Patient notifications

2002-11-27 Thread Sam Heard
Aniket

Of course I know about CPGs - just the acronym eluded me!

CPGs are very interesting from an EHR point of view. The issue here is the
generic CPG and the specific - how we allow specialisation to the particular
patient, how we merge a number of them sensibly, how we allow updates of
CPGs to influence future care.

Our learning in this area has a long way to go but we can start. The openEHR
entry called an instruction allows specific 'guidelines' to be entered into
the record - monitoring or notifications, therapies etc. This is relatively
straight forward - the issues start to arise when a generic guideline is
altered - what does this mean to someone who is adhering to the previous
guideline?

We can go with defaults - 2 years in Australia for a PAP test recall. So if
the Care Plan of a patient has a notification for a pap recall, and the
period is set to default, then the notification period can change with the
guideline. Not so bad - fixed recall periods will not be altered. There
might be some people however who need a 2 year one based on the evidence -
clinicians could learn to fix the period of anyone with any abnormality -
that seems solvable.

Then we get into the issue of a complex CPG such as immunisation - there are
many rules, temporal and sequencing, age at immunisation etc. Changing the
default guideline becomes very interesting and really requires a little
decision support engine to be available specifically for the purpose.

What do you think?

Cheers, Sam

Dr Sam Heard
The Good Electronic Health Record
Ocean Informatics, openEHR
105 Rapid Creek Rd
Rapid Creek NT 0810
Ph: +61 417 838 808
sam.heard at bigpond.com
www.gehr.org
www.openEHR.org
__


 -Original Message-
 From: aniket Joshi [mailto:anya_joshi at yahoo.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2002 3:02 AM
 To: Sam Heard
 Subject: RE: Patient notifications


 Clinical practice guidelines.
 These can be incorporated in GEHR and thus we can have
 a much more specific application development.
 We can have mappings which will lead to particular set
 of tests as per the CPGs.
 This will ease the implementation of CPGs in clinical
 practice.
 Dr Aniket Joshi
 --- Sam Heard sam.heard at bigpond.com wrote:
  Aniket
 
  I am not aware of CPG ??
 
  Sam
  
  Dr Sam Heard
  The Good Electronic Health Record
  Ocean Informatics, openEHR
  105 Rapid Creek Rd
  Rapid Creek NT 0810
  Ph: +61 417 838 808
  sam.heard at bigpond.com
  www.gehr.org
  www.openEHR.org
  __
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: aniket Joshi [mailto:anya_joshi at yahoo.com]
   Sent: Monday, 25 November 2002 6:02 PM
   To: Sam Heard
   Subject: Re: Patient notifications
  
  
   In our scenarios majority of the population is
   illeterate,so interaction with the computers is
  out of
   question.We can record their videos and keep them
  in
   the folders.
   Other non-medical communication which come from
  the
   HCPs can definitely be kept in the folder.
   For the medical record of each appt a Hyperlink
  can be
   given so that we can have a vertical record.
   Have gone through the CPGs and their application
  in
   GEHR?
   DR ANIKET JOSHi
   --- Sam Heard sam.heard at bigpond.com wrote:
Dear All
   
I have been developing the idea of part of the
record that the patient can
write in - I have (Gates style) called it My
  Folder
(eh?) and have two
subfolders in it at present - consent statements
  (as
these will be written
by the patient) and appointments and
  notifications.
   
It is clear that the patient needs to write and
interact with these. I have
thought recently that we may be best to develop
  a
transaction for each of
the patient notifications - which will have all
  the
details in it - rather
than process notifications into a collected
transaction (like a calendar) -
this means that the application will need to
  process
these.
   
I have thought that we could have an archive
  folder
for when the patient has
done whatever was required - or declined to do
  so.
This would mean perhaps
an archive folder and an entry for the outcome
  of
the notification.
   
What do you think?
   
Sam

Dr Sam Heard
The Good Electronic Health Record
Ocean Informatics, openEHR
105 Rapid Creek Rd
Rapid Creek NT 0810
Ph: +61 417 838 808
sam.heard at bigpond.com
www.gehr.org
www.openEHR.org
__
   
-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
  
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! Mail Plus  Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
  now.
   http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Patient notifications

2002-11-25 Thread Sam Heard
Dear All

I have been developing the idea of part of the record that the patient can
write in - I have (Gates style) called it My Folder (eh?) and have two
subfolders in it at present - consent statements (as these will be written
by the patient) and appointments and notifications.

It is clear that the patient needs to write and interact with these. I have
thought recently that we may be best to develop a transaction for each of
the patient notifications - which will have all the details in it - rather
than process notifications into a collected transaction (like a calendar) -
this means that the application will need to process these.

I have thought that we could have an archive folder for when the patient has
done whatever was required - or declined to do so. This would mean perhaps
an archive folder and an entry for the outcome of the notification.

What do you think?

Sam

Dr Sam Heard
The Good Electronic Health Record
Ocean Informatics, openEHR
105 Rapid Creek Rd
Rapid Creek NT 0810
Ph: +61 417 838 808
sam.heard at bigpond.com
www.gehr.org
www.openEHR.org
__

-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org