[onap-tsc] Kubernetes NodePort reservations are required until ingress refactoring is in - otherwise port conflicts occur #oom #kubernetes #nodeport

2019-01-14 Thread Michael O'Brien
Team,
   There is at least one team that is not reserving nodeports - this has caused 
several instances of nodeport conflicts during a full helm deploy - this has 
occurred regularly over the past 6 months - in some instances the effects were 
2 levels - a conflict - causing a 2nd conflict after a 2nd refactor.

TODO: NodePort reservation: temporary until we get ingress ports up - any 
nodeport change MUST consult/update this page before a test FULL deploy.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/OOM+NodePort+List


   Note 1: you will not see a conflict unless you deploy the entire onap - so 
only full deploys like during CD jobs will catch these.
   Note 2: a couple of the nodeports are reserved for design/test-time charts 
that are not normally deployed - please consult the wiki registry first before 
using an open nodeport.
   Note 3: remember you don't need an externally accessible nodeport for 
internal rest calls - the internal DNS service name is good for this - no 
exposure necessary.
   Note 4: the 304 prefix is more open than the 302 prefix - which is 
essentially closed now.
   Note 5: if you change any nodeport in a values.yaml - you MUST deploy all of 
ONAP - including every single pod listed in the dev/values.yaml override - for 
assistance in a managed deploy - use 
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/deploy/cd.sh

thank you
/michael

This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential 
and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4468): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4468
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29121746/21656
Mute #oom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=oom&subid=2743226
Mute #kubernetes: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=kubernetes&subid=2743226
Mute #nodeport: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=nodeport&subid=2743226
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[onap-tsc] Soliciting interest in a Telecom focused SIG regarding Blockchain and Hyperledger

2019-01-14 Thread Phil Robb
Hello Leaders of the LF Networking Communities:

The LF Networking and Hyperledger communities are exploring working
together in a new Hyperledger Telecom Special Interest Group (SIG) to
investigate use cases for blockchain technology in the Telecom industry.
There are many trust and transparency issues in the industry today where it
seems that blockchain solutions may have the potential to fill the
identified gaps.

This proposed SIG will gather a group of community members to work together
to dig into these use cases and potential solutions. As a leader in the
Telecom space, we would like to invite you or a member of your team to be
an early participant in the Hyperledger Telecom Special Interest Group.

To see the current SIG proposal, please review the following google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWjTCEpsoejkzwRf9XN8YEnSOcaILZwxGZda1slkRKk/edit#

If you are interested in participating or have others on your team that
would be, please let us know by replying to this email and/or adding your
name to the SIG proposal document and we will be in touch on the timing of
the launch of this SIG.

Thanks again for your support of the LF Networking community and I look
forward to hearing from you.

Best,

Phil.
-- 
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4467): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4467
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29113637/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

