Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[Sauvageau, David]

Thanks Roger. Gildas, do you need anything else for OOM?

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of Roger Maitland 
<roger.maitl...@amdocs.com<mailto:roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>>
Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 2:02 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
<plata...@research.att.com<mailto:plata...@research.att.com>>, "FREEMAN, BRIAN 
D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>, onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

I’ve gathered some data from Michael’s CD system to determine the size of the 
deployment – see the attached excel spreadsheet.  This data is from December 
1st, just before noon EST.  Here is a graph that summarizes the memory 
requirements:
[cid:image001.png@01D36AAD.03CE1400]
There are only 7 containers with memory usage over 1.5 GB.

The total memory usage peaks at just over 50 GB (my analysis was done just 
after the peak so the numbers are a little lower):
[cid:image005.png@01D36AAD.03CE1400]

Please keep in mind that there is no traffic on this CD systems so actually 
usage in a real-world deployment will be higher.

Cheers,
Roger
From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO 
(MARCO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:57 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; TIMONEY, DAN 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

I don’t think there is a real relationship between number of containers and 
resource needed, it mainly depends on what kind of computation you are doing. I 
leave the answer to the experts (OOM team) but a while ago I was told that on 
average you roughly need 2 GB per container, but I don’t know how accurate this 
is.

Today’s OOM cluster is 64 GB (without DCAE). That seems OK for non-replicated 
ONAP.

Marco

From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:46 AM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
<plata...@research.att.com<mailto:plata...@research.att.com>>, Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>, onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

That does make sense – perhaps another set of columns or separate table for 
container data.

How do you measure/estimate the memory needed for a container ?

Brian



From: PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:41 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; TIMONEY, DAN 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[HU, BIN]

Michael,

Looks very cool, and information shown are very helpful.

Thank you very much
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of OBRIEN, FRANK MICHAEL
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:53 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,
 For reference, there is an unprotected continuous deployment server we use 
to verify commits running the OOM master build hourly (No DCAE yet) where you 
can get a view of the runtime configuration of a single node (ONAP R1 currently 
fits in a 64G vm) – the kubernetes UI will show individual docker container 
cpu/ram limits.
 Launch the rancher UI and the Kubernetes console to see resource usage
 The CD server gets cleared/recreated at the top of the hour and is usually 
up within 25-45 min depending on the health check status (which may push 
maximum wait time for pods-up) – it is idle for the last 15 min of the hour.
  Note it is only a 4 core VM – so multiple users may slow the system

  Rancher UI: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/env/1a7/infra/hosts/1h1/containers<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dev.onap.info-3A8880_env_1a7_infra_hosts_1h1_containers=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=qAo8np3_ZClZ5RDeIoAvxkN7lpUTlXkN4vje1s0Ovl8=UONiw6THyl_nd3FwD6v8TMrvurMOdqZ1MEopH4tSDY0=>
 - it may switch back to cd.onap.info in the future
  Kubernetes Console: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/r/projects/1a7/kubernetes-dashboard:9090/#!/pod?namespace=_all<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dev.onap.info-3A8880_r_projects_1a7_kubernetes-2Ddashboard-3A9090_-23-21_pod-3Fnamespace-3D-5Fall=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=qAo8np3_ZClZ5RDeIoAvxkN7lpUTlXkN4vje1s0Ovl8=lR3QasrJVIn41WjjrNnQ6WM2ig-w1nC-8GyJF-yMLdM=>
  Check status at 
http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__jenkins.onap.info_job_oom-2Dcd_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=qAo8np3_ZClZ5RDeIoAvxkN7lpUTlXkN4vje1s0Ovl8=BeYkQkS8dsQ7Q1y7tFDs46pJMWs7u-iiOinqmkSH2yY=>

  Thank you
  /michael


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO 
(MARCO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 14:14
To: HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com<mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; 
eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__kubernetes.io_docs_tasks_administer-2Dcluster_highly-2Davailable-2Dmaster_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=6qPcDOqMgwf1K_r6YIIHhw=qAo8np3_ZClZ5RDeIoAvxkN7lpUTlXkN4vje1s0Ovl8=BcqZnUXS6XZvbnx5hV3XQ8O7webcVQQVmhhZl2sw0TE=>

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" <bh5...@att.com<mailto:bh5...@att.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
<plata...@research.att.com<mailto:plata...@research.att.com>>, 
"eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>" 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[Michael O'Brien]

Bin,
 For reference, there is an unprotected continuous deployment server we use 
to verify commits running the OOM master build hourly (No DCAE yet) where you 
can get a view of the runtime configuration of a single node (ONAP R1 currently 
fits in a 64G vm) – the kubernetes UI will show individual docker container 
cpu/ram limits.
 Launch the rancher UI and the Kubernetes console to see resource usage
 The CD server gets cleared/recreated at the top of the hour and is usually 
up within 25-45 min depending on the health check status (which may push 
maximum wait time for pods-up) – it is idle for the last 15 min of the hour.
  Note it is only a 4 core VM – so multiple users may slow the system

  Rancher UI: http://dev.onap.info:8880/env/1a7/infra/hosts/1h1/containers 
- it may switch back to cd.onap.info in the future
  Kubernetes Console: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/r/projects/1a7/kubernetes-dashboard:9090/#!/pod?namespace=_all
  Check status at http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/

  Thank you
  /michael


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO 
(MARCO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 14:14
To: HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com>; eric.deb...@orange.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" <bh5...@att.com<mailto:bh5...@att.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
<plata...@research.att.com<mailto:plata...@research.att.com>>, 
"eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>" 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-Recommended number of worker nodes?

-Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>" 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that 

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" <bh5...@att.com>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" <plata...@research.att.com>, 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" <eric.deb...@orange.com>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>" 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[HU, BIN]

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>" 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" <eric.deb...@orange.com>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[eric.debeau]

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

I don’t think there is a real relationship between number of containers and 
resource needed, it mainly depends on what kind of computation you are doing. I 
leave the answer to the experts (OOM team) but a while ago I was told that on 
average you roughly need 2 GB per container, but I don’t know how accurate this 
is.

Today’s OOM cluster is 64 GB (without DCAE). That seems OK for non-replicated 
ONAP.

Marco

From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:46 AM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" <plata...@research.att.com>, Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com>, "TIMONEY, DAN" <dt5...@att.com>, onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

That does make sense – perhaps another set of columns or separate table for 
container data.

How do you measure/estimate the memory needed for a container ?

Brian



From: PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:41 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com>; Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com>; TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>, onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussi

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

That does make sense – perhaps another set of columns or separate table for 
container data.

How do you measure/estimate the memory needed for a container ?

Brian



From: PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:41 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com>; Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com>; TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
<dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>, onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki<https://wiki.web.att.com/display/DERP/D2+ECOMP+Release+Planning+Home> for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
<onap-release-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" 
<bf1...@att.com>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
<dt5...@att.com>, onap-release <onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; onap-release <onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
<bf1...@att.com>
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki<https://wiki.web.att.com/display/DERP/D2+ECOMP+Release+Planning+Home> for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
<onap-release-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-release-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
<gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
<onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+labs+need+for+Beijing<https://urldefe

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN ; onap-release 
Cc: onap-discuss ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 

Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" >
Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+labs+need+for+Beijing
 and we need every team to fill out the table.

Please let my Catherine, Helen, Brian and Brian know if you have any questions.

It will be greatly appreciated if the table could be filled out by Monday, Dec 
4.

Thanks,
Gildas

[uaweiLogowithName]
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
gildas.lani...@huawei.com
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[Gildas Lanilis]

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis ; onap-release 

Cc: onap-discuss ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 

Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" >
Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+labs+need+for+Beijing
 and we need every team to fill out the table.

Please let my Catherine, Helen, Brian and Brian know if you have any questions.

It will be greatly appreciated if the table could be filled out by Monday, Dec 
4.

Thanks,
Gildas

[uaweiLogowithName]
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
gildas.lani...@huawei.com
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[TIMONEY, DAN]

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From:  on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 

Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
Cc: onap-discuss , "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" 

Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+labs+need+for+Beijing
 and we need every team to fill out the table.

Please let my Catherine, Helen, Brian and Brian know if you have any questions.

It will be greatly appreciated if the table could be filled out by Monday, Dec 
4.

Thanks,
Gildas

[uaweiLogowithName]
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
gildas.lani...@huawei.com
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss