Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
On 2013-11-08 02:38, tyrrell t wrote: Also the wiki says sun studio x86 for open_indiana is not 'publicly available', but I was able to find it on the oracle site. Is it still actively maintained or is the oi community attitude generally 'default to the oracle site' ? For historic reasons (as an ex-Sun OS) OI depends on a particular build of the Sun Studio. Oracle no longer provides it, and those who have it "stashed" may use it under Sun licensing - but not redistribute. So generally illumos is trying to not depend on it; in particular, the non-C++ parts (i.e. the illumos kernel) are compilable with GCC - also specially tweaked versions (gcc-4.4.4-il) that are provided as part of OpenIndiana for example. HTH, //Jim ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
On 11/ 7/13 05:40 PM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote: you're absolutely right regarding advanced features. But we're talking about a beginner's perspective. And there I think most things are still close enough in most parts, no? The change to network configuration is probably the biggest gotcha for beginners - that's definitely one you want to use the 2010.11 docs, not the S11.0 docs. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
My goodness, there is no such thing as stupid beginner's questions! The only stupidity I can find for beginners is not to ask questions! So just go ahead asking. And from a certain point you will be the one to answer another beginner's questions. ;-) Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
Alan, you're absolutely right regarding advanced features. But we're talking about a beginner's perspective. And there I think most things are still close enough in most parts, no? Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
thanks ; ) I'll see if I can get it, but I don't have an amazon account right now. Could you comment on how documentation is generally available? Is it soley in oracle blogs ? Do most people use the mailing list? Is it ok to generally use this list for what basically amounts to 'stupid beginner questions'? http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/documentation/solaris-10-192992.html I was hoping this would be 'comprehensive enough' Also the wiki says sun studio x86 for open_indiana is not 'publicly available', but I was able to find it on the oracle site. Is it still actively maintained or is the oi community attitude generally 'default to the oracle site' ? > From: stefan.mueller-wil...@acando.de > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:21:51 + > Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a > handbook? > > Hi Tyrrell, > > one of the best handbooks I've ever found is > http://www.amazon.com/OpenSolaris-Bible-Nicholas-A-Solter/dp/0470385480 . > .Regarding virtualization, there is the container guide > (https://blogs.oracle.com/solarium/entry/new_version_container_guide_3) > Apart from that, OI is (still) nearly identical to Solaris, so it is an ideal > playground if you need to migrate.. And so there is this list which has quite > a few extremely helpful and friendly subscribers. ;-) > > Cheers > Stefan > > > Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: > Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
In regard to: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a...: I have to migrate to solaris and I'm really set in my linux ways. containers? Very light-weight OS virtualization. pools? If you combined MD + LVM + ext4 into one thing, it would be heading in the direction of zfs. The Linux "btrfs" is heavily influenced by zfs. I have no idea what any of this is, is there a handbook for solaris? ( is openindiana fundementally different from solaris in terms of things in guides for solaris working under oi? ) There's some divergence, but for the most part all of the Oracle Solaris 11 documentation is going to be very relevant, especially for core functionality like Zones, dtrace, ZFS, IPS, etc. Tim -- Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice) Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax) North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
On 11/ 7/13 05:21 PM, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote: OI is (still) nearly identical to Solaris To Solaris 11 Express 2010.11 (snv_151 - a beta/preview release before S11 came out) - Solaris has made a few changes in Solaris 11.0 & Solaris 11.1 that aren't in OI, like grub2, UEFI boot, ZFS crypto, and NWAM 1.0, while OI has a few that Solaris 11 doesn't, like KVM. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
Hi Tyrrell, one of the best handbooks I've ever found is http://www.amazon.com/OpenSolaris-Bible-Nicholas-A-Solter/dp/0470385480 . .Regarding virtualization, there is the container guide (https://blogs.oracle.com/solarium/entry/new_version_container_guide_3) Apart from that, OI is (still) nearly identical to Solaris, so it is an ideal playground if you need to migrate.. And so there is this list which has quite a few extremely helpful and friendly subscribers. ;-) Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] i find the oi wiki lacking; is there a handbook?
I have to migrate to solaris and I'm really set in my linux ways. containers? pools? I have no idea what any of this is, is there a handbook for solaris? ( is openindiana fundementally different from solaris in terms of things in guides for solaris working under oi? ) Where would you direct someone so that they may get a firm grasp on solaris/OI ? ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
FYI: we ended up updating the ILOM and that solved the problem. Strange, but thanks for your support, anyway! Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
ok, so the resilvered just finished, I then did a remove that didn't work. The detach however worked perfectly. Thank you very much Le 07/11/2013 10:51, Peter Tribble a écrit : On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Laurent Blume wrote: On 07/11/13 10:21, Peter Tribble wrote: No, detach is the appropriate option here. It's a little whacky, but you're operating on the replacing vdev which is essentially a mirror and you want to detach one component of it. Really? And that works using nas as the pool name? Or do you tell it to use that replacing vdev? I've not seen that use so far. When replacing a disk that has been removed already, I don't see how that's a mirror, since the new disk must be reconstructed from the rest of the raidz, not from the removed disk. I find it confusing as hell, and redundant with the use of replace. Yes, really. And on the pool, it will find the appropriate device and vdev on its own. Normally, you don't need to do this, because zfs should detach the replaced drive without intervention as soon as the resilver finishes. But often it doesn't, and you have to manually detach the replaced drive. Note that I said essentially a mirror - it should contain identical data to the old drive (modulo the fact that data has been modified since), it's not going to be a real mirror obviously. It's not redundant with replace, because replace initiates a resilver. As for remove vs detach, the way I think about this is that remove works at the pool level, whereas detach works at the vdev level, although given that they do work at different layers I can't really see why they need to have different names. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox on OI 151a8 ???
Thanks. I thought it odd that the x64 was so much smaller. But saw no explanation. I'm sure I'd have figured it out, but I have enough rabbit holes to play in as it is. On Thu, 11/7/13, Jonathan Adams wrote: Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox on OI 151a8 ??? To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 3:50 AM I generally stick to the latest ESR version, which is currently 24: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ I have installed Java JDK 1.7u45 and it's working for me: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html make sure you download the 32bit _and_ the 64bit jadams@jadlaptop:~/Downloads$ more install-jdk.sh #!/bin/bash DIRNAME=$(which $0) DIRNAME=$(dirname $DIRNAME) DIRNAME=$(cd $DIRNAME ; pwd) cd /usr/jdk/instances /usr/sfw/bin/gtar zxvf $DIRNAME/jdk-7u45-solaris-i586.tar.gz /usr/sfw/bin/gtar zxvf $DIRNAME/jdk-7u45-solaris-x64.tar.gz cd .. ln -s instances/jdk1.7.0_45 rm latest ln -s jdk1.7.0_45 latest cd .. if [ -d java ] ; then mv java java.old ln -s jdk/latest java fi if [ ! -h /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/libnpjp2.so ] ; then mkdir -p /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/ cd /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/ ln -s /usr/java/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so fi echo DONE! On 7 November 2013 00:29, John D Groenveld wrote: > In message <527ac156.3060...@2e-systems.com>, Predrag Zecevic writes: > >i am using FF24 > >( > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/24.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/f= > >irefox-24.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2) > > 25.0 addresses some security issue: > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/25.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ > > > > The Java Applet Test runs with Oracle JRE 7u45: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html > > > http://www.java.com/en/download/testjava.jsp> > > John > groenv...@acm.org > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
Logging into the SP via SSH gives a different error message: "Warning: Product identification data missing. System may not function properly. Service must update product identification data. Contact Service immediately." ... and then the previous message again: "Unrecognized Chassis: This module is installed in an unknown or unsupported chasis. You must upgrade the firmware to a newer version that supports this chasiss." Just to repeat: we haven't changed anything on the machine apart from moving the SAS plugs from PCIe HBA to onboard SAS sockets and back to PCIe HBA again. Absolutely strange! Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
