Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Or Gerlitz
 I find it somehow hard to review your patch set as of two
 reasons: (a) all the patches having the same subject line 

 a) I thought using the same subject line was the convention since
it is essentially one patch.  I split it due to size and the
fact that each patch has a different owner.

Nope, the convention is to have the subject line telling what it this 
patch role within the patch series very similarly to what you have 
stated in some beginning of most of the patches. Another useful practice 
is to have all the patches sent over the same thread.

 The bulk of the changes are to the InfiniPath kernel driver (ib_ipath)
 to support mmap'ing the CQ and receive queues (QP, SRQ) into
 the user level verbs library.

 The changes to the core IB were neccessary in order to allow
 additional information (i.e., the mmap offset) to be returned
 from the kernel driver to the user level verbs driver plugin.

thanks for the clarification.

Or.



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] where are the userspace sources after installing the ofed-1.0?

2006-08-14 Thread Ian Jiang
Thank you very much!

On 8/13/06, Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ian Jiang wrote:
  I know the userspace sources could be got from
  OFED-1.0.tgz\SOURCES\openib-1.0\src\userspace.  But I am wondering
  wheather these source will be installed when installing the OFED-1.0
  RPMs. I cannot find them under /usr/local/ofed/
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 In OFED 1.0 sources are not installed at all after the installation.
 In OFED 1.1 after installation the sources are located on: prefix/src/

 Tziporet



-- 
Ian Jiang

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] [PATCHv2] osm: OSM crash TRIVIAL bug fix

2006-08-14 Thread Yevgeny Kliteynik
Hi Hal.This patch fixes an OSM crash when working with Cisco's stack.
Cisco's doesn't follow the same TID convention when generating 
transaction id which in some bad flow revealed this bug in the get_madw lookup.The bug is in get_madw which does not cleanup old pointers to retrieved madw and also does not detect lookup of its reserved free entry of key==0.
(This better text replaces my previous patch:OSM crash when working with Cisco's TopSpin stack)
YevgenySigned-off-by:Yevgeny Kliteynik 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c===
--- osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c (revision 8614)
+++ osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c (working copy)@@ -141,12 +141,20 @@ get_madw(osm_vendor_t *p_vend, ib_net64_
 ib_net64_t mtid = (*tid  cl_ntoh64(0xllu));
 osm_madw_t *res;
+ /*+ * Since mtid == 0 is the empty key we should not
+ * waste time looking for it+ */
+ if (mtid == 0)+ return 0;
+ cl_spinlock_acquire( p_vend-match_tbl_lock );
 for (m = p_vend-mtbl.tbl, e = m + p_vend-mtbl.max; m  e; m++) {
 if (m-tid == mtid) { m-tid = 0;
 *tid = mtid;
 res = m-v;+ m-v = NULL; /* just make sure we do not point to free'd madw */
 cl_spinlock_release( p_vend-match_tbl_lock );
 return res; }
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: TRIVIAL wrong description in log message

2006-08-14 Thread Yevgeny Kliteynik
Hi Hal,

Inspecting the log messages of the error flow in osm_vendor_send I have
noticed that the terms request and response are reversed:
If we are sending with response_expected it means we are sending our request...

Yevgeny

Signed-off-by:  Yevgeny Kliteynik  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c
===
--- osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c   (revision 8614)
+++ osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c   (working copy)
@@ -1148,7 +1156,7 @@ Resp:

osm_log(p_vend-p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG, osm_vendor_send: 
Completed sending %s p_madw = %p\n,
-   resp_expected ? response : request, p_madw);
+   resp_expected ? request : response, p_madw);
 Exit:
OSM_LOG_EXIT( p_vend-p_log );
return( ret );

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] Fix potential deadlock in mthca

2006-08-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 09:15 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 Roland Dreier wrote:
  Here's a long-standing bug that lockdep found very nicely.
  
  Ingo/Arjan, can you confirm that the fix looks OK and I am using
  spin_lock_nested() properly?  I couldn't find much documentation or
  many examples of it, so I'm not positive this is the right way to
  handle this fix.
  
 
 looks correct to me;
 
 Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]

looks good to me too.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

btw., we could introduce a new spin-lock op: 

spin_lock_double(l1, l2);
...
spin_unlock_double(l1, l2);

because some other code, like kernel/sched.c, fs/dcache.c and
kernel/futex.c uses quite similar locking.

Ingo


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] [opensm] the default behavior of the openSM causes problems (configure the PKey table)

2006-08-14 Thread Dotan Barak
Hi.

I noticed that the behavior of the openSM was changed in the latest driver:

in the past, every HCA was configured (by the FW) with 0x in the first 
entry.
today, the PKey table is being configured by the openSM: the first entry 
is being set to 0x7fff (except for the host that the SM is being executed from)

This behavior is very problemtic because not all of the users would like 
to change the default PKey table (for example: MPI users). 
Users that will try to use OFED 1.1 (in the same way they used OFED 1.0) will 
get unexplained failures, because the connectivity because the nodes will be 
broken.
(even the perfquery started to fail after executing the SM)


I think that the default behavior of the openSM should be: not to change the 
PKey table, unless the user provided a PKey table policy file.

Here are the props of the machines

*
Host Architecture : x86_64
Linux Distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 3)
Kernel Version: 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
GCC Version   : gcc (GCC) 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)
Memory size   : 4039892 kB
Driver Version: gen2_linux-20060813-1905 (REV=8916)
HCA ID(s) : mthca0
HCA model(s)  : 23108
FW version(s) : 3.4.927
Board(s)  : MT_003001
*


thanks
Dotan

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [opensm] the default behavior of the openSM causes problems (configure the PKey table)

2006-08-14 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Hi Dotan,

On 14:36 Mon 14 Aug , Dotan Barak wrote:
 Hi.
 
 I noticed that the behavior of the openSM was changed in the latest driver:
 
 in the past, every HCA was configured (by the FW) with 0x in the first 
 entry.
 today, the PKey table is being configured by the openSM: the first entry 
 is being set to 0x7fff (except for the host that the SM is being executed 
 from)

This is OpenSM default behavior in the case where partition policy file
exists (/etc/osm-partitions.conf is default name), even if it is empty.

When the partition policy file does not exist default 0x pkey value
(full membership) should be inserted for all end-ports.

I am not able to reproduce the reported behavior with my setup. If you
are please describe your scenario. Thanks.

Sasha

 This behavior is very problemtic because not all of the users would like 
 to change the default PKey table (for example: MPI users). 
 Users that will try to use OFED 1.1 (in the same way they used OFED 1.0) will 
 get unexplained failures, because the connectivity because the nodes will be 
 broken.
 (even the perfquery started to fail after executing the SM)
 
 
 I think that the default behavior of the openSM should be: not to change the 
 PKey table, unless the user provided a PKey table policy file.


 
 Here are the props of the machines
 
 *
 Host Architecture : x86_64
 Linux Distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 3)
 Kernel Version: 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
 GCC Version   : gcc (GCC) 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)
 Memory size   : 4039892 kB
 Driver Version: gen2_linux-20060813-1905 (REV=8916)
 HCA ID(s) : mthca0
 HCA model(s)  : 23108
 FW version(s) : 3.4.927
 Board(s)  : MT_003001
 *
 
 
 thanks
 Dotan
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 openib-general@openib.org
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [opensm] the default behavior of the openSM causes problems (configure the PKey table)

2006-08-14 Thread Dotan Barak
Thanks for the quick response.

On Monday 14 August 2006 15:17, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
 Hi Dotan,
 
 On 14:36 Mon 14 Aug , Dotan Barak wrote:
  Hi.
  
  I noticed that the behavior of the openSM was changed in the latest driver:
  
  in the past, every HCA was configured (by the FW) with 0x in the first 
  entry.
  today, the PKey table is being configured by the openSM: the first entry 
  is being set to 0x7fff (except for the host that the SM is being executed 
  from)
 
 This is OpenSM default behavior in the case where partition policy file
 exists (/etc/osm-partitions.conf is default name), even if it is empty.

You are right, this file was exist in the host with the following content:

Default=0x7fff : ALL, SELF=full ;
YetAnotherOne = 0x300 : ALL, SELF=full ;
partition1 = 0x1 : 0x0002c9020020b1c9=full;



 
 When the partition policy file does not exist default 0x pkey value
 (full membership) should be inserted for all end-ports.
 
 I am not able to reproduce the reported behavior with my setup. If you
 are please describe your scenario. Thanks.
I have 2 machines connected b2b (without any switch in the middle) connected 
using one cable from port 1 to port 1.

I executed the SM from one machine, and in the other machine perfquery i got 
the failure.


Why doesn't the SM print that this file was found?
this way, users can know that this file was found in their machine and the SM 
is using those rules
(instead of the default rules, as you described)

Thanks
Dotan

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [opensm] the default behavior of the openSM causes problems (configure the PKey table)

2006-08-14 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 15:36 Mon 14 Aug , Dotan Barak wrote:
 Thanks for the quick response.
 
 On Monday 14 August 2006 15:17, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
  Hi Dotan,
  
  On 14:36 Mon 14 Aug , Dotan Barak wrote:
   Hi.
   
   I noticed that the behavior of the openSM was changed in the latest 
   driver:
   
   in the past, every HCA was configured (by the FW) with 0x in the 
   first entry.
   today, the PKey table is being configured by the openSM: the first entry 
   is being set to 0x7fff (except for the host that the SM is being executed 
   from)
  
  This is OpenSM default behavior in the case where partition policy file
  exists (/etc/osm-partitions.conf is default name), even if it is empty.
 
 You are right, this file was exist in the host with the following content:
 
 Default=0x7fff : ALL, SELF=full ;
 YetAnotherOne = 0x300 : ALL, SELF=full ;
 partition1 = 0x1 : 0x0002c9020020b1c9=full;
 
 
 
  
  When the partition policy file does not exist default 0x pkey value
  (full membership) should be inserted for all end-ports.
  
  I am not able to reproduce the reported behavior with my setup. If you
  are please describe your scenario. Thanks.
 I have 2 machines connected b2b (without any switch in the middle) connected 
 using one cable from port 1 to port 1.
 
 I executed the SM from one machine, and in the other machine perfquery i 
 got the failure.

OpenSM configures pkey tables as requested in osm-partitions.conf file -
this is the reason. Just remove (or rename) this file if you don't need
it.

 
 
 Why doesn't the SM print that this file was found?

Yes, some prints may be helpful. Do you mean just log file or would prefer
the message on stdout too?

Sasha

 this way, users can know that this file was found in their machine and the SM 
 is using those rules
 (instead of the default rules, as you described)
 
 Thanks
 Dotan

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCHv2] osm: OSM crash TRIVIAL bug fix

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Yevgeny,

On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 04:13, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
 Hi Hal.
 
 This patch fixes an OSM crash when working with Cisco's stack.
 Cisco's doesn't follow the same TID convention when generating
 transaction id which in some bad flow revealed this bug in the
 get_madw lookup.
 The bug is in get_madw which does not cleanup old pointers to 
 retrieved madw and also does not detect lookup of its reserved free
 entry of key==0. 
 
 (This better text replaces my previous patch:
  OSM crash when working with Cisco's TopSpin stack)
 
 Yevgeny

Thanks. Good find.

 Signed-off-by:  Yevgeny Kliteynik  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Index: osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c
 ===
 --- osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c   (revision 8614)
 +++ osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c   (working copy)
 @@ -141,12 +141,20 @@ get_madw(osm_vendor_t *p_vend, ib_net64_
 ib_net64_t mtid = (*tid  cl_ntoh64(0xllu));
 osm_madw_t *res;
 
 +/*
 + * Since mtid == 0 is the empty key we should not
 + * waste time looking for it
 + */
 +if (mtid == 0)
 +   return 0;
 +
 cl_spinlock_acquire( p_vend-match_tbl_lock ); 
 for (m = p_vend-mtbl.tbl, e = m + p_vend-mtbl.max; m  e;
 m++) {
 if (m-tid == mtid) {
 m-tid = 0;
 *tid = mtid;
 res = m-v;
 +   m-v = NULL; /* just make sure we do not point
 to free'd madw */

This line wrapped so there is something wrong with your mailer.

Also, is this line really needed (and if so why) ? I know you did say
it cleans up old pointers to retrieved madw but this shouldn't be
accessed, right ? Also, if this is added here, there are other places
where the same thing should be done ?

 cl_spinlock_release( p_vend-match_tbl_lock
 );
 return res;
 }
 

Applied to trunk and 1.1 with the exception noted above.

-- Hal


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [opensm] the default behavior of the openSM causes problems (configure the PKey table)

2006-08-14 Thread Dotan Barak
On Monday 14 August 2006 16:09, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
  
  Why doesn't the SM print that this file was found?
 
 Yes, some prints may be helpful. Do you mean just log file or would prefer
 the message on stdout too?

I believe that most of the users don't look at the log file, so a message in 
the stdout can be usefull.

thanks
Dotan

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] osm: TRIVIAL wrong description in log message

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Yevgeny,

On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 04:24, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
 Hi Hal,
 
 Inspecting the log messages of the error flow in osm_vendor_send I have
 noticed that the terms request and response are reversed:
 If we are sending with response_expected it means we are sending our 
 request...
 
 Yevgeny
 
 Signed-off-by:  Yevgeny Kliteynik  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks. Applied to trunk and 1.1 (with minor cosmetic change).

-- Hal



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED 1.1-rc1 is available

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 09:14, Tziporet Koren wrote:
 Hal Rosenstock wrote:
  Target release date: 12-Sep 
 
  Intermediate milestones:
  1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
  2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
  3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
  
 
  What is the start build date for RC2 ? When do developers need to have
  their code in by to make RC2 ?

 We will start on Tue 15-Aug. Is this OK with you?

Yes; I just needed to know when this needed to be done by. Thanks.

-- Hal

   

  4. Code freeze (rc-x): 6-Sep
  
 
  Is this 1 or 2 RCs beyond RC2 in order to make this ?
 

 I hope one but I guess it will be two more RCs.
 
 Tziporet


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] RDMA_READ SGE

2006-08-14 Thread Tom Tucker
[...snip...]
 Practically I don't see reporting the exact values as a priority -
 I think applications really can figure this out easier by attempting
 operating with relevant parameters and fallback to smaller values
 on failure.

Perhaps it's not a priority, and it is certainly technically possible,
however, I would say that this is quite a burden to place on every
application to attempt to discover limits by submitting WR and checking
when they fail. Who do they talk to while they're doing all this? 

It seems to me that it would be better to expand the set of attributes.
Leave the current max_sge for backward compatibility, but let apps
reliably query limits instead of attempting to discover them through
trial and error.


 But assuming that applications really need this information -
 it seems we really should generalize this - maybe make the device provide
 a function mapping QP attributes and operation kinds to the max set of values
 allowed?
 


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] osm: Dynamic verbosity control per file

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Yevgeny,

On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 15:16, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
 Hi Hal.
 
  Is it hard to find which file and line an opensm 
  log message comes from
  ? Is this functionality really needed ?
 
 I'm guessing that your question refers to the second  
 bullet - logging source code filename and line number.
 
 IMHO, this is a nice-to-have functionality - when 
 debugging the SM that runs with a high verbosity,
 the log has a lot of information, and it's much 
 easier to follow the SM flow when each message
 tells where exactly it came from.

OK. I'll work on adding it but may not get to it for another day or so
(so it won't be in OFED 1.1 rc2) and may have other comments on the
specifics of the patch.

-- Hal

 Regards,
  
 Yevgeny Kliteynik
  
 Mellanox Technologies LTD
 Tel: +972-4-909-7200 ext: 394
 Fax: +972-4-959-3245
 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Rosenstock
 Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:50 PM
 To: Yevgeny Kliteynik
 Cc: OPENIB
 Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] osm: Dynamic verbosity control per
 file
 
 Hi Yevgeny,
 
 On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:16, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
  Hi Hal
 
 Just got back from vacation and am in the process of catching up.
 
  This patch adds new verbosity functionality.
 
  1. Verbosity configuration file
  ---
  
  The user is able to set verbosity level per source code file 
  by supplying verbosity configuration file using the following
  command line arguments:
  
-b filename
--verbosity_file filename
  
  By default, the OSM will use the following file: /etc/opensmlog.conf 
  Verbosity configuration file should contain zero or more lines of
  the following pattern:
  
filename verbosity_level
  
  where 'filename' is the name of the source code file that the
  'verbosity_level' refers to, and the 'verbosity_level' itself 
  should be specified as an integer number (decimal or hexadecimal).
  
  One reserved filename is 'all' - it represents general verbosity
  level, that is used for all the files that are not specified in
  the verbosity configuration file. 
  If 'all' is not specified, the verbosity level set in the
  command line will be used instead.
  Note: The 'all' file verbosity level will override any other
  general level that was specified by the command line arguments. 
  
  Sending a SIGHUP signal to the OSM will cause it to reload
  the verbosity configuration file.
  
  
  2. Logging source code filename and line number
  ---
  
  If command line option -S or --log_source_info is specified,
  OSM will add source code filename and line number to every
  log message that is written to the log file.
  By default, the OSM will not log this additional info. 
  
  
  Yevgeny
 
 Is it hard to find which file and line an opensm log message comes from
 ? Is this functionality really needed ?
 
 -- Hal
 
 
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 openib-general@openib.org
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] [PATCH] include change

2006-08-14 Thread James Lentini

Include the header file we really want.

Signed-off-by: James Lentini [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: hw/mthca/mthca_cmd.c
===
--- hw/mthca/mthca_cmd.c(revision 8850)
+++ hw/mthca/mthca_cmd.c(working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
  * $Id$
  */
 
-#include linux/sched.h
+#include linux/completion.h
 #include linux/pci.h
 #include linux/errno.h
 #include asm/io.h

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
   int ibv_cmd_resize_cq(struct ibv_cq *cq, int cqe,
  -  struct ibv_resize_cq *cmd, size_t cmd_size);
  +  struct ibv_resize_cq *cmd, size_t cmd_size,
  +  struct ibv_resize_cq_resp *resp, size_t resp_size);

We can't make this change without a little more work -- as it stands
this makes it impossible to have a low-level driver that works with
both libibverbs 1.0 and 1.1, since there doesn't seem to be any
autoconf way to check the number of parameters a function takes.

I see two ways forward: either at a new ibv_cmd_resize_cq_resp()
function (as you did originally), or add something like

#define IBV_CMD_RESIZE_CQ_HAS_RESP_PARAMS

and test that in libmthca and libehca.

Personally I lean towards the second solution, although neither is
very elegant.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Lakshmanan, Madhu


In .../include/infiniband/mad.h,  it is:

typedef uint8_t ib_gid_t[16];

In .../include/infiniband/iba/ib_types.h, it is:

#include complib/cl_packon.h
typedef union _ib_gid
{
uint8_t raw[16];
    struct _ib_gid_unicast
    {
ib_gid_prefix_t prefix;
ib_net64_t  interface_id;

    } PACK_SUFFIX unicast;

    struct _ib_gid_multicast
    {
uint8_t header[2];
uint8_t raw_group_id[14];

    } PACK_SUFFIX multicast;

} PACK_SUFFIX ib_gid_t;
#include complib/cl_packoff.h

I need to include both files for a user space tool and I'm getting a compile 
error due to the conflict. Is it not the norm for a user space application to 
include both files?
Appreciate any thoughts on this.

Madhu Lakshmanan
Silverstorm Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 4/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
   struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp {
   __u32 cqe;
  +__u32 reserved;
  +__u64 driver_data[0];
   };

I don't see any changes related to this in uverbs_cmd.c, and you don't
bump the ABI version.  So as far as I can tell, ib_uverbs_resize_cq()
will silently corrupt the stack on an old libibverbs that passes in a
pointer to a 4-byte response structure.

In general I've resisted putting backwards compatibility stuff into
the kernel side of uverbs, so maybe an ABI bump is the answer in this
case too.

But then I have to do another libibverbs 1.0 release etc., which is
kind of a pain.  So in this case it's probably OK to add a check in
ib_uverbs_resize_cq() for when out_len == 4, and not overflow the
response buffer in that case.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 7/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
  +/*
  + * ipath_vma_nopage - handle a VMA page fault.
  + */
  +static struct page *ipath_vma_nopage(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  + unsigned long address, int *type)
  +{
  +struct ipath_mmap_info *ip = vma-vm_private_data;
  +unsigned long offset = address - vma-vm_start;
  +struct page *page = NOPAGE_SIGBUS;
  +void *pageptr;
  +
  +if (offset = ip-size)
  +goto out; /* out of range */
  +
  +/*
  + * Convert the vmalloc address into a struct page.
  + */
  +pageptr = (void *)(offset + (vma-vm_pgoff  PAGE_SHIFT));
  +page = vmalloc_to_page(pageptr);
  +if (!page)
  +goto out;
  +
  +/* Increment the reference count. */
  +get_page(page);
  +if (type)
  +*type = VM_FAULT_MINOR;
  +out:
  +return page;
  +}
  +
  +static struct vm_operations_struct ipath_vm_ops = {
  +.open = ipath_vma_open,
  +.close =ipath_vma_close,
  +.nopage =   ipath_vma_nopage,
  +};

It seems that all this would be much simpler with vmalloc_user() and
remap_vmalloc_range().  And it would fix the information leak you
introduce here: I don't see anywhere that you clear the memory you
vmalloc and remap to userspace, so you're potentially exposing the
cached contents of /etc/passwd or something like that.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread ralphc
int ibv_cmd_resize_cq(struct ibv_cq *cq, int cqe,
   -struct ibv_resize_cq *cmd, size_t cmd_size);
   +struct ibv_resize_cq *cmd, size_t cmd_size,
   +struct ibv_resize_cq_resp *resp, size_t resp_size);

 We can't make this change without a little more work -- as it stands
 this makes it impossible to have a low-level driver that works with
 both libibverbs 1.0 and 1.1, since there doesn't seem to be any
 autoconf way to check the number of parameters a function takes.

What we really need is a version number for the device library
plug-in to libibverbs.so interface verses the existing kernel
device driver to plug-in or application to libibverbs.so version.

 I see two ways forward: either at a new ibv_cmd_resize_cq_resp()
 function (as you did originally), or add something like

 #define IBV_CMD_RESIZE_CQ_HAS_RESP_PARAMS

 and test that in libmthca and libehca.

 Personally I lean towards the second solution, although neither is
 very elegant.

  - R.

A #define won't help the plug-in know what parameters to pass,
only a function name change will work if the semantics change.

I can add another version argument to ibv_driver_init() if you
agree.  It seems to me that we have already made incompatible
changes by moving to libibverbs.so.2.  Couldn't we include this
as part of the transition?
Otherwise, I would vote for ibv_cmd_resize_cq_resp().



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 4/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread ralphc
struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp {
  __u32 cqe;
   +  __u32 reserved;
   +  __u64 driver_data[0];
};

 I don't see any changes related to this in uverbs_cmd.c, and you don't
 bump the ABI version.  So as far as I can tell, ib_uverbs_resize_cq()
 will silently corrupt the stack on an old libibverbs that passes in a
 pointer to a 4-byte response structure.

 In general I've resisted putting backwards compatibility stuff into
 the kernel side of uverbs, so maybe an ABI bump is the answer in this
 case too.

 But then I have to do another libibverbs 1.0 release etc., which is
 kind of a pain.  So in this case it's probably OK to add a check in
 ib_uverbs_resize_cq() for when out_len == 4, and not overflow the
 response buffer in that case.

  - R.

This doesn't break compatibility.  uverbs_cmd.c ib_uverbs_resize_cq()
allocates a struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp on the stack but
only reads the first element in.
The structure change isn't really needed at all since the INIT_UDATA()
macro gets the start of driver_data from the struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq.
The change to ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp just matches the structure
change used by libipathverbs to initialize ib_uverbs_resize_cq.response.

If you want, I can remove this from the patch.



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 7/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread ralphc
   +/*
   + * ipath_vma_nopage - handle a VMA page fault.
   + */
   +static struct page *ipath_vma_nopage(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
   +   unsigned long address, int *type)
   +{
   +  struct ipath_mmap_info *ip = vma-vm_private_data;
   +  unsigned long offset = address - vma-vm_start;
   +  struct page *page = NOPAGE_SIGBUS;
   +  void *pageptr;
   +
   +  if (offset = ip-size)
   +  goto out; /* out of range */
   +
   +  /*
   +   * Convert the vmalloc address into a struct page.
   +   */
   +  pageptr = (void *)(offset + (vma-vm_pgoff  PAGE_SHIFT));
   +  page = vmalloc_to_page(pageptr);
   +  if (!page)
   +  goto out;
   +
   +  /* Increment the reference count. */
   +  get_page(page);
   +  if (type)
   +  *type = VM_FAULT_MINOR;
   +out:
   +  return page;
   +}
   +
   +static struct vm_operations_struct ipath_vm_ops = {
   +  .open = ipath_vma_open,
   +  .close =ipath_vma_close,
   +  .nopage =   ipath_vma_nopage,
   +};

 It seems that all this would be much simpler with vmalloc_user() and
 remap_vmalloc_range().  And it would fix the information leak you
 introduce here: I don't see anywhere that you clear the memory you
 vmalloc and remap to userspace, so you're potentially exposing the
 cached contents of /etc/passwd or something like that.

  - R.

I was unaware of these functions. Looks like they were just
recently added (7/23/2006).
I will update the patch to use these.


