Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 11/11/11 15:56, Harry Putnam wrote:

sol11 will not let you chose your own passwd for root if it doesn't
have either a number or special char in it.


Yes, passwd/PAM now enforces the password strength checks for root as it has
always done for normal users.   See passwd(1) & pam_authtok_check(5) for
details.

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan Coopersmith  writes:

>> It appears to no longer even be possible to circumvent the suggested
>> usage of root account and allow root logins.
>>
>> Anyone know for sure if it is still possible to enforce an old
>> fashioned root account with regular login access?  If so how might it
>> be done?
>>
>> On oi its no harder than `rolemod -K type=normal root' and then allow
>> root login in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
>>
>> That does not work on sol11.  Even editing /etc/ssh/sshd_config, there
>> appears to be some extra editing needed on involving pam.
>
> That's two different things there - one is allowing root to login as an
> account directly, the other is allowing login via ssh, which wasn't
> allowed by default in Solaris 9 or 10 with a normal root account either.

Yes, I knew that, yet still managed to confuse them together.

After making both edits...I was not able to ssh to root, and from
there got into the muddle.

However I see now that the sole reason really stemmed from
something about sol11 that really is different.

sol11 will not let you chose your own passwd for root if it doesn't
have either a number or special char in it.

The login I normally use for root has upper and lower case letters and
a nice random selection of them... but sol11 will not allow me to use
that passwd.  So I added an underscore and moved on.

However, I have become so accustomed to logging in as root with my
regular passwd, that the next day, when I got around to working on the
root account edits, and it came time to enter a passwd with ssh to
root, I entered my regular passwd ..  when it was denied forgot that I
had been forced to use an underscore and I took the reason for failure
to be that I was not allowed to ssh to root even though I had edited
sshd_config.

So there is something that sol11 puts in the way... but it is neither
of root user/role nor edit of sshd_config... so I'm really sorry for
the line noise.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Richard L. Hamilton

On Nov 11, 2011, at 11:55 AM, James Carlson wrote:

> Edward Martinez wrote:
>> On 11/11/11 06:48, James Carlson wrote:
>>> But sources were indeed promised at some unspecified date after the
>>> binary release.  Hope they carry through.
>>> 
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059310.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>  Some solaris 11 code were published  and it appears some of the 
>> files are  CDDL licensed . I guess this  is the only CDDL  source  will
>> get. well,  maybe  for now.
>> 
>>   http://oss.oracle.com/systems-opensourcecode/#oracle-solaris
> 
> I looked those files over carefully, and that appears to be just the
> "must be distributed" third-party stuff, such as GPL'd components, and
> few user-level example bits.  That's not at all what was referenced in
> the link I provided above.

Yes, I saw that too (although I didn't look as closely, just looked
for kernel code).

I saw a page for what I can play with soonest, how to quickly install
as a VirtualBox guest.  But the page it linked to

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html

did not appear to include a pre-installed VM among the downloads,
although it was implied to be there.

While I assume that means a regular install might work, it would be
much quicker to check things out if the pre-installed VM (with suitable
settings, so one needn't guess) was available.  Once again, this suggests
to me a disinterest in anything other than official channels, Fortune 100
clients, etc.  Never mind that people working at large clients might want
to familiarize themselves on their own time…



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 11/11/11 05:15, Harry Putnam wrote:

Alan Coopersmith  writes:


On 11/10/11 23:00, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:

Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?


http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/completely_disabling_root_logins_on


It appears to no longer even be possible to circumvent the suggested
usage of root account and allow root logins.

Anyone know for sure if it is still possible to enforce an old
fashioned root account with regular login access?  If so how might it
be done?

On oi its no harder than `rolemod -K type=normal root' and then allow
root login in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

That does not work on sol11.  Even editing /etc/ssh/sshd_config, there
appears to be some extra editing needed on involving pam.


That's two different things there - one is allowing root to login as an
account directly, the other is allowing login via ssh, which wasn't
allowed by default in Solaris 9 or 10 with a normal root account either.

In any case, I believe both of those should be possible, but troubleshooting
what went wrong would be easier with details about which step failed.

Can you login as root on console?Does ssh give some error message when
you connect?Did you reset root's expired-by-default password first?

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread James Carlson
Hillel Lubman wrote:
> It's a make it or break it moment. If Oracle holds to their promise to
> release the source especially for ZFS - good. If they will make ZFS closed
> from now on - do you think illumos can manage to pull it through on its own?

Yes, but there are some interesting technical challenges.  One is that
the zpool and zfs version numbering space is flat, so unless the new
on-disk (and in-stream) formats can be reverse-engineered, the
compatibility story will be unusual, to say the least.

-- 
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W 

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 11/11/11 06:30, Gary Mills wrote:

Is there a legal requirement to release source built in to CDDL?


Yes, if your only right to the sources are the CDDL, and not the
fact that you own the copyrights, were assigned copyrights, or
have a license allowing you to ship them under another license.

There are some CDDL sources in the 3rd party source release that
was posted, like Joerg Schilling's cdrtools.