Do you have access to MOS (My Oracle Support) If not call the Oracle Support Hotline +49 0180.2000.170 provide the Serial Number and if you are aware of your Oracle Support Contract Support Number, provide this too. Cheers and Good luck. Bernd Helber ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
The chassis id is coded in a board located behind the front pannel. Perhaps something disconnected ? Am 07.11.13 schrieb Stefan Müller-Wilken : > Hi Bernd, > > thanks for your suggestions. Our local dealer's tech supporter is not > available today and I'd be happy not to have to wait till tomorrow if that's > possible. Nothing I can do prior to opening a support case? > > Cheers > Stefan > > > Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: > Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
Hi Bernd, thanks for your suggestions. Our local dealer's tech supporter is not available today and I'd be happy not to have to wait till tomorrow if that's possible. Nothing I can do prior to opening a support case? Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
Hi, firstly, open a Case at Oracle. Secondly check the Oracle Document Page for Hardware Isssues regarding T4-1 if possible, login as eis installer or root. Reset the SP, if thats not succesful, run the SP in Service mode, Oracle/SUN will provide a Password to get Access to the Service Mode. Cleanup the Warnings reset the SP again. If thats not the solution, check for an Update for the LOM, flash the SP and clean this up again. Kind regards. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OT: T3-1 ILOM complaining about unrecognized chassis
Hi all, I know this is off-topic on OI-discuss but maybe someone has an idea. Following our discussion from last month about going with onboard SAS controllers on the T3-1, I moved the SAS backplane plugs from the PCIe HBA to the onboard sockets. After switching the box on again, the ILOM now complains about an unrecognized chassis: "This module is installed in an unknown or unsupported chassis. You must upgrade the firmware to a newer version that supports this chassis." Say what?! Even stranger, even after putting the SAS plugs back into the PCIe HBA, the message remains. Anyone an idea how to proceed? Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox on OI 151a8 ???
I am have updated to FF24 and Thunderbird they seem to be stable releases Rob On 07/11/2013 00:29, John D Groenveld wrote: In message<527ac156.3060...@2e-systems.com>, Predrag Zecevic writes: i am using FF24 (ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/24.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/f= irefox-24.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2) 25.0 addresses some security issue: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/25.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/> The Java Applet Test runs with Oracle JRE 7u45: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html> http://www.java.com/en/download/testjava.jsp> John groenv...@acm.org ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss -- A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves. Lao Tzu This transmission is intended to be private and confidential.Intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.It may contain privileged and confidential information.If you are not the intended recipient,you should not copy,distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the e-mail address above.Thank you. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Laurent Blume wrote: > On 07/11/13 10:21, Peter Tribble wrote: > >> No, detach is the appropriate option here. It's a little whacky, >> but you're operating on the replacing vdev which is essentially a >> mirror and you want to detach one component of it. >> > > Really? And that works using nas as the pool name? Or do you tell it to > use that replacing vdev? I've not seen that use so far. When replacing a > disk that has been removed already, I don't see how that's a mirror, since > the new disk must be reconstructed from the rest of the raidz, not from the > removed disk. I find it confusing as hell, and redundant with the use of > replace. > Yes, really. And on the pool, it will find the appropriate device and vdev on its own. Normally, you don't need to do this, because zfs should detach the replaced drive without intervention as soon as the resilver finishes. But often it doesn't, and you have to manually detach the replaced drive. Note that I said essentially a mirror - it should contain identical data to the old drive (modulo the fact that data has been modified since), it's not going to be a real mirror obviously. It's not redundant with replace, because replace initiates a resilver. As for remove vs detach, the way I think about this is that remove works at the pool level, whereas detach works at the vdev level, although given that they do work at different layers I can't really see why they need to have different names. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox on OI 151a8 ???
I generally stick to the latest ESR version, which is currently 24: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-esr/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ I have installed Java JDK 1.7u45 and it's working for me: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html make sure you download the 32bit _and_ the 64bit jadams@jadlaptop:~/Downloads$ more install-jdk.sh #!/bin/bash DIRNAME=$(which $0) DIRNAME=$(dirname $DIRNAME) DIRNAME=$(cd $DIRNAME ; pwd) cd /usr/jdk/instances /usr/sfw/bin/gtar zxvf $DIRNAME/jdk-7u45-solaris-i586.tar.gz /usr/sfw/bin/gtar zxvf $DIRNAME/jdk-7u45-solaris-x64.tar.gz cd .. ln -s instances/jdk1.7.0_45 rm latest ln -s jdk1.7.0_45 latest cd .. if [ -d java ] ; then mv java java.old ln -s jdk/latest java fi if [ ! -h /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/libnpjp2.so ] ; then mkdir -p /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/ cd /opt/sfw/lib/firefox/plugins/ ln -s /usr/java/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so fi echo DONE! On 7 November 2013 00:29, John D Groenveld wrote: > In message <527ac156.3060...@2e-systems.com>, Predrag Zecevic writes: > >i am using FF24 > >( > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/24.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/f= > >irefox-24.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2) > > 25.0 addresses some security issue: > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/25.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/ > > > > The Java Applet Test runs with Oracle JRE 7u45: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html > > > http://www.java.com/en/download/testjava.jsp> > > John > groenv...@acm.org > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
The first vdev was done via freenas gui Le 07/11/2013 10:36, Laurent Blume a écrit : On 07/11/13 10:20, Clement BRIZARD wrote: For the p0 it was done automatically, I didn't do anything. Automatically? How did you create the pool? It's usually up to you to select the right device. p0 should not be used. What do you think I should do, format one by one ? Probably not worth it at this point. I'd try some more zpool replace nas c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 c8t50014EE0AE2377B1d0 It is weird that it says it's replacing one with the other already, but the resilver has finished. Laurent ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
On 07/11/13 10:20, Clement BRIZARD wrote: For the p0 it was done automatically, I didn't do anything. Automatically? How did you create the pool? It's usually up to you to select the right device. p0 should not be used. What do you think I should do, format one by one ? Probably not worth it at this point. I'd try some more zpool replace nas c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 c8t50014EE0AE2377B1d0 It is weird that it says it's replacing one with the other already, but the resilver has finished. Laurent ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
On 07/11/13 10:21, Peter Tribble wrote: No, detach is the appropriate option here. It's a little whacky, but you're operating on the replacing vdev which is essentially a mirror and you want to detach one component of it. Really? And that works using nas as the pool name? Or do you tell it to use that replacing vdev? I've not seen that use so far. When replacing a disk that has been removed already, I don't see how that's a mirror, since the new disk must be reconstructed from the rest of the raidz, not from the removed disk. I find it confusing as hell, and redundant with the use of replace. Normally, though, I see the device with /old appended, although that's with c#t#d# notation. The /old only makes sense when you're replacing a device with the same device name. Here with WWN, it's not needed. Laurent ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Laurent Blume wrote: > On 07/11/13 06:29, John Ryan wrote: > >> Try zpool detach nas c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 >> > > «detach» only works on mirrors. > You cannot remove or detach a device from a raidz, only offline it or > replace it. In my experience, sometimes the system needs some prodding to > accept the change. > No, detach is the appropriate option here. It's a little whacky, but you're operating on the replacing vdev which is essentially a mirror and you want to detach one component of it. Normally, though, I see the device with /old appended, although that's with c#t#d# notation. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
For the p0 it was done automatically, I didn't do anything. What do you think I should do, format one by one ? Le 07/11/2013 10:04, Laurent Blume a écrit : On 07/11/13 06:29, John Ryan wrote: Try zpool detach nas c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 «detach» only works on mirrors. You cannot remove or detach a device from a raidz, only offline it or replace it. In my experience, sometimes the system needs some prodding to accept the change. The use of p0 in those device names is odd. I'm not sure it would cause issues, but it's surely not the preferred way. It should be either full disk (d0) for data pools, or slice (d0s0) for rpools. Laurent ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] removing a disk after a replace
On 07/11/13 06:29, John Ryan wrote: Try zpool detach nas c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 «detach» only works on mirrors. You cannot remove or detach a device from a raidz, only offline it or replace it. In my experience, sometimes the system needs some prodding to accept the change. The use of p0 in those device names is odd. I'm not sure it would cause issues, but it's surely not the preferred way. It should be either full disk (d0) for data pools, or slice (d0s0) for rpools. Laurent ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