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Hi,
The first version of the IPoIB high availability daemon can be found at: 
https://openib.org/svn/trunk/contrib/mellanox/ipoibtools

The daemon is a perl script ipoib_ha.pl that should get the primary and 
the backup IPoIB interfaces as a parameters (default values are ib0 as a 
primary and ib1 as a backup).

The basic steps performed by IPoIB High Availability (HA) daemon:

- Get names of the IPoIB primary and backup interfaces.
- Get configuration of the primary interface from its standard place
  (ifcfg-ibN from /etc/sysconfig/{network,network-scripts}).
- Run 'ip monitor link all' and parse its output to monitor IPoIB 
primary interface.
- When NO-CARRIER occur, check if it is a primary IPoIB interface and 
if yes
  then migrate its IPoIB configuration to the backup IPoIB interface.
- Run 'arpingib' utility if configured to update neighbors with a new 
MAC address
- Get the list of multicast groups from /proc/net/dev_mcast
  that the primary IPoIB interface was registered to. Then register the
  backup IPoIB interface to these multicast groups (using ipmaddr utility).

Currently there is an issue with join to IPoIB multicast group using 
both ip and ipmaddr utilities.

This daemon is going to be added to the OFED-1.1 release.
Please comment.
Thanks,

Regards,
Vladimir


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Roland Dreier wrote:
 @@ -1502,7 +1506,7 @@ int mthca_tavor_post_send(struct ib_qp *
   int i;
   int size;
   int size0 = 0;
 - u32 f0 = 0;
 + u32 f0;

This causes compile warnings for me that 'f0' might be used uninitialized.

 @@ -1843,7 +1849,7 @@ int mthca_arbel_post_send(struct ib_qp *
   int i;
   int size;
   int size0 = 0;
 - u32 f0 = 0;
 + u32 f0;

Same here.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] [PATCH] OpenSM/osm_resp.c: In osm_resp_make_resp_smp, set direction bit only if direct routed class

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
OpenSM/osm_resp.c: In osm_resp_make_resp_smp, set direction bit only if
direct routed class

This change fixes two minor issues with osm_resp_make_resp_smp: 
1. Get/Set responses always had direction bit set. 
2. Trap represses never had direction bit set.

The direction bit needs setting in direct routed responses and it
doesn't exist in LID routed responses.

Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: opensm/osm_resp.c
===
--- opensm/osm_resp.c   (revision 8931)
+++ opensm/osm_resp.c   (working copy)
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ osm_resp_make_resp_smp(
   if (p_src_smp-method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET ||
   p_src_smp-method == IB_MAD_METHOD_SET ) {
 p_dest_smp-method = IB_MAD_METHOD_GET_RESP;
-p_dest_smp-status = (ib_net16_t)(status | IB_SMP_DIRECTION);
+p_dest_smp-status = status;
   }
   else if (p_src_smp-method == IB_MAD_METHOD_TRAP)
   {
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ osm_resp_make_resp_smp(
 goto Exit;
   }
 
+  if (p_src_smp-mgmt_class == IB_MCLASS_SUBN_DIR)
+p_dest_smp-status |= IB_SMP_DIRECTION;
+
   p_dest_smp-dr_dlid = p_dest_smp-dr_slid;
   p_dest_smp-dr_slid = p_dest_smp-dr_dlid;
   memcpy( p_dest_smp-data, p_payload, IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE );




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread mlakshmanan
  
 This is a similar but more mainstream example of the conflicts.  A previous 
 one was reported last week in terms of CM. Still not sure of the best 
 resolution for this.
  
 Do you really need both includes ?
  

The userspace tool shows a textual representation of a HCA port's capability 
mask. So it 
requires the port capability bit definitions in ib_types.h. And I require mad.h 
for the MAD API.

 -- Hal

Thanks,

Madhu
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Lakshmanan, Madhu
 Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 12:19 PM
 To: openib-general@openib.org
 Subject: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t
 
 
 
 
 
 In .../include/infiniband/mad.h,  it is:
 
 typedef uint8_t ib_gid_t[16];
 
 In .../include/infiniband/iba/ib_types.h, it is:
 
 #include complib/cl_packon.h
 typedef union _ib_gid
 {
 uint8_t raw[16];
 struct _ib_gid_unicast
 {
 ib_gid_prefix_t prefix;
 ib_net64_t  interface_id;
 
 } PACK_SUFFIX unicast;
 
 struct _ib_gid_multicast
 {
 uint8_t header[2];
 uint8_t raw_group_id[14];
 
 } PACK_SUFFIX multicast;
 
 } PACK_SUFFIX ib_gid_t;
 #include complib/cl_packoff.h
 
 I need to include both files for a user space tool and I'm getting a compile 
 error due to the conflict. Is it not the norm for a user space application to 
 include both files?
 Appreciate any thoughts on this.
 
 Madhu Lakshmanan
 Silverstorm Technologies, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 openib-general@openib.org
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 
 
 




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
IB experts,

I'm playing around with UD QPs over IB, and using the librdma services
to join and send to multicast groups.  I can run seans mckey example
program and it works.  I've written a simply program to echo stdin to a
mcast address and another program to read mcast packets and echo to
stout.  I run this on two hosts connected p2p via IB.  And it works as
expected. 

However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts and dumps
them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets delivered to one of the
applications.  Namely the first one who joins the group seems to get the
mcasts.  I know for UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same
port and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming mcast
packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?   It appears not based on my
tests...


Thanks,


Stevo.




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts and dumps
them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets delivered to one of the
applications.  Namely the first one who joins the group seems to get the
mcasts.  I know for UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same
port and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming mcast
packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?   It appears not based on my
tests...

My testing revealed the same issue, and I was unable to locate the root cause of
the problem.  I was not able to confirm that this configuration had ever been
successfully tested.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 4/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
ralphc This doesn't break compatibility.  uverbs_cmd.c
ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq() allocates a struct
ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp on the stack but only reads the
ralphc first element in.  The structure change isn't really
ralphc needed at all since the INIT_UDATA() macro gets the start
ralphc of driver_data from the struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq.  The
ralphc change to ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp just matches the
ralphc structure change used by libipathverbs to initialize
ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq.response.

Am I missing something?  Think about the case of old libibverbs, new
kernel.  libibverbs allocates a 4-byte response structure and passes
the pointer to that to the kernel.  The kernel allocates an 8-byte
response structure and copies it back to userspace.  And the 4 bytes
after the userspace response structure get zeroed.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Sean This causes compile warnings for me that 'f0' might be used
Sean uninitialized.

Yes, but they're bogus.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Vladimir Currently there is an issue with join to IPoIB multicast
Vladimir group using both ip and ipmaddr utilities.

What's the issue?

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Vladimir The daemon is a perl script ipoib_ha.pl that should get
Vladimir the primary and the backup IPoIB interfaces as a
Vladimir parameters (default values are ib0 as a primary and ib1
Vladimir as a backup).

Seems like a perl script that relies on the ip command is a little
heavyweight.  Why not a standalone program that uses rtnetlink?

Vladimir - Get configuration of the primary interface from its
Vladimir standard place (ifcfg-ibN from
Vladimir /etc/sysconfig/{network,network-scripts}).

This is not standard on all distributions.  It would be better to have
a more flexible method that worked on Debian/Ubuntu, etc.

 - R.

Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:41:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vladimir Sokolovsky's message of Mon, 14 Aug 
2006 20:44:10 +0300)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux)

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Steve However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts
Steve and dumps them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets
Steve delivered to one of the applications.  Namely the first one
Steve who joins the group seems to get the mcasts.  I know for
Steve UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same port
Steve and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming
Steve mcast packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?  It appears
Steve not based on my tests...

This should work -- multicast packets should be replicated to all
attached UD QPs.  There is likely a bug in the librdma multicast support.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Sean My testing revealed the same issue, and I was unable to
Sean locate the root cause of the problem.  I was not able to
Sean confirm that this configuration had ever been successfully
Sean tested.

Are you positive ibv_attach_mcast() is called on all the QPs, and that
the MGID is passed correctly in to all calls?

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t
 
   
  This is a similar but more mainstream example of the conflicts.  A previous
  one was reported last week in terms of CM. Still not sure of the best
  resolution for this.
   
  Do you really need both includes ?
   
 
 The userspace tool shows a textual representation of a HCA port's capability
 mask. So it requires the port capability bit definitions in ib_types.h. And I
 require mad.h for the MAD API.

I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications.
I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps
that want their own layer for portability between stacks.

Wrt issue at hand, using ib_ prefix anywhere is a mistake which will always lead
to conflicts between libraries.  Let us start prefixing types libibumad defines
with umad_, just like ib verbs library prefixes types by ibv_.

For example we have union ibv_gid, so can't mad.h have umad_gid_t?

Hal, what do you say?

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:43 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
 Sean My testing revealed the same issue, and I was unable to
 Sean locate the root cause of the problem.  I was not able to
 Sean confirm that this configuration had ever been successfully
 Sean tested.
 
 Are you positive ibv_attach_mcast() is called on all the QPs, and that
 the MGID is passed correctly in to all calls?
 
  - R.

I'll let you know...






___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:31 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
 However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts and dumps
 them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets delivered to one of the
 applications.  Namely the first one who joins the group seems to get the
 mcasts.  I know for UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same
 port and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming mcast
 packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?   It appears not based on my
 tests...
 
 My testing revealed the same issue, and I was unable to locate the root cause 
 of
 the problem.  I was not able to confirm that this configuration had ever been
 successfully tested.
 
 - Sean

Hmm.  Ok. I'll debug this.  I need to get this working...

Steve.




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work
 
 Sean This causes compile warnings for me that 'f0' might be used
 Sean uninitialized.
 
 Yes, but they're bogus.

Yes, I see lots of such bogus warnings in kernel code too.
And it seems obvious that since compiler isn't smart enough to
figure out the initialization isn't needed, it will generate
unecessary code if we *do* add initilization just to shut it up.

Maybe compile with -Wno-uninitialized?

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Roland Dreier wrote:
 Are you positive ibv_attach_mcast() is called on all the QPs, and that
 the MGID is passed correctly in to all calls?

Yes - ibv_attach_mcast() is being called with the same MLID, MGID by both 
receiving processes.  That doesn't necessarily mean that there's not a bug in 
ib_multicast or the RDMA CM; I just couldn't locate any.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h

I'm not sure I understand what you mean in terms of libibumad. He's including 
libibmad rather than libibumad.
So I suspect you mean changing this (ib_gid_t) to mad_gid_t ?

-- Hal



From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: openib-general@openib.org; Hal Rosenstock
Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



Quoting r. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

  
  This is a similar but more mainstream example of the conflicts.  A previous
  one was reported last week in terms of CM. Still not sure of the best
  resolution for this.
  
  Do you really need both includes ?
  

 The userspace tool shows a textual representation of a HCA port's capability
 mask. So it requires the port capability bit definitions in ib_types.h. And I
 require mad.h for the MAD API.

I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications.
I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps
that want their own layer for portability between stacks.

Wrt issue at hand, using ib_ prefix anywhere is a mistake which will always lead
to conflicts between libraries.  Let us start prefixing types libibumad defines
with umad_, just like ib verbs library prefixes types by ibv_.

For example we have union ibv_gid, so can't mad.h have umad_gid_t?

Hal, what do you say?

--
MST



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon
 
 Vladimir Currently there is an issue with join to IPoIB multicast
 Vladimir group using both ip and ipmaddr utilities.
 
 What's the issue?

I think I heard that ip maddr shows trunkated addresses, and attempt to join
also fails as join is done to he wrong address.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:42 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
 Steve However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts
 Steve and dumps them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets
 Steve delivered to one of the applications.  Namely the first one
 Steve who joins the group seems to get the mcasts.  I know for
 Steve UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same port
 Steve and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming
 Steve mcast packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?  It appears
 Steve not based on my tests...
 
 This should work -- multicast packets should be replicated to all
 attached UD QPs.  There is likely a bug in the librdma multicast support.
 

So is this replicating done in the mthca hca?  

Since one app is getting the mcast packet, can I assume the opensm code
is doing the right thing switch/port wise?

Should the SM get join requests for both applications that join the
group on the same host?  Or only the first one?

Steve.




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: RE: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t
 
 I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h
 
 I'm not sure I understand what you mean in terms of libibumad. He's including 
 libibmad rather than libibumad.
 So I suspect you mean changing this (ib_gid_t) to mad_gid_t ?

Yes, or ib_mad_, or ibmad_. And same for other IB_ and ib_ names there.
We really need to do something about names like ib_attr_t.

rant
I also would like the number of typedefs libibmad exposes reduced - its not like
you'll be able to convert these structs to anything else transparently
without breaking users - anyone sticks their data in there anyway.
But this is more a matter of taste.
/rant

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
 Yes, I see lots of such bogus warnings in kernel code too.
 And it seems obvious that since compiler isn't smart enough to
 figure out the initialization isn't needed, it will generate
 unecessary code if we *do* add initilization just to shut it up.

Can we relocate the setting for op0 and f0 outside of the for-loop (maybe 
before 
we enter the loop)?  I'm really not familiar with this code, but on first 
glance, it looks like these are set based on the send_flag of the first posted 
wr.

This could eliminate the warning, and remove an if statement from executing on 
each iteration.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Steve,
 
IB only replicates once per node (and also not on the incoming port if there 
are any members).
 
The SM tracks join states (full, non member, send only member) for a port. It 
doesn't matter whether the SM gets duplicated join requests for a port. It 
would just indicate that was OK and the node would still only get one packet 
per send from another port in that group. It's up to the HCA to replicate the 
multicast packet to all its QPs which are part of that group.
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Wise
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 4:18 PM
To: Roland Dreier
Cc: openib-general
Subject: Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question



On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:42 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
 Steve However, if I run 2 instances of the app that reads mcasts
 Steve and dumps them to stdout, I only get the mcast packets
 Steve delivered to one of the applications.  Namely the first one
 Steve who joins the group seems to get the mcasts.  I know for
 Steve UDP/IP multicast, all applications bound to the same port
 Steve and joined to the IP mcast addr will get a copy of incoming
 Steve mcast packets.  Is this not true for IB mcast?  It appears
 Steve not based on my tests...

 This should work -- multicast packets should be replicated to all
 attached UD QPs.  There is likely a bug in the librdma multicast support.


So is this replicating done in the mthca hca? 

Since one app is getting the mcast packet, can I assume the opensm code
is doing the right thing switch/port wise?

Should the SM get join requests for both applications that join the
group on the same host?  Or only the first one?

Steve.




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: [RFC] IPoIB high availability daemon
 
 Vladimir The daemon is a perl script ipoib_ha.pl that should get
 Vladimir the primary and the backup IPoIB interfaces as a
 Vladimir parameters (default values are ib0 as a primary and ib1
 Vladimir as a backup).
 
 Seems like a perl script that relies on the ip command is a little
 heavyweight.  Why not a standalone program that uses rtnetlink?

We could go there yet, but there'd be a lot of issues to cover:
note how we need to also set IP addresses, read configuration ...
Further, the only system that might care about this I know about (bproc)
dislikes running daemons on endnodes anyway.

Finally - work is underway for kernel-level solutions
involving bonding etc.

So - let's see a working implementation first, optimize later.
Makes sense?

 Vladimir - Get configuration of the primary interface from its
 Vladimir standard place (ifcfg-ibN from
 Vladimir /etc/sysconfig/{network,network-scripts}).
 
 This is not standard on all distributions.  It would be better to have
 a more flexible method that worked on Debian/Ubuntu, etc.

Yea, but just adding our own configuration would mean configuration
overhead for the administrator, lack of convenient tools to do it ...
Using standard interfaces is good.  An idea how to solve this?



-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread mlakshmanan
 I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications.
 I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps
 that want their own layer for portability between stacks.
  
  I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h

Does that imply that the definitions in iba/ib_types.h are not expected to be 
required or used 
by user-space applications other than those categories mentioned above? If 
iba/ib_types.h is 
only a legacy header, are the definitions also present in another header file?

Madhu


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Steve Wise wrote:
 So is this replicating done in the mthca hca?  

As just an FYI, I didn't see anything wrong in the mthca driver either when I 
was looking at this problem.

 Since one app is getting the mcast packet, can I assume the opensm code
 is doing the right thing switch/port wise?

That seems like a fairly safe assumption.

 Should the SM get join requests for both applications that join the
 group on the same host?  Or only the first one?

Only the first join request should make it to the SA.  The second join request 
is fulfilled by ib_multicast.  This is what makes ib_multicast suspect.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 4/7] IB/ipath - performance improvements via mmap of queues

2006-08-14 Thread Ralph Campbell
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:37 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
 ralphc This doesn't break compatibility.  uverbs_cmd.c
 ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq() allocates a struct
 ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp on the stack but only reads the
 ralphc first element in.  The structure change isn't really
 ralphc needed at all since the INIT_UDATA() macro gets the start
 ralphc of driver_data from the struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq.  The
 ralphc change to ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp just matches the
 ralphc structure change used by libipathverbs to initialize
 ralphc ib_uverbs_resize_cq.response.
 
 Am I missing something?  Think about the case of old libibverbs, new
 kernel.  libibverbs allocates a 4-byte response structure and passes
 the pointer to that to the kernel.  The kernel allocates an 8-byte
 response structure and copies it back to userspace.  And the 4 bytes
 after the userspace response structure get zeroed.
 
  - R.

No, I was missing something :-)
You are correct. The structure change was needed
to get the alignment correct for returning a u64
after the struct ib_uverbs_resize_cq_resp.
I can avoid the incompatibility a number of ways:
1) change ib_uverbs_resize_cq() to only copyout resp.cqe.
2) change ib_ipath to ALIGN the udata-outbuf address.
3) define two resp structures, check the version, copyout the
   right one.
Seems like #1 is the simplest to me.


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Yes, or ib_mad_, or ibmad_. And same for other IB_ and ib_ names there.
We really need to do something about names like ib_attr_t.

I like to move away from each library re-defining common IB data types.
Something like ibv_gid should be picked up from libibverbs.

IMO, the core of the problem is that opensm include files carry too many legacy
typedefs.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 This could eliminate the warning, and remove an if statement from executing 
 on 
 each iteration.

We still need to test size0 to set size0 = size.
So we just reuse the extra branch, and I agree with Roland
this way code is clearer.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
To answer your questions:
 
I'm not totally sure about your application but it seems to me to fall in the 
category being discussed.
 
Not all of the definitions in ib_types.h are elsewhere.
 
I am working on a patch to get you past this issue.
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 4:35 PM
To: Hal Rosenstock; Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



 I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications.
 I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps
 that want their own layer for portability between stacks.
 
  I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h

Does that imply that the definitions in iba/ib_types.h are not expected to be 
required or used
by user-space applications other than those categories mentioned above? If 
iba/ib_types.h is
only a legacy header, are the definitions also present in another header file?

Madhu




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] sanity check on datapath

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Roland, do we really need code like

if (wr-opcode = sizeof mthca_opcode / sizeof mthca_opcode[0])
{
ret = -1;
*bad_wr = wr;
goto out;
}

in mthca on data path? Should this be put within ifdef DEBUG or something?

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
 We still need to test size0 to set size0 = size.
 So we just reuse the extra branch, and I agree with Roland
 this way code is clearer.

You're right; I missed where size0 was used below the loop.

Then I think we can also do without initializing op0 = 0, and we can eliminate 
the size0 initialization by changing if (!size0) to if (!nreq).

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Lakshmanan, Madhu
I concur with your categorization of the application I mentioned. I was
curious about the way going forward, as to whether anyone anticipated
this to be a more commonly recurring issue. 

Thanks in advance for the patch.

-- Madhu 

-Original Message-
From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 4:39 PM
To: Lakshmanan, Madhu; Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: RE: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

To answer your questions:
 
I'm not totally sure about your application but it seems to me to fall
in the category being discussed.
 
Not all of the definitions in ib_types.h are elsewhere.
 
I am working on a patch to get you past this issue.
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 4:35 PM
To: Hal Rosenstock; Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



 I don't think the way forward is using iba/ in all applications.
 I see it mostly as a legacy header for opensm and related apps
 that want their own layer for portability between stacks.
 
  I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h

Does that imply that the definitions in iba/ib_types.h are not expected
to be required or used
by user-space applications other than those categories mentioned above?
If iba/ib_types.h is
only a legacy header, are the definitions also present in another header
file?

Madhu




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 13:33 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
 Steve Wise wrote:
  So is this replicating done in the mthca hca?  
 
 As just an FYI, I didn't see anything wrong in the mthca driver either when I 
 was looking at this problem.
 

Ok.  I added printks in the mcast attach/detach and they're firing as
expected:

vic18:/home/swise/zip # dmesg
mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 406 gid ff124001:000a0aff lid c003
mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 407 gid ff124001:000a0aff lid c003
mthca_multicast_detach qp_num 406 gid ff124001:000a0aff lid c003
mthca_multicast_detach qp_num 407 gid ff124001:000a0aff lid c003


  Should the SM get join requests for both applications that join the
  group on the same host?  Or only the first one?
 
 Only the first join request should make it to the SA.  The second join 
 request 
 is fulfilled by ib_multicast.  This is what makes ib_multicast suspect.


I'll look into this module...

Thanks,

Stevo.



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: RE: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t
 
 Yes, or ib_mad_, or ibmad_. And same for other IB_ and ib_ names there.
 We really need to do something about names like ib_attr_t.
 
 I like to move away from each library re-defining common IB data types.

There are not that many common IB types. verbs and management for example
are more or less isolated. CM users mostly don't care about SMPs. etc.
What's common? GID? It does not seem worth it for a free format 16 byte network
endianness type.

I don't necessary see a problem with what we have.  Such defines mirror IB spec
so are static and there is no overhead maintaining them.  And this simplifies
dependencies no end - think about testing tens of dependent libraries
for breakage just 'cause you removed an used line in this
included by everyone header.

 Something like ibv_gid should be picked up from libibverbs.

Hmm. User might not have uverbs even loaded, so adding verbs as a dependency
to e.g. SM seems like a bad idea.

 IMO, the core of the problem is that opensm include files carry too many 
 legacy
 typedefs.

opensm really tries to be stack-agnostic, so it does need its own
layer for things.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Eitan Zahavi
Hi Sean,

If we had all the IBTA related defines and structs in a well defined and
tracked location there was no reason for OpenSM to have this header.
To my best recollection I could not get any agreement to such common
IBTA  specifications file.

Can I assume you are willing to have such common set of header files???
I would propose having a set of files (one common and one for each
class) under include/infiniband/iba 

 
 I like to move away from each library re-defining common IB data
types.
 Something like ibv_gid should be picked up from libibverbs.
 
 IMO, the core of the problem is that opensm include files carry too
many
 legacy typedefs.
 
 - Sean
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 openib-general@openib.org
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work
 
 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
  We still need to test size0 to set size0 = size.
  So we just reuse the extra branch, and I agree with Roland
  this way code is clearer.
 
 You're right; I missed where size0 was used below the loop.
 
 Then I think we can also do without initializing op0 = 0, and we can 
 eliminate 
 the size0 initialization by changing if (!size0) to if (!nreq).
 
 - Sean
 

There's the ee_nds line above that tests size0 and should be changed
then as well.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
  
  Only the first join request should make it to the SA.  The second join 
  request 
  is fulfilled by ib_multicast.  This is what makes ib_multicast suspect.
 
 
 I'll look into this module...
 

ib_multicast takes care of sending the join/leave info to the SA, right?
It keeps track of _when_ to leave, for instance.  So since opensm -is-
getting the join and setting up the group, and the mcast packet is being
passed to the first member who joined, then I don't think ib_multicast
can mess up the subsequent members, can it?  

I confirmed that mthca was called to attach both qps to the mgid/mlid,
so this makes me think ib_multicast worked ok. 

I'm new to IB mcast, so I'm learning, but it seems like the mthca
firmware maybe isn't doing the right thing here.  

Any suggestions on how to further debug this? 

BTW my HCAs are at the latest firmware.  I just had them upgraded.

Steve.









___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Eitan Zahavi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 If we had all the IBTA related defines and structs in a well defined and 
 tracked location there was no reason for OpenSM to have this header.

Define well defined :)

Seriously, won't opensm need a portability layer to be stack agnostic anyway?

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
 There are not that many common IB types. verbs and management for example
 are more or less isolated. CM users mostly don't care about SMPs. etc.
 What's common? GID? It does not seem worth it for a free format 16 byte 
 network
 endianness type.

Verbs and management are not isolated.  Establishing a connection, joining a 
multicast group, or acquiring a path record are essential for actually using 
verbs correctly.

 I don't necessary see a problem with what we have.  Such defines mirror IB 
 spec
 so are static and there is no overhead maintaining them.  And this simplifies
 dependencies no end - think about testing tens of dependent libraries
 for breakage just 'cause you removed an used line in this
 included by everyone header.

Having umad_gid, ibv_gid, ibv_sa_gid, mad_gid, cm_gid, 
some_other_random_library_gid is goofy.  (Sorry, I'm completely ranting now.)

 Hmm. User might not have uverbs even loaded, so adding verbs as a dependency
 to e.g. SM seems like a bad idea.

We only need the include file, not the library.

 opensm really tries to be stack-agnostic, so it does need its own
 layer for things.

Then those things should be completely internal to opensm.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] mthca: make IB_SEND_FENCE work

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Michael Maybe compile with -Wno-uninitialized?

This is discussed periodically on lkml.

The problem with -Wno-uninitialized is that it shuts up the good is
used uninitialized warnings also (in addition to the may be used
warnings, which are often bogus).

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Eitan Zahavi
OpenSM ib_types.h had nothing to do with stack implementation.
It carries the constants and structures (MAD formats) defined in IBTA
specification 1.2 (+ errata).

Any application that needs to send MADs and decode their status etc will
need to use similar headers.

ib_gid_t is just another example for a struct defined by IBTA. It has
nothing to do with specific stack implementation.

Eitan Zahavi
Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect
Mellanox Technologies LTD
Tel:+972-4-9097208
Fax:+972-4-9593245
P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL


 -Original Message-
 From: Michael S. Tsirkin
 Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:17 AM
 To: Eitan Zahavi
 Cc: Sean Hefty; Hal Rosenstock; openib-general@openib.org
 Subject: Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t
 
 Quoting r. Eitan Zahavi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  If we had all the IBTA related defines and structs in a well defined
and
 tracked location there was no reason for OpenSM to have this header.
 
 Define well defined :)
 
 Seriously, won't opensm need a portability layer to be stack agnostic
anyway?
 
 --
 MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Steve So is this replicating done in the mthca hca?

Yes, it should be.  There may be a bug in the mthca kernel multicast
code for handling multiple QPs attached to the same group.

Steve Since one app is getting the mcast packet, can I assume the
Steve opensm code is doing the right thing switch/port wise?

Yep.

Steve Should the SM get join requests for both applications that
Steve join the group on the same host?  Or only the first one?

No there should only be one join request for a given port.

 - R.


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] sanity check on datapath

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Michael if (wr-opcode = sizeof mthca_opcode / sizeof mthca_opcode[0])
Michael {
Michaelret = -1;
Michael*bad_wr = wr;
Michaelgoto out;
Michael }

Michael in mthca on data path? Should this be put within ifdef
Michael DEBUG or something?

Probably not needed -- I guess we can trust what the consumer gives
us.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Steve Wise wrote:
 ib_multicast takes care of sending the join/leave info to the SA, right?
 It keeps track of _when_ to leave, for instance.  So since opensm -is-
 getting the join and setting up the group, and the mcast packet is being
 passed to the first member who joined, then I don't think ib_multicast
 can mess up the subsequent members, can it?  

It theory, it shouldn't mess up subsequent members.  While the first join is 
active, subsequent join / leave requests to that same group should be queued. 
After the first join completes, subsequent joins should get a copy of the 
MCMemberRecord that was returned by the SA.

(This is a slight simplification, with the actual operation determined by the 
type of join operation that occurs.  But for the RDMA CM, this is what should 
happen.)

 I'm new to IB mcast, so I'm learning, but it seems like the mthca
 firmware maybe isn't doing the right thing here.  

This was my suspicion, but I couldn't be certain.  It would help if anyone can 
say that they've successfully tested this sort of multicast configuration.  
I.e. 
two QPs from the same HCA in the same group.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] (no subject)

2006-08-14 Thread Ishai Rabinovitz



Hi 
Roland,

In order to support 
High-Availability in OFED 1.1, we need more functionality to the srp 
daemon.
Based on your code I 
implemented a new srp daemon (I listed its new features below) . 

I put 
the code in https://openib.org/svn/trunk/contrib/mellanox/gen2/src/userspace/srptools/srp_daemon
and I'm in an initialtesting stage (there are some known 
bugs).
Since I think that 
people may still want to use your original ibsrpdm, I think we should keep your 
version and start a new tool from my code. What do you 
think?

Ishai


The new tool main 
features:

 
1) Register to Traps 64 and 144.
 2) Can ask 
ib_srp toconnect tothe targets it finds.
 
3) Can check if the target is already connectedby ib_srp from the same 
port.
 
4) Can perform rescan of the fabric every X seconds.
 
5) Identify SA changes and other events and act accordingly.
 
6) Can get an hca name and a port number as input (not only a umad 
device).

 
7) Uses the umad package.
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Sean,
 
I think it was agreed a long time ago on OpenIB to have duplicated definitions 
for some of the ib_xxx things. The specific issue here is that the one in the 
gen2 user libraries/verbs is different from the one which OpenSM uses. If they 
both were the same, this would work, right ?
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sean Hefty
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 5:15 PM
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
 There are not that many common IB types. verbs and management for example
 are more or less isolated. CM users mostly don't care about SMPs. etc.
 What's common? GID? It does not seem worth it for a free format 16 byte 
 network
 endianness type.

Verbs and management are not isolated.  Establishing a connection, joining a
multicast group, or acquiring a path record are essential for actually using
verbs correctly.

 I don't necessary see a problem with what we have.  Such defines mirror IB 
 spec
 so are static and there is no overhead maintaining them.  And this simplifies
 dependencies no end - think about testing tens of dependent libraries
 for breakage just 'cause you removed an used line in this
 included by everyone header.

Having umad_gid, ibv_gid, ibv_sa_gid, mad_gid, cm_gid,
some_other_random_library_gid is goofy.  (Sorry, I'm completely ranting now.)

 Hmm. User might not have uverbs even loaded, so adding verbs as a dependency
 to e.g. SM seems like a bad idea.

We only need the include file, not the library.

 opensm really tries to be stack-agnostic, so it does need its own
 layer for things.

Then those things should be completely internal to opensm.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



[openib-general] A new version for srp daemon

2006-08-14 Thread Ishai Rabinovitz



Adding 
a subject


From: Ishai Rabinovitz Sent: Tuesday, 
August 15, 2006 12:32 AMTo: 'Roland Dreier'Cc: 
'openib-general@openib.org'; Tziporet KorenSubject: 


Hi 
Roland,

In order to support 
High-Availability in OFED 1.1, we need more functionality to the srp 
daemon.
Based on your code I 
implemented a new srp daemon (I listed its new features below) . 

I put the code in https://openib.org/svn/trunk/contrib/mellanox/gen2/src/userspace/srptools/srp_daemon
and I'm in an initialtesting stage (there are some known 
bugs).
Since I think that 
people may still want to use your original ibsrpdm, I think we should keep your 
version and start a new tool from my code. What do you 
think?

Ishai


The new tool main 
features:

 
1) Register to Traps 64 and 144.
 2) Can ask 
ib_srp toconnect tothe targets it finds.
 
3) Can check if the target is already connectedby ib_srp from the same 
port.
 
4) Can perform rescan of the fabric every X seconds.
 
5) Identify SA changes and other events and act accordingly.
 
6) Can get an hca name and a port number as input (not only a umad 
device).

 
7) Uses the umad package.
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
This is not the main issue (the lack of replication is) but I don't think a 
subsequent join from the same port does any harm but ib_multicast shouldn't be 
doing this. It would matter in terms of the leave though.
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Roland Dreier
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 5:24 PM
To: Steve Wise
Cc: openib-general
Subject: Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question



Steve So is this replicating done in the mthca hca?

Yes, it should be.  There may be a bug in the mthca kernel multicast
code for handling multiple QPs attached to the same group.

Steve Since one app is getting the mcast packet, can I assume the
Steve opensm code is doing the right thing switch/port wise?

Yep.

Steve Should the SM get join requests for both applications that
Steve join the group on the same host?  Or only the first one?

No there should only be one join request for a given port.

 - R.


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 00:38 +0300, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
 This is not the main issue (the lack of replication is) but I don't
 think a subsequent join from the same port does any harm but
 ib_multicast shouldn't be doing this. It would matter in terms of the
 leave though.
  

The osm logs seem to show only one join_mgrp request, when the first app
joins, and one leave_mgrp when the 2nd app exits.

So I  think the interaction with OSM is okeydokey.

Steve.




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Eitan Zahavi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 ib_gid_t is just another example for a struct defined by IBTA.

IBTA only defines a wire protocol. It's often wrong for applications
work in terms of raw packets- we should have libraries to encapsulate
typical usage.

While using on-the-wire values for library API sometimes makes sense,
this is not necessarily always the right way and e.g. efficiency concerns
might dictate otherwise.

 It has nothing to do with specific stack implementation.

The name is stack specific.  Whether it's best as an array or a union or a
struct is specific for an app.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED 1.1-rc1 is available

2006-08-14 Thread Ira Weiny
Why is the OFED 1.1-rc1 source tar ball missing files when compared with the 
1.1 branch?

Of specific question is the absence of autogen.sh in libibverbs.

Ira

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:14:10 +0300
Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hal Rosenstock wrote:
  Target release date: 12-Sep 
 
  Intermediate milestones:
  1. Create 1.1 branch of user level: 27-Jul - done
  2. RC1: 8-Aug - done
  3. Feature freeze (RC2): 17-Aug
  
 
  What is the start build date for RC2 ? When do developers need to have
  their code in by to make RC2 ?

