Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 15.01.2012 01:46, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Hi there, On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0100, O.Felka wrote: I'm using this Office http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe on WinXP - SP3. Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed. Olaf I'm using http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Regards, Zoltan Ok, I see. Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. I tend to disagree here. It seems you're not subscribed to the issues mailing list (ooo-issues-subscr...@incubator.apache.org). Many issues have been discovered (and even solved) since we started providing builds for testing purposes. I'm writing about AOO and Java 7 (see subject). Calling this a nonsense is underestimating the efforts of people doing the build, people doing the QA (Regina, Reizinger, Oliver, et. al.), and people solving the issues. Just to quote an example, Regina's work testing the new SVG implementation is remarkable, and I'm sure Armin appreciates it. This example doesn't fit. I've you've watched the issue (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352) and this thread you'll see that I've been told to try - http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ - http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe - http://people.apache.org/~orw/ That's not the same as the work of Regina and Armin. Facts have shown that builds are useful, we have volunteers willing to help QAing, so we should keep providing them until we have official weekly Developer Snapshots. That said, I agree that the situation is suboptimal, but we do not have buildboots for all platforms yet. It makes no sense to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed or not. Back to the present issue, as I wrote in the bug, we have to split: a) this issue, detect JRE 7.0 version b) issues with things that don't work with JRE 7 For (b), please open new bug reports of the kind [java 7] XXX does not work or the like. And set them as blockers for i118352 when/if they are confirmed. And I wrote that this are two sides of one medal. Fixing a) without b) is senseless. So it has to be fixed in one go. Regards Olaf Regards
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 13.01.2012 17:33, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 17:21 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/ Regards, Zoltan It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but the Wizard doesn't work. Regards, Olaf It shows a debug messeage: Debug Output --- Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her? From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx at Line 79 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click no, then second debug error: --- Debug Output --- Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents! From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at Line 1444 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click No, the wizard starts. May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version of AOO. Regards, Zoltan I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one. Regards, Olaf May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7. Regards, Zoltan I'm using this Office http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe on WinXP - SP3. Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed. Olaf I'm using http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Regards, Zoltan Ok, I see. Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no sense to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if something is fixed or not. Regars, Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
On 13/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Wasn't the cycle something like the following? - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED. - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. ... The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also test around the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review is not the same person who did the commit? Sure, but the review (by someone else than the developer) would be the step from RESOLVED FIXED to VERIFIED. When Ariel fixes something, the issue status should change to something different than STARTED (i.e., to RESOLVED FIXED), otherwise there will be no way for QA volunteers to find the RESOLVED FIXED issues and verify that they have actually been fixed properly. At least this was my understanding of the VERIFIED status in Bugzilla. Regards, Andrea.
RE: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
+1 There is a similar situation with some JIRA systems that I work on. VERIFIED is a nice condition. My understanding is that RESOLVED means that there is a resolution, with FIXED meaning it has been applied, with VERIFIED needed to be satisfied that the issue can be closed. There is still the case of whether it is verified in the build of a release candidate, and that takes a little more to differentiate. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 14:38 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice On 13/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Wasn't the cycle something like the following? - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED. - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. ... The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also test around the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review is not the same person who did the commit? Sure, but the review (by someone else than the developer) would be the step from RESOLVED FIXED to VERIFIED. When Ariel fixes something, the issue status should change to something different than STARTED (i.e., to RESOLVED FIXED), otherwise there will be no way for QA volunteers to find the RESOLVED FIXED issues and verify that they have actually been fixed properly. At least this was my understanding of the VERIFIED status in Bugzilla. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/ Regards, Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/ Regards, Zoltan It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but the Wizard doesn't work. Regards, Olaf It shows a debug messeage: Debug Output --- Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her? From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx at Line 79 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click no, then second debug error: --- Debug Output --- Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents! From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at Line 1444 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click No, the wizard starts. May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version of AOO. Regards, Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/ Regards, Zoltan It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but the Wizard doesn't work. Regards, Olaf It shows a debug messeage: Debug Output --- Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her? From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx at Line 79 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click no, then second debug error: --- Debug Output --- Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents! From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at Line 1444 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click No, the wizard starts. May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version of AOO. Regards, Zoltan I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one. Regards, Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
2012.01.13. 17:21 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 17:06 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:55, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 16:43 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 13.01.2012 16:21, schrieb Reizinger Zoltán: 2012.01.13. 14:30 keltezéssel, O.Felka írta: Am 12.01.2012 03:35, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards Due to issue 118352 I've made some tests with AOO and Java 7. Java 7 is detected now by AOO but AOO doesn't support it (see issue 118352). So my conclusion is not to detect it if it's not supported. Regards, Olaf Try orw's build it works with java 1.7. : http://people.apache.org/~orw/ Regards, Zoltan It's the same with the builds of Olive: Java 7 has been detected but the Wizard doesn't work. Regards, Olaf It shows a debug messeage: Debug Output --- Error: SfxHTMLParser::SfxHTMLParser: Wo kommt der ZS her? From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/bastyp/sfxhtml.cxx at Line 79 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click no, then second debug error: --- Debug Output --- Error: Don't close the medium when loading documents! From File c:/AOO/sources/firsttasks/main/sfx2/source/doc/objmisc.cxx at Line 1444 Abort ? (Yes=abort / No=ignore / Cancel=core dump) Click No, the wizard starts. May be the debug allowed switch was set and they created a debug version of AOO. Regards, Zoltan I don't get a debug output. Just a message box that says that the selected JRE is defective and I should choose another one. Regards, Olaf May be we use different OS, I run under Windows 7. Regards, Zoltan I'm using this Office http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe on WinXP - SP3. Regards, Olaf I'm using http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Regards, Zoltan
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. Wasn't the cycle something like the following? - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED. - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. The workflow you describe seems overly complex, but indeed you may well be right: it wouldn't be the only overly complex procedure in the old OpenOffice.org... I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. So the VERIFIED and CLOSED status would be for further verification? Or maybe for the moment when the fix can be independently verified in a developer snapshot? Leaving a resolved issue as STARTED seems like a suboptimal workflow. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. Wasn't the cycle something like the following? - Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED. - QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. The workflow you describe seems overly complex, but indeed you may well be right: it wouldn't be the only overly complex procedure in the old OpenOffice.org... The value of having a QA engineer test a bug fix is they also test around the fix, to make sure related areas are not broken. If we want CRT, then maybe it is a good thing if the person doing the review is not the same person who did the commit? I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. So the VERIFIED and CLOSED status would be for further verification? Or maybe for the moment when the fix can be independently verified in a developer snapshot? Leaving a resolved issue as STARTED seems like a suboptimal workflow. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Andrea, On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:13:04PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote: seems lo fixed this issue. me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix it. This applies to actual code, but I don't see anything wrong in avoiding duplicate investigations or development discussions; i.e., reading issue discussions in the LibreOffice Bugzilla, or even discussing together with LibreOffice developers bugs and strategies to fix them is not hampered by incompatible licensing and in some cases will probably make sense. notice that in this case there was actual code: Oliver said there was a fix. This applies to other examples, like https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117010#c20 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpMkbYosGh5Z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:43:59PM +0100, FR web forum wrote: - Mail original - De: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org À: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 10 Janvier 2012 17:12:39 Objet: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice Committed as revision 1229371 Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 IIRC I resolved as fixed only 2 issues I fixed in order to test the new bugzilla instancia was keeping my can-confirm privileges. Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed. Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the issue status. I'm not sure what the new rules are, so I will wait to resolve this as fixed until someone can confirm it is actually fixed. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpdwgTYlx9vy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi *, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:47:09PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Oliver, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote: Hi, i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because sadly Sun Microsystems Inc. does not exist anymore. We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to Oracle Corporation caused some obscure build errors. have you seen http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ? seems lo fixed this issue. me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix it. In the mean time I solved the issue, tested at least on Linux and WinXP. Committed as revision 1229371 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1229371 Notice that I only committed the settings XML file for the platforms I could build and test, Linux and Windows: jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_linux.xml jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_wnt.xml If you are building and testing on other platform, please add the changes to the respective file in jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/ and commit the changes (obviously, after building and testing it works ;) ). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpL1GZ31E2DE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
- Mail original - De: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org À: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Envoyé: Mardi 10 Janvier 2012 17:12:39 Objet: Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice Committed as revision 1229371 Thanks for the fix. Could you set up the issue status? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote: seems lo fixed this issue. me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix it. This applies to actual code, but I don't see anything wrong in avoiding duplicate investigations or development discussions; i.e., reading issue discussions in the LibreOffice Bugzilla, or even discussing together with LibreOffice developers bugs and strategies to fix them is not hampered by incompatible licensing and in some cases will probably make sense. That said, thanks for fixing this in Apache OpenOffice too! Regards, Andrea.