2019-01-14 Thread Stephen Terrill
Apologies, reply/email error, nothing to do with the reply from Srini.
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 17:34, Stephen Terrill  
> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, don’t know.  I know he was looking at S3P, but I am not aware of what 
> he was looking at for xNFs and PNFs.
> 
> 
>> On 14 Jan 2019, at 14:51, Srini  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>>  
>> On this “#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by 
>> the Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information”
>>  
>> In phase1, we will not be able to get to the stage of integrating with CLAMP 
>> or DCAE framework. In phase1, intention is to develop charts needed for big 
>> data analytics framework and prove that one set of charts can be used to 
>> create multiple instances in various sites. 
>>  
>> At the same time, During first 3 months of this year, intention is to figure 
>> out the architecture direction for distributed functions  in general and 
>> then figure out the path for distributed analytics. Ramki is starting these 
>> discussion first in edge-automation working group as a task force for 
>> architecture committee. Goal is to provide architecture direction during ONS.
>>  
>> Hi Pam,
>>  
>> We (Dileep, Ramki or I) can present in any upcoming ‘Control Loop 
>> Subcommittee’ meetings on phase1 scope.  Please let us know which day work 
>> for you.
>>  
>> Thanks
>> Srini
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Catherine LEFEVRE
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:02 AM
>> To: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; 
>> onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-sec...@lists.onap.org; 
>> onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
>> Subject: [Onap-arc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)
>> Importance: High
>>  
>> Good morning/afternoon/morning ONAP Community,
>>  
>> The latest TSC Prioritization spreadsheet (v11) has been uploaded: 
>> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
>> I have also enhanced the Dublin Release Requirements wiki page accordingly.
>>  
>> I would like to share additional feedback/action items captured during the 
>> APAC/EMEA/US sessions organized last week and this morning:
>>  
>> #1 S3P requirements will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call 
>> (1/14): https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003367
>> #2 vFW enhancements: Marco to confirm if APPC is impacted or not
>> #3 Consistent ID of a Cloud Region – OOF PTL to reply to Bing Yang
>> #4 Change Management Dublin Extensions – Use Case Owner (Ajay Mahimkar) to 
>> review the flows based on Architecture feedback and to discuss with VID/SDC 
>> PTLs
>> #5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by the 
>> Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information
>> #6 Modularity –Use Case Owner (John NG/Seshu) to contact SDC PTL (Ofir)
>> #7 ETSI Alignment (SO plug-in) - Use Case Owner (Fred, Ciaran) to contact 
>> SDC PTL (Ofir)
>> #8 PNF/xNF will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14)
>>  
>> The following items are currently “NO GO”:
>> #1 OSAM/PNF – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
>> #2  S3P - Service Mesh (ISTIO) except if covered by Extra Resource
>> #3 Tosca Task Force – PTLs are requesting additional information about the 5 
>> requirements
>> #4 Allotted Network Function – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
>> #5 - S3P Manageability - Logging capabilities – no clarification has been 
>> provided to PTLs
>>  
>> If I have miscaptured or missed anything then I would like to invite you to 
>> update the wiki page accordingly.
>> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
>>  
>> Many thanks & regards
>> Catherine
>>  
>> Catherine Lefèvre
>> AVP Software Development & Engineering
>>  
>> AT&T Labs – Network Cloud & Infrastructure
>> D2 Platform & Systems Development
>> ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA
>> ONAP TSC Chair
>>  
>>  
>> Phone: +32 81 84 09 08
>> Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73
>> catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com
>>  
>> TEXTING and DRIVING… It Can Wait
>> AT&T
>> BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA
>> Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2
>> 5101 Loyers (Namur)
>> Belgium
>>  
>>  
>> NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the 
>> sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. 
>> The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or 
>> entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
>> hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in 
>> reliance on the content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
>> this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender identified above
>>  
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4465): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4465
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29078411/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.o

Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

2019-01-14 Thread Srini
Hi Steve,

I did not understand the response. You meant to reply to some other email?

Thanks
Srini


From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
Stephen Terrill
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 8:33 AM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

Hmmm, don’t know.  I know he was looking at S3P, but I am not aware of what he 
was looking at for xNFs and PNFs.

On 14 Jan 2019, at 14:51, Srini 
mailto:srinivasa.r.addepa...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi,

On this “#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by 
the Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information”

In phase1, we will not be able to get to the stage of integrating with CLAMP or 
DCAE framework. In phase1, intention is to develop charts needed for big data 
analytics framework and prove that one set of charts can be used to create 
multiple instances in various sites.

At the same time, During first 3 months of this year, intention is to figure 
out the architecture direction for distributed functions  in general and then 
figure out the path for distributed analytics. Ramki is starting these 
discussion first in edge-automation working group as a task force for 
architecture committee. Goal is to provide architecture direction during ONS.

Hi Pam,

We (Dileep, Ramki or I) can present in any upcoming ‘Control Loop Subcommittee’ 
meetings on phase1 scope.  Please let us know which day work for you.