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread James Carlson
Edward Martinez wrote:
> On 11/11/11 06:48, James Carlson wrote:
>> But sources were indeed promised at some unspecified date after the
>> binary release.  Hope they carry through.
>>
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059310.html
>>
>>
>   Some solaris 11 code were published  and it appears some of the 
> files are  CDDL licensed . I guess this  is the only CDDL  source  will
> get. well,  maybe  for now.
> 
>http://oss.oracle.com/systems-opensourcecode/#oracle-solaris

I looked those files over carefully, and that appears to be just the
"must be distributed" third-party stuff, such as GPL'd components, and
few user-level example bits.  That's not at all what was referenced in
the link I provided above.

-- 
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W 


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Hillel Lubman
It's a make it or break it moment. If Oracle holds to their promise to
release the source especially for ZFS - good. If they will make ZFS closed
from now on - do you think illumos can manage to pull it through on its own?

Regards,

Hillel.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:48 AM, James Carlson wrote:

> They're the legal owners of the code, so it frankly does not matter what
> the CDDL says.  The property owner can set or change any terms at any
> time, and is not bound by previous terms.
>
> But sources were indeed promised at some unspecified date after the
> binary release.  Hope they carry through.
>
>
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059310.html
>
> --
> James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W 
>
>
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Edward Martinez

On 11/11/11 06:48, James Carlson wrote:

Gary Mills wrote:

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:47:56AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:

From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]

Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
What is the status of the promised sources?

Sources were never promised.  We all want them, but I never believed they
were going to release them.

Is there a legal requirement to release source built in to CDDL?
If not, we are unlikely to see it.

They're the legal owners of the code, so it frankly does not matter what
the CDDL says.  The property owner can set or change any terms at any
time, and is not bound by previous terms.

But sources were indeed promised at some unspecified date after the
binary release.  Hope they carry through.

http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059310.html

  Some solaris 11 code were published  and it appears some of the  
files are  CDDL licensed . I guess this  is the only CDDL  source  will 
get. well,  maybe  for now.


   http://oss.oracle.com/systems-opensourcecode/#oracle-solaris

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread James Carlson
Gary Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:47:56AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>>> From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
>>>
>>> Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
>>> Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
>>> What is the status of the promised sources?
>> Sources were never promised.  We all want them, but I never believed they
>> were going to release them.
> 
> Is there a legal requirement to release source built in to CDDL?
> If not, we are unlikely to see it.

They're the legal owners of the code, so it frankly does not matter what
the CDDL says.  The property owner can set or change any terms at any
time, and is not bound by previous terms.

But sources were indeed promised at some unspecified date after the
binary release.  Hope they carry through.

http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059310.html

-- 
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W 

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
they own the code and therefore can do whatever they want with it

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Gary Mills  wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:47:56AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> > From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
>> >
>> > Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
>> > Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
>>
>> > What is the status of the promised sources?
>>
>> Sources were never promised.  We all want them, but I never believed they
>> were going to release them.
>
> Is there a legal requirement to release source built in to CDDL?
> If not, we are unlikely to see it.
>
> --
> -Gary Mills-            -refurb-                -Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada-
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Gary Mills
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:47:56AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
> > 
> > Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
> > Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
> 
> > What is the status of the promised sources?
> 
> Sources were never promised.  We all want them, but I never believed they
> were going to release them.

Is there a legal requirement to release source built in to CDDL?
If not, we are unlikely to see it.

-- 
-Gary Mills--refurb--Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada-

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
> 
> Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
> Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?

How about a zpool version higher than 28?  AKA, all the stuff that's now in
closed source development.  Not in OI/Illumos.


> What is the status of the promised sources?

Sources were never promised.  We all want them, but I never believed they
were going to release them.  Did you ever listen to Larry talk about open
source?  There's this one in particular, where he says something like "We
used to spend tons of money developing our own http server, and then apache
came along, so we were able to fire all those people and use apache for
free, and sell it even though the customers could get it for free."  He was
so proud.  And I'm sure he's not willing to be on the other side of the
equation - allowing companies like apple, nexenta, etc, to make money off
the open source he pays to develop.  Don't count on seeing any open source,
IMHO.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan Coopersmith  writes:

> On 11/10/11 23:00, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>> Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
>> Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
>
> http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/completely_disabling_root_logins_on

It appears to no longer even be possible to circumvent the suggested
usage of root account and allow root logins.

Anyone know for sure if it is still possible to enforce an old
fashioned root account with regular login access?  If so how might it
be done?

On oi its no harder than `rolemod -K type=normal root' and then allow
root login in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

That does not work on sol11.  Even editing /etc/ssh/sshd_config, there
appears to be some extra editing needed on involving pam.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-10 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 11/10/11 23:00, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:

Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?


http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/completely_disabling_root_logins_on
http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/password_caching_for_solaris_su
http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/user_user_home_directory_encryption
http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/immutable_zones_on_encrypted_zfs
http://blogs.oracle.com/darren/entry/my_11_favourite_solaris_11
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+fm/Solaris11FCS
http://blogs.oracle.com/SolarisSMF/entry/introducig_smf_layers
http://blogs.oracle.com/zoneszone/entry/these_are_11_of_my
http://blogs.oracle.com/DanX/entry/solaris_x86_aesni_openssl_engine

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Solaris 11 is out - so?

2011-11-10 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Oracle announced availabilty of Solaris 11.
Do you notice any real news in the O.S. that OI/IllumOS has not?
What is the status of the promised sources?

Inviato da iPad

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss