[osol-discuss] starting $1, 000.00 - Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware
seems like solaris subs for OEM, now can be purchase from oracle store for people that need them:-) clip: Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware (1-4 socket server) Get world class, global support with Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware for Solaris with the choice of x86 hardware. $1,000.00 / Socket Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware (5+ socket server) Get world class, global support with Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware for Solaris with the choice of x86 hardware. $2,000.00 / Socket https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/product?p1=oraclesolarissc=ocom_solarispremiersubscription -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] snv_134 slow down every monday morning
Will, I'll quickly blast through the answers, 1) mysqldump of remote server, rsync of files then a ZFS snapshot. Does this for 4 servers. And there is a windows backup over CIFS. 2) I have done a scrub, I don't have it scheduled but I did it after the first 'crash' and have done it since. Doesn't seem to have helped. 3) We have two 2TB disks in a mirror 4) I'm going to skip this sunday's evenings backups and see how it goes. 5) we don't use NFS, we do however have one server backing up over CIFS. Using wbadmin. I though briefly it was that, since it does a full backup on sunday. BUT I moved that backup to last night to try replicate the issue and no joy. (and there was a heavier backup load last night since it was monday, so if anything was going to happen it should have been then) 6) The hardware is a brand new DELL T110 (I'm not saying its impossible there's something wrong with it, but I think its unlikely) In the mean time I'll scrub the pool again. Thanks for you reply, - Daniel On 24 Aug 2010, at 03:13, William Bauer wrote: What exactly are your backup scripts doing? Have you run a zpool scrub on your pool(s), and do so regularly? Do you have a mirror or other RAID config? Have you tried going one Sunday without any of your backups running to see if they're the culprit? Details may help someone help you. My 134 desktop is backed up every night with Veritas and it's stable. Plus it's an NFS client and server and NIS client and is used by several people all day. The platform seems stable, so perhaps your hardware can't handle the backup stress or there's some major problem with your ZFS pool. Only speculating. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] starting $1, 000.00 - Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware
AFAIK, that's pretty much what they said they'd do (as contrasted with coming out with one more OpenSolaris release, which they had said they'd do but didn't). So for those who want to run Solaris on non-Oracle x86 hardware on the HCL in a business setting, it's (still) possible. The lack of a low-end support option (no human time spent to respond to specific problems, just online access to info and updates), affordable (at least for small systems) by home users or freeware developers, is still disappointing though. Any freeware developer, and potentially home users and students too eventually, increase the value of the ecosystem, whether by writing or porting software that runs on the platform, or by some of them becoming future big-ticket customers. That's practically free money, too; no cost aside from bandwidth and setting up the account to provide low-end software support. And it's money that wouldn't be there without the low-end option. Heck, it's even free advertising! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] starting $1, 000.00 - Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware
On 24 Aug 2010, at 08:57, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: The lack of a low-end support option (no human time spent to respond to specific problems, just online access to info and updates), affordable (at least for small systems) by home users or freeware developers, is still disappointing though. Yes. However it gives the community a very very good reason to do it's own distro, and provide updates for that. Oracle have made it clear they're going after the top end of the market. The community can (and will) provide for itself, now they've stopped spoon feeding us :-) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Old News ?
Old news ?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100823/tc_pcworld/dontcountonoracletokeepopenofficeorgalive -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express
Uros Nedic wrote: You are starting a new fork? The existing forks already have names, chosen by the people working on them, not spectators on mailing lists. Like Oracle Solaris name is chosen by people working on it like you :).Or Solarix Express :). For the distros I work on, the names were chosen by the people who decided to create them or who lead them, again, not by spectators on mailing lists. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Measuring cost of TLB misses
Thank you, Bart. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Old News ?
It would seem to me that if Oracle was planning to discontinue their support of OpenOffice (or even VirtualBox), they would not have taken the time to rebrand the product. That was never done for OpenSolaris, and Oracle clearly doesn't like spending money or time if they're going to abandon something. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Measuring cost of TLB misses
You can also use Oracle Solaris Studio to profile your application using one of the TLB HW counters. Various counters are available depending on the precise Opteron chip model. To do such a profile: collect -h l2dtlbm a.out args will collect a statistical profile, and show which functions and source lines had the most L2 DTLB misses. Marty dot Itzkowitz at oracle dot com Project Lead, Oracle Solaris Studio Performance Tools -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] bridging question
Hi all: I'm trying to bridge a couple of physical links and assign an ipaddr to the resulting bridge. I'm not very familiar with OpenSolaris bridging, and would appreciate any help. My system has the following: # dladm show-phys LINK MEDIASTATE SPEED DUPLEXDEVICE igb0 Ethernet up 1000 full igb0 igb1 Ethernet unknown0 half igb1 I bridge them with: # dladm create-bridge -l igb0 -l igb1 pmi_if # svcadm enable pmi_if # [ network/bridge:pmi_if starting (bridge) ] # dladm show-bridge BRIDGE PROTECT ADDRESSPRIORITY DESROOT pmi_if stp 32768/0:25:90:2:9b:6e 32768 32768/0:25:90:2:9b:6e # dladm show-bridge -l pmi_if LINKSTATE UPTIME DESROOT igb0discarding 0 32768/0:25:90:2:9b:6e igb1disabled0 0/0:0:0:0:0:0 And now I'm not sure what to do. I want to assign an ipaddr to the pmi_if0 interface. # ifconfig pmi_if0 dhcp ifconfig: Aug 24 08:10:12 /sbin/dhcpagent[100422]: insert_pif: SIOCGLIFINDEX for pmi_if0: No such device or address pmi_if0: interface does not exist or cannot be managed using DHCP or # ifconfig pmi_if0 plumb ifconfig: Aug 24 08:10:34 ip: pmi_if0: DL_BIND_REQ failed: DL_SYSERR (errno 16) SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: Aug 24 08:10:34 ip: pmi_if0: DL_UNBIND_REQ failed: DL_OUTSTATE pmi_if0: Device busy Full disclosure: The OpenSolaris I am using is a custom boot archive generated by taking bits and pieces in an effort to minimize the footprint. It is based off of build 135. Thanks in advance. Mark Maule -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] starting $1, 000.00 - Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 00:10 -0700, Edward Martinez wrote: seems like solaris subs for OEM, now can be purchase from oracle store for people that need them:-) clip: Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware (1-4 socket server) Get world class, global support with Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware for Solaris with the choice of x86 hardware. $1,000.00 / Socket Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware (5+ socket server) Get world class, global support with Oracle Solaris Premier Subscription for Non-Oracle Hardware for Solaris with the choice of x86 hardware. $2,000.00 / Socket https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/product?p1=oraclesolarissc=ocom_solarispremiersubscription Just to be completely above board, these Premium Subscriptions also cover support for things *besides* Solaris - such as the Oracle Unbreakable Linux distro, the Xen-based VM setup, etc. See here for a complete list of what the Premium Support option includes: http://www.oracle.com/us/support/software/premier/index.html Also, this being Oracle and all, all prices are subject to intense negotiation - what you see as the price is not necessarily what you pay. Though it might be. :-) Disclaimer: I neither speak for Oracle, nor represent that my opinions are anything but my own. This message contains no proprietary information or non-public insider knowledge. -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-317 Phone: x67195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Raidctl disk description
Have a failed disk in a hardware raid config:- RAIDVolume RAIDRAIDDisk Volume TypeStatus DiskStatus -- c0t2d0 IM DEGRADEDc0t3d0 OK c0t2d0 FAILED c0t0d0 IM OKc0t0d0 OK c0t1d0 OK The information I require is the Vendor description of the FAILED disk but cannot use raidctl -l -g to get the info as the -g argument is not available on the SOl 10 release I have installed ( 11/06 ). Any other way of getting the info for the failed disk ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
