Re: Hi Everybody

[taotao.liu]

good news... ...


2012-08-07 



China Standard Software Co., Ltd. LiuTao
China  Phone: (+86) 010-51659955-8106

OpenOffice Community Modularization project lead

http://www.cs2c.com.cn
http://modularization.openoffice.org
mailto:taotao@cs2c.com.cn



发件人： 李震宁 
发送时间： 2012-08-07  14:48:25 
收件人： ooo-market...@incubator.apache.org 
抄送： ooo-dev 
主题： Hi Everybody 
 
Hi Everybody：
I’m Michael Lee from China Standard Software. I’m very glad to meet you.
We have been cooperating with IBM since 2012. We appoint engineers in the 
research and development projects of AOO, and also submit codes.
We hope to promote the progress of local open source community during the 
research and development.
We plan to set up AOO user groups in China, and gather them to have discussions 
and activities regularly.
Our purpose is to attract more user groups to use AOO and more developers to 
pay attention to AOO.
We’ll follow up for the activities and introduce to all of you. I hope you 
could pay attention to us and help us. Thank you!

-- China Standard SoftWare Co .Ltd Public Rdlations Director 
Michael Lee 13910018684 010-51659955-8131 zhenning...@cs2c.com.cn 
www.cs2c.com.cn
发自我的 iPad

[Call-for-​Review]Two issues about font size change in document.

[Chen Peng]

Hi All,
 I have fixed two problems about font size change in document, as shown
in below:

 1. *Bug 119649*
- [From
Symphony]Hyperlink font size increased if saved to .doc file
 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119649
 *Root Cause:
* In the id definition, RES_TXTATR_INETFMT must precede
RES_TXTATR_CHARFMT, so that link
 style can overwrite char style. And in #i24291# it describes
"All we want to do is ensure for now is
 that if a charfmt exist  in the character properties that it
rises to the top and is exported first.",
 so hyperlink text property will override the original text
property in this situation.
 *Resolution:
* Ignore the link style in such situation when doing ms word
filter exports.

 2. *Bug 119650*
- [From
Symphony]Font size increased if saved by AOO
 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119650
 *Root Cause:
*The properties of CHP PLC was not broken after a paragraph
ending.
 *Resolution:
*   Add such broken after paragraph ending.

Thank you very much if you can help me to review them!

3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120476] Inserting a slide in presentation will freeze AOO with clean environment.

[bugzilla]

Li Lin Yi  has asked  for 3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120476: Inserting a slide in presentation will freeze AOO with clean
environment.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120476


--- Additional Comments from Li Lin Yi 
I checked AOO3.4(r1327774, on windows 7 64bit), it is OK.
So mark it as 3.4.1_release_blocker.

Re: Do we *really* support Windows 2000?

[Ji Yan]

IMHO, If no volunteer test product on Windows 2000, we can remove it from
support OS list.

2012/8/7 Kay Schenk 

> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
>
> > We're listing Windows 2000 SP2 as a supported platform in our System
> > Requirements page:
> > http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo34.html
> >
> > But has anyone actually tested with Windows 2000?
> >
> > I tried to install Windows 2000, but I can't even get the ISO image
> > from MSDN.  They pulled it years ago, apparently as part of a legal
> > settlement related to Java:
> >
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ff723773.aspx
> >
> > Unless anyone is actually testing with Windows 2000, and we're willing
> > to treat failures in Windows 2000 as ship blocking issues, I'd
> > recommend that we stop listing it as a supported platform.
> >
> > -Rob
> >
>
> ...and recently we had a question about Win 98 wasn't it? I think the last
> version that ran with that was in the 2.x range, though I can't recall
> what.
>
> Is it at all beneficial to try to keep a table of what (A)OOo version ran
> on what to address some of these users?
>
> I thought I might find the "old" release notes *with* the old source
> archives but alas I did not, so no answers unless we consult the "way back
> machine".
>
> Anyway, if we don't care to keep a history list (or can't), then we should
> delete Win 2000.
>
> --
>
> 
> MzK
>
> "I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music.
>  As long as my brain and fingers work, I'm cool."
>   -- Eddie Van Halen
>



-- 


Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji

3.4.1_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 120257] Standard Dictionary does not recognize any words.

[bugzilla]

Du Jing  has canceled Du Jing 's
request for 3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120257: Standard Dictionary does not recognize any words.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120257

Re: CMS diff: Why Apache OpenOffice

[Kay Schenk]

This is now published , and thank you!



On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Shenfeng Liu  wrote:

> Hi, all,
>   I translated the copied the "why" pages to zh-cn, and translated the
> index of why (I didn't change the zh-cn index.html to point to it yet). I
> wonder if Erik or any one can help to review and commit?
>   It is my first time to try the web page translation, so please tell me if
> any thing I did wrong.
>   And if every thing ok, I will continue to translation other pages under
> "why".
>   Thanks!
>
> - Shenfeng
>
>
> 在 2012年8月3日 下午4:01，Shenfeng Liu 写道：
>
> > Clone URL (Committers only):
> >
> >
> https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/zh-cn%2Fwhy%2Findex.mdtext
> >
> > Shenfeng Liu
> >
> > Index: trunk/content/zh-cn/why/index.mdtext
> > ===
> > --- trunk/content/zh-cn/why/index.mdtext(working copy)
> > +++ trunk/content/zh-cn/why/index.mdtext(working copy)
> > @@ -16,29 +16,29 @@
> > specific language governing permissions and limitations
> > under the License.
> >
> > -## Why should I use Apache OpenOffice?
> > +## 为什么我应当使用Apache OpenOffice？
> >
> > -![Why Apache OpenOffice](/images/AOO_logos/orb.jpg) # {.rfloatimg}
> > +![为何选择Apache OpenOffice](/images/AOO_logos/orb.jpg) # {.rfloatimg}
> >
> > -Apache OpenOffice is the leading **open-source** **office software
> > suite** for **word processing**, **spreadsheets**, **presentations**,
> > **graphics**, **databases** and more. It is available in **many
> languages**
> > and works on all **common computers**. It stores all your data in an
> > **international open standard format** and can also read and write files
> > from other common office software packages. It can be downloaded and used
> > completely **free of charge** for **any purpose**.
> > +Apache OpenOffice是一款先进的**开源**
> > **办公软件套件**，它包含**文本文档**、**电子表格**、**演示文稿**、**绘图**、**数据库**等。
> >
> 它能够支持**许多语言**并且在所有**普通计算机**上工作。它将你所有的数据以**国际开放标准格式**存储下来，并能够读写从其它常用办公软件包来的文件。它可以被完全**免费**下载并使用于**任何用途**。
> >
> > -  - [Great software](why_great.html)
> > +  - [杰出的软件](why_great.html)
> >
> > -Apache OpenOffice is the result of over twenty years' software
> > engineering. Designed from the start as a single piece of software, it
> has
> > a consistency other products cannot match. A completely open development
> > process means that anyone can report bugs, request new features, or
> enhance
> > the software. The result: Apache OpenOffice does everything you want your
> > office software to do, the way you want it to.
> > +Apache
> >
> OpenOffice凝聚了二十多年软件工程的结晶。它从最初的单一功能软件开始，秉承一致，专注发展，是其它许多产品所不能比拟的。它采用完全开放的开发流程，这意味着每个人都可以报告产品缺陷，或对这个软件提出新功能或功能增强的需求。其结果就是：
> > Apache OpenOffice能够如你所愿做到你期望一个办公软件为你做到的任何事。
> >
> > -  - [Easy to use](why_easy.html)
> > +  - [易于使用](why_easy.html)
> >
> > -Apache OpenOffice is easy to learn, and if you're already using
> > another office software package, you'll take to OpenOffice straight away.
> > Our world-wide native-language community means that OpenOffice is
> probably
> > available and supported in your own language. And if you already have
> files
> > from another office package - OpenOffice will probably read them with no
> > difficulty.
> > +Apache
> >
> OpenOffice很方便学习，而且如果你已经有使用其它办公软件包的经验，你会发现OpenOffice很容易上手。我们遍布全球的本地语言社区意味着OpenOffice很可能已经具有了针对你的语言的版本和支持。如果你已经有一些由其它办公包产生的文件，OpenOffice也可能毫无困难地读取它们。
> >
> > -  - [and it's free](why_free.html)
> > +  - [并且免费](why_free.html)
> >
> > -Best of all, Apache OpenOffice can be downloaded and used entirely
> > free of any license fees. Apache OpenOffice is released under the Apache
> > 2.0 Licence. This means you may use it for any purpose - domestic,
> > commercial, educational, public administration. You may install it on as
> > many computers as you like. You may make copies and give them away to
> > family, friends, students, employees - anyone you like.
> > +最好的是，Apache OpenOffice可以被完全自由下载和使用而没有任何许可证费用。Apache
> > OpenOffice是基于Apache
> >
> 2.0许可证而发布的。这意味着你可以将它使用于任何目的：家庭、商业、教育、公共管理。你可以按自己的意愿将它安装在多台机器上。你可以复制这个软件，把它们给你的家人、朋友、学生、雇员――任何你想给的人。
> >
> > -## Where is Apache OpenOffice currently used?
> > +## 目前Apache OpenOffice在哪些地方被使用？
> >
> > -  - [Governments](why_gov.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for Public
> > Administration")
> > -  - [Education](why_edu.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for Education")
> > -  - [Businesses](why_sme.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for Businesses")
> > -  - [Not for profits](why_nfp.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for Not For
> > Profits")
> > -  - [IT Businesses](why_oem.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for IT
> > businesses")
> > -  - [F/OSS advocates](why_foss.html "Why Apache OpenOffice for
> > Free/Open-Source Systems advocates")
> > +  - [政府](why_gov.html "为何在公共管理中使用Apache OpenOffice")
> > +  - [教育](why_edu.html "为何在教育行业中使用Apache OpenOffice")
> > +  - [商业](why_sme.html "为何在商业中使用Apache OpenOffice")
> > +  - [非盈利事业](why_nfp.html "为何在非盈利事业

Re: Do we *really* support Windows 2000?

[Kay Schenk]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:

> We're listing Windows 2000 SP2 as a supported platform in our System
> Requirements page:
> http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo34.html
>
> But has anyone actually tested with Windows 2000?
>
> I tried to install Windows 2000, but I can't even get the ISO image
> from MSDN.  They pulled it years ago, apparently as part of a legal
> settlement related to Java:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ff723773.aspx
>
> Unless anyone is actually testing with Windows 2000, and we're willing
> to treat failures in Windows 2000 as ship blocking issues, I'd
> recommend that we stop listing it as a supported platform.
>
> -Rob
>

...and recently we had a question about Win 98 wasn't it? I think the last
version that ran with that was in the 2.x range, though I can't recall what.

Is it at all beneficial to try to keep a table of what (A)OOo version ran
on what to address some of these users?

I thought I might find the "old" release notes *with* the old source
archives but alas I did not, so no answers unless we consult the "way back
machine".

Anyway, if we don't care to keep a history list (or can't), then we should
delete Win 2000.

-- 

MzK

"I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music.
 As long as my brain and fingers work, I'm cool."
  -- Eddie Van Halen

Re: Do we *really* support Windows 2000?

[Fernando Cassia]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> Unless anyone is actually testing with Windows 2000, and we're willing
> to treat failures in Windows 2000 as ship blocking issues, I'd
> recommend that we stop listing it as a supported platform.

