[OpenAFS] endianness problem somewhere in pts lookup, 1.5.77

2011-08-11 Thread dorian taylor
Hi there,

I think I found a byte-sex problem somewhere in the system of aklog
and DNS SRV records. My Mac (10.5.8 running OpenAFS 1.5.77) kept
taking inordinately long to run aklog, so I decided to investigate.
Upon retrieving the SRV record for the prserver, aklog makes multiple
attempts to query the server on port 23067 rather than 7002. Of
course:

$ perl -le 'printf "%x %x\n", 7002, 23067'
1b5a 5a1b

I'm not sure if this was fixed in future releases, just letting you know.

Cheers,

-- 
Dorian Taylor
http://doriantaylor.com/
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


[OpenAFS] Re: ETA for 1.4.15?

2011-08-11 Thread Andrew Deason
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:58:25 +0100
Simon Wilkinson  wrote:

> and 1.4.16 (which has all of the bug fixes that have been collecting
> in the 1.4 branch since 1.4.14).

I think that's "since 1.4.12".

-- 
Andrew Deason
adea...@sinenomine.net

___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] Re: kernel panic in 1.4.14.1 on rhel6

2011-08-11 Thread Aaron Knister
For what it's worth, the panic doesn't occur in 1.6.0pre7 even with repeated
hammering with ab.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Aaron Knister  wrote:

> I know everyone's busy, but out of curiosity has anybody had a chance to
> look at this? Could it be that it's not even an AFS bug, but a linux kernel
> issue? I'm getting ready to put a webserver into production and am concerned
> because I can reliably trigger the mentioned kernel panic using "ab".
>
> Thanks,
> -Aaron
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Aaron Knister  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:25:15 -0400
>>> Aaron Knister  wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Andrew,
>>> >
>>> > Here's the output of the last few, what I think are relavent lines:
>>>
>>> Well, this is basically the same information as you originally gave.
>>> There's nothing else around these, or immediately before?
>>>
>>
>> The lines preceding what I originally sent are:
>>
>> openafs: module license 'http://www.openafs.org/dl/license10.html' taints
>> kernel.
>> Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>> enabling dynamically allocated vcaches
>> Starting AFS cache scan...found 993 non-empty cache files (31%).
>> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>> general protection fault:  [#1] SMP
>>
>> I don't know if that's any more helpful.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Also, could you run in crash
>>>
>>> dis rxi_NewCall
>>> dis rxi_ResetCall
>>> dis mutex_lock
>>>
>>>
>> Here's a link to a directory containing the output of those commands:
>> http://userpages.umbc.edu/~aaronk/afs/linux-kernel-panic/.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Aaron
>>
>>
>>> and put the result somewhere? (It's probably a bit large for the list)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Deason
>>> adea...@sinenomine.net
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Knister
>> Systems Administrator
>> Division of Information Technology
>> University of Maryland, Baltimore County
>> aar...@umbc.edu
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Knister
> Systems Administrator
> Division of Information Technology
> University of Maryland, Baltimore County
> aar...@umbc.edu
>



-- 
Aaron Knister
Systems Administrator
Division of Information Technology
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
aar...@umbc.edu


Re: [OpenAFS] ETA for 1.4.15?

2011-08-11 Thread Simon Wilkinson

On 11 Aug 2011, at 17:44, Dale Pontius wrote:
> I was under the impression that 1.4.14.1 was it, and that 1.6.0 would be the 
> next release out, which begs the next question.
> 
> Will 1.4.15 support the linux-3.0.x kernel series?  It was actually 
> linux-2.6.39 that drove me off of 1.4.14.1.

So, I think the current plan is that we will do 1.4.15 as a security release 
(this will be 1.4.14.1 with only a couple of security fixes applied), and 
1.4.16 (which has all of the bug fixes that have been collecting in the 1.4 
branch since 1.4.14).

After that, we'll see. If the uptake of 1.6 is rapid enough, then 1.4.16 may be 
the last 1.4 series release. If there are still a large number of users on 
1.4.x, and sufficiently serious bugs appear, then there may be further 1.4.x 
series releases.

None of the recent Linux fixes (including the change for Linux 3.0 support) 
have been backported to the 1.4 branch yet. This is primarily because we've all 
be focussing on getting 1.6 out of the door. If those backports are simple then 
I'd imagine that they'll appear in 1.4.16, otherwise it's going to depend on 
whether there is sufficient demand for that work to be done.

It's worth bearing in mind that anyone can submit backports to gerrit. Use git 
cherry-pick -x to pull the change that you are interested in onto a checkout of 
the openafs-stable-1_4_x branch. Test that it works as expected, then edit the 
change's commit message to remove the existing Commit-Id line. Finally, push 
the change to the refs/for/openafs-stable-1_4_x branch of gerrit.

Cheers,

Simon

___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] ETA for 1.4.15?

2011-08-11 Thread Dale Pontius

On 08/11/2011 11:12 AM, Derrick Brashear wrote:

send a time machine?

a security fix will be included. final testing is happening.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Blaine  wrote:

Do we have an ETA for 1.4.15 by any chance?  Last
I heard it was March/April 2011.  Looking to have
an official/bundled fix for the Solaris 10 hang
at shutdown thing.

Anything I can do to help the cause?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

I was under the impression that 1.4.14.1 was it, and that 1.6.0 would be 
the next release out, which begs the next question.


Will 1.4.15 support the linux-3.0.x kernel series?  It was actually 
linux-2.6.39 that drove me off of 1.4.14.1.


--
Dale Pontius
Senior Engineer
IBM Corporation
Phone: (802) 769-6850
Tie-Line: 446-6850
email: pont...@us.ibm.com

This e-mail and its attachments, if any, may contain confidential and 
privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, 
use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message from 
your system without copying it and notify sender of the misdirection by reply 
e-mail.

___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] ETA for 1.4.15?

2011-08-11 Thread Derrick Brashear
send a time machine?

a security fix will be included. final testing is happening.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Blaine  wrote:
> Do we have an ETA for 1.4.15 by any chance?  Last
> I heard it was March/April 2011.  Looking to have
> an official/bundled fix for the Solaris 10 hang
> at shutdown thing.
>
> Anything I can do to help the cause?
> ___
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>



-- 
Derrick
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


[OpenAFS] ETA for 1.4.15?

2011-08-11 Thread Jeff Blaine

Do we have an ETA for 1.4.15 by any chance?  Last
I heard it was March/April 2011.  Looking to have
an official/bundled fix for the Solaris 10 hang
at shutdown thing.

Anything I can do to help the cause?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.0pre7 and Mac OS 10.7 (Lion) cannot aklog

2011-08-11 Thread Derrick Brashear
The fix will be in 1.6.0 final.

In the meantime, you can have something for now from
/afs/your-file-system.com/user/shadow/OpenAFS-1.6.0pre7-31-g24471-Lion.dmg



On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Derrick Brashear  wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Kristy Kallback-Rose
>  wrote:
>> Well, it appears I have one of the Macs which is blacklisted from booting 
>> into 64-bit mode --though I can run Lion. If you want to know more about 
>> what I'm referring to you can see the workaround that people did for Snow 
>> Leopard and the same issue here http://netkas.org/?p=189 Though I have not 
>> seem similar fixes for Lion, nor do I want to support users doing that sort 
>> of fix.
>>
>> Regarding getting OpenAFS working on this type of system, do you have a 
>> recommendation for next steps? Should I build openafs from source on this 
>> machine? We will no doubt have users running into this problem as the 
>> semester begins.
>
> given that the existing build is a universal build, i suspect
> something more subtle is in play. you can try building for source but
> i suspect you will have the same error.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Derrick
>



-- 
Derrick
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] Re: kernel panic in 1.4.14.1 on rhel6

2011-08-11 Thread Aaron Knister
I know everyone's busy, but out of curiosity has anybody had a chance to
look at this? Could it be that it's not even an AFS bug, but a linux kernel
issue? I'm getting ready to put a webserver into production and am concerned
because I can reliably trigger the mentioned kernel panic using "ab".

Thanks,
-Aaron

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Aaron Knister  wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:25:15 -0400
>> Aaron Knister  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> > Here's the output of the last few, what I think are relavent lines:
>>
>> Well, this is basically the same information as you originally gave.
>> There's nothing else around these, or immediately before?
>>
>
> The lines preceding what I originally sent are:
>
> openafs: module license 'http://www.openafs.org/dl/license10.html' taints
> kernel.
> Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> enabling dynamically allocated vcaches
> Starting AFS cache scan...found 993 non-empty cache files (31%).
> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
> general protection fault:  [#1] SMP
>
> I don't know if that's any more helpful.
>
>
>>
>> Also, could you run in crash
>>
>> dis rxi_NewCall
>> dis rxi_ResetCall
>> dis mutex_lock
>>
>>
> Here's a link to a directory containing the output of those commands:
> http://userpages.umbc.edu/~aaronk/afs/linux-kernel-panic/.
>
> Thanks,
> -Aaron
>
>
>> and put the result somewhere? (It's probably a bit large for the list)
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Deason
>> adea...@sinenomine.net
>>
>> ___
>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Knister
> Systems Administrator
> Division of Information Technology
> University of Maryland, Baltimore County
> aar...@umbc.edu
>



-- 
Aaron Knister
Systems Administrator
Division of Information Technology
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
aar...@umbc.edu