team,
 Bringing this up to the community because we have a couple general 
questions around how to release projects with many artifacts per repo.
 Running into an issue where I need to 1 artifact at a time but the jobs 
and my pom structure is set for a single global build.
 Prudence, Jessica and I are looking into this - adding community - if 
there are any others with my same issue.
 Either I need to flatten and disassociate my pom tree or find a way to 
build specifically at folder level - not from the root pom.xml of the repo.
Release a specific jar
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/reference/logging-slf4j/pom.xml
instead of the default root which builds 5 jars and 1 war (leaving out the 
non-java pom projects for python, kubernetes and docker
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/pom.xml

 We are working very closely with Jessica right now and in the past on our 
repos and now on our release of the 2 projects logging and pomba - but running 
into issues with the rele

Re: [onap-discuss] [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source announcement

[Chaker Al Hakim]

Sorry folks I am late to this discussion.

Reading through this long email thread, I sort of agree with Srini’s/ Ramki’s  
comments. Having said that, we should problem try to clearly define what 
problem we are trying to solve. if we assume that the Edge cloud is a ‘Special’ 
case of multiVIM than we would need an orchestration platform to manage the 
orchestration and the LCM of the VNF’s/CNFs that would run on it. If ONAP is 
not the orchestration Platform then we would need to re-create something 
similar.

Chaker

From: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 2:48 AM
To: BEGWANI, VIMAL ; Ramki Krishnan ; Srini 
; Ranganathan, Raghu 
Cc: HEKMAT, ARASH ; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

+1

Thank You,
Margaret Chiosi
VP Open Ecosystem Team

Admin: Sophie Johnson
sophie.johns...@huawei.com
+1 (908) 541-3590

Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
Fixed Network Solution CC
400 Crossing Blvd
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
(cell) +1-732-216-5507

[cid:image001.png@01CCE115.88302080]

From: BEGWANI, VIMAL [mailto:vb1...@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:21 AM
To: Margaret Chiosi (A) 
mailto:margaret.chio...@huawei.com>>; Ramki 
Krishnan mailto:ram...@vmware.com>>; Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: HEKMAT, ARASH mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

There are several reasons why we might want to keep Edge Cloud and ONAP 
separate.  Enterprise customer might want to deploy their applications / 
content at the right edge location and pay only for the cloud services instead 
of paying for a fully ONAP managed applications or content.  While back AT&T 
had fully managed hosting and basic co-location services (we provided servers, 
basic connectivity check, customers managed their applications).  Co-location 
services was widely more popular than fully managed hosting services.  Customer 
might not want to go through the trouble of packing their applications that SDC 
can upload.  I can envision a scenario where Edge Cloud is an independent 
services that is being used by more than one operator (just like cell towers in 
US today or AWS or Azure).

Regards,
Vimal

From: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> On 
Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:08 AM
To: Ramki Krishnan mailto:ram...@vmware.com>>; Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: HEKMAT, ARASH mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

But it may be a passthrough for certain functions. Maybe it would be good to 
create a table with all the different cloud edge ‘management’ functions and 
talk through what ONAPs role is.
e.g. optimized location for app; scale out/in; availability; optimized server 
for a specific set of SLA (CPU speed or RAM speed or NIC specific or Linux 
version or CPU type….)
If cloud edge software covers all of this – then what is ONAP’s role. If cloud 
edge only does subset, then what is ONAP’s role.

Thank You,
Margaret Chiosi
VP Open Ecosystem Team

Admin: Sophie Johnson
sophie.johns...@huawei.com
+1 (908) 541-3590

Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
Fixed Network Solution CC
400 Crossing Blvd
Bridgewater, NJ 08807
(cell) +1-732-216-5507

[cid:image001.png@01CCE115.88302080]

From: Ramki Krishnan [mailto:ram...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:36 PM
To: Margaret Chiosi (A) 
mailto:margaret.chio...@huawei.com>>; Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>>; 
Ranganathan, Raghu mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>
Cc: Arash Hekmat mailto:arash.hek...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [**EXTERNAL**] [Onap-usecasesub] MobileEdgeX open source 
announcement

Hi Margaret,

From Srini -- “That said, what are the reasons for application providers to go 
edge orchestrators directly instead of going via ONAP assuming that all edges 
are under that operator domain?”

I think the case Srini is bringing up is very specific – in this case, all the 
edges are under a specific operator domain. If the operator is using ONAP then 
all the edges should go through ONAP right?