Latest Oracle JRE to support Win2K is Java 6 update 30 or thereabouts.
Then Oracle stopped supporting it. So even the latest Java6 update
will NOT install on Win2K. (it will run,however, I hammered it into my
Win2K VM)

Java7 does not support Win2k. :-(

I personally think win2k was the best windows ever, due to its low
kernel footprint and low system requirements, which makes it specially
well suited to run virtualized  (nt to mention embedded).

I really think the win32 API is good enough to allow most devs to
support "win2k onwards" like some FOSS projects do (ie Nullsoft´s
Winamp, MPlayer for Windows, etc)... however most follow MSFT and
their compilers, so eventually they run into dependencies that makes
supporting older releases impossible :-(

Oh well, I can dream with an AOO built with OpenWatcom
(www.openwatcom.org) some day, not to depend on Microsoft´s VC
runtime... . ;)

Back to reality, I guess nothing of the above will happen...
FC

Need MWiki Admin assistance to correct Google Analytics code

[Rob Weir]

I need some help, from a MWiki admin, to fix the issue reported here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120301

I tried a JIRA issue with Infra, but they said that our admins need to
handle this.

I'd be happy to do this myself, but I don't have permissions.

Thanks!

-Rob

Re: Blog post draft: OpenOffice Conference Call for Papers

[Andrea Pescetti]

Donald Harbison wrote:

Andrea, I hope that you submit a proposal for a talk. We need the
impressive Italian community to represent key aspects of the proejct and
participate at ApacheCon Europe.


It's quite likely that I will propose a talk (not necessary on a topic 
related to OpenOffice in Italy).



Please encourage others from Italy to join
the effort.  Make sure folks know that the deadline is August 13th


I sent a note a few days ago to the users list in Italian:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-utenti-it/201208.mbox/%3C501CDF99.4090002%40apache.org%3E
and RGB did the same on the forums in Italian, so we tried to spread the 
news as much as possible.


Regards,
  Andrea.

Re: Ubuntu package for building AOO

[Kay Schenk]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Andre Fischer  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to let you know that over the weekend I played around
> > with Ubuntu metapackages and came up with one that pulls in all
> > packages that have to be installed in order to build Apache OpenOffice.
> >
> > I have put the relevant files in my public_html directory on
> > people.apache.org.  Try it out by adding it as additional package
> > repository and install package "build-aoo".
> >
> > A. With the synaptic package manager:
> >
> > 1. Open the repositories dialog via menu Settings->Repositories
> >
> > 2. Select tab page "Other Software"
> >
> > 3. Click the "Add..." button
> >
> > 4. Fill in after "APT line:"
> >deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
> >
> > 5. Close all dialogs.
> >
> > 6. Update package list by clicking on the "Reload" button of the tool
> > bar.
> >
> >
> > B. or via the command line:
> >
> > 1. Add these lines to /etc/apt/sources.list
> >
> > deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
> > deb-src http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
> >
> > 2. Execute in a shell
> >
> >sudo apt-get update
> >sudo apt-get install build-aoo
> >
> >
> > The build-aoo metapackage is not signed and on installation you will
> > be asked whether you want to install it anyway.
> >
> > Comments are welcome.
> >
>
> Cool.  I'll give it a try.  But please everyone, do not share this
> link broadly outside of the dev list,because of bandwidth
> considerations.
>
> Maybe after AOO 3.4.1 is released we could host something like this on
> SourceForge or Apache Extras/Google Code?
>
> -Rob
>
> > Andre
> >
>

Andre -- good for you.

Of course, I would still like to make a case for linux windows environments
vs OSes, but I know Ubuntu now uses "unity" and I know nothing about that.

We have a LOT of interest from Ubuntu folks so this is a good move.

-- 

MzK

"I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music.
 As long as my brain and fingers work, I'm cool."
  -- Eddie Van Halen

Do we *really* support Windows 2000?

[Rob Weir]

We're listing Windows 2000 SP2 as a supported platform in our System
Requirements page:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo34.html

But has anyone actually tested with Windows 2000?

I tried to install Windows 2000, but I can't even get the ISO image
from MSDN.  They pulled it years ago, apparently as part of a legal
settlement related to Java:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ff723773.aspx

Unless anyone is actually testing with Windows 2000, and we're willing
to treat failures in Windows 2000 as ship blocking issues, I'd
recommend that we stop listing it as a supported platform.

-Rob

Re: Download URL of commons-logging

[sebb]

On 6 August 2012 16:31, Andre Fischer  wrote:
> On 03.08.2012 12:45, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 3 August 2012 09:09, Andre Fischer  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am currently cleaning up and improving the download mechanism of the
>>> external tarballs.  Most of them (all that are used by the AOO34 branch)
>>> can
>>> now be found on apache-extras [1].  However, that is intended only as a
>>> fallback in case the tarballs can not be downloaded directly from their
>>> original download server.  At the moment we use the SVN repository as a
>>> secondary fallback.  I will remove that maybe next week.
>>>
>>> I need help regarding the original download site of one of the apache
>>> commons libraries.  The general download page for
>>> commons-logging-1.1.1-src.tar.gz is [2].  I don't know how to produce a
>>> URL
>>> that does not contain a specific mirror but instead is resolved by the
>>> server.
>>
>> You could perhaps download from Maven Central instead:
>>
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-logging/
>
>
> Is this an instance of maven that uses commons-logging or one that builds
> (and distributes) it?

Not sure I understand the questions.

That URL is where Maven projects will download Commons Logging from if
they have a dependency (direct or indirect) on it.

It is the default Maven repository which is embedded in Maven, but
there's no reason why you should not download jars from it using Ant
or any other build tool.