Thanks
Srini



From: onap-...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:02 AM
To: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-sec...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [Onap-arc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)
Importance: High

Good morning/afternoon/morning ONAP Community,

The latest TSC Prioritization spreadsheet (v11) has been uploaded: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
I have also enhanced the Dublin Release Requirements wiki page accordingly.

I would like to share additional feedback/action items captured during the 
APAC/EMEA/US sessions organized last week and this morning:

#1 S3P requirements will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14): 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003367
#2 vFW enhancements: Marco to confirm if APPC is impacted or not
#3 Consistent ID of a Cloud Region – OOF PTL to reply to Bing Yang
#4 Change Management Dublin Extensions – Use Case Owner (Ajay Mahimkar) to 
review the flows based on Architecture feedback and to discuss with VID/SDC PTLs
#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by the Control 
Loop Subcommittee to get additional information
#6 Modularity –Use Case Owner (John NG/Seshu) to contact SDC PTL (Ofir)
#7 ETSI Alignment (SO plug-in) - Use Case Owner (Fred, Ciaran) to contact SDC 
PTL (Ofir)
#8 PNF/xNF will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14)

The following items are currently “NO GO”:
#1 OSAM/PNF – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#2  S3P - Service Mesh (ISTIO) except if covered by Extra Resource
#3 Tosca Task Force – PTLs are requesting additional information about the 5 
requirements
#4 Allotted Network Function – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#5 - S3P Manageability - Logging capabilities – no clarification has been 
provided to PTLs

If I have miscaptured or missed anything then I would like to invite you to 
update the wiki page accordingly.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements

Many thanks & regards
Catherine

Catherine Lefèvre
AVP Software Development & Engineering

AT&T Labs – Network Cloud & Infrastructure
D2 Platform & Systems Development
ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA
ONAP TSC Chair


Phone: +32 81 84 09 08
Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com

TEXTING and DRIVING… It Can Wait

AT&T
BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA
Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2
5101 Loyers (Namur)
Belgium



NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the 
sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The 
information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the 
content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in 
error please immediately notify the sender identified above



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4464): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-ts

Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

2019-01-14 Thread Stephen Terrill
Hmmm, don’t know.  I know he was looking at S3P, but I am not aware of what he 
was looking at for xNFs and PNFs.
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 14:51, Srini  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  
> On this “#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by 
> the Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information”
>  
> In phase1, we will not be able to get to the stage of integrating with CLAMP 
> or DCAE framework. In phase1, intention is to develop charts needed for big 
> data analytics framework and prove that one set of charts can be used to 
> create multiple instances in various sites. 
>  
> At the same time, During first 3 months of this year, intention is to figure 
> out the architecture direction for distributed functions  in general and then 
> figure out the path for distributed analytics. Ramki is starting these 
> discussion first in edge-automation working group as a task force for 
> architecture committee. Goal is to provide architecture direction during ONS.
>  
> Hi Pam,
>  
> We (Dileep, Ramki or I) can present in any upcoming ‘Control Loop 
> Subcommittee’ meetings on phase1 scope.  Please let us know which day work 
> for you.
>  
> Thanks
> Srini
>  
>  
>  
> From: onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
> Catherine LEFEVRE
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:02 AM
> To: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; 
> onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-sec...@lists.onap.org; 
> onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
> Subject: [Onap-arc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)
> Importance: High
>  
> Good morning/afternoon/morning ONAP Community,
>  
> The latest TSC Prioritization spreadsheet (v11) has been uploaded: 
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
> I have also enhanced the Dublin Release Requirements wiki page accordingly.
>  
> I would like to share additional feedback/action items captured during the 
> APAC/EMEA/US sessions organized last week and this morning:
>  
> #1 S3P requirements will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call 
> (1/14): https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003367
> #2 vFW enhancements: Marco to confirm if APPC is impacted or not
> #3 Consistent ID of a Cloud Region – OOF PTL to reply to Bing Yang
> #4 Change Management Dublin Extensions – Use Case Owner (Ajay Mahimkar) to 
> review the flows based on Architecture feedback and to discuss with VID/SDC 
> PTLs
> #5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) – Request raised by the 
> Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information
> #6 Modularity –Use Case Owner (John NG/Seshu) to contact SDC PTL (Ofir)
> #7 ETSI Alignment (SO plug-in) - Use Case Owner (Fred, Ciaran) to contact SDC 
> PTL (Ofir)
> #8 PNF/xNF will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14)
>  
> The following items are currently “NO GO”:
> #1 OSAM/PNF – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
> #2  S3P - Service Mesh (ISTIO) except if covered by Extra Resource
> #3 Tosca Task Force – PTLs are requesting additional information about the 5 
> requirements
> #4 Allotted Network Function – no clarification has been provided to PTLs
> #5 - S3P Manageability - Logging capabilities – no clarification has been 
> provided to PTLs
>  
> If I have miscaptured or missed anything then I would like to invite you to 
> update the wiki page accordingly.
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
>  
> Many thanks & regards
> Catherine
>  
> Catherine Lefèvre
> AVP Software Development & Engineering
>  
> AT&T Labs – Network Cloud & Infrastructure
> D2 Platform & Systems Development
> ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA
> ONAP TSC Chair
>  
>  
> Phone: +32 81 84 09 08
> Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73
> catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com
>  
> TEXTING and DRIVING… It Can Wait
> AT&T
> BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA
> Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2
> 5101 Loyers (Namur)
> Belgium
>  
>  
> NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the 
> sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The 
> information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) 
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the 
> content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in 
> error please immediately notify the sender identified above
>  
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4463): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4463
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29078411/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [onap-tsc] Mailing list netiquette

2019-01-14 Thread Alexis de Talhouet


> On Jan 8, 2019, at 6:02 PM, Krzysztof Opasiak  wrote:
> 
> Please share your opinion about above issues.

I do agree having ML practices for ONAP would be beneficial, and I’m all
in favour the two mentioned points. I’m not sure how to enforce but I believe
it is more a best / educational practices.

> If you would like to have some discussion about that or to present to 
> the broader audience on this topic I'm available during current event.


I believe it worth having a discussion about this; could be a 15mn item during
TSC meeting.

Thanks,
Alexis
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4462): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4462
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29073941/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

2019-01-14 Thread Srini
Hi,

On this "#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) - Request raised by 
the Control Loop Subcommittee to get additional information"

In phase1, we will not be able to get to the stage of integrating with CLAMP or 
DCAE framework. In phase1, intention is to develop charts needed for big data 
analytics framework and prove that one set of charts can be used to create 
multiple instances in various sites.

At the same time, During first 3 months of this year, intention is to figure 
out the architecture direction for distributed functions  in general and then 
figure out the path for distributed analytics. Ramki is starting these 
discussion first in edge-automation working group as a task force for 
architecture committee. Goal is to provide architecture direction during ONS.

Hi Pam,

We (Dileep, Ramki or I) can present in any upcoming 'Control Loop Subcommittee' 
meetings on phase1 scope.  Please let us know which day work for you.

Thanks
Srini



From: onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:02 AM
To: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-sec...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [Onap-arc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)
Importance: High

Good morning/afternoon/morning ONAP Community,

The latest TSC Prioritization spreadsheet (v11) has been uploaded: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
I have also enhanced the Dublin Release Requirements wiki page accordingly.

