[openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming

2014-09-22 Thread Mikael Nyström
Hi Tom,

It sounds that HL7 Brazil uses Adobe Connect, 
http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeconnect.html . It is at least the software 
the universities in Sweden uses for online meetings and some online teaching 
and I think that it works quite well.

 Regards
 Mikael

From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: den 21 september 2014 10:55
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: [openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming


Hi Bert,

DIPS, who provided the meeting venue and catering had to change the location a 
few days earlier to one outside of their offices, in a town called Lillestrom, 
near Oslo. So we were in a culture centre with its own wifi etc, not under DIPS 
control, and the best we could manage collectively was using their office Lync 
from one of their computers. We also had no real control over mics and sound. 
We didn't do Skype because we wanted video as well.

In the future we will need to use something that works universally, and be more 
prepared. Two suggestions I had from people were:

Roger Erens: Ericom Cloud Internet Explorer for Chrome could be of use on Mac 
or Linux.

Jussara: vydio app

I don't know much about this technology, so if someone has a proposal for the 
next meeting, let us know. My preference for how it should work is how HL7 
Brazil does its online courses - they use some Adobe platform, and broadcast is 
voice + slides and/or webcam, moderators have voice and video, and the main 
audience asks questions and comments via a chat panel. It's all integrated. 
This costs money obviously, but functionally I think it's very good.

Anyway, we're doing our best to get all the outcomes documented, and we may yet 
get the recorded files up online.

- thomas

On 17/09/2014 00:20, Bert Verhees wrote:
It didn't work on Linux, though the opening screen was confusing. It wouldn't 
work, it said, but still it invited to fill in my name. I did, and it didn't 
work.

Just for fun, I looked at the supported platforms, first the 128 versions of 
Windows, and in the end was "Macintosh". I never heard about that OS. But Linux 
was not on the list. You can see which platform they hate most. It is because. 
reason we all know. Microsoft hates "open". It hates interoperability.

But in the meantime, my whole Eco-system is running on Linux, my databases, my 
Tomcat, my Eclipse, my Oxygen, my github, my five consoles which remember the 
git-commands I do ten times a day. Everything stable and fine.

I cannot go to another platform to watch a meeting. I am really sorry for that.

Suggestions about what to use? I guess you considered Google. I used it a few 
times. Or Skype, works also fine.

I hope someone has an idea. But, please, never again Mixrosoft, that is asking 
for trouble.


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140922/d1d0790d/attachment-0001.html>


[openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming

2014-09-21 Thread Thomas Beale

Hi Bert,

DIPS, who provided the meeting venue and catering had to change the 
location a few days earlier to one outside of their offices, in a town 
called Lillestrom, near Oslo. So we were in a culture centre with its 
own wifi etc, not under DIPS control, and the best we could manage 
collectively was using their office Lync from one of their computers. We 
also had no real control over mics and sound. We didn't do Skype because 
we wanted video as well.

In the future we will need to use something that works universally, and 
be more prepared. Two suggestions I had from people were:

Roger Erens: Ericom Cloud Internet Explorer for Chrome could be of use 
on Mac or Linux.

Jussara: vydio app

I don't know much about this technology, so if someone has a proposal 
for the next meeting, let us know. My preference for how it should work 
is how HL7 Brazil does its online courses - they use some Adobe 
platform, and broadcast is voice + slides and/or webcam, moderators have 
voice and video, and the main audience asks questions and comments via a 
chat panel. It's all integrated. This costs money obviously, but 
functionally I think it's very good.

Anyway, we're doing our best to get all the outcomes documented, and we 
may yet get the recorded files up online.

- thomas

On 17/09/2014 00:20, Bert Verhees wrote:
> It didn't work on Linux, though the opening screen was confusing. It 
> wouldn't work, it said, but still it invited to fill in my name. I 
> did, and it didn't work.
>
> Just for fun, I looked at the supported platforms, first the 128 
> versions of Windows, and in the end was "Macintosh". I never heard 
> about that OS. But Linux was not on the list. You can see which 
> platform they hate most. It is because. reason we all know. Microsoft 
> hates "open". It hates interoperability.
>
> But in the meantime, my whole Eco-system is running on Linux, my 
> databases, my Tomcat, my Eclipse, my Oxygen, my github, my 
> five consoles which remember the git-commands I do ten times a day. 
> Everything stable and fine.
>
> I cannot go to another platform to watch a meeting. I am really sorry 
> for that.
>
> Suggestions about what to use? I guess you considered Google. I used 
> it a few times. Or Skype, works also fine.
>
> I hope someone has an idea. But, please, never again Mixrosoft, that 
> is asking for trouble.
>

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



[openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming

2014-09-17 Thread Bert Verhees
On 17-09-14 01:25, Diego Bosc? wrote:
> Not sure if this is referring to the same lync, but maybe it is worth trying
>
> http://its.uiowa.edu/support/article/4049
> http://uits.arizona.edu/uaconnect/lync/linux
I try to remember for the next time

>
> 2014-09-17 1:20 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees :
>> It didn't work on Linux, though the opening screen was confusing. It
>> wouldn't work, it said, but still it invited to fill in my name. I did, and
>> it didn't work.
>>
>> Just for fun, I looked at the supported platforms, first the 128 versions of
>> Windows, and in the end was "Macintosh". I never heard about that OS. But
>> Linux was not on the list. You can see which platform they hate most. It is
>> because. reason we all know. Microsoft hates "open". It hates
>> interoperability.
>>
>> But in the meantime, my whole Eco-system is running on Linux, my databases,
>> my Tomcat, my Eclipse, my Oxygen, my github, my five consoles which remember
>> the git-commands I do ten times a day. Everything stable and fine.
>>
>> I cannot go to another platform to watch a meeting. I am really sorry for
>> that.
>>
>> Suggestions about what to use? I guess you considered Google. I used it a
>> few times. Or Skype, works also fine.
>>
>> I hope someone has an idea. But, please, never again Mixrosoft, that is
>> asking for trouble.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Bert
>>
>> Op dinsdag 16 september 2014 heeft Thomas Beale
>>  het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> All who are interested / wanted to follow the meeting, our meeting was
>>> moved to a different venue, and the only streaming we were able to run LYNC,
>>> which is a Microsoft tool. This won't work for people on Linux
>>> unfortunately.
>>>
>>> We probably can't do anything about this tomorrow (especially as the wifi
>>> is somewhat limiting at the venue), but we will upload all the sessions as
>>> mp4s or similar, so at least you will be able to listen to the meeting
>>> proceedings.
>>>
>>> We are also live updating the wiki pages for each agenda item, with notes
>>> from the floor and presentations.
>>>
>>> In the future, we clearly need to be better prepared with a streaming
>>> solution supported by all platforms, with  live chat input. Suggestions on
>>> this topic could be made on the technical list.
>>>
>>> - thomas beale
>>>
>>> ___
>>> openEHR-announce mailing list
>>> openEHR-announce at lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-announce_lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s).
>> Please inform us immediately if you are not the addressee.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org




[openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming

2014-09-17 Thread Diego Boscá
Not sure if this is referring to the same lync, but maybe it is worth trying

http://its.uiowa.edu/support/article/4049
http://uits.arizona.edu/uaconnect/lync/linux

2014-09-17 1:20 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees :
> It didn't work on Linux, though the opening screen was confusing. It
> wouldn't work, it said, but still it invited to fill in my name. I did, and
> it didn't work.
>
> Just for fun, I looked at the supported platforms, first the 128 versions of
> Windows, and in the end was "Macintosh". I never heard about that OS. But
> Linux was not on the list. You can see which platform they hate most. It is
> because. reason we all know. Microsoft hates "open". It hates
> interoperability.
>
> But in the meantime, my whole Eco-system is running on Linux, my databases,
> my Tomcat, my Eclipse, my Oxygen, my github, my five consoles which remember
> the git-commands I do ten times a day. Everything stable and fine.
>
> I cannot go to another platform to watch a meeting. I am really sorry for
> that.
>
> Suggestions about what to use? I guess you considered Google. I used it a
> few times. Or Skype, works also fine.
>
> I hope someone has an idea. But, please, never again Mixrosoft, that is
> asking for trouble.
>
> Best regards
> Bert
>
> Op dinsdag 16 september 2014 heeft Thomas Beale
>  het volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>> All who are interested / wanted to follow the meeting, our meeting was
>> moved to a different venue, and the only streaming we were able to run LYNC,
>> which is a Microsoft tool. This won't work for people on Linux
>> unfortunately.
>>
>> We probably can't do anything about this tomorrow (especially as the wifi
>> is somewhat limiting at the venue), but we will upload all the sessions as
>> mp4s or similar, so at least you will be able to listen to the meeting
>> proceedings.
>>
>> We are also live updating the wiki pages for each agenda item, with notes
>> from the floor and presentations.
>>
>> In the future, we clearly need to be better prepared with a streaming
>> solution supported by all platforms, with  live chat input. Suggestions on
>> this topic could be made on the technical list.
>>
>> - thomas beale
>>
>> ___
>> openEHR-announce mailing list
>> openEHR-announce at lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-announce_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
> --
> This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s).
> Please inform us immediately if you are not the addressee.
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org



[openEHR-announce] roadmap 2014 meeting streaming

2014-09-17 Thread Bert Verhees
It didn't work on Linux, though the opening screen was confusing. It
wouldn't work, it said, but still it invited to fill in my name. I did, and
it didn't work.

Just for fun, I looked at the supported platforms, first the 128 versions
of Windows, and in the end was "Macintosh". I never heard about that OS.
But Linux was not on the list. You can see which platform they hate most.
It is because. reason we all know. Microsoft hates "open". It hates
interoperability.

But in the meantime, my whole Eco-system is running on Linux, my databases,
my Tomcat, my Eclipse, my Oxygen, my github, my five consoles which
remember the git-commands I do ten times a day. Everything stable and fine.

I cannot go to another platform to watch a meeting. I am really sorry for
that.

Suggestions about what to use? I guess you considered Google. I used it a
few times. Or Skype, works also fine.

I hope someone has an idea. But, please, never again Mixrosoft, that is
asking for trouble.

Best regards
Bert

Op dinsdag 16 september 2014 heeft Thomas Beale <
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> het volgende geschreven:

>
> All who are interested / wanted to follow the meeting, our meeting was
> moved to a different venue, and the only streaming we were able to run
> LYNC, which is a Microsoft tool. This won't work for people on Linux
> unfortunately.
>
> We probably can't do anything about this tomorrow (especially as the wifi
> is somewhat limiting at the venue), but we will upload all the sessions as
> mp4s or similar, so at least you will be able to listen to the meeting
> proceedings.
>
> We are also live updating the wiki pages for each agenda item, with notes
> from the floor and presentations.
>
> In the future, we clearly need to be better prepared with a streaming
> solution supported by all platforms, with  live chat input. Suggestions on
> this topic could be made on the technical list.
>
> - thomas beale
>
> ___
> openEHR-announce mailing list
> openEHR-announce at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> announce_lists.openehr.org
>


-- 

*This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s). Please
inform us immediately if you are not the addressee.*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: