Re: [osol-discuss] Quick question about the future
here: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Installing+or+Upgrading -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Quick question about the future
On 10/29/2010 7:04 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote: AIX is soon dead, according to IBM executives. That is the reason there are not too many great AIX people around. Nah, I haven't seen any pronouncements of the death of AIX in the last couple of years. At the minimum, it will continue on like OS/400 or the other legacy IBM OSes (i.e. no new features, but supported for decades). I expect AIX will still have support when I retire in 20 years. That said, AIX admins are rare, and will become and endangered species soon. Particularly, anyone under 40 at this time. I'd be willing to bet that there aren't more than 100 people world-wide born after 1980 who could actually lay claim to being a serious AIX admin. It's actually one of the big problems with legacy OSes - not that you can't get support, but that there is no talent left in the marketplace to talk to support. :-) -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Quick question about the future
AIX is soon dead, according to IBM executives. That is the reason there are not too many great AIX people around. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] TCP fusion Parameters
What is the perofrmance impact of the setting tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min=0.Because its a system wise setting.So will it effect the overall performance . -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] TCP fusion Parameters
> Hi, what happened to the TCP fusion tunables in > Latest OpenSolaris? The variable I can find via mdb > on Solaris 10, tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min.Are these > parameter are still available in Latest Solaris .Did > the counter of outstanding writes without a read get > removed. > > So does it it means it is same as using > tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min=0 > > Or the variable is not at all using in Latest Solaris > .Please confirm Looks to me like it's probably not there any more. http://src.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=&dfs=&refs=tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min&path=&hist=&project=%2Fonnv Further, the following blog entry seems to say that it isn't, for OpenSolaris: http://blogs.sun.com/stw/entry/tcp_fusion_and_improved_loopback (presumably it isn't needed any more and just does the right thing automatically) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] TCP fusion Parameters
Also I want to know by setting tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min=0 how it will impact the performance -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] TCP fusion Parameters
Hi, what happened to the TCP fusion tunables in Latest OpenSolaris? The variable I can find via mdb on Solaris 10, tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min.Are these parameter are still available in Latest Solaris .Did the counter of outstanding writes without a read get removed. So does it it means it is same as using tcp_fusion_rcv_unread_min=0 Or the variable is not at all using in Latest Solaris .Please confirm -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Quick question about the future
On 28 Oct 2010, at 20:15, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote: >> and the forum could be better organized like this one for example > > I could not find a forum at openindiana.org at all... Is it exists? They have mailing lists instead. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