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi, i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because sadly Sun Microsystems Inc. does not exist anymore. We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to Oracle Corporation caused some obscure build errors. have you seen http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ? seems lo fixed this issue. Regards Oliver -- GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Oliver, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote: Hi, i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because sadly Sun Microsystems Inc. does not exist anymore. We ran into this with the ODF Toolkit this week., The change to Oracle Corporation caused some obscure build errors. have you seen http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=549e54fb2f8113502743c443d6deadfe648dede1 ? seems lo fixed this issue. me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix it. In the mean time I solved the issue, tested at least on Linux and WinXP. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpVpftKxm9xg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi all Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Raphael, Do mean building or just testing on of the snapshots? I'm running java version 1.7.0_b147-icedtea OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64) If testing a snapshot, any idea which features should be tested? I can do that today. Best regards, Carl On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? Greetings Raphael
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi carl Am 07.01.12 13:55, schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi Raphael, Do mean building or just testing on of the snapshots? Only at the snapshot, you have not to build AOO I'm running java version 1.7.0_b147-icedtea OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64) Same people tells that Java 7 is not recognized from OpenOffice.org under Extras - Options - Java. I don't know if this is true, but if it's true it should be solved befor 3.4. If testing a snapshot, any idea which features should be tested? - Extension Manager - SVG Import - Regular expressions at the search function. This are same exemple. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
R: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
TBH; Some of the stuff that we carry (Apache commons, lucene) is very outdated, is based on Java 1.4 and is known to give trouble with newer versions of Java. Some of it is rather easy to update but I am busy with other things at this time. regards, Pedro. --- Sab 7/1/12, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch ha scritto: Data: Sabato 7 gennaio 2012, 07:33 Hi all Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Does it matter if I use: OOo-Dev_DEV300m106_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US download from website or OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US-2012-01-07_04:12:57 from buildbot Will either one overwrite OOo 3.3? Thanks, Carl
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Raphael, Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02, but aoo does not find the new jre. i cannot add the jre 1.7 via tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.. aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre... Regards Oliver -- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Carl Yes it matters. Use the one here http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ The builds from Ariel does not overwrite a 3.3 version Greetings Raphael Am 07.01.12 16:16, schrieb Carl Marcum: Does it matter if I use: OOo-Dev_DEV300m106_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US download from website or OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US-2012-01-07_04:12:57 from buildbot Will either one overwrite OOo 3.3? Thanks, Carl -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Oliver Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing: Hi Raphael, Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02, but aoo does not find the new jre. i cannot add the jre 1.7 via tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.. aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre... Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue? Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-) Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 07.01.2012 16:35, schrieb Raphael Bircher: Hi Oliver Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing: Hi Raphael, Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02, but aoo does not find the new jre. i cannot add the jre 1.7 via tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.. aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre... Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue? Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-) Greetings Raphael We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 Do we know what we have to test if AOO will support JRE 7.x? The detection on Tools | Options will not be enough. Olaf
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Raphael, On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? Greetings Raphael I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ OS is Fedora 16 x86_64 My bash_profile has: JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1.x86_64 My system would normally run java 7: java -version java version 1.7.0_b147-icedtea OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode) The AOO 3.4 java options dialog only displays the 1.6 versions which are installed. When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a The folder you selected does not contain a Java runtime environment error. I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have installed by download previously. If can be of further help, please let me know. Best regards, Carl
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Olaf, Am 07.01.2012 17:22, schrieb O.Felka: Am 07.01.2012 16:35, schrieb Raphael Bircher: Hi Oliver Am 07.01.12 16:28, schrieb Oliver Brinzing: Hi Raphael, Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? i installed aoo34m1 revision 1226179 from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ on my win xp 32bit vm with jre 1.6_24 - no problems now i uninstalled jre 1.6_24 and installed jre 1.7_02, but aoo does not find the new jre. i cannot add the jre 1.7 via tools - options - ooo-dev - java add.. aoo tells me, the path does not contain a jre... Thanks for the feedback. Then we have a problem... do you write a issue? Or you prefer to fix it your self ;-) Greetings Raphael We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 Do we know what we have to test if AOO will support JRE 7.x? The detection on Tools | Options will not be enough. One thing we should test ist to start base and generate a database with the internal DBMS. An then create a form and a report via reportbuilder. All these things need a working java version Kind regards Mechtilde Olaf -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8IfxwACgkQucZfh1OziSswmQCeIbx5JyG+0K81hXDxf2HZVWkJ 44MAnRtVeLoMHHMLqWBgcWwkzfORIYhF =4RWj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 12:09 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: Raphael, On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone test this? Greetings Raphael I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/ OS is Fedora 16 x86_64 My bash_profile has: JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.1.x86_64 My system would normally run java 7: java -version java version 1.7.0_b147-icedtea OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.0.3.fc16-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode) The AOO 3.4 java options dialog only displays the 1.6 versions which are installed. When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a The folder you selected does not contain a Java runtime environment error. I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have installed by download previously. If can be of further help, please let me know. Best regards, Carl Beware third hand information IIRC, the fix turned out to be an update to a string resource in the code - easy hack - but that comes from reading along on a mailing list, third hand information ;-/
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Hi Olaf, On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:22:13PM +0100, O.Felka wrote: We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 the issue is assigned to you. Did you start working on fixing it? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpGmGUdz83Sj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Java 7 and Apache OpenOffice
Am 07.01.2012 18:44, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: Hi Olaf, On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:22:13PM +0100, O.Felka wrote: We have Issue 118352: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352 the issue is assigned to you. Did you start working on fixing it? Regards I'm not a developer. I'm the default assignee for these issues. Olaf