>
>>
>>> Does anybody know how to do that?
>>>
>>> Andre
>>>
>>> [1] https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/
>>> [2] http://commons.apache.org/logging/download_logging.cgi
>>>
>>> PS: I changed my email address from a...@a-w-f.de to
>>> awf@googlemail.com,
>>> but I am still the same person.
>
>

Re: Blog post draft: OpenOffice Conference Call for Papers

[Donald Harbison]

Andrea, I hope that you submit a proposal for a talk. We need the
impressive Italian community to represent key aspects of the proejct and
participate at ApacheCon Europe. Please encourage others from Italy to join
the effort.  Make sure folks know that the deadline is August 13th, not
August 3rd as originally communicated. Also, we do have funds for travel
assistance which we suggest be prioritized for speakers with a genuine
need. More on that soon.

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> On 25/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> If possible, I'd like to also replace our "Announcing Apache
>> OpenOffice 3.4" header link on ooo-site with one linking to this blog
>> post, once published.  We can let that run for the next week or so
>>
>
> Thanks, the pages under /it now have a translated version of the same
> header link (which will stay online until 3.4.1 is officially released).
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>

Re: Handout view display only a blank slide

[Andre Fischer]

On 01.08.2012 09:27, Shenfeng Liu wrote:

Hi, all,
   I Installed r1366353 Windows for both en-US and zh-CN. Basically they
works well. Only one thing seems to be a big problem: the Handout view
display only a blank slide. It also happens in 3.4.0, so not a regression.
I'm not sure if it is a designed behavior.

   Steps to reproduce are very simple:
1. Create a presentation with built-in template.
2. Switch to Handout view.  Issue: you will notice that the handout view
display only a blank slide.
Do you mean that the view is completely empty (only a white rectangle) 
or that it shows a template with empty placeholders for slides?


The first would be an error, the second is the intended behavior.

-Andre


3. Related issue: if you switch from Handout view to Outline view, there
will be only 1 slide left in the slide navigator.
4. Not sure if related: it happened twice that when I switch quickly
between views, AOO freeze on the Outline view.

   If it is not a designed behavior, I will open a defect in BZ.
   Thanks!

- Shenfeng

Re: Download URL of commons-logging

[Andre Fischer]

On 03.08.2012 12:45, sebb wrote:

On 3 August 2012 09:09, Andre Fischer  wrote:

Hi all,

I am currently cleaning up and improving the download mechanism of the
external tarballs.  Most of them (all that are used by the AOO34 branch) can
now be found on apache-extras [1].  However, that is intended only as a
fallback in case the tarballs can not be downloaded directly from their
original download server.  At the moment we use the SVN repository as a
secondary fallback.  I will remove that maybe next week.

I need help regarding the original download site of one of the apache
commons libraries.  The general download page for
commons-logging-1.1.1-src.tar.gz is [2].  I don't know how to produce a URL
that does not contain a specific mirror but instead is resolved by the
server.

You could perhaps download from Maven Central instead:

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-logging/


Is this an instance of maven that uses commons-logging or one that 
builds (and distributes) it?





Does anybody know how to do that?

Andre

[1] https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/
[2] http://commons.apache.org/logging/download_logging.cgi

PS: I changed my email address from a...@a-w-f.de to awf@googlemail.com,
but I am still the same person.

Re: Ubuntu package for building AOO

[Rob Weir]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Andre Fischer  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that over the weekend I played around
> with Ubuntu metapackages and came up with one that pulls in all
> packages that have to be installed in order to build Apache OpenOffice.
>
> I have put the relevant files in my public_html directory on
> people.apache.org.  Try it out by adding it as additional package
> repository and install package "build-aoo".
>
> A. With the synaptic package manager:
>
> 1. Open the repositories dialog via menu Settings->Repositories
>
> 2. Select tab page "Other Software"
>
> 3. Click the "Add..." button
>
> 4. Fill in after "APT line:"
>deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
>
> 5. Close all dialogs.
>
> 6. Update package list by clicking on the "Reload" button of the tool
> bar.
>
>
> B. or via the command line:
>
> 1. Add these lines to /etc/apt/sources.list
>
> deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
> deb-src http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
>
> 2. Execute in a shell
>
>sudo apt-get update
>sudo apt-get install build-aoo
>
>
> The build-aoo metapackage is not signed and on installation you will
> be asked whether you want to install it anyway.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>

Cool.  I'll give it a try.  But please everyone, do not share this
link broadly outside of the dev list,because of bandwidth
considerations.

Maybe after AOO 3.4.1 is released we could host something like this on
SourceForge or Apache Extras/Google Code?

-Rob

> Andre
>

Ubuntu package for building AOO

[Andre Fischer]

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that over the weekend I played around
with Ubuntu metapackages and came up with one that pulls in all
packages that have to be installed in order to build Apache OpenOffice.

I have put the relevant files in my public_html directory on
people.apache.org.  Try it out by adding it as additional package
repository and install package "build-aoo".

A. With the synaptic package manager:

1. Open the repositories dialog via menu Settings->Repositories

2. Select tab page "Other Software"

3. Click the "Add..." button

4. Fill in after "APT line:"
   deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./

5. Close all dialogs.

6. Update package list by clicking on the "Reload" button of the 
tool bar.



B. or via the command line:

1. Add these lines to /etc/apt/sources.list

deb http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./
deb-src http://people.apache.org/~af/repository/ ./

2. Execute in a shell

   sudo apt-get update
   sudo apt-get install build-aoo


The build-aoo metapackage is not signed and on installation you will
be asked whether you want to install it anyway.

Comments are welcome.

Andre

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Andre Fischer]

On 06.08.2012 12:47, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

On 8/6/12 12:30 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:


Hi Jürgen, *

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation

- print problem with multiple pages
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
confirmed Linux as well

- documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
on rev. 1369110)


I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:

- I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
- I can reproduce it on
   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
   - Fedora 1764 bits
- Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
- Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits


This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).

