Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] OpenFlow committer nomination : Gobinath Suganthan
+1 Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Anil Vishnoi Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 11:05 AM To: Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: ; openflowplugin-dev Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow committer nomination : Gobinath Suganthan +1 On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:00 AM Abhijit Kumbhare mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: TSC members - please vote on this thread. On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:58 AM Luis Gomez mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On May 6, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Anil Vishnoi mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: Given that we didn't get a chance to vote on Gobinath's committer nomination in last TSC meeting, can we please vote through mail thread please? Thanks Anil On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:43 PM Anil Vishnoi mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Abhijit, Sorry for the ast minute notice, is it possible to add agenda time in tomorrows tsc to vote for Gobinath's nomination as OpenFlow plugin committer? If not, can we use this thread to vote on it ? Thanks Anil -- Forwarded message - From: Anil Vishnoi mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> Date: Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:40 PM Subject: Re: OpenFlow committer nomination : Gobinath Suganthan To: Hema Gopalkrishnan mailto:hema.gopalkrish...@ericsson.com>> Cc: Prasanna Huddar mailto:prasanna.hud...@ericsson.com>>, D Arunprakash mailto:d.arunprak...@ericsson.com>>, Shuva Kar mailto:shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com>>, Abhijit Kumbhare mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>>, openflowplugin-dev mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>> Thanks for the prompt reply folks. We got 6 votes out of 8 all in favor. I will propose this nomination to TSC for approval. On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:12 PM Hema Gopalkrishnan mailto:hema.gopalkrish...@ericsson.com>> wrote: +1 From: Prasanna Huddar Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 8:58 AM To: D Arunprakash mailto:d.arunprak...@ericsson.com>>; vishnoia...@gmail.com<mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>; Shuva Kar mailto:shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com>> Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>>; openflowplugin-dev mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>>; Hema Gopalkrishnan mailto:hema.gopalkrish...@ericsson.com>> Subject: Re: OpenFlow committer nomination : Gobinath Suganthan +1 Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer On 2 May 2019 08:51, D Arunprakash mailto:d.arunprak...@ericsson.com>> wrote: +1 On 2 May 2019 08:32, Shuva Kar mailto:shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On Thu, 2 May 2019, 08:12 Anil Vishnoi, mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:00 PM Anil Vishnoi mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi OpenFlow plugin committers, I would like to propose Gobinath Suganthan as a committer to the OpenFlow plugin project. Gobinath has done significant contribution in term of code contribution and patch review. You can find his contribution here Merged Patches : https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:%22Gobinath+Suganthan+%253Cgobinath%2540ericsson.com%253E%22++project:openflowplugin+status:merged Please respond to this mail thread with your vote +1,0,-1. Also please do not drop the openflowplugin-dev mailing list in your response. -- Thanks Anil -- Thanks Anil -- Thanks Anil -- Thanks Anil -- Thanks Anil ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev -- Thanks Anil ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] OpenFlowplugin Committer Nomination for Arun Prakash
+1 Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 11:07 AM To: Sam Hague Cc: Stephen Kitt ; TSC ; openflowplugin-dev Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlowplugin Committer Nomination for Arun Prakash +1 (and more) This is 6 TSC members who have voted - we need one more vote to confirm. Please vote -1, 0 or +1. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Sam Hague mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote: +1 On Fri, May 25, 2018, 4:31 AM Stephen Kitt mailto:sk...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 18:10:57 -0700 Luis Gomez mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: > +1 to Arun becoming committer for openflowplugin. +1 Regards, Stephen ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Carbon SR2 Blocker Bug
Hi Abhijit Kumbhare, There is a blocker bug assigned to the OPENFLOWPLUGIN project that is blocking the release of Carbon SR2. Bug 9038: IllegalStateException: Attempted to close chain with outstanding transaction PingPongTransaction... https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9038 [No Patch Available] We kindly ask projects to share the status of your bugs by providing a patch to fix the blocker bug, or providing an ETA for when it can be +2 in Carbon, or by retargeting the bug for Carbon SR3 (ODL SR TARGET MILESTONE=Carbon-SR3), or by downgrading the bug to critical if it is not a regression. Please report any blocker bugs in Carbon by updating the Carbon Tracking Spreadsheet or replying to this email. Note that the stable/carbon branch has been locked and only blocker bugs are permitted to merge at this time. Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Carbon SR2 Distribution Test Failure
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There are Distribution Test failures [1] in the Carbon SR2 Build 20170815 [2] related to your project. Please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Carbon SR2. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1226505712 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#SR2_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] OpenFlow Plugin Nitrogen M5 Offset 1 Status
OPENFLOWPLUGIN CLM Job shows it may have violations. Please review the violations and reply to this email to confirm that the violations are invalid false positives for your project: https://clm.opendaylight.org/assets/index.html#/reports/openflowplugin/91f5b1cd6e1f46efbff8b6a100e4172f Best Regards, An Ho From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 3:19 PM To: Release Cc: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [release] OpenFlow Plugin Nitrogen M5 Offset 1 Status OpenFlow Plugin 1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts. N/A 2. Has your project met code freeze, i.e., only bug fixes are allowed from now on? Yes (with caveat that the patches for the reconciliation framework and bundles based resync are in the review process) 3. Are all externally visible strings frozen to allow for translation & documentation? Yes 4. Is your documentation complete such that only editing and enhancing should take place after this point? Yes (as before - but there will likely be updates) User Guide: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=docs.git;a=tree;f=manuals/user-guide/src/main/asciidoc/openflowplugin;h=095ba08edd29ec3175279b21de717c2254fded76;hb=refs/heads/master Developer Guide: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=docs.git;a=tree;f=manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/openflowplugin;h=b8eeb27ff35453d5a4009e8fa9ee75787e5b45b9;hb=refs/heads/master 5. Were project-specific deliverables planned for this milestone delivered successfully? Yes 6. Are you running at least one basic automated system test job for each top-level feature? Yes * https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/ 7. Have you completed Nitrogen Karaf 4 Migration? Yes 8. Do you have any CLM violations: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CLM/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jenkins.opendaylight.org_releng_view_CLM_=DwMFAg=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg=sjyjjO85Qr4J10JvZAtMkQ=ZGdhw9BUS4iXggcRJGtlt-N5OPD-51Im5TK-WpZ5Ezg=kmPIzSLVIbbzpuhAGtZsIk2AHfAjQdRj-1AAKIyok8c=> ? (Yes/No) No failures - some unstable Stables Features (Only for Projects with Stable Features) 9. Do your stable features fulfill quality requirements (i.e. unit and/or integration test coverage of at least 75%)? Yes https://sonar.opendaylight.org/overview?id=12170 10.Are you running several automated system test jobs including functionality, cluster, scalability, performance, longevity/stability for each stable feature? Yes * https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/ ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] [openflowjava-dev] OpenFlow Plugin and OpenFlow Java Library merge status
Abhijit, would it be safe to remove OpenFlowJava Project from Nitrogen Autorelease? Thanh, could you submit a patch to remove openflowjava and hopefully the build completes successfully. Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Colin Dixon Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 6:00 AM To: Abhijit Kumbhare; OpenDaylight Infrastructure; Release; openflowjava-dev; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; t...@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [openflowjava-dev] OpenFlow Plugin and OpenFlow Java Library merge status Thanks for the update. It sounds like things are going pretty smoothly. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:26 PM Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi TSC, Infra, Release, OpenFlow Java Library & OpenFlow Plugin, As you probably know OpenFlow Java Library & OpenFlow Plugin projects had decided to merge in Nitrogen. Specifically the OpenFlow Java Library project codebase has been merged into the OpenFlow Plugin project - and the impacts to downstream projects have been resolved. OpenFlow Java committers also voted to archive the project. A termination proposal [5] has been created with a two week notice. More details on the OpenFlow Plugin and OpenFlow Java Library merge from Tomas Slusny & Michal Rehak: What was done: - * Discussion about merging OpenFlowJava to OpenFlowPlugin was initiated here: [0] * Weather report for merge was created here: [1] * OpenFlowJava latest HEAD ([2]) was merged to OpenFlowPlugin repository master branch (Nitrogen) in this patches: [3] * All references to OpenFlowJava in OpenFlowPlugin was replaced with consumed code, odl-openflowjava-all feature was removed, but odl-openflowjava-protocol remained same * OpenFlowJava project is not going to participate in Nitrogen release as it was consumed by OpenFlowPlugin * Vote [6] on OpenFlow Java Library mailing list to archive the project - with a two week termination notice * A termination proposal [5] for OpenFlow Java Library has been created as per archival process [4] What needs to be done: * OpenFlowJava master (Nitrogen) branch needs to be locked/archived. Tomas will follow up with the infra for this. * Update OpenFlowJava wiki with informations about the merge * Create wiki page for OpenFlowPlugin with informations about the merge and about changes in structure to help contributors that was contributing to both OpenFlowPlugin and OpenFlowJava Please let us know if you need more info. - Abhijit [0] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2017-June/007276.html [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#OpenFlowJava_being_merged_into_OpenFlowPlugin_in_Nitrogen [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=openflowjava.git;a=commit;h=76c83901c7a265e0d00c537d34f3f093c636129c [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/status:merged+project:openflowplugin+branch:master+topic:bug/8747 [4] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Archive_Proposals [5] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Openflow_Protocol_Library:Termination_Proposal [6] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowjava-dev/2017-June/000836.html On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: I talked with Jozef and Tomas right now - and we think it will be good to discuss this in the Monday OpenFlow Plugin meeting this process (steps provided by Andy, the process followed by Sam/NetVirt when they consumed VPN Service into NetVirt, history, etc.). That way we can ensure it is done right - have all the OpenFlow Plugin committers vote during the meeting if needed. And then initiate OpenFlow Java vote. Hence we will greatly appreciate if Andy (Grimberg) and Sam Hague can join the meeting. The meeting details are here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weekly_Project_Meeting_List Also pasting below: Weekly on Mondays from 08:30-9:30 am PST/PDT | 11:30-12:30 EST/EDT | 15:30-16:30 UTC during Daylight Time/16:30-17:30 UTC during Standard Time · Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/751766361 · Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +14086380968<tel:(408)%20638-0968>,751766361# or +16465588656<tel:(646)%20558-8656>,751766361# · Or Telephone: oDial: +1 408 638 0968<tel:(408)%20638-0968> (US Toll) or +1 646 558 8656<tel:(646)%20558-8656> (US Toll) oMeeting ID: 751 766 361 oInternational numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=RnpzDoDRkdpjWl6TcLb7wYiYV2NYaEUw · IRC: Freenode: #opendaylight-openflowplugin On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Agree with you Ed about having a vote in OpenFlow Java committer community - and in gener
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Nitrogen Status
Hi Abhijit Kumbhare, Please note that we are still missing a Wiki Page Document with the OpenFlowPlugin Per Project Release Plan for the Nitrogen Simultaneous Release. Best Regards, An Ho From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 8:23 PM To: An Ho; Casey Cain; Colin Dixon; abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: OPENFLOWPLUGIN Nitrogen Status Apologies - had missed sending it - but you knew we were planning to be in the Nitrogen release Please consider the following as the M0 status: 1. "The OpenFlow Plugin project formally joins the OpenDaylight Nitrogen Simultaneous Release and agrees to the activities and timeline documented on the Nitrogen Release Plan Page: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Nitrogen_Release_Plan; 2. Project Offset: 1 3. Project Category: Protocol 4. Do you confirm that the list of Active Project Committers is updated and accurate? Yes 5. Project PTL Contact: Abhijit Kumbhare /abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com<mailto:abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com> | abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com> / abhijitkumbhare) 6. Project Contact: (Same as PTL) 7. Test Contact: (Luis Gomez/ec...@gmail.com/LuisGomez<http://ec...@gmail.com/LuisGomez>) 8. Documentation Contact (Shuva Jyoti Kar/ shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com<mailto:shuva.jyoti.kar...@gmail.com>/shuva) 9. Draft Release Plan: Mainly Karaf 4, bug fixes and absorbing OpenFlow Java (schedule for this still under construction - Nitrogen or Oxygen) We may update the names for a few of these items if needed. On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:02 AM An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Abhijit Kumbhare and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, Please take a moment to send your Nitrogen M0 Status [1] stating your intent to participate in the OpenDaylight Nitrogen Simultaneous Release and follow the activities and timeline documented on the Nitrogen Simultaneous Release Plan [2]. We kindly remind your project that the Nitrogen M0 Offest 2 Status Email was due on June 21, 2017. Best Regards, An Ho 1. A statement to the effect: "The project formally joins the OpenDaylight Nitrogen Simultaneous Release and agrees to the activities and timeline documented on the Nitrogen Release Plan Page: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Nitrogen_Release_Plan; 2. Project Offset: (Offset 0/Offset 1/Offset 2) 3. Project Category: (Kernel/Protocol/Services/Application/Support) 4. Do you confirm that the list of Active Project Committers is updated and accurate? (Yes/No) 5. Project PTL Contact: (name/email/IRC) 6. Project Contact: (name/email/IRC) 7. Test Contact: (name/email/IRC) 8. Documentation Contact (name/email/IRC) 9. Draft Release Plan: (link) [1] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-June/011123.html [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Nitrogen_Release_Plan ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Carbon SR1 Distribution Test Failure
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, Carbon SR1 Build 20170712 [1] has Distribution Test Failures [2] related to OPENFLOWPLUGIN. Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Carbon SR1. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-all-carbon/497/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-frs-only-carbon/506/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/702/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-scale-stats-collection-daily-frs-only-carbon/321/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-scale-stats-collection-daily-only-carbon/346/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-carbon/334/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-perf-daily-only-carbon/300/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-restconf-clustering-perf-daily-only-carbon/291/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#SR1_Download [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=363467887 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron SR4 Distribution Test Failures
Hi Abhijit Kumbhare, Luis Gomez, and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, Boron SR4 Build 20170615 [1] has Distribution Test Failures [2] related to OPENFLOWPLUGIN. Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Boron SR4. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-boron/397/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan#SR4_Download [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=1037896712 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] [Reminder] Boron SR4: OPENFLOWPLUGIN