Thanks,
Ramki

From: onap-usecase...@lists.o

[onap-discuss] VFC ( gvnfm) - VNF IP details in AAI

[Mandeep Singh Kalra]

Hi,

If am using the Beijing release of ONAP and trying to create the VNFs on the 
cloud.

I can see that LCM module puts the generic VNF details in the inventory ( AAI ) 
but does it also put the details like VNF IP etc ?
Will the gvnfm do that part ?



Regards
Mandeep



This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other 
use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic 
communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant 
messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes 
of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture 
policy. Your privacy is important to us. Accenture uses your personal data only 
in compliance with data protection laws. For further information on how 
Accenture processes your personal data, please see our privacy statement at 
https://www.accenture.com/us-en/privacy-policy.
__

www.accenture.com

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12814): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12814
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26717735/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [E] Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-arc] Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting

[Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya via Lists.Onap.Org]

Dear All,

I just want to bring it to everyone's notice that, for people coming from
India ( & also China I guess ), we won't likely make it to the event as
Canadian Visa issuance is taking a solid 1 month as per my travel desk .
Though I have started the paperwork ( they are asking too much info :-( )
, I'm very much skeptical in getting a visa before Oct 29/30 . Had the
registration for the event was made available a week back, things would
have been much smoother.

Hence I here *request* both IBM & LF Events committee to try pushing this
event by a week (Nov 5,6) so that folks like me who are travelling from
India would get a chance to attend this F2F .

May I also request other members who are also on the same boat as of me, to
comment here, so that we can estimate no of people who are impacted.

Thanks!

BR,
Viswa



Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
Senior Architect
Technology, Architecture & Planning



On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM Catherine LEFEVRE <
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] *On
> Behalf Of *ramki krishnan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 02, 2018 2:06 AM
> *To:* Chaker Al Hakim ; Alla Goldner <
> alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; Kenny Paul ;
> onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;
> onap-...@lists.onap.org
> *Cc:* Phil Robb 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-arc] Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-...@lists.onap.org  *On Behalf Of 
> *Chaker
> Al Hakim
> *Sent:* Monday, October 1, 2018 2:13 PM
> *To:* Alla Goldner ; Kenny Paul <
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-...@lists.onap.org;
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
> *Cc:* Phil Robb 
> *Subject:* Re: [Onap-arc] Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Alla Goldner
> *Sent:* Monday, October 01, 2018 1:12 PM
> *To:* Kenny Paul ; onap-...@lists.onap.org;
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
> *Cc:* Phil Robb 
> *Subject:* Re: [Onap-arc] Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting
>
>
>
> Adding discuss and tsc lists.
>
>
>
> Kenny, Phill,
>
>
>
> As it looks right now, we will not have Dublin Developer Forum before
> Dublin release.
>
> Thus, it is extremely important to have at least VF2F, preferably in
> November, where we can discuss Dublin scope and contents per each one of
> the projects.
>
> We, probably, need 3 or 4 days (Mon to Thu), 3 hours each day for the
> meetings.
>
> Is it possible to set up such a meeting?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> *Alla Goldner*
>
>
>
> Open Network Division
>
> Amdocs Technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Kenny Paul
> *Sent:* Monday, October 01, 2018 9:30 AM
> *To:* onap-...@lists.onap.org
> *Cc:* Bartosz Balazinski ; Phil Robb <
> pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; Lara Taback 
> *Subject:* [Onap-arc] Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting
>
>
>
> First and foremost, I want to apologize for the delay in assisting here. I
> know that is has been frustrating for many community members given upcoming
> holidays and such.  I greatly appreciate the community's understanding and
> patience regarding all of the activities we are juggling in parallel.
> Secondly, I wish to thank IBM, and Bartosz Balazinski in particular, for
> their outstanding help and support!!!  Bartosz started a wiki page for this
> meeting that I've just finished fleshing out a bit further with all of the
> information you should need. *Dublin Architecture Planning Meeting
> *
>
>
>
> *A couple of important items of note about this meeting:*
>
>
>
> -  *This is NOT a Dublin Release Developer event* – unfortunately we
> still do not have a final date for that, however there was a great deal of
> progress made working with potential hosts at ONS. Please stay tuned.
>
>
>
> -  *The F2F meeting is an Architecture Subcommittee meeting*,
> specifically for Dublin Architecture Planning.  This is similar to the
> meeting that occurred at the Openstack Summit back in May
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Architecture+Planning+Meeting
>