I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit and Windows 
XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the four pages of the test file 
correctly, Windows printed the first page, followed by three blank pages (correct page 
count). I tried Windows printing to page 1-4, with same result.  But if I tell it to 
print in reverse order, it prints all pages!  It will also print any page selected by 
number.  Having done all that, it still will only print page 1 followed by three blank 
pages if I tell it to print "all".

So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
Windows XP 32 bit fails


build 9110 contains no fix for both described issues above.

- the print problem is analyzed and already fixed, it will be in the
next snapshot

- the password problem is under investigation ...
64 bit only problem sounds reasonable but we have to check what's going
wrong.


This really is a 64bit-only problem.  Due to a recent modification 
encryption and digest type are internally stored as 64bit values on 
64bit compilers.  When they are later converted into 32bit values the 
conversion fails silently and the verification of the password fails also.
With 32bit compilers the values are stored internally as 32bit values 
and the conversion is OK.


For details see issue 120385 
(https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120385).


Fixed in SVN revision 1369843 on branch AOO34.

-Andre

[RELEASE][3.4.1]: new snapshot build based on revision r1369843

[Jürgen Schmidt]

Hi,

I would  like to propose a new snapshot build based on revision r1369843.

This new snapshot build contains fixes for the latest found problems

1. reopened - problem loading password protected files (Linux 64 bit)
   https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120385
2. new regression - printing of documents with multiple pages
   https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464


Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rob Weir]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
>>
>> - print problem with multiple pages
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
>> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
>> confirmed Linux as well
>>
>> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
>> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
>> on rev. 1369110)
>>
>
>
> I did a full matrix of tests on Windows XP, creating a password
> protected file in each of OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.1 and the '110 snapshot.
> This was a simple "Hello world!" text document with password=password.
>
> 1) The file created in OOo 3.3.0 was read correctly in all three versions.
>
> 2) The file created in AOO 3.4.0 was read correctly in all three versions.
>
> 3)The file created in AOO 3.4.0 was read correctly in all three versions.
>

Should say "The file created on AOO 3.4.1 snapshot '110 ..."

> So I'm not seeing the problem in my env.  But Regina is reporting a
> problem.  So I think we need to clarify whether she is testing files
> created on 32-bit Windows OOo/AOO, or whether she was testing with
> Ariel's documents created on Linux-64?
>
> -Rob
>
>> Both problems seems to be regression issues and we analyzing the problems.
>>
>> The latest available snapshot is based on 1369110 and should be used for
>> any further testing.
>>
>> I will keep you informed.
>>
>> Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rob Weir]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
>
> - print problem with multiple pages
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> confirmed Linux as well
>
> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
> on rev. 1369110)
>


I did a full matrix of tests on Windows XP, creating a password
protected file in each of OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.1 and the '110 snapshot.
This was a simple "Hello world!" text document with password=password.

1) The file created in OOo 3.3.0 was read correctly in all three versions.

2) The file created in AOO 3.4.0 was read correctly in all three versions.

3)The file created in AOO 3.4.0 was read correctly in all three versions.

So I'm not seeing the problem in my env.  But Regina is reporting a
problem.  So I think we need to clarify whether she is testing files
created on 32-bit Windows OOo/AOO, or whether she was testing with
Ariel's documents created on Linux-64?

-Rob

> Both problems seems to be regression issues and we analyzing the problems.
>
> The latest available snapshot is based on 1369110 and should be used for
> any further testing.
>
> I will keep you informed.
>
> Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 06.08.2012 13:01, Regina Henschel wrote:

Hi Jürgen,

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:

I can reproduce the password problem with my build on WinXP 32bit too.



I can't reproduce the password problem with AOO 3.4.1, dev. snapshot, r1369110 
on my WinXP 32bit VM environment which had AOO 3.4.0 installed.


Best regards, Oliver.

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rob Weir]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Regina Henschel  wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>
> I can reproduce the password problem with my build on WinXP 32bit too.
>

Are you seeing the problem with password-protected files that yo8u
created in the 32-bit build?  Or are they files that were created on
Linux 64 bit?

-Rob

> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>> On 8/6/12 12:30 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
>>> Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jürgen, *

 On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
>
> - print problem with multiple pages
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> confirmed Linux as well
>
> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean
> builds
> on rev. 1369110)



 I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
 only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:

 - I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
 - I can reproduce it on
- Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
- Fedora 1764 bits
 - Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
 - Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits


 This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
 testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32
>>> bit and Windows XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the
>>> four pages of the test file correctly, Windows printed the first page,
>>> followed by three blank pages (correct page count). I tried Windows printing
>>> to page 1-4, with same result.  But if I tell it to print in reverse order,
>>> it prints all pages!  It will also print any page selected by number.
>>> Having done all that, it still will only print page 1 followed by three
>>> blank pages if I tell it to print "all".
>>>
>>> So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
>>> Windows XP 32 bit fails
>>>
>>
>> build 9110 contains no fix for both described issues above.
>>
>> - the print problem is analyzed and already fixed, it will be in the
>> next snapshot
>>
>> - the password problem is under investigation ...
>> 64 bit only problem sounds reasonable but we have to check what's going
>> wrong.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Regina Henschel]

Hi Jürgen,

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:

I can reproduce the password problem with my build on WinXP 32bit too.

Kind regards
Regina


On 8/6/12 12:30 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:


Hi Jürgen, *

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation

- print problem with multiple pages
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
confirmed Linux as well

- documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
on rev. 1369110)



I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:

- I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
- I can reproduce it on
   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
   - Fedora 1764 bits
- Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
- Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits


This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).


I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit and Windows 
XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the four pages of the test file 
correctly, Windows printed the first page, followed by three blank pages (correct page 
count). I tried Windows printing to page 1-4, with same result.  But if I tell it to 
print in reverse order, it prints all pages!  It will also print any page selected by 
number.  Having done all that, it still will only print page 1 followed by three blank 
pages if I tell it to print "all".