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, We would like to kindly remind your project that Boron-SR4 cutoff is scheduled for June 11 at 23:59 UTC. Your project currently has the following Boron issues: 0 Blocker Bugs registered on Bugzilla and Google Tracking Spreadsheet [1] 27 Gerrit Patch open for stable/boron branch [2] 6 Distribution Test Failures [3] Please merge the open patches before the cutoff. Please let us know if you would like to voluntarily identify any test failures as IGNORE to help reduce the number of test failures that require follow-up/sign-off during release time. openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-frs-only-boronUnstable#325 openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-scale-stats-collection-daily-frs-only-boronUnstable#308 openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boronUnstable#1108 openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-boronUnstable#385 openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-perf-daily-only-boronUnstable#291 openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-restconf-clustering-perf-daily-only-boronUnstable#282 Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=294913046 [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/status:open+branch:stable/boron+(project:openflowplugin) [3] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/integration-distribution-test-boron/257/ [4] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan#SR4_Prebuild ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] Carbon RC3 Distribution Test Failure
The latest distribution test job for Carbon-RC3-Build-20170522 has PENDING failures in the following projects: bgpcep, controller, integration/distribution, netconf, openflowplugin Projects with failures should update the spreadsheet [1] and let us know if there are any blocking issues. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#RC3_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] [URGENT] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Carbon GO/NOGO Vote
Hi Abhijit Kumbhare and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, We are missing your required GO/NOGO Vote. Please vote GO/NOGO on the spreadsheet below by filling out Column B through E next to your project name: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948 Please let us know if you are having trouble accessing the spreadsheet, in which case you may reply to this email and I can update the spreadsheet on your behalf. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#RC3_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [lispflowmapping-dev] [release] Carbon RC1 Status
Thanks Vina, We have merge both the patches and would like to kindly request that you update the blocker bug status (to fixed and resolved if that is the case). Best Regards, An Ho From: Vina Ermagan (vermagan) [mailto:verma...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:43 PM To: An Ho; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org Cc: odl netvirt dev; genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; odl lispflowmapping dev; controller-...@lists.opendaylight.org; bgpcep-...@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [lispflowmapping-dev] [release] Carbon RC1 Status Hi An, The fix for lispflowmapping [1] is ready for merge, together with the revert patch for the associated disabled IT. Would be great if the two patches can be merged prior to RC2 build. Fix: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57200/ IT: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57203/ Thanks, Vina [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8429 On 5/17/17, 11:02 AM, "lispflowmapping-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:lispflowmapping-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of An Ho" <lispflowmapping-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:lispflowmapping-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Carbon Projects, We are looking to build RC2 tomorrow 5/18 at 23:59 UTC time assuming no blocker bugs. But it looks like there is still quite a long list of blocker bugs [1]. Can the following projects please provide us an update on the ETA for each blocker bug identified in the spreadsheet [2]: controller, bgpcep, genius, lispflowmapping, netvirt, openflowplugin. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-May/010924.html [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=921315511 -Original Message- From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> [mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Anil Belur Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:59 PM To: rele...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Casey Cain Subject: Re: [release] Carbon RC1 Status Correction: we are still waiting for integration-distribution-test-carbon Build #132 to complete. The count just got decremented since a job in the queue was canceled. Thanks, Anil On Wednesday 17 May 2017 07:46 AM, Anil Belur wrote: Hi Carbon Projects, The latest Carbon RC1 Build is complete with details located here [1]. We ask projects to download Carbon RC1, and report their RC1 test progress and status [2]. Unfortunately, we are still waiting for integration-distribution-test-carbon Build #133 to complete. We kindly ask projects to reply to this email thread to identify any additional blocking bugs not already being tracked. Regards, Anil Belur [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release _Plan#RC1_Download [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9Xug Jp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948 ___ lispflowmapping-dev mailing list lispflowmapping-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:lispflowmapping-...@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/lispflowmapping-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] Carbon RC1 Status
Hi Carbon Projects, We are looking to build RC2 tomorrow 5/18 at 23:59 UTC time assuming no blocker bugs. But it looks like there is still quite a long list of blocker bugs [1]. Can the following projects please provide us an update on the ETA for each blocker bug identified in the spreadsheet [2]: controller, bgpcep, genius, lispflowmapping, netvirt, openflowplugin. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-May/010924.html [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=921315511 -Original Message- From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Anil Belur Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:59 PM To: rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; Casey Cain Subject: Re: [release] Carbon RC1 Status Correction: we are still waiting for integration-distribution-test-carbon Build #132 to complete. The count just got decremented since a job in the queue was canceled. Thanks, Anil On Wednesday 17 May 2017 07:46 AM, Anil Belur wrote: > Hi Carbon Projects, > > The latest Carbon RC1 Build is complete with details located here [1]. > We ask projects to download Carbon RC1, and report their RC1 test > progress and status [2]. > > Unfortunately, we are still waiting for > integration-distribution-test-carbon Build #133 to complete. > > We kindly ask projects to reply to this email thread to identify any > additional blocking bugs not already being tracked. > > Regards, > Anil Belur > > [1] > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release > _Plan#RC1_Download > [2] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9Xug > Jp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948 > ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] [VOTE} Tomas Slusny as a committer on OpenFlow Plugin
+1 Best Regards, An Ho From: tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:tsc-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Colin Dixon Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:55 AM To: Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: t...@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [OpenDaylight TSC] [VOTE} Tomas Slusny as a committer on OpenFlow Plugin See below and please vote +1,0,-1. Thanks, --Colin On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello TSC, On behalf of the OpenFlow Plugin project, I would like to request the TSC to approve Tomas Slusny as an OpenFlow Plugin committer. He has committed over 100 merged patches in OpenFlow Plugin: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/project:openflowplugin+status:merged+owner:%22Tomas+Slusny+%253Ctomas.slusny%2540pantheon.tech%253E%22 The OpenFlow Plugin project voted for him to be nominated, 7 votes in favor, with no votes against. Also note that all the 6 active committers have voted in favor. The votes are here on the thread below: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2017-April/007038.html https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2017-April/007024.html Thanks, Abhijit ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron SR2 Distribution Test Failure
Many Thanks Luis Gomez for taking a look and we look forward to hearing your analysis soon. Best Regards, An Ho From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 11:14 AM To: An Ho Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare; openflowplugin-dev; Jamo Luhrsen Subject: Re: OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron SR2 Distribution Test Failure Hi An, I am looking at the issue now, will update shortly if this is new blocker or not. On Dec 19, 2016, at 11:10 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Abhijit Kumbhare and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There is one OpenFlowPlugin Cbench Performance Distribution Test Failure in Boron SR2. Any updates on the test failures or an ETA on when the investigation will complete? Please let us know if we are “OKAY” to release or if there is a “BLOCKING” issue that requires us to delay Boron SR2. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-boron/895/ Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron SR2 Distribution Test Failure
