Re: [openib-general] [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support

2007-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> 
> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 14:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees
> > > > for connected QPs.
> > > 
> > > Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ?
> > 
> > It's not the question of "proper" handling - this patch is an enhancement,
> > not really a bug fix. I think mthca already does the best it can with UD 
> > AVs.
> 
> So there are no scheduling parameters or anything else that needs
> tweaking in mthca in terms of the SL for UD AVs ? Just want to be sure.

Not that I know.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 14:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> > 
> > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees
> > > for connected QPs.
> > 
> > Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ?
> 
> It's not the question of "proper" handling - this patch is an enhancement,
> not really a bug fix. I think mthca already does the best it can with UD AVs.

So there are no scheduling parameters or anything else that needs
tweaking in mthca in terms of the SL for UD AVs ? Just want to be sure.

-- Hal


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support

2007-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support
> 
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees
> > for connected QPs.
> 
> Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ?

It's not the question of "proper" handling - this patch is an enhancement,
not really a bug fix. I think mthca already does the best it can with UD AVs.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH RFC 4 of 5] IB/mthca: QoS support

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees
> for connected QPs.

Is UD already handled properly in terms of mthca ?

-- Hal

> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_qp.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_qp.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_qp.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
>  #include "mthca_memfree.h"
>  #include "mthca_wqe.h"
>  
> +static int mthca_qos_support = 0;
> +module_param_named(qos_support, mthca_qos_support, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(qos_support, "Enable QoS support if > 0");
> +
>  enum {
>   MTHCA_MAX_DIRECT_QP_SIZE = 4 * PAGE_SIZE,
>   MTHCA_ACK_REQ_FREQ   = 10,
> @@ -694,6 +698,19 @@ int mthca_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, 
>   goto out_mailbox;
>  
>   qp_param->opt_param_mask |= 
> cpu_to_be32(MTHCA_QP_OPTPAR_PRIMARY_ADDR_PATH);
> + if (mthca_qos_support) {
> + u8 sl = attr->ah_attr.sl;
> + u8 sched_queue = (sl & 0x8) | (sl & (~(sl >> 1)) & 0x4) 
> |
> + ((sl >> 1) & (sl >> 2) & 0x2) | ((sl >> 1) & 
> 0x1);
> +
> + if (mthca_is_memfree(dev)) {
> + qp_context->rlkey_arbel_sched_queue |= 
> sched_queue;
> + } else {
> + qp_context->tavor_sched_queue |= sched_queue;
> + }
> + qp_param->opt_param_mask |=
> + cpu_to_be32(MTHCA_QP_OPTPAR_SCHED_QUEUE);
> + }
>   }
>  
>   if (attr_mask & IB_QP_TIMEOUT) {
> 


___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general