So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
Windows XP 32 bit fails



build 9110 contains no fix for both described issues above.

- the print problem is analyzed and already fixed, it will be in the
next snapshot

- the password problem is under investigation ...
64 bit only problem sounds reasonable but we have to check what's going
wrong.

Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:47:39 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt  wrote:

> On 8/6/12 12:30 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
> > Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Jürgen, *
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
> >>>
> >>> - print problem with multiple pages
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> >>> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> >>> confirmed Linux as well
> >>>
> >>> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> >>> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
> >>> on rev. 1369110)
> >>
> >>
> >> I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
> >> only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:
> >>
> >> - I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
> >> - I can reproduce it on 
> >>   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
> >>   - Fedora 1764 bits
> >> - Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
> >> - Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits
> >>
> >>
> >> This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
> >> testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).
> > 
> > I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32 
> > bit and Windows XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the 
> > four pages of the test file correctly, Windows printed the first page, 
> > followed by three blank pages (correct page count). I tried Windows 
> > printing to page 1-4, with same result.  But if I tell it to print in 
> > reverse order, it prints all pages!  It will also print any page selected 
> > by number.  Having done all that, it still will only print page 1 followed 
> > by three blank pages if I tell it to print "all".
> > 
> > So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
> > Windows XP 32 bit fails
> > 
> 
> build 9110 contains no fix for both described issues above.
> 
> - the print problem is analyzed and already fixed, it will be in the
> next snapshot
> 
> - the password problem is under investigation ...
> 64 bit only problem sounds reasonable but we have to check what's going
> wrong.

As soon as next snapshot builds are available I'll check the 32bit Windows 
printing.
 
-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 8/6/12 12:30 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
> Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jürgen, *
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
>>>
>>> - print problem with multiple pages
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
>>> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
>>> confirmed Linux as well
>>>
>>> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
>>> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
>>> on rev. 1369110)
>>
>>
>> I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
>> only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:
>>
>> - I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
>> - I can reproduce it on 
>>   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
>>   - Fedora 1764 bits
>> - Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
>> - Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits
>>
>>
>> This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
>> testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).
> 
> I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit 
> and Windows XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the four 
> pages of the test file correctly, Windows printed the first page, followed by 
> three blank pages (correct page count). I tried Windows printing to page 1-4, 
> with same result.  But if I tell it to print in reverse order, it prints all 
> pages!  It will also print any page selected by number.  Having done all 
> that, it still will only print page 1 followed by three blank pages if I tell 
> it to print "all".
> 
> So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
> Windows XP 32 bit fails
> 

build 9110 contains no fix for both described issues above.

- the print problem is analyzed and already fixed, it will be in the
next snapshot

- the password problem is under investigation ...
64 bit only problem sounds reasonable but we have to check what's going
wrong.

Juergen

3.4.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 120464] AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is printed

[bugzilla]

j...@apache.org has granted Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 's request
for 3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120464: AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is
printed
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464


--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
set flag again

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:10:00 -0300
Ariel Constenla-Haile  wrote:

> Hi Jürgen, *
> 
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
> > 
> > - print problem with multiple pages
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> > I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> > confirmed Linux as well
> > 
> > - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> > problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
> > on rev. 1369110)
> 
> 
> I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
> only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:
> 
> - I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
> - I can reproduce it on 
>   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
>   - Fedora 1764 bits
> - Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
> - Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits
> 
> 
> This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
> testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).

I've just installed rev. 1369110 on a dual boot machine (Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit 
and Windows XP 32 bit). Working to the same printer, Ubuntu printed the four 
pages of the test file correctly, Windows printed the first page, followed by 
three blank pages (correct page count). I tried Windows printing to page 1-4, 
with same result.  But if I tell it to print in reverse order, it prints all 
pages!  It will also print any page selected by number.  Having done all that, 
it still will only print page 1 followed by three blank pages if I tell it to 
print "all".

So Ubuntu 11:10 32bit passes
Windows XP 32 bit fails

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 06.08.2012 12:10, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi Jürgen, *

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation

- print problem with multiple pages
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
confirmed Linux as well

- documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
on rev. 1369110)



I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:

- I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
- I can reproduce it on
   - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
   - Fedora 1764 bits
- Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
- Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits



just adding my test results here:
I couldn't reproduce it on Windows 7.

Thus, I agree here with Ariel that this issue seems to be a 64 bits one.

Best regards, Oliver.



This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

Hi Jürgen, *

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
> 
> - print problem with multiple pages
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> confirmed Linux as well
> 
> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
> on rev. 1369110)


I assume it's a 64 bits only issue (it happens that we support 64 bits
only in Linux), I base my assumption in the following:

- I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu 10.4 32 bits
- I can reproduce it on 
  - Ubuntu 10.4  64 bits
  - Fedora 1764 bits
- Josef reproduced it on Ubuntu 12.04 64 bits
- Rory couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 11.10 32 bits


This can't be a build bug: I made a full clean build (and just for
testing once again, I rebuilt it just now, and is still reproducible).


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgp0cgkdlecBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Understanding custom shapes

[Regina Henschel]

Hi Jianyuan,

Jianyuan Li schrieb:

Hi, Regina,

The attachment has been sent you directly.



Thanks, I've got the file. And the hint to [MS-ODRAW].pdf has been very 
useful too. I think, I understand the values in mso..Segm[] now :)


Kind regards
Regina



2012/8/6 Jianyuan Li 


This time attachment is provided with doc file.
I think mso..Segm[] use a different numbering pattern. You can find more
details for them in MS specification "[MS-ODRAW].pdf".


2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 


Hi Jianyuan,

thanks for your answer. Unfortunately the attachment was stripped. Can
you please sent me the attachment directly or provide it for download?