Hi Abhijit Kumbhare and OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There is one OpenFlowPlugin Cbench Performance Distribution Test Failure in Boron SR2. Any updates on the test failures or an ETA on when the investigation will complete? Please let us know if we are "OKAY" to release or if there is a "BLOCKING" issue that requires us to delay Boron SR2. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-boron/895/ Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin blocker bug
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, We would like to kindly request an update on these OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron Blocker Bugs? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should retarget the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. Bug 6908 - failed to update port status - all new OVS ports fail from this point. Is this only for Carbon or does it apply to Boron-SR2 as well? Otherwise, we should retarget for Carbon. Bug 6917 - Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is not stable. Luis reopened this bug on 12/08. Are there plans to fix it now, or can we retarget for Boron-SR3 for more time? Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7343 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR4 Distribution Test Failures
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR4 Build 20161017 related to your project. Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Beryllium SR4. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/722/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=843418255 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR4_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] Closing Weather Item: Unmerged Patch for projects to test OpenFlow Plugin default design to Lithium
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN, We believe that the following weather item has been resolved and would like to close this item by moving it to the Historical Weather Page. Please let us know if your teams have any objections or concerns and we will revert the action. Please let us know if this weather item has not been resolved and has pending work. Thank you for the tremendous help in this cross project effort. Name: Unmerged Patch for projects to test OpenFlow Plugin default design to Lithium We need all the dependent projects of OpenFlow Plugin (OFP) to move to the Lithium design for the Boron release. To help in this process OpenFlow Plugin has created an unmerged patch which swaps the default design to the new Lithium design. The patch is: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/35892. The purpose of this patch is for projects to identify issues in the migration and help OpenFlow Plugin fix them. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Unmerged_Patch_for_projects_to_test_OpenFlow_Plugin_default_design_to_Lithium ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Boron RC3.5 Distribution Test Failure
Thanks Luis for respinning the distribution test job. I've updated the spreadsheet to the reflect the results of Job #16. There are failures in the following projects: integration, l2switch, netvirt, openflowplugin, packetcable, sxp, tsdr Projects with failures should update the spreadsheet [1] and let us know if there are any blocking issues. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=103855824 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan#RC3.5 -Original Message- From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:34 PM To: An Ho Cc: rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; l2switch-...@lists.opendaylight.org; netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; sxp-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Jamo Luhrsen Subject: Re: Boron RC3.5 Distribution Test Failure Hi An, I just realized the distribution test you started for RC3.5 was not picking that but last Boron SNAPSHOT, so I started this: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-distribution-test-boron/16/ BR/Luis > On Sep 12, 2016, at 4:00 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote: > > The latest distribution test job for Boron RC3.5 Build 20160912 has failures > in the following projects: l2switch, netvirt, openflowplugin, sxp > > Projects with failures should update the spreadsheet [1] and let us know if > there are any blocking issues. > > Best Regards, > An Ho > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=103855824 > > [2] > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan#RC3.5 > > > > > ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron Blocker Bugs
Hi Abhijit, could you verify that these bugs no longer appear in the latest Boron RC 3.1 Build? Best Regards, An Ho From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:40 PM To: An Ho Cc: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; co...@colindixon.com; Phil Robb Subject: Re: OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron Blocker Bugs I have updated the status to Yellow - we can update it to Green once the bugs have been verified in the RC. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Patches were submitted to resolve the Boron Blocker Bugs for OPENFLOWPLUGIN. 6176: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/44893/ 6646: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45231/ 6554: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45228/ 6595: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45125/ Once the patches are merged, I believe OPENFLOWPLUGIN is no longer in "Red" status. If there are no other pending blocking issues, could someone from your team please update the Google Tracking Spreadsheet to reflect the current testing status as "Green" [1]. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=199721620 From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:51 PM To: An Ho Cc: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>; Luis Gomez Palacios; Shuva Jyoti Kar; co...@colindixon.com<mailto:co...@colindixon.com>; Anna Medvedová Subject: Re: Boron Blocker Bugs Looks like our emails crossed - I have asked for a meeting Tuesday morning 7 am Pacific. I do need a Webex for that time though - if Luis or Anna are not able to provide their Webex. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:23 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Any updates on these bug? Is there an ETA for when these bug can be fixed? We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/2 at 23:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6176 cbench throughput test does not work in Boron https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho -Original Message- From: An Ho Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:18 PM To: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: Boron Blocker Bugs Is this still a blocker bug for Boron? If it has been fixed, please mark the bug as fixed and resolved (STATUS=RESOLVED). If the bug will not be fixed in Boron, please retarget the bug for Carbon (ODL SR TARGET MILESTONE=CARBON). If this bug is still a blocker bug for Boron, please provide an ETA for when it can be fixed. We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/1 at 11:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Regression in OF cluster test
I believe Daniel Malachovsky has stated to retarget this for Boron SR1 on October 6, 2016 [1], which is roughly a month from now. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-September/008168.html -Original Message- From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 2:26 PM To: An Ho; Colin Dixon; Philip Robb; Tom Pantelis; Anil Vishnoi Cc: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [controller-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Regression in OF cluster test Hello An, does this mean that the DLUX patches are free to go in? Thanks, Robert On 2016-09-07 22:02, An Ho wrote: > The CONTROLLER/OPENFLOWPLUGIN team and other folks met to discuss the > status of this bug and the current plan of action is as follows: > > > > 1. TomP & CONTROLLER team will remove the invalid test(s) as per Bug > 6659 [1]. > >Deliverable: Patch(es) removing or fixing the tests. > > 2. The release team will schedule a respin of RC3.2 with the VBD fix > at > 9/7 23:59 UTC. > >Deliverable: Boron RC3.2 Common Karaf Disitrbution. > > 3. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will run OFP tests a few more times. > >Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if we only get the > expected 26 failures in subsequent runs. > > 4. Anil & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will attempt to reproduce locally in > order to establish if this is a real blocker. We strongly recommend > that the team enable "debug" on some runs while trying to reproduce the bug. > >Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if Bug 6658 is a > real blocker. > > 5. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will fix the tests that are failing > because of the change in behavior of candidate lists. > >Deliverable: Patch(es) fixing tests. > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6659 > > [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 > > > > > > *From:*Colin Dixon [mailto:co...@colindixon.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:35 AM > *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare > *Cc:* An Ho; controller-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; > openflowplugin-dev > *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Regression in OF > cluster test > > > > We're trying to figure that out, but if we could have somebody with > experience in OpenFlow plugin clustering give their 2 cents on if it's > a bug in the test or the behavior, that would really help. > > Thanks, > > --Colin > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > <abhijitk...@gmail.com <mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Thanks Luis and An. If it is a test needing update rather than the > code > - it might be better to keep Tom's fix. > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:23 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com > <mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: > > Still waiting to hear back from the controller team, but in the > meantime I have created the following blocker bug [1] and updated > the tracking spreadsheet. > > > > Hopefully after updating the tests there will not be any issues found. > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 > > > > *From:*Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:07 AM > *To:* An Ho > *Cc:* controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; > rele...@lists.opendaylight.org > <mailto:rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Tom Pantelis; Colin Dixon > > > *Subject:* Re: Regression in OF cluster test > > > > So far I can see it mostly impacts entity-owner API behavior, so > updating the test cases will fix most of the failures. I am counting > 1 day to update the test cases and run few times to see if there are > other issues. If there is no issue after updating the test we can be > ready by tomorrow, if there are issues after the test update I > really doubt we can address them before Friday morning. > > > > BR/Luis > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com > <mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: > > > > Adding release mailing list since it may impact RC3 > > > > Hi Tom Pantelis, > > > > Any comments regarding patch 45271. Seems like it is changed > the cluster behavior and that introduced regression in > OpenFlowPlugin. Would reverting be an option? > > > > Hi Luis,
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Regression in OF cluster test
The CONTROLLER/OPENFLOWPLUGIN team and other folks met to discuss the status of this bug and the current plan of action is as follows: 1. TomP & CONTROLLER team will remove the invalid test(s) as per Bug 6659 [1]. Deliverable: Patch(es) removing or fixing the tests. 2. The release team will schedule a respin of RC3.2 with the VBD fix at 9/7 23:59 UTC. Deliverable: Boron RC3.2 Common Karaf Disitrbution. 3. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will run OFP tests a few more times. Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if we only get the expected 26 failures in subsequent runs. 4. Anil & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will attempt to reproduce locally in order to establish if this is a real blocker. We strongly recommend that the team enable "debug" on some runs while trying to reproduce the bug. Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if Bug 6658 is a real blocker. 5. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will fix the tests that are failing because of the change in behavior of candidate lists. Deliverable: Patch(es) fixing tests. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6659 [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 From: Colin Dixon [mailto:co...@colindixon.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:35 AM To: Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: An Ho; controller-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Regression in OF cluster test We're trying to figure that out, but if we could have somebody with experience in OpenFlow plugin clustering give their 2 cents on if it's a bug in the test or the behavior, that would really help. Thanks, --Colin On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Luis and An. If it is a test needing update rather than the code - it might be better to keep Tom's fix. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:23 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Still waiting to hear back from the controller team, but in the meantime I have created the following blocker bug [1] and updated the tracking spreadsheet. Hopefully after updating the tests there will not be any issues found. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:07 AM To: An Ho Cc: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Tom Pantelis; Colin Dixon Subject: Re: Regression in OF cluster test So far I can see it mostly impacts entity-owner API behavior, so updating the test cases will fix most of the failures. I am counting 1 day to update the test cases and run few times to see if there are other issues. If there is no issue after updating the test we can be ready by tomorrow, if there are issues after the test update I really doubt we can address them before Friday morning. BR/Luis On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Adding release mailing list since it may impact RC3 Hi Tom Pantelis, Any comments regarding patch 45271. Seems like it is changed the cluster behavior and that introduced regression in OpenFlowPlugin. Would reverting be an option? Hi Luis, Is the impact confined to only CSIT test cases? Or does it affect end user regression of functionality as well? In other words, would be sufficient to update the test cases? Currently patch 45271 is related to blocker bug 6540 so reverting may be difficult. Hypothetically, if the testing phase of RC3.2 will stretch to Friday morning, so would that be enough time to update the test cases and rerun the test? Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6540 From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:49 AM To: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; An Ho Subject: Re: Regression in OF cluster test Most of the test regression seems to be related with entity-owner API behavior. Repair the test and retest everything is going to cost us one day, so should we go ahead or we revert the patch? BR/Luis On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: I am not sure this was intended (cluster behavior change) but this patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ introduced regression in the OpenFlow cluster test: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ BR/Luis ___ controller-dev mailing list controller-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:controller-...@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/cont
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Regression in OF cluster test
Still waiting to hear back from the controller team, but in the meantime I have created the following blocker bug [1] and updated the tracking spreadsheet. Hopefully after updating the tests there will not be any issues found. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:07 AM To: An Ho Cc: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; Tom Pantelis; Colin Dixon Subject: Re: Regression in OF cluster test So far I can see it mostly impacts entity-owner API behavior, so updating the test cases will fix most of the failures. I am counting 1 day to update the test cases and run few times to see if there are other issues. If there is no issue after updating the test we can be ready by tomorrow, if there are issues after the test update I really doubt we can address them before Friday morning. BR/Luis On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Adding release mailing list since it may impact RC3 Hi Tom Pantelis, Any comments regarding patch 45271. Seems like it is changed the cluster behavior and that introduced regression in OpenFlowPlugin. Would reverting be an option? Hi Luis, Is the impact confined to only CSIT test cases? Or does it affect end user regression of functionality as well? In other words, would be sufficient to update the test cases? Currently patch 45271 is related to blocker bug 6540 so reverting may be difficult. Hypothetically, if the testing phase of RC3.2 will stretch to Friday morning, so would that be enough time to update the test cases and rerun the test? Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6540 From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:49 AM To: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; An Ho Subject: Re: Regression in OF cluster test Most of the test regression seems to be related with entity-owner API behavior. Repair the test and retest everything is going to cost us one day, so should we go ahead or we revert the patch? BR/Luis On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: I am not sure this was intended (cluster behavior change) but this patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ introduced regression in the OpenFlow cluster test: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ BR/Luis ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Regression in OF cluster test
