Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
When voting for the proposal are we (or are we not) voting for Initial Committers / PMC Rory O'Farrell - RoryOF - ofarrwrk at iol.ie Ricardo Gabriel Berlasso - RGB-es on the Spanish forums (Admin) - rgb dot mldc at gmail dot com If I am not mistaken that formality needs to occur on ooo-private as a separate process. I have started a [DISCUSS] thread there. Normally a DISCUSS / VOTE on ooo-private is NOT discussed in public. I think an exception should be made here to assure the community that the whole of the proposal is being fairly processed by the PPMC. Regards, Dave On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Op 18-10-2011 18:48, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef: PPMC MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO CAST BINDING VOTES This is the roster of the 54 established PPMC members, with their Apache User Names/IDs, as of midnight Monday, 2011-10-17T24:00Z Kai Ahrens : kahrens Florent André : florent Eric Bachard : ericb2 Dave Barton : bmcs Mathias Bauer : mbauer Stephan Bergmann : sb Raphael Bircher : rbircher Simon Brouwer : simonbr Andy Brown : therabi Arthur Buijs : artietee Jin Hua Chen : chenjinh Jian Hong Cheng : chengjh Alexandro Colorado : jza Robert Burrell Donkin : rdonkin Terry Ellison : terrye David Fisher : wave Wolf Halton : wolfhalton Dennis E. Hamilton : orcmid Don Harbison : dpharbison Ivo Hinkelmann : ivo Kazunari Hirano : khirano Drew Jensen : atjensen Christoph Jopp : cjopp Damjan Jovanovic : damjan Peter Junge : pj Yegor Kozlov : yegor Marcus Lange : marcus Graham Lauder : yo Steve Lee : stevelee Wang Lei : leiw Christian Lippka : clippka Ian Lynch : ingotian Yong Lin Ma : mayongl Carl Marcum : cmarcum David McKay : thegurkha Ingrid von der Mehden : ingrid Maho Nakata : maho Frank Thomas Peters : fpe Allen Pulsifer : apulsifer Eike Rathke : erack Manfred Reiter : fredao Zoltán Reizinger : r4zoli Phillip Rhodes : prhodes Andrew Rist : arist Lawrence Rosen : lrosen Kay Schenk : kschenk Jürgen Schmidt : jsc Yang Shih-Ching : imacat Jomar Silva : homembit Kai Sommerfeld : kso Malte Timmermann : malte Jean Hollis Weber : jeanweber Rob Weir : robweir Jian Fang Zhang : zhangjf -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 09:27 To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal [ ... ] GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability,http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
RE: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
Dave, thanks for your questions. My reading as the initiator of the [VOTE]: The vote is solely on the acceptance of the proposal. The proposal is the text so identified on the OOOUSER web page. Actions that are called for require their own execution, including further discussion as needed. Finally, personnel matters are not discussed here or voted on here ever, as far as I know. In any case, it is not part of this vote. I recommend that no such discussion occur here. Likewise, there is nothing in the statement of the vote that suggests who will do what, regardless of table-talk to that effect. It is not part of the ballot measure. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 09:54 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal When voting for the proposal are we (or are we not) voting for Initial Committers / PMC Rory O'Farrell - RoryOF - ofarrwrk at iol.ie Ricardo Gabriel Berlasso - RGB-es on the Spanish forums (Admin) - rgb dot mldc at gmail dot com If I am not mistaken that formality needs to occur on ooo-private as a separate process. I have started a [DISCUSS] thread there. Normally a DISCUSS / VOTE on ooo-private is NOT discussed in public. I think an exception should be made here to assure the community that the whole of the proposal is being fairly processed by the PPMC. Regards, Dave On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