Jianyuan Li schrieb:

  Hi, Regina,


Below is my understanding for custom shape segment.
An segment is consist of two parts: command and count. It is described
with
an integer with two bytes. The high byte describes command and the low
byte
describes count. For the high byte, the high 3 bits is used to show the
basic command and the low 5 bits is used to show extended command. See my
attachment for details.
Taking "0x4000" as an example, it means command is moveto and count is 0.
Moveto is shown with "2" and occupy the first 3 bits of high byte. So
0x40
will be calculated.



The values shown in Basic follow the EnhancedCustomShapeSegmentComm**and
from the idl reference. There MOVETO is 1. Does mso..Segm[] use a different
numbering pattern?

Kind regards
Regina





2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 

  Hi all,


I'm currently learning, how custom shapes work. I know already, how to
write them directly in the XML file format, I understand what I see in
Basic, I understand mso_sptxxxVer[], mso_sptxxxCalc[], and
mso_sptxxxGluePoints[].

But now I stuck with mso_sptxxxSegm[]. I understand the "Segments" as
they
are shown in Basic, but I cannot map that to mso_sptxxxSegm[].

For example for custom shape "Parallelogram" I see in Basic:
Command Count Command Count Command Count Command Count
 1  1  2  3  4  0  5 0
which is
M L L L Z N

In mso_sptParallelogramSegm[] I read
 0x4000, 0x0003, 0x6001, 0x8000
and have no idea, how that fits together.

Can someone give me a pointer or explain it to me?

Kind regards
Regina

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 06.08.2012 11:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation

- print problem with multiple pages
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
confirmed Linux as well



I have found the root cause. My fix for issue 119189 causes this defect.
I have attached a patch to the issue and applied it on trunk and AOO34 branch.

Best regards, Oliver.


- documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
on rev. 1369110)

Both problems seems to be regression issues and we analyzing the problems.

The latest available snapshot is based on 1369110 and should be used for
any further testing.

I will keep you informed.

Juergen

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:36:01 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation
> 
> - print problem with multiple pages
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
> confirmed Linux as well
> 
> - documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
> problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
> on rev. 1369110)
> 
> Both problems seems to be regression issues and we analyzing the problems.
> 
> The latest available snapshot is based on 1369110 and should be used for
> any further testing.
> 
> I will keep you informed.

An important point, Jürgen: rev. 1369110 can save and open passworded files.  
It is legacy passworded files that do not open, as I understand it.

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

[RELEASE][3.4.1]: current status

[Jürgen Schmidt]

Hi,

we have currently 2 issues that need further investigation

- print problem with multiple pages
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
I can't reproduce it on MacOS but reproducable on Windows and others
confirmed Linux as well

- documents with password can't be loaded. This seems to be Linux only
problem because we can't reproduce it on MacOS and Windows (clean builds
on rev. 1369110)

Both problems seems to be regression issues and we analyzing the problems.

The latest available snapshot is based on 1369110 and should be used for
any further testing.

I will keep you informed.

Juergen

3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120464] AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is printed

[bugzilla]

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann  has asked  for 3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120464: AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is
printed
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464


--- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 
fixed on trunk and on AOO34 branch

Re: Understanding custom shapes

[Jianyuan Li]

Hi, Regina,

The attachment has been sent you directly.


2012/8/6 Jianyuan Li 

> This time attachment is provided with doc file.
> I think mso..Segm[] use a different numbering pattern. You can find more
> details for them in MS specification "[MS-ODRAW].pdf".
>
>
> 2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 
>
>> Hi Jianyuan,
>>
>> thanks for your answer. Unfortunately the attachment was stripped. Can
>> you please sent me the attachment directly or provide it for download?
>>
>> Jianyuan Li schrieb:
>>
>>  Hi, Regina,
>>>
>>> Below is my understanding for custom shape segment.
>>> An segment is consist of two parts: command and count. It is described
>>> with
>>> an integer with two bytes. The high byte describes command and the low
>>> byte
>>> describes count. For the high byte, the high 3 bits is used to show the
>>> basic command and the low 5 bits is used to show extended command. See my
>>> attachment for details.
>>> Taking "0x4000" as an example, it means command is moveto and count is 0.
>>> Moveto is shown with "2" and occupy the first 3 bits of high byte. So
>>> 0x40
>>> will be calculated.
>>>
>>
>> The values shown in Basic follow the EnhancedCustomShapeSegmentComm**and
>> from the idl reference. There MOVETO is 1. Does mso..Segm[] use a different
>> numbering pattern?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Regina
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 
>>>
>>>  Hi all,

 I'm currently learning, how custom shapes work. I know already, how to
 write them directly in the XML file format, I understand what I see in
 Basic, I understand mso_sptxxxVer[], mso_sptxxxCalc[], and
 mso_sptxxxGluePoints[].

 But now I stuck with mso_sptxxxSegm[]. I understand the "Segments" as
 they
 are shown in Basic, but I cannot map that to mso_sptxxxSegm[].

 For example for custom shape "Parallelogram" I see in Basic:
 Command Count Command Count Command Count Command Count
 1  1  2  3  4  0  5 0
 which is
 M L L L Z N

 In mso_sptParallelogramSegm[] I read
 0x4000, 0x0003, 0x6001, 0x8000
 and have no idea, how that fits together.

 Can someone give me a pointer or explain it to me?

 Kind regards
 Regina


>>>
>>
>

Re: Understanding custom shapes

[Jianyuan Li]

This time attachment is provided with doc file.
I think mso..Segm[] use a different numbering pattern. You can find more
details for them in MS specification "[MS-ODRAW].pdf".