Adding release mailing list since it may impact RC3 Hi Tom Pantelis, Any comments regarding patch 45271. Seems like it is changed the cluster behavior and that introduced regression in OpenFlowPlugin. Would reverting be an option? Hi Luis, Is the impact confined to only CSIT test cases? Or does it affect end user regression of functionality as well? In other words, would be sufficient to update the test cases? Currently patch 45271 is related to blocker bug 6540 so reverting may be difficult. Hypothetically, if the testing phase of RC3.2 will stretch to Friday morning, so would that be enough time to update the test cases and rerun the test? Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6540 From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:49 AM To: controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; An Ho Subject: Re: Regression in OF cluster test Most of the test regression seems to be related with entity-owner API behavior. Repair the test and retest everything is going to cost us one day, so should we go ahead or we revert the patch? BR/Luis On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: I am not sure this was intended (cluster behavior change) but this patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ introduced regression in the OpenFlow cluster test: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ BR/Luis ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron Blocker Bugs
Patches were submitted to resolve the Boron Blocker Bugs for OPENFLOWPLUGIN. 6176: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/44893/ 6646: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45231/ 6554: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45228/ 6595: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45125/ Once the patches are merged, I believe OPENFLOWPLUGIN is no longer in "Red" status. If there are no other pending blocking issues, could someone from your team please update the Google Tracking Spreadsheet to reflect the current testing status as "Green" [1]. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=199721620 From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:51 PM To: An Ho Cc: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios; Shuva Jyoti Kar; co...@colindixon.com; Anna Medvedová Subject: Re: Boron Blocker Bugs Looks like our emails crossed - I have asked for a meeting Tuesday morning 7 am Pacific. I do need a Webex for that time though - if Luis or Anna are not able to provide their Webex. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:23 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Any updates on these bug? Is there an ETA for when these bug can be fixed? We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/2 at 23:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6176 cbench throughput test does not work in Boron https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho -Original Message- From: An Ho Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:18 PM To: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: Boron Blocker Bugs Is this still a blocker bug for Boron? If it has been fixed, please mark the bug as fixed and resolved (STATUS=RESOLVED). If the bug will not be fixed in Boron, please retarget the bug for Carbon (ODL SR TARGET MILESTONE=CARBON). If this bug is still a blocker bug for Boron, please provide an ETA for when it can be fixed. We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/1 at 11:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Boron Blocker Bugs
Any updates on these bug? Is there an ETA for when these bug can be fixed? We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/2 at 23:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6176 cbench throughput test does not work in Boron https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho -Original Message- From: An Ho Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:18 PM To: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Boron Blocker Bugs Is this still a blocker bug for Boron? If it has been fixed, please mark the bug as fixed and resolved (STATUS=RESOLVED). If the bug will not be fixed in Boron, please retarget the bug for Carbon (ODL SR TARGET MILESTONE=CARBON). If this bug is still a blocker bug for Boron, please provide an ETA for when it can be fixed. We kindly remind your project that the final build RC3 is scheduled for Thursday 9/1 at 11:59 UTC Time. https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6554 Li plugin: Entity-owner API is not stable when switch disconnect and connect quickly https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6595 Flow installation failures are observed in OF 1.0 switches in VTN CSIT testing Best Regards, An Ho ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin
Hi Shuva, Abhijit, Any comments regarding the errors? Hi Jayasree, Have you opened a blocker bug against openflowplugin? Are these errors causing a regression in functionality, or are they restricted to only the tests cases? Best Regards, An Ho From: Jayasree Kilaru/HYD/TCS [mailto:jayasree.kil...@tcs.com] Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 10:54 PM To: An Ho; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Cc: sirisha sangam Subject: Re: OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin Hi, Could openflowplugin team help us on this issue as soon as possible because we need to update test result of RC0 and RC1 karaf boron versions. Thanks and regards, Jayasree k TCS - Original Message - From: An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> To: Jayasree Kilaru/HYD/TCS <jayasree.kil...@tcs.com<mailto:jayasree.kil...@tcs.com>>, rele...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>, openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Cc: sirisha sangam <sirisha.san...@tcs.com<mailto:sirisha.san...@tcs.com>> Sent: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:22:40 +0530 (IST) Subject: OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin + adding openflowplugin team, who may have more insight into the issues. Best Regards, An Ho From: Jayasree Kilaru/HYD/TCS [mailto:jayasree.kil...@tcs.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:33 AM To: An Ho Cc: sirisha sangam Subject: Reg testing of RC0 and RC1 distribution karaf Hi, We are from sdninterfaceapp team and while testing RC0 and RC1 distribution karaf, are unable to access databroker object through OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin.However,earlier we were able to access the databroker object in the above specified way.Right now we are being able to access Databroker object in another way i.e.through Salservice of ProviderContext in controller.So could you help us with this issue as due to this we are encountering errors while testing. Thanks and regards, Jayasree k, TCS. =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin
+ adding openflowplugin team, who may have more insight into the issues. Best Regards, An Ho From: Jayasree Kilaru/HYD/TCS [mailto:jayasree.kil...@tcs.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:33 AM To: An Ho Cc: sirisha sangam Subject: Reg testing of RC0 and RC1 distribution karaf Hi, We are from sdninterfaceapp team and while testing RC0 and RC1 distribution karaf, are unable to access databroker object through OFSessionUtil of openflowplugin.However,earlier we were able to access the databroker object in the above specified way.Right now we are being able to access Databroker object in another way i.e.through Salservice of ProviderContext in controller.So could you help us with this issue as due to this we are encountering errors while testing. Thanks and regards, Jayasree k, TCS. =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] SEEK AGREEMENT ON API FREEZE WAIVER "Add learn action" required by NetVirt/Genius
Hi Shlomi Alfasi, Thank you for sending this notice out. Have you had a chance to update the Boron API Waiver Record Wiki Page? I can also update it on your behalf if you prefer. Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Boron/Waiver/API/Records From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 6:09 PM To: Alfasi, Shlomi; Release; genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org; netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org Cc: openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [release] SEEK AGREEMENT ON API FREEZE WAIVER "Add learn action" required by NetVirt/Genius Added Genius, NetVirt and release - had missed them while doing reply-all. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: NetVirt (Shlomi Alfasi) has requested the following change inside of OpenFlow Plugin as it is needed by NetVirt & Genius: Add learn action: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42702/. This code includes only addition functionalities (support for learn action) and does not change any existing api’s. Note: This email is to seek agreement on a waiver of API FREEZE. The patch for wich a waiver of API FREEZE is being sought is: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42702/ and it is contributed to: openflowplugin project The following projects have been determined to be impacted: NetVirt Genius Agreement to waive API FREEZE for https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42702/ will be indicated by +1 from each project representative on the Gerrit itself. There is no agreement to waive API FREEZE until all project representatives have +1ed the Gerrit. This email is *only* about waiving of API FREEZE, normal code review will proceed in the normal fashion On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Alfasi, Shlomi <shlomi.alf...@hpe.com<mailto:shlomi.alf...@hpe.com>> wrote: HI Abhijit, We have this review in openflowplugin ready and we would like to merge it before netvirt code freeze since other projects depends on it (genius, netvirt). This code includes only addition functionalities (support for learn action) and does not change any existing api’s. Can someone look at that and merge if possible? Shlomi Alfasi ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures
Should we be concerned if tests are failing depending on if Jenkins is less busy or more busy? As we get closer to the Boron release, I can only imagine the demand increasing. Best Regards, An Ho -Original Message- From: Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:08 PM To: Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: An Ho; Jamo Luhrsen; openflowplugin-dev; Anil Vishnoi Subject: Re: OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures So I repeated the cbench test when Jenkins was less busy today and it passed. Also when it fails I see this is the karaf log: 2016-07-27 04:58:02,092 | WARN | entLoopGroup-7-7 | HandshakeManagerImpl | 150 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin - 0.2.3.Beryllium-SR3 | issuing disconnect during handshake [/10.29.13.16:39231] 2016-07-27 04:58:02,092 | INFO | entLoopGroup-7-7 | ConnectionConductorImpl | 150 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin - 0.2.3.Beryllium-SR3 | OF handshake failed, doing cleanup. 2016-07-27 04:58:02,108 | INFO | Thread-111 | SessionManagerOFImpl | 150 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin - 0.2.3.Beryllium-SR3 | context for invalidation not found 2016-07-27 04:58:02,123 | WARN | entLoopGroup-7-1 | OFFrameDecoder | 147 - org.opendaylight.openflowjava.openflow-protocol-impl - 0.7.3.Beryllium-SR3 | Unexpected exception from downstream. java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)[:1.7.0_101] at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)[:1.7.0_101] at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)[:1.7.0_101] at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:192)[:1.7.0_101] at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:384)[:1.7.0_101] at io.netty.buffer.PooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(PooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.java:221)[96:io.netty.buffer:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:897)[96:io.netty.buffer:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doReadBytes(NioSocketChannel.java:242)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:119)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:564)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:505)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:419)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:386)[98:io.netty.transport:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$2.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:112)[97:io.netty.common:4.0.37.Final] at io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultThreadFactory.java:145)[97:io.netty.common:4.0.37.Final] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)[:1.7.0_101] Which makes me think the issue could be in the cbench tool or the network in between. BR/Luis > On Jul 26, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks! > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2016, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > First worked as expected: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-scalability-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/967/ > > Second still fails so issue has to be investigated although I do not think it > is blocker: > > cbench: controller benchmarking tool >running in mode 'throughput' >connecting to controller at > 10.29.9.112:6633 > >faking 8 switches offset 1 :: 10 tests each; 12000 ms per test >with 1 unique source MACs per switch >learning destination mac addresses before the test >starting test with 0 ms delay after features_reply >ignoring first 1 "warmup" and last 0 "cooldown" loops >connection delay of 0ms per 1 switch(es) >debugging info is off > controller msgbuf_read() = 0: closed connection … exiting > > > BR/Luis > >> On Jul 26, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The first is a test error, I fixed it and I re-triggered the job. >> >> The second I am not sure, I re-triggered to see if this is an sporadic or a >> real issue. >> >> BR/Luis >> >> >>> On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Both are classified as non-critical (as per the test case) - but Luis can >>> answer better. First one is a create JVM
[openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR3 related to your project. Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin and delay of Beryllium SR3. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-scalability-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/966/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-beryllium/1616/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=1820514274 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR3_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin bug scrub for July 21
Go to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cUHvDMlE8lDwJdeJMUP7NXkjhfs2NnwsATGqSd6KtOc/edit#gid=1772502898 On the toolbar, click on the "Data" menu. Then click on the "Filter Views..." menu item. Then click on "Blocker Filter" to view all the Blocker Bugs. Click on the "Li Plugin Filter" to view all the Li Plugin Bugs. Click on the "He Plugin Filter" to view all the He Plugin Bugs. Click on the "Unclassified Filter" to view all the unclassified bugs. Best Regards, An Ho From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:10 PM To: openflowplugin-dev; An Ho Subject: OpenFlow Plugin bug scrub for July 21 Hi folks, I have created a google spreadsheet from the open OpenFlow Plugin bugs for the bug scrub tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cUHvDMlE8lDwJdeJMUP7NXkjhfs2NnwsATGqSd6KtOc/edit?usp=sharing Anyone with the link above can edit. I have also added a category for each bug: 1) blocker-crit-maj; 2) Li plugin only; 3) He plugin only; 4) Unclassified If anyone knows of an easy way for me to view only the rows with a certain category (say blocker-crit-maj & Li plugin only) - please let me know and add it to the spreadsheet. Usually this is done by clicking the drop down on the first row. Thanks, Abhijit On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes - we will do that. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com<mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Abhijit/Luis, Let's track these bugs in our weekly meetings. Thanks Anil On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: The status of the plugin in CI this week: GENERAL (both Be and Li plugins): - Cluster: 1) Reconciliation not triggering after a single node reboot in a non HA scenario: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-beryllium/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058 2) Entity Owner not resolved properly after owner is isolated or rejoined. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6177 - Performance: 1) Cbench throughput test does not work in Boron: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-boron/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6176 2) Bulkomatic RPC does not work in Beryllium: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-rpc-time-measure-daily-only-beryllium/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6086 LI PLUGIN ONLY (in addition to the above): - Cluster: 1) Switch inventory remains when switch goes off (after owner restarts): https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5641 2) Switch Disconnect+Connect to Ownership Candidate fails: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6208 - Performance: 1) Unstable Switch scalability (100 to 400 switches): https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-sw-scalability-daily-only-boron/ https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6178 BR/Luis > On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:39 AM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jbaci...@cisco.com<mailto:jbaci...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Tomas Slusny is testing performance on deviceflowregistry. We are creating > this cache before the role change on master and we a reading all config and > opertional DS for the flows. It may cause slow down the start up after device > restart at all. Tomas is preparing a patch to let the deviceregistryflow run > on another thread. We'll see if the performance will go up. Patch is already > done, but just testing it right now. > > Jozef > > From: > openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> > > <openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org>> > on behalf of Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com<mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> > Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 12:24 AM > To: openflowplugin-dev > Subject: [openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin issue observed in CI > > Hi all, > > It is been a while so here the list of issues classified by general or Li > pl
[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] Upgrade ietf-{inet, yang}-types
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Committers, There are plans to upgrade ietf-inet-types@2010-09-24 and ietf-yang-types@2010-09-24 (RFC 6021) to ietf-inet-types-2013-07-15 and ietf-yang-types@2013-07-15 (RFC 6991) in the Boron release [1], and a patch has been generated to address the impacts to your project. Please kindly take a moment to +2 but DO NOT MERGE the following patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/40798/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Upgrade_ietf-.7Binet.2Cyang.7D-types_to_2013-07-15 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [nic-dev] [didm-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm
>From this file [1], it appears only atrium and didm have been removed. >However, EMAN and VBD are two projects not yet included in autorelease because >they do not have any code yet. >From the latest autorelease build [2] [3] [4], the two projects causing issues >are lispflowmapping and sxp Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=releng/autorelease.git;a=blob;f=pom.xml; [2] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-boron/144/ [3] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-boron/144/org.opendaylight.lispflowmapping$mappingservice.integrationtest/ [4] https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-boron/144/org.opendaylight.sxp$sxp-core/ From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Luis Gomez Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 11:02 AM To: Thanh Ha Cc: openflowplugin-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Shuva Jyoti Kar; didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Subhash Singh Subject: Re: [release] [nic-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] [didm-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm Thanh, would it be possible to get a list of projects that are currently breaking or have been removed (for same reason) from autorelease? If you have also a bug number, that would also help tracking. BR/Luis On Jun 6, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Thanh Ha <thanh...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:thanh...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Any updates here? Are we any closer to getting a fix for this issue? Thanks, Thanh On 27 May 2016 at 10:00, Colin Dixon <co...@colindixon.com<mailto:co...@colindixon.com>> wrote: Not to discourage discussing BUG-5954, but we still haven't seen a good build of autorelease for Boron in more than a month: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/ It looks like the last two failed for Jenkins reasons, but do we believe we've fixed everything? --Colin On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com<mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: Just a minor correct. Lithium plugin in master branch don't have a flag to disable it. We took an alternate solution to move table-features out of /"node/table" path. I think we should cherry-pick that patch to master as well for LIthium, if we want to disable table features by default. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Tai, Hideyuki <hideyuki@necam.com<mailto:hideyuki@necam.com>> wrote: I agree with Anil's and Abhijit's proposal. Hi Raphael and Renato, What do you think about this proposal from the point of view of NIC committers? Since you implemented PipelineManager which uses the table features, we need your opinions about if it is acceptable to NIC project or not. Actually, I'm still not sure if the PipelineManager really needs the table features. By the way, does the table features still generates huge data even after the model change on the master branch? https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559/ Regards, Hideyuki Tai From: nic-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:nic-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> [mailto:nic-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:nic-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org>] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 17:58 To: Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com<mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> Cc: openflowplugin-dev <openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>>; Thanh Ha <thanh...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:thanh...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jbaci...@cisco.com<mailto:jbaci...@cisco.com>>; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk<mailto:n...@hq.sk>>; Subhash Singh <subhash_si...@criterionnetworks.com<mailto:subhash_si...@criterionnetworks.com>>; nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Shuva Jyoti Kar <shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com<mailto:shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com>>; didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Manikantan, Anandhi <anandhi.manikan...@hpe.com<mailto:anandhi.manikan...@hpe.com>>; Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - Pantheon Technologies SRO at Cisco) <mire...@cisco.com<mailto:mire...@cisco.com>> Subject: Re: [nic-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [didm-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm Thanks for the good summary & analysis Anil. Having table features collection by default on will make the performance unacceptable with OVS 2.4 regardless of whether DIDM or NIC is being used or not. It might be possible for people to use OpenFlow Plugin wit
[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR2 Distribution Test Failures
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR2 related to your project. My analysis indicates that the failure also appeared in the previous SR2-Build-20160430 and SR2-Build-20160425. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-helium-design-only-beryllium/234/ Another action item for the OpenFlowPlugin team: could someone from your team verify if the bug has been fixed in the latest build for Beryllium SR2? https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5523 Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=185051143 [2] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR2_Download ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR1 Distribution Test Failures
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR1 related to your project. Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING" and requires a respin and delay of Beryllium SR1. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-beryllium/1372/ https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/1038/ Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=820477153 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [vtn-dev] Beryllium Blocker in OPENFLOWPLUGIN
Hi Hideyuki and VTN Team, Is VTN still blocked by this issue? Best Regards, An Ho From: Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech [mailto:venkatrang...@hcl.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 2:11 PM To: Anil Vishnoi; Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; vtn-...@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: RE: [vtn-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Beryllium Blocker in OPENFLOWPLUGIN Hi All, Thanks for the response to the bug report. Tested the scenario again. Did not find the exceptions and errors as reported in the bug. The Bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4678 seems to be occurring though. We are debugging the same. The importance field has been modified to Normal. We would continuously debug and update the bug if we face the exception again, We faced it multiple times when testing yesterday. Regards, Venkat G From: vtn-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:vtn-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> [mailto:vtn-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Anil Vishnoi Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 11:47 AM To: Abhijit Kumbhare Cc: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>; vtn-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:vtn-...@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: Re: [vtn-dev] [openflowplugin-dev] Beryllium Blocker in OPENFLOWPLUGIN updated the bug. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com<mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: Anil is looking at it. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:09 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com<mailto:an...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN and VTN Team, There may be a potential blocker related to openflowplugin and vtn. Further investigated is needed as it may block Beryllium from releasing. Please provide ETA and let me know if there is anything I can do to help. RPC Exceptions observed with openflowplugin He design (tested with VTN): https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=2030147923 ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev -- Thanks Anil ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