I would like to share additional feedback/action items captured during the 
APAC/EMEA/US sessions organized last week and this morning:

#1 S3P requirements will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14): 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003367
#2 vFW enhancements: Marco to confirm if APPC is impacted or not
#3 Consistent ID of a Cloud Region - OOF PTL to reply to Bing Yang
#4 Change Management Dublin Extensions - Use Case Owner (Ajay Mahimkar) to 
review the flows based on Architecture feedback and to discuss with VID/SDC PTLs
#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) - Request raised by the Control 
Loop Subcommittee to get additional information
#6 Modularity -Use Case Owner (John NG/Seshu) to contact SDC PTL (Ofir)
#7 ETSI Alignment (SO plug-in) - Use Case Owner (Fred, Ciaran) to contact SDC 
PTL (Ofir)
#8 PNF/xNF will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14)

The following items are currently "NO GO":
#1 OSAM/PNF - no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#2  S3P - Service Mesh (ISTIO) except if covered by Extra Resource
#3 Tosca Task Force - PTLs are requesting additional information about the 5 
requirements
#4 Allotted Network Function - no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#5 - S3P Manageability - Logging capabilities - no clarification has been 
provided to PTLs

If I have miscaptured or missed anything then I would like to invite you to 
update the wiki page accordingly.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements

Many thanks & regards
Catherine

Catherine Lefèvre
AVP Software Development & Engineering

AT&T Labs - Network Cloud & Infrastructure
D2 Platform & Systems Development
ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA
ONAP TSC Chair


Phone: +32 81 84 09 08
Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com

TEXTING and DRIVING... It Can Wait

AT&T
BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA
Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2
5101 Loyers (Namur)
Belgium



NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the 
sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The 
information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the 
content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in 
error please immediately notify the sender identified above



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4461): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4461
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29078411/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[onap-tsc] Dublin Release - TSC Prioritization (Latest Updates)

2019-01-14 Thread Catherine LEFEVRE
Good morning/afternoon/morning ONAP Community,

The latest TSC Prioritization spreadsheet (v11) has been uploaded: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements
I have also enhanced the Dublin Release Requirements wiki page accordingly.

I would like to share additional feedback/action items captured during the 
APAC/EMEA/US sessions organized last week and this morning:

#1 S3P requirements will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14): 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003367
#2 vFW enhancements: Marco to confirm if APPC is impacted or not
#3 Consistent ID of a Cloud Region - OOF PTL to reply to Bing Yang
#4 Change Management Dublin Extensions - Use Case Owner (Ajay Mahimkar) to 
review the flows based on Architecture feedback and to discuss with VID/SDC PTLs
#5 Distributed Analytics as a Service (Phase 1) - Request raised by the Control 
Loop Subcommittee to get additional information
#6 Modularity -Use Case Owner (John NG/Seshu) to contact SDC PTL (Ofir)
#7 ETSI Alignment (SO plug-in) - Use Case Owner (Fred, Ciaran) to contact SDC 
PTL (Ofir)
#8 PNF/xNF will be presented by Jason Hunt during the PTL call (1/14)

The following items are currently "NO GO":
#1 OSAM/PNF - no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#2  S3P - Service Mesh (ISTIO) except if covered by Extra Resource
#3 Tosca Task Force - PTLs are requesting additional information about the 5 
requirements
#4 Allotted Network Function - no clarification has been provided to PTLs
#5 - S3P Manageability - Logging capabilities - no clarification has been 
provided to PTLs

If I have miscaptured or missed anything then I would like to invite you to 
update the wiki page accordingly.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Release+Requirements

Many thanks & regards
Catherine

Catherine Lefèvre
AVP Software Development & Engineering

AT&T Labs - Network Cloud & Infrastructure
D2 Platform & Systems Development
ECOMP/RUBY/SPP-NEAM-Appl. Servers/SIA
ONAP TSC Chair


Phone: +32 81 84 09 08
Mobile: +32 475 77 36 73
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com

TEXTING and DRIVING... It Can Wait

AT&T
BUROGEST OFFICE PARK SA
Avenue des Dessus-de-Lives, 2
5101 Loyers (Namur)
Belgium



NOTE: This email (or its attachments) contains information belonging to the 
sender, which may be confidential. proprietary and/or legally privileged. The 
information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the 
content of this is strictly forbidden. If you have received this e-mail in 
error please immediately notify the sender identified above


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4460): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4460
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29078411/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-