2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 

> Hi Jianyuan,
>
> thanks for your answer. Unfortunately the attachment was stripped. Can you
> please sent me the attachment directly or provide it for download?
>
> Jianyuan Li schrieb:
>
>  Hi, Regina,
>>
>> Below is my understanding for custom shape segment.
>> An segment is consist of two parts: command and count. It is described
>> with
>> an integer with two bytes. The high byte describes command and the low
>> byte
>> describes count. For the high byte, the high 3 bits is used to show the
>> basic command and the low 5 bits is used to show extended command. See my
>> attachment for details.
>> Taking "0x4000" as an example, it means command is moveto and count is 0.
>> Moveto is shown with "2" and occupy the first 3 bits of high byte. So 0x40
>> will be calculated.
>>
>
> The values shown in Basic follow the EnhancedCustomShapeSegmentComm**and
> from the idl reference. There MOVETO is 1. Does mso..Segm[] use a different
> numbering pattern?
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>
>
>> 2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm currently learning, how custom shapes work. I know already, how to
>>> write them directly in the XML file format, I understand what I see in
>>> Basic, I understand mso_sptxxxVer[], mso_sptxxxCalc[], and
>>> mso_sptxxxGluePoints[].
>>>
>>> But now I stuck with mso_sptxxxSegm[]. I understand the "Segments" as
>>> they
>>> are shown in Basic, but I cannot map that to mso_sptxxxSegm[].
>>>
>>> For example for custom shape "Parallelogram" I see in Basic:
>>> Command Count Command Count Command Count Command Count
>>> 1  1  2  3  4  0  5 0
>>> which is
>>> M L L L Z N
>>>
>>> In mso_sptParallelogramSegm[] I read
>>> 0x4000, 0x0003, 0x6001, 0x8000
>>> and have no idea, how that fits together.
>>>
>>> Can someone give me a pointer or explain it to me?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Regina
>>>
>>>
>>
>

3.4.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 120464] AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is printed

[bugzilla]

j...@apache.org has granted Shenfeng Liu 's request for
3.4.1_release_blocker:
Bug 120464: AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is
printed
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464


--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
set release blocker flag for 3.4.1

Re: 3.4.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 120464] AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is printed

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

+1 - see comments in issue

On 05.08.2012 17:45, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> Shenfeng Liu  has asked  for 3.4.1_release_blocker:
> Bug 120464: AOO 3.4.1: Printing with multiple pages - only the first page is
> printed
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120464
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments from Shenfeng Liu 
> 3.4.1 release blocker candidate if it is a regression.
> 

Re: [UX]: Help - who can help me to implement these new templates into AOO?

[Xin Li]

Hi Da Li,

Thanks very much for your reminder and help.

I have created a wiki under Da Li's help, Please see the template example
in the wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/TemplatesDesginPreview

Thanks!

2012/8/3 Liu Da Li 

> Hi LiXin,
>
> All the attachments have been deleted by Maillist automatically , it's
> better that you create a wiki page for tracking this case
>
> 2012/8/3 Xin Li 
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question about templates. We have designed many new templates
> for
> > AOO. Every template including cover page and content page. Please see
> some
> > examples in the attachments.
> >
> > As you know, I'm the UX designer and I created all this templates
> > background as pictures. I don't know how to implement them into AOO and
> how
> > can we let our user know and make the user experience better. So I ask
> for
> > help, who can help me to implement these new templates into AOO, or could
> > you please tell me what should I do?
> >
> > I think AOO template improvement should be a long-term plan. Maybe
> > including:Phase 1, "look and feel" improvement - have nice background
> > picture; Phase 2, Make the template easy to use. We start from the "look
> > and feel“, we have some new design now and we will continue to design
> more
> > .
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Xin Li   李欣
> > UX designer
> >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,
Xin Li   李欣
UX designer

Re: Understanding custom shapes

[Regina Henschel]

Hi Jianyuan,

thanks for your answer. Unfortunately the attachment was stripped. Can 
you please sent me the attachment directly or provide it for download?


Jianyuan Li schrieb:

Hi, Regina,

Below is my understanding for custom shape segment.
An segment is consist of two parts: command and count. It is described with
an integer with two bytes. The high byte describes command and the low byte
describes count. For the high byte, the high 3 bits is used to show the
basic command and the low 5 bits is used to show extended command. See my
attachment for details.
Taking "0x4000" as an example, it means command is moveto and count is 0.
Moveto is shown with "2" and occupy the first 3 bits of high byte. So 0x40
will be calculated.


The values shown in Basic follow the EnhancedCustomShapeSegmentCommand 
from the idl reference. There MOVETO is 1. Does mso..Segm[] use a 
different numbering pattern?


Kind regards
Regina




2012/8/6 Regina Henschel 


Hi all,

I'm currently learning, how custom shapes work. I know already, how to
write them directly in the XML file format, I understand what I see in
Basic, I understand mso_sptxxxVer[], mso_sptxxxCalc[], and
mso_sptxxxGluePoints[].

But now I stuck with mso_sptxxxSegm[]. I understand the "Segments" as they
are shown in Basic, but I cannot map that to mso_sptxxxSegm[].

For example for custom shape "Parallelogram" I see in Basic:
Command Count Command Count Command Count Command Count
1  1  2  3  4  0  5 0
which is
M L L L Z N

In mso_sptParallelogramSegm[] I read
0x4000, 0x0003, 0x6001, 0x8000
and have no idea, how that fits together.

Can someone give me a pointer or explain it to me?

Kind regards
Regina

[QA][Call-for-review]-VCLAu​to patch: TableBackgroundProperty automation script patch in Presentation

[liu ping]

Hi,
In this patch, Support for Win&Linux&Mac platform
With this new patch, user could Select predefined table  and
setTablebackground to different Color/Gradient/Hatch/Bitmap
And open a defect to follow it:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120467
 Please help to review,thanks~

 I am interested in presentation ,Except the manual testing , I  will
 continue to develope properties and action automation script I've
submitted a patch of  TableBackgroundProperty automation script.
,Any comments are welcome:)