 We will start on Tue 15-Aug. Is this OK with you?
   

  4. Code freeze (rc-x): 6-Sep
  
 
  Is this 1 or 2 RCs beyond RC2 in order to make this ?
 

 I hope one but I guess it will be two more RCs.
 
 Tziporet
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 openib-general@openib.org
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] IB/srp: add port/device attributes

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
Michael Hi, Roland!  There does not, at the moment, seem to exist
Michael a way to find out which HCA port the specific SRP host is
Michael connected through.

Seems OK -- although I wonder about the names srp_port and
srp_device.  I think ib_port and ib_device would make more sense
(or perhaps local_ib_port and local_ib_device although I don't
think that's really required).

Michael While not really a bugfix, maybe the following is small
Michael enough for 2.6.18?  We will use it in srptools that will
Michael ship with OFED.

No, I think this is purely a new feature and I'll queue it for 2.6.19.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Steve Wise
I added some debug printks in mthca_multicast_attach().

Roland, does this look ok to you? It seems correct to me:

# dmesg
mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 406 gid ff124001:000a0a0a lid c003
mthca_multicast_attach line 167 - found mgm, hash a20, prev , index a20
mthca_multicast_attach line 197 - updated mgm gid: mgm gid 
ff124001:000a0a0a
mthca_multicast_attach line 219 - writing mgm: mgm-qp[0] 8406 (BE)
mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 407 gid ff124001:000a0a0a lid c003
mthca_multicast_attach line 167 - found mgm, hash a20, prev , index a20
mthca_multicast_attach line 197 - updated mgm gid: mgm gid 
ff124001:000a0a0a
mthca_multicast_attach line 219 - writing mgm: mgm-qp[1] 8407 (BE)



On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 14:30 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
 Steve Wise wrote:
  ib_multicast takes care of sending the join/leave info to the SA, right?
  It keeps track of _when_ to leave, for instance.  So since opensm -is-
  getting the join and setting up the group, and the mcast packet is being
  passed to the first member who joined, then I don't think ib_multicast
  can mess up the subsequent members, can it?  
 
 It theory, it shouldn't mess up subsequent members.  While the first join is 
 active, subsequent join / leave requests to that same group should be queued. 
 After the first join completes, subsequent joins should get a copy of the 
 MCMemberRecord that was returned by the SA.
 
 (This is a slight simplification, with the actual operation determined by the 
 type of join operation that occurs.  But for the RDMA CM, this is what should 
 happen.)
 
  I'm new to IB mcast, so I'm learning, but it seems like the mthca
  firmware maybe isn't doing the right thing here.  
 
 This was my suspicion, but I couldn't be certain.  It would help if anyone 
 can 
 say that they've successfully tested this sort of multicast configuration.  
 I.e. 
 two QPs from the same HCA in the same group.
 
 - SeanR


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Do you have a proposal for how to get to where you think this needs to be ? 
Have you looked at this ?
 
I think you are proposing OpenSM include verbs.h. I think that's only part of 
what would need to be done (and has some other side effects).
 
-- Hal



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sean Hefty
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 5:15 PM
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
 There are not that many common IB types. verbs and management for example
 are more or less isolated. CM users mostly don't care about SMPs. etc.
 What's common? GID? It does not seem worth it for a free format 16 byte 
 network
 endianness type.

Verbs and management are not isolated.  Establishing a connection, joining a
multicast group, or acquiring a path record are essential for actually using
verbs correctly.

 I don't necessary see a problem with what we have.  Such defines mirror IB 
 spec
 so are static and there is no overhead maintaining them.  And this simplifies
 dependencies no end - think about testing tens of dependent libraries
 for breakage just 'cause you removed an used line in this
 included by everyone header.

Having umad_gid, ibv_gid, ibv_sa_gid, mad_gid, cm_gid,
some_other_random_library_gid is goofy.  (Sorry, I'm completely ranting now.)

 Hmm. User might not have uverbs even loaded, so adding verbs as a dependency
 to e.g. SM seems like a bad idea.

We only need the include file, not the library.

 opensm really tries to be stack-agnostic, so it does need its own
 layer for things.

Then those things should be completely internal to opensm.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Sean Hefty
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
 Do you have a proposal for how to get to where you think this needs to be ?
 Have you looked at this ?

I think defining include files similar to what we have for the kernel make 
sense.

The problem is more complex than what definitions an application gets from 
which 
include file.  The data in these structures are also exchanged between 
userspace 
and the kernel.  For example, there's an sa.h file as part of libibverbs, since 
it marshals parameters from kernel to userspace.  Wire structure definitions 
ended up working well for me for user to kernel transitions.

 I think you are proposing OpenSM include verbs.h. I think that's only part of
 what would need to be done (and has some other side effects).

I would also have definitions in a libibsa and libibcm.  The relevant CM 
definitions are there.  (I don't see a need to expose most of the CM wire 
definition outside of the kernel.)  I can't think of a reason why OpenSM would 
need any CM definitions, so I would remove those from from any OpenSM include 
files.

SA attribute structures are also needed by libibsa, but since it seems overkill 
to include OpenSM on all nodes, I would define the SA attribute structures as 
part of libibsa, and let OpenSM use its include files.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t

2006-08-14 Thread Hal Rosenstock
I agree that SM (OpenSM) doesn't need CM definitions. ib_types.h was for 
convenience of other apps and having all the definitions in one place.  It 
includes other definitions for other classes also unused by OpenSM.
 
Once libibsa is present and supports (at least) all the SA attributes that 
OpenSM does, we could then talk about moving this over. However, at that point, 
things will be quite different between Linux and Windows versions of OpenSM 
unless Windows adopted more of what going on in Linux.
 
-- Hal



From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 7:44 PM
To: Hal Rosenstock
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin; openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Conflicting typedefs for ib_gid_t



Hal Rosenstock wrote:
 Do you have a proposal for how to get to where you think this needs to be ?
 Have you looked at this ?

I think defining include files similar to what we have for the kernel make 
sense.

The problem is more complex than what definitions an application gets from which
include file.  The data in these structures are also exchanged between userspace
and the kernel.  For example, there's an sa.h file as part of libibverbs, since
it marshals parameters from kernel to userspace.  Wire structure definitions
ended up working well for me for user to kernel transitions.

 I think you are proposing OpenSM include verbs.h. I think that's only part of
 what would need to be done (and has some other side effects).

I would also have definitions in a libibsa and libibcm.  The relevant CM
definitions are there.  (I don't see a need to expose most of the CM wire
definition outside of the kernel.)  I can't think of a reason why OpenSM would
need any CM definitions, so I would remove those from from any OpenSM include 
files.

SA attribute structures are also needed by libibsa, but since it seems overkill
to include OpenSM on all nodes, I would define the SA attribute structures as
part of libibsa, and let OpenSM use its include files.

- Sean



___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] IB mcast question

2006-08-14 Thread Roland Dreier
  I added some debug printks in mthca_multicast_attach().
  
  Roland, does this look ok to you? It seems correct to me:
  
  # dmesg
  mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 406 gid ff124001:000a0a0a lid 
  c003
  mthca_multicast_attach line 167 - found mgm, hash a20, prev , index 
  a20
  mthca_multicast_attach line 197 - updated mgm gid: mgm gid 
  ff124001:000a0a0a
  mthca_multicast_attach line 219 - writing mgm: mgm-qp[0] 8406 (BE)
  mthca_multicast_attach qp_num 407 gid ff124001:000a0a0a lid 
  c003
  mthca_multicast_attach line 167 - found mgm, hash a20, prev , index 
  a20
  mthca_multicast_attach line 197 - updated mgm gid: mgm gid 
  ff124001:000a0a0a
  mthca_multicast_attach line 219 - writing mgm: mgm-qp[1] 8407 (BE)

You're two steps ahead.  Yeah, that looks fine to me.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] IB/srp: add port/device attributes

2006-08-14 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: add port/device attributes
 
 Michael Hi, Roland!  There does not, at the moment, seem to exist
 Michael a way to find out which HCA port the specific SRP host is
 Michael connected through.
 
 Seems OK -- although I wonder about the names srp_port and
 srp_device.  I think ib_port and ib_device would make more sense
 (or perhaps local_ib_port and local_ib_device although I don't
 think that's really required).

OK. Want a patch like that or will you fix it up?

 Michael While not really a bugfix, maybe the following is small
 Michael enough for 2.6.18?  We will use it in srptools that will
 Michael ship with OFED.
 
 No, I think this is purely a new feature and I'll queue it for 2.6.19.
 

Fair enough.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general