Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/xmlsec/ xmlsec.patch xmlsec.spec

2004-06-04 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004, Michael Schloh wrote:

 similar to libxslt, remove the nonessential and incomplete test for a
 C++ preprocessor

But why aren't you use the sed(1) based solution? It will allow us to
more easily upgrade the package in the future (because it depends on
just the Autoconf version instead of the package version). We've chosen
the sed(1) approach intentionally...

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com

__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [CVS] OpenPKG: openpkg-src/xmlsec/ xmlsec.patch xmlsec.spec

2004-06-04 Thread Michael Schloh von Bennewitz
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 04, 2004, Michael Schloh wrote:
 similar to libxslt, remove the nonessential and incomplete test for a
 C++ preprocessor

 But why aren't you use the sed(1) based solution? It will allow us to
 more easily upgrade the package in the future (because it depends on
 just the Autoconf version instead of the package version). We've chosen
 the sed(1) approach intentionally...

A patch(1) based fix has its merits as well, but I'll use the shtool(1)
substitution instead anyway.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe
Cable  Wireless Telecommunications Services


pgpWObWBs4T9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature