Re: [opensc-devel] Secure Messaging IPR Situation

2010-04-10 Thread Anders Rundgren 
Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hi Anders,
> 
> Please give links to a) patents b) previous troubles in EU.

Would love to but the people who brought the message represent companies
with IP interests in this so they wanted to scare me from continuing to
work on my take of Secure Messaging.  Anyway, IPR should be specified
in the ETSI/IEC standard which I don't have since I find it appalling
*paying* for an open standard.

Anders

> 
> 
> 
> On 10/04/2010, Anders Rundgren  wrote:
>> According to several sources Secure Messaging in smart cards
>> is a veritable mine-field of patents.
>>
>> /a
>> ___
>> opensc-devel mailing list
>> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>>
> 

___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Re: [opensc-devel] Secure Messaging IPR Situation

2010-04-10 Thread Martin Paljak 
Hi Anders,

Please give links to a) patents b) previous troubles in EU.



On 10/04/2010, Anders Rundgren  wrote:
> According to several sources Secure Messaging in smart cards
> is a veritable mine-field of patents.
>
> /a
> ___
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Martin Paljak
http://martin.paljak.pri.ee
GSM:+3725156495
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

[opensc-devel] Secure Messaging IPR Situation

2010-04-09 Thread Anders Rundgren 
According to several sources Secure Messaging in smart cards
is a veritable mine-field of patents.

/a
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel