Re: Branding on extensions site
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:43 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 14:18 +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote: The only reason is that when we re-engineered the website the new logo wasn't available yet. We are going to enhance both Extensions and Templates websites within July (spam management, stats) and we'll fix that too. Howdy all, A couple of questions - these aren't time critical at all IMO so no need to rush a reply, BTW. The drupal mods for the site, are they available to the public yet? I noticed Alexandro asked the other day, to no answer. Sorry to have missed that one, I'm actually on holiday with nearly no internet connection. All I know is that we got the source via Apache Infra, and from Oracle it came with no license. All the changes we made are available to Apache Infra, about licensing and publicity I don't know. A slightly different question - and I know I shouldn't really put two in one email..but here goes There was talk early on about working on a syndication scheme for extension/template repositories - how can we not lose that as a project goal? As reported we're now working to finalize some changes required by the community as well as fixing some issues, anyone is welcome to help to enhance the platform, maybe the syndication scheme could be an interesting addendum. Roberto Thanks, //drew Sent from my iPhone On 14/lug/2012, at 12:30, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Is there a reason the extensions site is using the old oo.o logo rather than the AOO one? Ross -- This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Branding on extensions site
Is there a reason the extensions site is using the old oo.o logo rather than the AOO one? Ross
Re: Branding on extensions site
The only reason is that when we re-engineered the website the new logo wasn't available yet. We are going to enhance both Extensions and Templates websites within July (spam management, stats) and we'll fix that too. Sent from my iPhone On 14/lug/2012, at 12:30, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Is there a reason the extensions site is using the old oo.o logo rather than the AOO one? Ross -- This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Re: Branding on extensions site
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 14:18 +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote: The only reason is that when we re-engineered the website the new logo wasn't available yet. We are going to enhance both Extensions and Templates websites within July (spam management, stats) and we'll fix that too. Howdy all, A couple of questions - these aren't time critical at all IMO so no need to rush a reply, BTW. The drupal mods for the site, are they available to the public yet? I noticed Alexandro asked the other day, to no answer. A slightly different question - and I know I shouldn't really put two in one email..but here goes There was talk early on about working on a syndication scheme for extension/template repositories - how can we not lose that as a project goal? Thanks, //drew Sent from my iPhone On 14/lug/2012, at 12:30, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Is there a reason the extensions site is using the old oo.o logo rather than the AOO one? Ross
